Comments by "Jim Luebke" (@jimluebke3869) on "Asmongold TV "
channel.
-
53
-
14
-
12
-
12
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
6
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@velho3942 Populations are collapsing worldwide thanks to secular "values".
Within your lifetime, we're going to see "secular values saying "oops, the 60s and 70s were a mistake" and going back to more Christian roots.
By the way, you do know that the entire Bible is basically a story of freeing people from slavery, right? (Exodus, Philemon, all the Gospels, etc) not to mention it was Christian fanatics (Quakers, Wilberforce, etc) that ended slavery in the modern world?
If your ethical education includes anyone insisting that Christian values involve slavery, you were badly educated -- you need to start doing some research of your own to counteract that foolishness.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Promoting general science literacy would be great.
This guy might be a bit taken aback by how many of his sacred cows would be hamburger, in this process.
The core dozen or so vaccines (measles, mumps, polio, whooping cough, smallpox, etc) that helped drop child mortality rates from around 50% to less than 1%, largely about 100 years ago, are obviously useful. Their interactions if you give them all at once are a little less well-characterized, because that's just how complicated biological systems are.
The dozens of medications that have been given the label "vaccine", sometimes inaccurately so they can enjoy the legal benefits (government mandates, immunity from prosecution)? Not so much, especially when they're given in combinations whose impacts are near-impossible to predict.
In terms of climate -- do the math for the role CO2's opacity, in the incoming solar flux vs. Earth's blackbody radiation, and you'll find that its contribution to the greenhouse effect is less than 0.1 degrees.
Look at the stochastic computer models used to support claims that some kind of runaway effect would occur, and you find that these models can't be used to scientifically prove anything about the behavior or impact of one of their inputs (or even combination of their inputs).
In other words, climate activists who claim to know anything at all about catastrophic impacts from CO2, are deluding themselves, just like they were when they said we were due for another ice age.
The climate narrative flip-flopped very quickly, by the way. As late as 1978, Leonard Nimoy was warning about ice ages, and as early as 1990, the BBC was claiming global warming would boost temperatures 10-15 degrees by 2020.
If we had a scientifically literate population, we would not have either this proliferation of vaccines, or "climate change" hysteria.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1