Comments by "" (@jb76489) on "Found And Explained" channel.

  1. Yeahno, the yak-141 had nothing to do with the f-35b
    6
  2. An outdated, overhyped aircraft that was outperformed by it contemporaries, good riddance
    5
  3. @ source: trust me bro. And you know the Swiss have a deal for the f35, right?
    5
  4. A handful out of several hundred thousand people
    4
  5. Russia can’t even manage 5th gen, 6th gen for them is a fantasy
    3
  6. This will be the stealthiest bomber ever. We'll neevr see it flying, we'll never see it on the ground, we'll never see it being made or maintained. It will be like it never existed
    3
  7. Modern Russian jets and their NATO names Su-57: the fuckwit Su-75: the femboy Mig-41:the fictional
    3
  8.  @sop1918 wow, it must be hard to be smarter than literally everyone else, I wonder why they didn’t ask you for your opinion? It couldn’t be because it’s an uninformed one could it? After all, it’s not like the black hawk already has two engines, right? Wait, shit, it does
    3
  9.  @sop1918  of course, rotor blades and engines, those are effectively the same word, right?
    3
  10.  @poklianon it’s nonexistent
    3
  11. More shitty Russian vapor ware that they’ll never actually make lmao how pathetic
    3
  12. That’s what you get from talking to a Canadian, that are a dull people. The a,Erica s have hard hypersonic missiles since the 60s
    2
  13.  @lionheartx-ray4135  33. If losing 33 engineers was a “big brain drain” then Canada is even more pathetic than I thought
    2
  14. The USA has had hypersonic missiles since the 60s my dude
    2
  15.  @zenith7024 lmao cope
    2
  16.  @igorvasin6960 source: trust me bro, I’m totally not full of shit
    1
  17. Lmao “built” is very generous, have the russians managed a single squadron for the Fuckwit yet? The Americans finished their 1000th F35 recently
    1
  18.  @jop4691 your confusing russia with the Soviet Union my dude
    1
  19.  @alexmcc-art7768  go back and read my comment again bro. Sound out the words if you need to
    1
  20.  @kauske  you know if you were literate, you might’ve seen where the original test specifically referred to those engineers who went to nasa, such a shame you apparently can’t read
    1
  21.  @ЕвгенийБулыгин-д6ч  " US stealth tech was indeed quite useless against Russian Army radars " citation needed
    1
  22. “I don’t understand how stealth works or why it’s useful but I’ve never let my ignorance or stupidity stop me before!”-you, right now, for some fucking reason
    1
  23.  @ViolentCabbage-ym7ko lmao even in the 90s bvr missiles accounted for more a2a kills than everything else put together, dog fighting is dead
    1
  24.  @ghostrider-be9ek Russian “stealth” fighters don’t look like American stealth fighters because the Russian don’t have the capability of building real ones “Passive stealth is obsolete” source, trust me bro
    1
  25. @poodlescone9700 do you not know what a artists impression is? It has nothing to do with the actual design
    1
  26.  @ghostrider-be9ek  lmao that was an impressive amount of stupid to pack info such a short comment. An abbreviated list of things you don’t understand >how stealth aircraft work >why you want stealth >why only one of three f117 were shot down that day >how stealth tech has changed in the intervening decades Lmao Godbless the unwarranted confidence of the stupid
    1
  27.  @SagatBordyev t the s-97 and v280 weren’t in competition with each other, they were submitted to different programs dipshit
    1
  28. If it’s so good, why do so few countries use it?
    1
  29. I guess if you can’t make it perform, it maybe as well be pretty
    1
  30. ⁠ @Heshem_Joel the mig41 is entirely conceptual, it will never exist
    1