General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Binkov's Battlegrounds
comments
Comments by "" (@jb76489) on "China launched a 50 000 ton drone carrier. What are its roles and capabilities?" video.
I sure hope china nefer misrepresents anything, you might end up feeling pretty silly
4
@aburetik4866 you can have a big navy of little boats, thats what north korea does
2
@aburetik4866 And? Is every ship in the PLAN a type 076? If not, kinda irrelevant bro. Go back and try reading what i said again
1
@aburetik4866 And yet the battle tonnage of the American fleet is still higher. Seriously dude, your reading comprehension sucks "obsolete technology" citation needed
1
@aburetik4866 are you allergic to making coherent points? Or maybe you think a cargo container can be quickly made into a destroyer
1
@ if, may, could, we’re talking about things as they are, not they could be
1
@aburetik4866 fascinating
1
@ of what? I’m not American lmao
1
@ because you have more toes than brain cells and you can’t imagine other reason someone would disagree
1
@aburetik4866 I don’t, you perceive that way cause you’re dumb
1
@ttuliorancao lmao pov:you don’t know what you’re talking about
1
@aburetik4866 because you can’t imagine any other reason someone would disagree with you
1
@ do you think spelling and grammar are US propaganda?
1
@ as much as you trust the Chinese about theirs
1
@ do they have to be? No, they often are but they don’t have to be. And the academy’s aren’t the only way of becoming an officer either but whatever, I doubt being factually accurate interests you very much
1
@ we’ve already established you can in fact not read English so you;l forgive me for not believing
1
@ttuliorancao he didn’t say politician, he said member of congress, do you more help or can you tell those are two separate words? And again, those academies are not the only way to become an officer
1
@ “we all know” should be easy to cite that then
1
@ hmm, I wonder if the sort of person who has the inclination to get themselves into a service academy, I wonder if they also might be the sort with the inclination to stay in the military long enough to get to the top. No, that cannot possibly be a thing. Fun fact: of the current joint chiefs of staff, 5 of 8 didn’t go to any service academy, including both the chairman and vice chairman
1
@ listen dude, it’s not my fault you chose this hill to die on when it was such shaky ground, that’s all on you. Maybe look this stuff up before you start claiming it’s true. Also “dynastic” was the word you were looking for
1
@ “I proved you wrong” sure, whatever r you say buddy
1