Comments by "" (@jb76489) on "The Gun That Aims Itself (Documentary)" video.

  1. Actually it's done mostly for food
    16
  2. Mike Messiah People can't get food from hunting? Also, if they weren't hunted, the population of things like deer would explode, far beyond the carrying capacity of the places they live; they'd starve to death
    6
  3. cobnutts I'm curious, where exactly did I say that people hunted zebra for food? The only animal I ever mentioned was deer "90% of them have access to pleanty of food" I rather doubt its about not having access to meat, more so the fact that its more ethical to eat an animal that been in the wild it's entire life than on a farm. Besides, with out hunters killing them relatively quickly and painlessly, they'd be dying from other animals, being hit by vehicles and starving to death because they've exceeded the carrying capacity of their local environment 
    3
  4. Mike Messiah "under the dynamics of nature's food chain" Are we not a part of nature's food chain?  "they are just meant to wane away, thats the way of nature" Unless of course that takes thee form of hunters If you're going to claim that hunting is bad you have to consider the alternatives; deer breed like rabbit and sans their normal predators their population will grow unsustainably 
    2
  5. Mike Messiah yeah, thats why its done by tags, the population is estimated and a certain number of tags are issue to lower the population to a sustainable level 
    2
  6. Because gangs have the spare capital and the volition to buy one of these, remember they're the ones who can't even be bothered to hold their handguns correctly
    1
  7. Was it some how better, the hundreds upon thousands upon millions of Japanese who were killed by incendiary bombs or conventional bombs or even just bullets? Does that make their death less of an outrage that the nukes? Also they weren't strikes against civilians, it was against the industry of the two cities. Also they ended the war, negating the need for an invasion of Japan which would have killed a lot more people. Whilst we're talking about such thing, ever heard of the rape of Nanking? How many hundred of thousand of civilians were raped and killed by Japanese soldiers? But by all means, don't let these inconvenient truths stop your idiocy and your bigotry
    1
  8. Wow. I'm stunned by the eloquence of that reply, you've caused me to rethink ever position I have in life Seriously dude? Is that the best thing you can come up with? "You suck, you're wrong" care to point out how either of those are true? Also you care enough to reply but not enough to provide a cognizant, coherent and resonance response? That actually explains a lto
    1
  9. Also, does it give you some perverse pride that gangs in Russia and Europe are better( or worse) than they are in the U.S.? What a strange thing to be proud of
    1
  10. You say that and yet you always seem to reply
    1
  11. Oh by the way, still waiting to hear how I suck/am wrong
    1
  12. Response not resonance, my bad, I'm sure a smart little cookie like yourself understood what I meant though
    1
  13. So I guess you're not done here then. That's not at all what I said, I said that I mistyped and that you probably still understood what I meant. Still waiting to be told how I'm wrong
    1