Comments by "" (@jb76489) on "If the US shared a border with Russia, who'd win that war? (2016)" video.

  1. "IN FACT ironically the abrams is much older than the T-90." the t90is justas upgraded t72, which is from 1973,if you're going compare them,at least have the decency to compare apple to apples
    5
  2. Vlad The Impaler Firstly this "We don't trash talk Americans in comment sections" is a bigger pile of steaming fresh horseshoe than the red army at the start of ww2 Secondly, how do you know they're all americans?
    3
  3. 350*T90 *1000 T-72B3(T-90 standard) 3000 T-80U, T-80BV 0 T-64 "T-72 is not a bad tank at all. It gets the job done. Especially if you have it in good hands." rememeber when the most elite units in the iraqi army were using t72 variants and got their asses handed to them? Whats the word for a wehraboo but with the soviet union/russia instead of germany
    2
  4. http://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/parameters/Articles/09spring/mcdermott.pdf
    2
  5. Is that why russia doesn't use the ak47 anymore? Because its the best?
    2
  6. SCUD B " Russia has a larger fleet of tanks(like you said) and most of them are on the same level or better than m1s" Uh no,not even close,of russias tanks,~14,000 of there T72s or older
    1
  7. +Lapkonium Battle of 73 eastings, see how much tanks have improved
    1
  8. Unless you went back and rewrote all of your comments, they're still as idiotic as they were before
    1
  9. citation needed on Sgt. Fury being american
    1
  10. Oh look, a wehraboo
    1
  11. Eetu Hannola The T14 having such a long running, impressive and well documented combat history, amiright?
    1
  12. "Yemen and Iraq showed that the Abrams is highly overrated" citation needed
    1
  13. "just 10 seconds and 2 lazy hands away from you." weird that, especially since you took all that time type out this comment, one would think you could use your two lazy hands to provide some citation, alas, it'd seem too great a task for you And what exactly your argument? Its not perfect and invulnerable in everyway to everything at every angle? Surely you're not that dull, right?
    1
  14. "In fact their air defense is one of the most advanced these days if not the most advanced" citation needed
    1
  15. "The Russians say they can" and never has any country ever lied about anything Here is one. http://www.globalresearch.ca/russias-superior-air-defense-systems/5577032 for as much actual information and citation as that article provides, you'd have done better to cite the wikipedia page "It’s protected against electronic warfare" "It renders stealth aircraft obsolete" Doesn't care to show how he knows any of these things, we're just supposed to take it on faith i guess "400 km away at altitudes up to 90,000 feet, " this is curious because the 400 km range is for the 40N6 yet he uses that altitude for the 9M96 maybe, he seems to be randomly picking numbers "That stealth crap only works on short wavelength radars" eh, an f22 evaded iranian VHF radar to sneak up on one of their F4s. Besides long wavelengths are impractical for radar as theres a lot of other traffic on those frequencies and the radar equipment itself is inherently larger and due to the long wavelength its less accurate
    1
  16. Weisswurstesser "Don't complain you asked for some citation and i gave you some" awful generous to call the piece of shit a "citation" "laziness as i was able to find that shit in less than 10 seconds." calling it shit certainly is accurate "Who knows?" apparently you, you seemed so happy to lecture us all "he USA admit the long wavelength radars can see all their stealth aircraft" for the slower members of the audience (read: you), i repeat myself. long wavelengths are impractical for radar as theres a lot of other traffic on those frequencies and the radar equipment itself is inherently larger and due to the long wavelength its less accurate
    1
  17. Mustash Monthly you are allowed to use grammar and punctuation, i promises you won't get in trouble
    1