Comments by "" (@andylewis7360) on "Andrew Neil on Russell Brand's 'ludicrous' defenders | SpectatorTV" video.

  1. Always wondered what the media’s been doing for the last four years or so. Now we know! 😂
    22
  2. He’s spent 40 years or so diligently telling people what to think and he’s butt-hurt that some people are still able to think for themselves
    9
  3. “We don’t tell people the news! We tell people what to think!”
    6
  4. Just watched. Bolt’s face when his guest mentions Epstein was a picture!
    4
  5. Precisely. No inconsistencies there. In the addled cranium of someone who’s valiantly endeavouring to cover for the establishment
    4
  6. Ghislane Maxwell, for instance
    4
  7. Neil made his name interviewing the great and the good for the BBC. The “interviewer” was really just decoration. Neil patently has an axe to grind but couldn’t do a piece-to-camera because it’d be too obvious
    4
  8. At his age that’s probably every room he enters
    3
  9. Not unlike Andrew Neil
    3
  10. If Andrew Neil had said this I’d have more respect for him. Which is now at an all time low
    3
  11.  @raevj  Sorry. Brain fart 😂
    2
  12. Hypocritical?!? Andrew Neil?!? Heaven forbid!!
    2
  13. Well at least it covers up the strawberry bulge
    2
  14. What amazes me is the glacial rate at which the establishment reacts. But then I suppose one can only have one cozy chat over lunch every day… “Andrew, dear chap! Seems to be a lot of push-back on this Brand thing. Could you lend a little of your gravitas to the home team, dear boy? More Foie gras?”
    2
  15. Neil chose. He knows on which side his bread is buttered.
    2
  16. He’s spent 40+ years telling us what to think. Must be infuriating seeing a young buck like Russell asking people to think for themselves
    2
  17.  @julianshepherd2038 Brand certainly informs opinion far more than this old has-been
    2
  18. Neil just couldn’t help himself. But after all, that was the purpose of this “interview” in the first place. One can picture Neil salivating at the prospect.
    2
  19. Why spectate when you can give that knife a little twist? 😅
    2
  20. What is so problematic about “innocent until PROVEN guilty” so far as you’re concerned? Nobody’s rushing to defend Brand. If anything they’re rushing to defend a fundamental principle of British Law!
    2
  21. Those cozy lunches at the club won’t pay for themselves ya know.
    2
  22. Strange that init. 🤔
    2
  23. Of course Andrew Neil thinks he’s above us. He’s spent 40+ years telling us what to think
    2
  24. Gotta keep regurgitating that narrative. Protest your innocence until the firing squad pull their triggers
    2
  25. You’re not a journalist by any chance? Or is it sarcasm? 😂
    2
  26. Russell Brand? Or Andrew Neil?
    1
  27. It’s always hard to pitch things just right when you’ve got your own skeletons to hide.
    1
  28. Might it be that Andrew is jealous of the ease with which RB could charm a lady’s panties off?
    1
  29.  @OsellaSquadraCorse  Bugger all! 🤣
    1
  30. Others pile up the gossip and watch the filthy lucre roll in. Of course, some will be more underhand about it, perhaps asking a naive cub to interview them on YouTube
    1
  31. Andrew believes himself to be above the concerns of we mere mortals. Ours not to reason why, ours but to absorb his opinion. And if we die….. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    1
  32.  @colinjames2469  Spoken like someone who’s never made dollar one, let alone initiated an enterprise
    1
  33. Apparently RB’s viewers are more stupid than the average juror. I find that hard to believe
    1
  34. Spoken like someone who hasn’t seen his content in years and has no idea what they’re talking about
    1
  35. Well, at least that gives him less chance of incriminating himself! 😂
    1
  36. Absolutely the right questions to ask. You start taking flak when you’re over the target.
    1
  37. It’s not like Andrew to be a hypocritical prig. Well, not until he left school at least
    1
  38. Actually Russell seems to be doing quite well. 6 Million subs on YouTube is nothing to sniff at
    1
  39. I don’t see anyone being salty here. Just a lot of people intent on remaining impartial while a has-been froths at the mouth.
    1
  40. Ohh, I’m sure that as a member of the Inner Circle Andrew knows precisely what he’s at. He just underestimates viewers’ capacity for thought
    1
  41. He doesn’t care. Neil cares to crucify Brand while the opportunity presents itself
    1
  42. He may come across as seedy and talentless to you but you may find his recent YouTube videos surprisingly erudite and illuminating.
    1
  43.  @michaelsimpson4400  Exactly the point I’ve been making. Which was dismissed after only a few minutes by the red nosed duffer
    1
  44. The hysteria is palpable. Might even explain the propensity for fear porn
    1
  45.  @garyambrosini1427 Who would you suggest? The Spectator?
    1
  46. Quite right. “Yes, we’ve been lying to you and manipulating you for years but why won’t you believe us now?!?”
    1
  47. @@robtye3333 I believe millennia are measured in years. Is that not so? Also, I haven’t been alive since the time of Plato so the media couldn’t have been lying to me for that long. In the immortal words of Discombobulus “If you pick the nits, expect the nits to pick you back”
    1
  48. @@robtye3333 You’re welcome tick
    1
  49. Nooo. He’s a has-been heavyweight who’s been co-opted to lend a little strawberry-nosed gravitas to the hit job.
    1
  50. I wonder if Neil ever visited Epstein Island 🤔
    1
  51. Steady on! He can’t pay for ALL those lunches at The Club.
    1
  52. The words of an intellectual diplodocus
    1
  53. There’s a contradiction in terms of ever I heard one! 🤣🤣
    1
  54. I think you give him too much credit. He’s a clockwork journalist in the age of Apple Watch. Treasured as a curiosity but little more
    1
  55. Neil’s a typical Scottish establishment puritan hypocrite. I’m sure his skeletons are far more repulsive than anything in Russell Brand’s cupboard.
    1
  56.  @colincampbell4261  There are also many reasons why people state the obvious in such a way as to imply that they’re morally superior to others. And none of those reasons is actual moral superiority
    1
  57. Neil is their crown jewel. Without that old fart to give them some semblance of credibility they’d be dead in the water
    1
  58. My thoughts exactly. What Andrew wanted to do Russell could do without any effort. Must be excruciating! 😂
    1
  59. Sean Connery wouldn’t bother with him
    1
  60.  @j.a.velarde5901 please don’t do that. “/irony” is like laughing at your own jokes. Apparently 😏
    1
  61.  @JaneDoe-bo9tz  Then you’ll know all about the visitors to Epstein’s island and the court cases surrounding their crimes. Tell me all about it
    1
  62. Good. It wouldn’t be before time
    1
  63. No doubt about that. What did he say?
    1
  64.  @hachwarwickshire292  If he weren’t so obviously a chancer and a spiv, he’d be a part of the establishment. 🤣
    1
  65. Andrew holds all Englishmen in contempt, especially when the opportunity to twist a knife presents itself.
    1
  66.  @elkpaz560  Especially jealousy of a guy who can get a girls pants off with a wink 😉
    1
  67.  @22wabbit  Of course not! He’s an Englishman! That’s a coarse American affectation like high-fives and fist-bumps.
    1
  68. The “Of course he should be innocent until proven guilty” bit or the “professional journalists” bit?
    1