Comments by "Andrew Sentinel" (@sentinel1armour) on "The Primitive Nature of Russian Propaganda" video.
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Pino-ko1qu You mismatch freedom of speech with support of idiots. Simple as that. And you also don't have understanding how to deal with savages. Who will always take your "values" for weakness. As well as your tedious attempts to explain "how logic and scientific evidences work" would be taken for good reason to stab you with knife, adding a comment "huh, you think you are very smart?" (one of the main insults in USSR and Russia, btw).
In fact, you could have understood all that without experiencing dealing with such... mhm, people. There's an astonishing Novel by Arkady Strugatsky and Boris Strugatsky - "Escape Attempt". Just by reading it, you could understand A LOT about the matter. About mentality of Russians and Westerners. And why the approach of the latter don't work for the former. Funny enough, even there (spoiler) is the same comparison, as the main character "escapes" from a Nazi concentration camp, while the basic idea was about a Soviet camp. But authors were not allowed to write that. Guess why?
But you won't read it. Instead, you'll keep speaking about false dichotomy fallacy (🤦♂), just to defend your own fallacy - yes, pure straw man argument.
Although, it's SO EASY to watch the video again and find out that there was nothing about "lesser about two evils". It was so clearly said, that it is much more natural when conqueror kills representatives of other nations, comparing to someone killing his own people. Who later on still remains... sort of national hero (so many Russians are begging for Stalin's resurrection!). "Millions of lives lost—equally horrific"? Most likely, you will never understand how horrible is civil war comparing to interstate war, where you at least KNOW who is your enemy. Or WHY you are persecuted. Never mind "silent" repressions... So, how could anybody with clear mind see "defence of particular ideology"? While there's a comparison of direct *actions*. In particular place. And reactions to them.
Well, can't blame you for the lack of experience in rough real life - obviously (and luckily), you have never been to war. Clearly used to hothouse conditions and just like to lecture there, where nobody asks you for it (piece about social Darwinism was hilarious). And, no, your comments are NOT a criticism. You're simply awful in it. Substitution of concepts - much better name for it. Substantive arguments?! Who told you that they are? You've been tricked.
Learn definitions first. Use reflection to maintain objectivity. Practice Logic. Again and again. Because so far you have proven what you only heard about it. No skills, sorry. Ah, and definitely admire this direct expression of opinion. Which you tend to value so much.
Or are you not ready for criticisms?
1
-
1