Comments by "Jim Luebke" (@jimluebke3869) on "Radical Ideology and the Nihilistic Void | Douglas Murray | EP 152" video.

  1. A moment of silence for Professor Jordan Peterson. The Wise King has gone willfully blind, preferring to turn a blind eye to 2020 election anomalies.
    9
  2. Jordan Peterson and Douglas Murray: "Everyone else thinks there was no evidence of cheating, so it would be unreasonable for me to think that there was". Also Jordan Peterson and Douglas Murray: "There's no reason that any judge would have thought there was no evidence of cheating, unless there wasn't any." These judges are not smarter than you are, and you are LITERALLY embodying the rationale that would lead them to the same conclusion you have come to.
    5
  3. That's why that story keeps getting retold a thousand ways.
    5
  4. Men get old. The wise king is mortal. The younger generation has to bring the energy to revivify the world.
    4
  5. This is not a "margin of error problem". This is an "anomalous pro-Biden spikes in the vote count" problem. If the Democrats stuffed the ballot boxes, what we saw, is what it would look like.
    4
  6. What can be done about the "stolen election narrative"? A clear, transparent, conscientious, thorough investigation of the election irregularities. How is this anything other than OBVIOUS?
    4
  7. Why did Trump think he'd won, on Election night? HE LOOKED AT THE DATA.
    4
  8.  @PitchBlackYeti  That wasn't the voice of reason (logos), that was the voice of authority (ethos). The two are very distinct rhetorical strategies. Aristotle saw "ethos" as most persuasive, and he's right, from a cynical point of view. The Enlightenment, however, saw "logos" as most persuasive, and that gave us the modern world.
    3
  9. The only person in the entire US Political Establishment who is steadfastly pro-Trump, is Trump himself. Yeah, that seems about right.
    2
  10. He said himself, his courage is waning. What we need is the generation to come, who raised themselves up according to his teachings.
    2
  11. If you want to believe there were irregularities in the vote counts across major battleground states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, etc) that ended up tipping the election for Biden, all you have to do is LOOK AT THE DATA. Does that make you a radical? Really? Just looking at the data?
    2
  12. That last part of 1984, right?
    1
  13.  @jaredmello  You mean the mail-in vote spikes that were 99% Biden? Yeah, when we looked into it, it just got worse. Like, vote tallies that looked like vote tallies from Communist countries, worse. Nice try.
    1
  14.  @jaredmello  99%? Those are numbers even Stalin would blush to claim. No, your "narrative" is bull, plain and simple, and your anecdotes aren't anything like convincing.
    1
  15.  @jaredmello  You didn't watch any of the public presentations in Gettysburg, etc, did you?
    1
  16.  @jaredmello  Please re-read my comment, I've already shared that. The Socratic method doesn't work as well, when the answer is something you don't want to hear.
    1
  17.  @jaredmello  Oh how cute, you know rhetorical flourishes. Data is data. The data shows what it shows. Covering it up will just make things worse, when people finally wise up.
    1
  18.  @jaredmello  I'm curious, how did you even find this thread? YouTube is burying these sorts of comments (rational, evidence-based critiques of the 2020 election) very, very deep. Should I just be impressed with your patient willingness to keep scrolling down? Or is this more of a professional interest of yours?
    1
  19. Did either of you notice the cheering when Luke Skywalker came back?
    1
  20. Good old fashioned ballot box stuffing was what did the trick.
    1
  21.  @kermitfrog593  I don't think they critiqued it, that's the thing. There wasn't any hearing about it. What we're seeing in this video is two very intelligent people convincing themselves that if no one else saw anything untoward, nothing untoward could have happened. That could very easily have been the thought process of most of those judges, too.
    1
  22.  @kermitfrog593  Um, the idea that someone is not guaranteed a hearing is the OPPOSITE of justice. At this point you're just stringing words together that point in the direction you want to go, without any regard for what's true or right.
    1
  23. - There are serious questions as to whether Mitch McConnell's race had irregularities that favored McConnell. He is also on record with "winning is everything" statements. - Mike Pence is willing to betray the Republican base on issues of principle, like the Religious Freedom Restoration Act that he gutted while governor. So, yeah, it's not out of character for these Establishment figures to push for Establishment goals, like getting rid of the anti-Establishment leader: Trump.
    1