Comments by "Jim Luebke" (@jimluebke3869) on "How modern feminism is failing women, with Louise Perry | The Brendan O'Neill Show" video.
-
Britain's birthrates have been collapsing for a long time, as a direct result of the s**ual revolution. "British" will cease to be a meaningful category in the next 30 or 40 years because of that, unless Hungarian-level efforts to restore British family life are enacted. (Probably some Victorian era social mores, too.)
As an American (without a drop of English blood to my name, unless you count the stuff on the hands of my Nordic and Irish ancestors), I have to say I'll miss Britishness. The land of Churchill and Shakespeare, of the King James Bible and the Book of Common Prayer, of the Royal Society and the Industrial Revolution, of Magna Carta and the Glorious Revolution, of Elgar and Holst, of Wellington and Nelson, of CS Lewis and Tolkien, and the "few" from Agincourt to Rourke's Drift to the Blitz' RAF -- how anyone can look at British history and not wish to dedicate their lives to keeping these grand traditions alive, is completely beyond me.
The generations waiting in the wings have their own ideas about contemporary British culture, and I have to say the ones who hold your latter-day lack of morals as beneath contempt, are entirely justified in their appraisal of you. Whoever is the successor to the current generation calling Britain home, whether that successor had ancestors there or not, will look at the current moral values as deeply stupid, self-destructive, and demonstrably inferior to the morals of the generations who will come after. "Pride cometh before a destruction", is absolutely true - the Victorians had it right, and you all have it wrong.
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
"The S**ual Revolution can't be undone"
Wrong. Regency-era social mores were very similar to the social mores of today (including flamboyant transvestism), and despite the technological discovery of how to work latex effectively, next up in the queue of social movements was the Victorian Era.
The Victorian Era happened because the children (like Victoria and Albert) of promiscuous people have profoundly worse lives than the children of morally upright people. We're seeing the pendulum swing now as well, in spite of huge propaganda efforts to impede true progress on this point.
Immoral people make bad times, bad times make moral people (suffering leads to endurance, endurance to character, character to hope, as St. Paul teaches), moral people make good times, good times make immoral people, on and on it goes...
3
-
What liberated women? Not washing machines, not "great" feminists, not birth control -- It's plumbing, vaccines, and antibiotics.
Back when infant mortality rates were 50% and up, if you had told any woman that being a society photographer was a higher calling than doing whatever she could to keep children alive, she would have called you a fool.
The plain fact is that while it's unquestionably a good thing that women doing traditional women's work doesn't have such shocking stakes anymore, we've completely overshot what need to be the norms of a generationally successful society. Norms need to be something like, "Women should contribute to society and their own lives by pursuing their talents outside the home, but not to the exclusion of having two, maybe three kids."
Any real adult discussion should be about how loosely or strictly those norms need to be enforced, and by what means, to achieve a stable population. Most of what we have now is just adolescent whinging - a desire to stay stuck at one stage of life, never making any progress, never achieving any kind of maturity.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1