Comments by "" (@jb76489) on "Military History Visualized" channel.

Nazi wunderwaffe: Me262, v2, v3 Allied wunderwaffe: logistics, cooperation between allies and the tank transmission
68
9:56 I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. The Zumwalts were supposed to replace the Burkes but the class was cancelled after only three of 32 ships were started. meanwhile a third flight of Burkes,up to 42 ships, have had contracts awarded
16
dan the man you don’t know much about Americans lmao
9
SouthParkCows88 spent longer testing tin cans than designing the transmission or thinking about logistics “classic German” incompetence indeed
8
REgamesplayer First you say "anyone who claim that lend lease was crucial in winning the war are just making the stuff up and grasping at straws" Then you immediately turn around and say "The issue is when westerners claim that lend lease was essential in winning a war. No one disputed that, even Russians did not." Whereas people who actually know what they're talking about "Today [1963] some say the Allies didn't really help us… But listen, one cannot deny that the Americans shipped over to us material without which we could not have equipped our armies held in reserve or been able to continue the war." Soviet Marshal Georgy Zhukov "...if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany's pressure, and we would have lost the war." Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev "On the whole the following conclusion can be drawn: that without these Western shipments under Lend-Lease the Soviet Union not only would not have been able to win the Great Patriotic War, it would not have been able even to oppose the German invaders, since it could not itself produce sufficient quantities of arms and military equipment or adequate supplies of fuel and ammunition. The Soviet authorities were well aware of this dependency on Lend-Lease. Thus, Stalin told Harry Hopkins [FDR's emissary to Moscow in July 1941] that the U.S.S.R. could not match Germany's might as an occupier of Europe and its resources" Russian historian Boris Vadimovich Sokolov " "Without American production the United Nations [the Allies] could never have won the war." Joseph Stalin But what the fuck do they know right? Just a bunch of dumb americans amiright?
8
@qanon7958 like their paratroopers that didn’t have risers? Or their lack of prox fused AA shells? Or sub par radar? Or their horses?
7
Has there ever been an instance where an armored vehicle crossed a river amphibiously tactically or operationally?
7
Honestly wouldn’t be surprised is Russia did do that
7
@qanon7958 “a British product” some was, other wasn’t. Another thing the brilliant Germans failed to figure out, how to work with allies “Maybe bad people can do good at stem and warfare” declaring war on the most powerful countries in the world is not good warfare. Nor is ignoring logistics entirely. And don’t forget the Germans came up with the idea of “Jewish physics” too
6
Guardia Rossa "On YOUR language," on my language? I don't own any languages, I'm just saying that he pronounced it wrong "Stop being annoying." stop being wrong
4
Guardia Rossa "It's his way to pronounce it." Yes it is and his way is wrong. For the actual number 113 it's fine but for the M113 it's wrong, really not hard to grasp
4
He was wrong though, the numbers are pronounced separately
3
@qanon7958 sometimes good
3
daniel halachev in the beginning maybe but that certainly didn’t last long
3
Cen Blackwell shame the same cant be said for the land weapons
2
spartakus warrior thanks to shipments of supplies from the western allies
2
+Exeggcuter Timur you say that yet Stalin didn't think so, whom should we believe?
1
@ragoonsgg589 “redefined modern warfare” lmao what a twat
1
Sebastian Arena my goodness, you could light up a new moon with all this projection
1
@MrBims yes and everyone who opposed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan hated America and wanted the terrorists to win
1
@spellcaster39ify such as?
1
@qanon7958 did you have a fucking stroke while writing that?
1
@qanon7958 1. Quotations 2. Spacing 3. Grammar
1
@qanon7958 see? That’s wasn’t so hard. With concerted effort, even you can write a coherent sentence. 1. Most of them though it depends on which specific tech you’re talking about. 2. You do know Germany and Japan were Allie s before with war started right? And that there were other axis countries other than Germany Italy and Japan, right? Japan and German y sign agreements before the war broke out to share militarily useful technological developments 3. Ah nevermind what I said earlier, you can’t actually write coherently. Oh well, good effort I suppose. As for Churchill, you do know that he wasn’t prime minister until after Germany and Britain were at war, right? And that war was started due to Germany invading Poland? Oh and Barbarossa didn’t happen until 1941 but whatever “Prevails to this day” citation needed
1
@scorchclasstitan6727 Please show me where I either A used Poland as an excuse or B said Russia didn’t Also, killing several of your own people isn’t something to be proud of
1
@scorchclasstitan6727 "oh you deleted the comment as soon as someone called you out for it LMAO ." No its still very much there and by the lack of an "edited" tag, unchanged. I'm not sure why you find it so difficult to find that but whatever " "
1
@qanon7958 " the alliance between Germany and Japan wasn't nearly as sharp as you seem to think it was"" yes, they were very dumb , i would like you to get into an argument in a language that isn't your own mother-tongue with nearly the same performance as i did
1
ookiemand citation needed
1
James Robert mhmm, cause that totally happened
1
huma474 tigers maintain social distancing by breaking down
1
"REgamesplayer" well, then its a good thing most of those weren't written years or even decades after the war ended, else you'd look even dumber than you already do
1
In short, for anything bad, always blame Americans, literally EVERYTHING BAD EVER is their fault
1