Comments by "" (@jb76489) on "Vox" channel.

  1. +Manuel Gómez yah, because destroying an entire industry over night and issuing 300,000,000+ licenses is real simple
    4
  2. 2:35 that’s a sphere is it? Oh Vox, never change
    3
  3. Manuel Gómez an industry which the majority of those I voled with it hated and still took four years and several hundred thousand lives to get rid of
    2
  4. Ivan Petrus that would be the pot calling the kettle black based on the drivel you've been typing  "your cops kill more people than criminals per year" citation needed,i imagine we'll waiting on this for a while
    2
  5. Maxim Gwiazda put them in Detention? Show them Disney movies and give them class rooms? How terrible
    2
  6. He wasn't there that day
    2
  7. DEEPANJAN ROY I’m sorry, do you think that the native tribes evolved in North America? News flash Sherlock, they immigrated too and guess what, North America was one hell of a violent place when it was just them. If you’re born somewhere, you’re native, end of story, it’s not hard t understand and it’s not some privilege reserved for the noble savage just cause you’re wracked with guilt for something you didn’t do
    2
  8. Clive Newby the region is unstable enough without envy outside help They killed an enemy commander after attacks on their embassy
    2
  9. Manuel Gómez "I think" Well stop the fucking presses, Manuel had a thought; tell me, is that the first one? I'd hope so, you don't seem very good at it
    1
  10. Manuel Gómez you'll forgive me if your ignorant and completely unfounded opinion is not a cogent argument in need of refution
    1
  11. Manuel Gómez "unfounded" because you only refer to to your feelings and cum hoc ergo propter hoc fallacies Igormet because went presented with contrary evidence, as with the cdc study, you return to your feelings
    1
  12. Sam Verebesh http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18319/priorities-for-research-to-reduce-the-threat-of-firearm-related-violence "national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year.” "Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was ‘used’ by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies,”"
    1
  13. +Sam Verebesh congratulations, I guess everywhere in the world is exactly the same as hong kong
    1
  14. Manuel Gómez don't you think that if guns were bad for society, a society that has recently had a spike in the number of guns wouldn't be nearing a century low murder rate? " crime rates in Europe and in the USA and then compare the european gun control with the american gun control ¿Coincidence?." 1. Because the U.S. and Europe are totally the only two places on the planet 2. Because the only difference between the U.S. and Europe is gun laws 3. Because the murder rate in the Us hasn't dropped by more than fifty percent the past two decades, faster than europe's
    1
  15. Manuel Gómez "Do you know what an EXAMPLE is?" yes, that was a bad one "That argument would be valid if both, USA and Europe started from the same poin in crime rate" uh yeahno, internal comparison is more accuate and less susceptible to lurking variables than external "I see a simple reason for that: Gun control has been more strict through years." Here we go with you and your feeling again. What gun control might that be? The twilight of the Clinton era AWB? The adoption of constitutional carry in a number of states? Maybe it was how chicago allowed concealed carry last year and the murder rate dropped to a five decade low http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/24/chicago-crime-rate-drops-as-concealed-carry-gun-pe/?page=all Why am I not surprised you don't understand maths/stats? A better analogy would be A loses 50% of their mass, not weight, and B loses 30% and turns to A and says "See how lighter much l am than you? Obviously that means my method was more effective"
    1
  16. ccmanize you're speaking from an anecdote, which is a fallacy 
    1
  17. How many civilians in gaza would it take for you to care?
    1
  18. Kiên Ng i agree, those parents had no empathy for their children, the journey itself is extremely dangerous just because of the terrain, coyotes are known to be an unsavory lot especially around women and they knew they’d be making their children criminals. Honestly those kids are probably better off away from their parents
    1
  19. FluorescentMango is that how you say “ I can’t come up with a reason as to why you’re wrong besides it feels wrong so there” where you’re from?
    1
  20. Scott Petrovits fair enough, if you completely change the definition of sphere to something it has never meant before, then yeah it s a sphere
    1
  21. Clumbia L lets start by not breaking laws, hows that sound
    1
  22. This is trumps America, dollars over lives smh
    1
  23. So wait a second, I didn’t see how this is Drumpfs fault
    1
  24. Looks very Wes Anderson-y
    1
  25.  @124085  you don't know what ad hominem is. you also dont know how to spell it
    1
  26. They should just stay in Mexico, as we all know Mexico is a paradise and anyone who says other wise is a goose stepping, racist, fascist alt righter rapist in the same vein as blonald blummpf ala his “animals comment
    1