Comments by "Jim Luebke" (@jimluebke3869) on "Uganda’s Anti-Gay Laws" video.

Most of us privately agree now -- but 90% of Americans who are afraid they'll lose their jobs if they tell the truth, will lie to those pollsters.
50
This is where the slippery slope leads. We never should have tolerated any of it.
7
How much more proof do you need? They will never "leave the kids alone". That is how they reproduce. We have tolerated this for far too long.
5
Half your paycheck? You're expected to give them your job.
4
And since they can't reproduce, they recruit. If you don't them to come for your children, you need to take much more active measures against this.
4
@Oicurmtoyoy If you don't act on it, I'm sure no one would care. It would certainly be a relief to any children you would have preyed upon.
2
The day may come where Christians and Muslims and everyone whose religion advocates basic decency, will go their separate ways Today is not that day!
1
Homosexuality is now, and always has been, a story of intergenerational abuse and exploitation. The fact that the anti-Ugandans cannot even condemn this behavior towards children and the disabled, shows that they see every act of this sort as perfectly natural, morally equivalent to any other act their worldview encourages, and never to be discouraged under any circumstances. The only way to avoid the normalization of these crimes is zero-tolerance, combined with active suppression, and banning any media whatsoever that propagates this worldview.
1
@Oicurmtoyoy Cities like San Francisco are removing penalties from this sort of assault. If you think this is going to go away on its own, you're fooling yourself. If you don't think this is a problem, you're straight-up evil.
1
@orirune3079 Thank you random internet comment. I will certainly take what you say as absolute truth, and disbelieve the evidence of my own lying eyes accordingly. The average age of people admitting they had been sexually abused as a youth, is 52. This is not something people are willing to talk about.
1
@Oicurmtoyoy The psychological torture that led to a young man going from distinctly heterosexual to distinctly homosexual, I witnessed as it was happening. It was not recorded. Feel free to research cases of child molestation on your own time. Homosexual abuse and grooming lead to more homosexual abuse and grooming. That is how homosexuality is spread, one generation to another. Grooming is becoming more socially acceptable, which is why we're seeing more "identification". This is child abuse, and the Ugandans have the right idea about what to do about to stop it. Instead of complaining, the West should follow suit. When legislation to oppose grooming is proposed, the "community" comes out swinging against it. When legislation to penalize abuse is proposed (as in Uganda) the "community" comes out swinging against it. Organizations like "Gays against Groomers" are gaining no political traction whatsoever. The homosexual "community" as a group, by their demonstrated political preferences, is pushing for more child abuse to increase their numbers. This is evil, and we will put a stop to it. Fortunately peaceful means are still available.
1
You believe those elections are real? The fact that we have politicians who support this claiming to have some kind of mandate from the people, is a giant red flag indicating election fraud. Seriously, most black people in the US agree with Uganda here, but somehow their ballots are always marked "D". Do you think the actual voters filled out those ballots? I don't.
1
It's the result of sexual and psychological abuse. It's only trending upwards because we tolerate it. That must stop.
1
@Oicurmtoyoy Yes, I witnessed the psychological abuse in one case, and there are court records of others I'm referring to. Therapeutic professionals (who are professionally forbidden to give details) indicate that this is extremely common. These people are victims. They become victimizers in turn when they are not stopped. We must shut down all of their points of contact with children (even indirect ones such as school library materials) and prevent all opportunities for them to recruit. Normal people are sick of this s**t. It's now clear that "the community" is incapable of policing itself, and probably in most cases unwilling to do so. This ends now. They will be stopped.
1
@vilgessuola You can choose to keep your pants zipped, or not. You can also choose to be performative, or not. The guy who plays Sheldon in the Big Bang Theory (Jim Parsons) is supposedly gay. However, in that pilot episode, keep your eyes open -- there's a scene where he's in his tighty whiteys, and then gets a hug from Penny (Kaley Cuoco). He quickly takes a step backwards (which you are taught to NEVER do on a stage) to put an obstruction between himself and the camera. Being gay is a choice.
1
@Oicurmtoyoy You can think about stealing something, but if you don't act on that impulse, you're not a thief. Being a thief, like being gay, is a choice.
1
@Oicurmtoyoy Having proper boundaries wrecked -- the heteronormative boundary that every surviving civilization has ever had -- means it's only a matter of time there's an attempt to normalize paederasty too. Being unable to distinguish between proper relations between male and female, leads to an inability to maintain the distinction between adult and child. Don't even start to try to gaslight me about this. When I was a kid I was catcalled in the Castro district. When I was an adult one of my high school associates wrote on behalf of a mutual acquaintance, who had just gotten out of prison for abusing children and wanted to re-integrate into society. He had been abused himself as a child; his recruiting was a natural step. The issue here is not that I am unfamiliar with homosexuals. The issue here is that I have known too many. I have seen too much. It's evil, and will be passed from one generation to the next through exploitation and abuse until we put a stop to it. And put a stop to it we will -- because it's getting to be more in the open, and more and more people are getting to know the truth about these things.
