Comments by "" (@jb76489) on "Kyle Rittenhouse Breaks Down In Tears Describing Shooting, Testimony Halted" video.

Well seeing as how he only shot those who were actively attacking him, seems he had pretty good control
6
Forbes editor: “Remember , the narrative is that this kid is the most evil person since trump, make sure the thumbnail makes him look as bad as possible” Forbes yt person: “Done”
6
@nk-dw2hm “break curfew” there was no curfew, if you watched the trial you’d know that “Most of them were unarmed” Most of who? Not the people this kid shot thats for certain. And for the record, more people are punched/kicked to death than are killed by rifles like he had so just because someone is “unarmed” hardly means they’re not dangerous “Drove with the rifle from a different state” citation needed “Threaten people with” you do know that bicep boy had a hand gun on him, without a current license to carry it and was threatening people with it, right?
2
@nk-dw2hm “drove from a different state” and? “Illegally acquired” citation needed “Breaking curfew” again, you do know the judge dismissed the breaking curfew charge because the prosecution couldn’t prove there was one in effect, right? By all means if you have evidence they couldn’t find please do share it “No legal ability to be in possession” citation needed “One one was armed” when you’re using something with the intent to apply blunt force trauma, it starts being a weapon bro “2/3 we’re unarmed” 1. No. 2. They attacked him, go watch the videos “He shouldn’t have been there” I mean, did you see what he was wearing? Did you see how short his skirt was? He was clearly asking for it
1
@nk-dw2hm “go look it up” oh I don’t know, if someone as smart as yourself can’t find anything despite being asked repeatedly to do so, what chance do I have? “It’s illegal for 17 year old to have a rifle” prove it “He drove from a different state” and? Is that against the law “He wasn’t defending anything” pretty sure he was defending himself “He shouldn’t have been there” probably not but he was and he still had the right to defend himself “Incite violence” citation needed “He shouldn’t have been part of the violence he incited” what violence was that again? The one he incited by running away? “Only one was armed” so, in what passes for your brain, only guns are weapons? Bloody brilliant you are. And as we already discuss, even if someone has nothing in their hands, they can still very much kill you. Plus, if said person with nothing in their hands has been following you all day, saying “shoot me nigga” and “I’m gonna kill your” as Rosenbaum did, I’d wager most people wouldn’t be inclined to given them the benefit of the doubt if they were being chased by said person
1