Comments by "Jim Luebke" (@jimluebke3869) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. OK, at what point can we say as a society, "Changing your lifestyle to avoid serious diseases is a good and admirable thing"?
    263
  2.  @joemad  Wishing for others to avoid serious diseases is hatred? Objectively, it would seem to fall under the category of "willing the good of the other", which is just the opposite.
    21
  3.  @OhSoddit  We need to change the political fashions. There are enough of us to make that happen - there are more of us than there are of them.
    13
  4. It turns out that Taiwan (famous for having a much better Covid record than other countries) uses Ivermectin (or a variant) for a common pesticide. Its use is so widespread that Taiwan's NIH-equivalent has published papers concerned that detectable levels of Ivermectin were showing up in humans. Could Taiwan's broad environmental use of Ivermectin explain its better Covid outcomes?
    3
  5.  @Lifetalk849  Science has shown itself to be corruptible by political interest groups. It's good to keep the older information in mind. When you get right down to it, humans haven't changed that much.
    2
  6. I've never heard "leading the free world" pronounced, "driving a bus."
    2
  7. What is most remarkable about this situation, is that we have the infrastructure in place (independent media) to come to the true-to-reality conclusions about what is happening here. All we need to do is eliminate bureaucratic control over this situation, and we will be able to enjoy the vast benefits of distributed inquiries that the Information Revolution has enabled.
    1
  8. I looked into whether Taiwan used Ivermectin, since Taiwan is famous for better Covid performance than other countries. Turns out, they use Ivermectin (or a variant thereof) for a common pesticide, to the point that their NIH-equivalent was worried that excessive levels were showing up in human beings. Is there a connection between Taiwan's environmental use of Ivermectin and their better Covid performance?
    1
  9. Doesn't the immune system have what you might call an "anchor bias" when it comes to reactions to pathogens? I've heard it called "Original pathogenic sin", and it refers to the fact that if the immune system develops one response to a pathogen, it will stick with that response, even if a more effective response is introduced later. If this applies to vaccines (which engender a less-effective immune response) versus natural immunity (which is a more-effective immune response), isn't it actively degrading a child's immune system in the long term, to have them vaccinated?
    1
  10.  @MASTERPPA  That does not follow, at all.
    1
  11. I'm not that much of an expert, but according to Constitutional cases I've followed in the Supreme Court, the Executive Branch is indeed obligated to act in a Constitutional way.
    1
  12. "This is a diagnostic tool that has been used to shut down a country for years, and you can't tell me how accurate it is?" Wait until they start asking these questions about climate models.
    1
  13. It looks to me that if we have vaccines given out on the order of millions or tens of millions, you could easily demonstrate that vaccines are actually more likely to do damage for many demographics, than coronavirus itself.
    1