1
@orirune3079 That was evidence that someone who is aroused by women, can still "identify as gay". Being gay is a choice.
1
@Serjo777 To behave in any way is a choice. You can think about stealing, without being a thief. Being a thief is a choice.
1
@Serjo777 If it's just your thoughts that's between you and God, and the rest of us truly wouldn't care. This is a semantic argument about the word "being". Any urge not acted on, is not brought into being, and so is irrelevant to any social label. So, "being" homosexual is a choice.
1
@Oicurmtoyoy Cutting the tree down is a choice.
1
@vilgessuola AIDS. Monkeypox. Relationships that lead nowhere but exploitation. That'll do for a start. Homosexual relationships are useless and destructive. They are in no way equivalent to heterosexual relationships, and should never be seen as such from a legal point of view. You can say "isn't a choice isn't a choice isn't a choice" all you want, but that doesn't change a thing. 1) It is a choice. 2) It is the wrong choice. These two statements are true and always will be.
1
@Oicurmtoyoy Your analogy fails.
1
@Oicurmtoyoy Not an analogy? Then it's irrelevant to this conversation. As far as why it fails -- it proves the opposite of your point. That tree you're discussing, being an imaginary tree confined to your own head, will not make a sound anyone else can hear when you imagine that it falls. Only if you CHOOSE TO ACT in the world on a real tree, would a sound be made. By analogy, homosexuality is a choice. The wrong choice. Uganda has chosen to disincentivize some of its more depraved manifestations. This is good and right.
1
@Oicurmtoyoy We're not talking about trees, we're talking about choices. It has to be an analogy to be relevant. If you don't know what's wrong or depraved about abusing children or the disabled, you have proven my point.
1
@BlackCatNinja Sooooo many slogans, all nonsense. - Homosexuality isn't about love, it is about sex. Nothing of value is lost in a loving relationship between two men or two women, when sex is not involved. By all means, love everyone, that's good and right. Do not have sex with everyone, that's depraved and wrong. In fact, it's depraved and wrong to have sex with anyone of the same sex. Love has nothing to do with this, and to claim that it does betrays a frankly mentally ill definition of love. - With your discussion of "harder" and "easier" choices, you leave out that controlling your urges is in fact the harder choice. People face choices all the time, where following one's urge is made illegal or otherwise discouraged. Working to get the money to buy something is harder than giving in to the urge to steal it, and we properly punish people for stealing. This punishment makes their lives harder. Why do people still steal, then? They don't resist the urge to do so, for whatever reason. After you've finished a meal from a drive-through in your car, most people resist any urge to throw the trash out the window, instead of finding a proper place to dispose of it. Should we take into account whether people have the urge to throw it out the window, when we punish people for littering? Why? If you feel the urge to relieve yourself after the meal, it's harder to find proper facilities for that, than it is to just relieve yourself in your seat as you drive. Giving in to this urge is disgusting and abhorrent to any well-brought-up individual, so most people choose the harder option of abiding by proper sanitation standards. This is also one of many sufficient reasons to be heterosexual, by the way. Being homosexual is a choice.
1
@BlackCatNinja Who's to say? Anyone and everyone. It's inherent in the term "homosexual". I am a human being who loves other people. Some of the people I love are male, some are female. This is common to the vast majority of people -- loving their fathers and mothers, loving their brothers and sisters, loving their sons and daughters. No one would have any rational basis to call me (or anyone else) "bisexual" because of that, because sex is not involved. Love and sex are not the same. Homosexuality is not about love, it is about sex, hence the name. Confusing love and sex is dangerous, leading to exploitation and abuse, and the inability to tell the difference is a mental illness (probably psychopathy). When there is no sex in a loving relationship, nothing of value is lost. Sex should be involved in monogamous relationships between a man and a woman, because that's the best (indeed only) way to produce and raise children. Producing and raising children at a replacement rate is essential for society to function and sustain itself. You have to be so nihilistic (i.e., evil) as to believe that this is not a good thing, to advance any other worldview. This is why heteronormativity is a feature of all successful civilizations, and why our own civilization will fail if we do not return to it.
1
The problem with "compromise" is that yesterday's "compromise" position is today's "Far-Right". The cultural Left thinks that there is a ratchet that only twists one way, and they are attempting to turn it faster and faster. Soon, the whole thing will break loose and the pendulum will swing back. The longer we wait, the more extreme the Left goes, the harder that swing will hit.
1