Comments by "" (@jb76489) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Dario Belenfante “Russia, China, superpowers” lmao
    2
  2. Dario Belenfante and I take it you’re a fucking idiot, one of us is right, guess which one
    2
  3.  @dariob52  whatever you say buddy "Nobody wants to join the US led coalition to patrol the straight. Even UK is like, thanks but we will handle it ourselves" https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/world/middleeast/britain-iran-strait-of-hormuz.html
    2
  4. Dario Belenfante who exactly are “you people”?
    2
  5. GazzaMrazz except you’re farcically over selling the capabilities of the QE, it’s more expensive than that and the lower crew count comes at the prices of reduces through put and lack of redundancy
    2
  6. EmperorLionflame “most advanced” citation needed “Next gen I’ve- make it future proof” citation needed
    2
  7.  @briant5685  hey siri, what was desert storm?
    2
  8. So over rated that countries are falling over each other to adopt it
    2
  9.  SSR  1 more rafales have crashed despite there being fewer of them 2 f35 have radar reflectors on them in peace time
    2
  10. Spaghetti God if you can see the future, can I get some lotto numbers bro?
    2
  11.  @c.rutherford  and the British don’t view it as a defeat either, despite failing to curtail American growth and the Americans burning down the capital of Canada
    2
  12.  @maxbrause4116  so why’d they sacrifice so many men and so much material trying to take it?
    2
  13.  @GenghisX999  citation needed
    2
  14. Meh, Germans were happy to support the nazis then, plenty would support them now
    2
  15. Chrischi4598 very cool, thanks for sharing
    2
  16.  @aburetik4866  you can have a big navy of little boats, thats what north korea does
    2
  17.  @prabhatsingh5234  like Switzerland? Or Singapore? Or Finland?
    2
  18. It’s more because 1. It’s such a large aircraft it’s easy to replace old systems be they avionics or engines with new ones and 2. Only about 10% of the b52s made are still flying so there is an ocean of spare parts for them
    2
  19.  @MuffHam citation needed
    2
  20. @ I keep being told how trump is Putin lackey but no one can explain when Putin would invade before and after his lackey was in power but not during
    2
  21.  @hiteshadhikari  congrats russian supported the dictator of Syria, must be so proud
    2
  22. Rehan Zainul Abdeen Soviet Union ceased to exist and its successor states are shadows of their formal selves The war on terror is mostly echoes of Europeans(French and British) fucking about both in taking and leaving the Middle East. And while the GWoT can hardly be said to have been a vow helming success, it’s hardly one the west has lost
    2
  23. If they’re really dumb I guess lmao
    2
  24. SCUD B " Russia has a larger fleet of tanks(like you said) and most of them are on the same level or better than m1s" Uh no,not even close,of russias tanks,~14,000 of there T72s or older
    1
  25. +Lapkonium Battle of 73 eastings, see how much tanks have improved
    1
  26. Unless you went back and rewrote all of your comments, they're still as idiotic as they were before
    1
  27. citation needed on Sgt. Fury being american
    1
  28. Oh look, a wehraboo
    1
  29. Eetu Hannola The T14 having such a long running, impressive and well documented combat history, amiright?
    1
  30. "Yemen and Iraq showed that the Abrams is highly overrated" citation needed
    1
  31. "just 10 seconds and 2 lazy hands away from you." weird that, especially since you took all that time type out this comment, one would think you could use your two lazy hands to provide some citation, alas, it'd seem too great a task for you And what exactly your argument? Its not perfect and invulnerable in everyway to everything at every angle? Surely you're not that dull, right?
    1
  32. "In fact their air defense is one of the most advanced these days if not the most advanced" citation needed
    1
  33. "The Russians say they can" and never has any country ever lied about anything Here is one. http://www.globalresearch.ca/russias-superior-air-defense-systems/5577032 for as much actual information and citation as that article provides, you'd have done better to cite the wikipedia page "It’s protected against electronic warfare" "It renders stealth aircraft obsolete" Doesn't care to show how he knows any of these things, we're just supposed to take it on faith i guess "400 km away at altitudes up to 90,000 feet, " this is curious because the 400 km range is for the 40N6 yet he uses that altitude for the 9M96 maybe, he seems to be randomly picking numbers "That stealth crap only works on short wavelength radars" eh, an f22 evaded iranian VHF radar to sneak up on one of their F4s. Besides long wavelengths are impractical for radar as theres a lot of other traffic on those frequencies and the radar equipment itself is inherently larger and due to the long wavelength its less accurate
    1
  34. Weisswurstesser "Don't complain you asked for some citation and i gave you some" awful generous to call the piece of shit a "citation" "laziness as i was able to find that shit in less than 10 seconds." calling it shit certainly is accurate "Who knows?" apparently you, you seemed so happy to lecture us all "he USA admit the long wavelength radars can see all their stealth aircraft" for the slower members of the audience (read: you), i repeat myself. long wavelengths are impractical for radar as theres a lot of other traffic on those frequencies and the radar equipment itself is inherently larger and due to the long wavelength its less accurate
    1
  35. Mustash Monthly you are allowed to use grammar and punctuation, i promises you won't get in trouble
    1
  36. +Wulfzzout out of curiosity, how do you know they're american
    1
  37. Ray Hu America spend more on education and health care than defense but egatever
    1
  38. Citation needed
    1
  39.  @yelleryoung  Source: it was revealed to me in a dream. 10/10 there bro, definitely proved yourself right
    1
  40.  @yelleryoung  citation needed
    1
  41.  @yelleryoung  oh yeah, that’s definitely something someone who’s not totally full of shit would say, good job buddy. You claim all these things are true yet can’t seem to actually prove them, what are we supposed to take away from that?
    1
  42.  @yelleryoung  nah, you made the claim, you back it up
    1
  43. @Anthony Richardson and yet so many countries are choosing the f35 over the Rafale, why is that do you think?
    1
  44. Is that not better than nothing?
    1
  45. Except close air combat is an oxymoron these days. Air to air happens beyond visible range (BVR)
    1
  46.  @sigma_frenchie4075 "the Rafale's still excellent in that domain" in a domain that doesnt matter any more. How very european Not what belgium said. Or finland
    1
  47.  @sigma_frenchie4075  Not as good though
    1
  48.  @innocento.1552  just so we’re clear, you don’t think that a jet getting detected and shot down first would be detrimental to that jet being able to defend?
    1
  49.  @hahua90  is that why so many counties are adopting it?
    1
  50.  @hahua90  ok that’s not true but whatever
    1