Comments by "Axxe" (@Axxe80) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire! We don't need no water, let...
    4
  2. If all of you who dislike science because of your religion - why not just join the Amish? Would at least save the world from more anti-science comments on the net.
    3
  3. wtf šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    3
  4. "Thou shallst not use the scripture for YouTube comments as it proves nothing and is annoying af." 2 Morons 08;15
    3
  5. Putin started the war and no one else, vatnik.
    3
  6. Wow, that's some record breaking huge pile of nonsense. šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    3
  7. Couldn't you conspxxxcy believers at least invent some new myths? That portals nonsense is getting really old and boring now.
    3
  8. Want some dressing for your incoherent word salad?
    3
  9. No, the name anti matter suggests nothing like that and merely references the opposite electrial charges of atom core and hull of antimatter.
    2
  10. What a complete nonsense šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    2
  11. That is not the point of their research. It is about understanding the nature of matter on a subatomic level.
    2
  12. No.
    2
  13. bs
    2
  14. OK Vatnik
    2
  15. Not even possible.
    2
  16. Get a therapy.
    2
  17. That is pure nonsense, and of course CERN has nothing to do with "playing god". There's nothing bad about particle physics.
    2
  18. Ā @K_d_-dz6psĀ  Your argument from incredulity refutes nothing and means nothing.
    2
  19. You Olgino trolls are getting worse every day šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    2
  20. Ā @AlexanderUnit-731Ā  Ah, that fairy tale from the first page of Putler's propaganda guide again...
    2
  21. There's nothing bad about peaceful physics research.
    2
  22. Ā @K_d_-dz6psĀ  Why do you even try to argue against evolution when you obviously didn't even correctly understand it?! I tell you why: because normally people look at facts and how they are backed up by evidence and then (!) form an opinion. You and other creationists have an opinion beforehand and then start looking for stuff that allegedly gives evidence for it. Humans are apes, that's a biological fact. The difference in intelligence between humans and other members of the hominidae family doesn't prove creationism. Btw: Evolution is scientifically proven beyond doubt, it's a fact. And almost all christian denominations agree. Why do you think you know better than expert scientists and leading theologists?
    2
  23. They have a website and a youtube channel where the projects are explained.
    2
  24. And don't forget to wear your tinfoil hat...
    2
  25. Ā @ZTVbrothaĀ  Being informed about what they are actually doing there and how their facilities work is the exact opposite of being naive. Naive is what you do: watching sensationalist clickbait videos with nothing but impossible fantasy tales without any proof whatsoever and then actually believing such BS. That is naive and really dumb.
    2
  26. Ā @King-er7efĀ  Nonsense. CERN = C onseil E uropĆ©en pour la R echerche N uclĆ©aire
    2
  27. Ā @ZTVbrothaĀ  So you believe unfounded claims from some clickbaity nonsense online and are even unedcuted enough to not know that this b.s. is actually completly impossible šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚šŸ¤¦ā€ā™€
    2
  28. Ā @ZTVbrothaĀ  No, I just don't believe silly unfounded claims that are impossible, Mr. Dunning.
    2
  29. Ā @DamianStefanickiĀ  OK, definitly a stroke. Get well soon.
    2
  30. But from your intensive studies at YouTube University and Telegram College YOU know the truth šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    2
  31. Your comment makes no sense at all. Here's why in short form: they do create antimatter in tiniest amounts to study its characteristics, so there's no "what if". And there is no "positive matter", there's just matter and antimatter. The difference between them is that matter atom have a core with a positive electrical charge and the electron shell with a negative electrical charge. For antimatter it's the other way round - negative electrical charge for the core and a positron shell with a positive electrical charge. Both types exist in the universe although matter is predominant and antimatter very rare.
    2
  32. Ā @ImaginationInAPitĀ ...or in other words: you have no clue what you're talking about and since you don't want to admit to have written nonsense you instead post some condescending rabulistic. šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    2
  33. Ā @paulanderson7796Ā  Yeah you're right - actually it is a waste of time. Some people just want to believe something "non mainstream" in order to feel special, even if it's pure nonsense.
    2
  34. How did that "prediction" age, hmm?
    2
  35. "And thou shallst not spam bible quotes under science related videos as it is annoying af." 2 Morons 08.15
    2
  36. There never was a "ritual" and there's no reason why a european science organisation should care about an eclipse visible only from North America.
    2
  37. ...you mean like educated and not posting creationist nonsense?
    2
  38. Get well soon.
    1
  39. Ā @anjalE30Ā  Get a therapy.
    1
  40. ok ivan...
    1
  41. šŸ¤”
    1
  42. Morons and consp....y theoriest are in the same silly club
    1
  43. Your first statement seems incorrect to me as you obviously actually are intelligent and not missing a brain. The brainless folks come here, then just hear a word like "anti matter", decide that because it has "anti" in its name it has to be evil and than they declare their superstitious nonsense to be facts. (Same thing about CERN in general, about "black holes", about "dark matter", etc.) And they actually think that this has to be correct, as they are too dumb to be able to see that they're dumb (--> "Dunning Kruger effect"). Stating that something is beyond one own's comprehension is the opposite of that; in fact it is a sign of intelligence! TLDR: By your statement you actually showed that you are definitly NOT missing a brain!
    1
  44. Not directly - it is part of their research to have the conditions for some subatomic particles similar to what they were shortly after the big bang, but not recreating the bb itself (which isn't possible).
    1
  45. šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    1
  46. bs
    1
  47. Foundational research in the field of particle physics (and some other fields) and educating new scientists and students.
    1
  48. Not sure if you're trolling or just really dumb.
    1
  49. Not really. This is foundational physics research - and from foundational research it's most of the time not clear what it would lead to - perhaps some time later it might have an impact to giving people decent meals, clear water, safe cars, housing, etc. Just imagine the time electricity was discovered and researched (or magnetism) it wouldn't have been done because they didn't have an immediate direct use for it. CERN isn't funded that heavily, it costs the individual tax payer in the member countries less than a small cup of coffee per year!
    1
  50. It's foundational research, it doesn't necessarily lead directly to a practical application. Nevertheless CERN's scientific efforts already lead to improvements in medical imaging and radiation therapy. Also I don't see what you think is dangerous about a particle collider.
    1
  51. šŸ¤”
    1
  52. šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    1
  53. embryo =/= baby And you demand that a woman should give up her life for an unviable pregnancy or 'at least' accept an unnessary surgery? That's just insane.
    1
  54. You think antimatter is something hellish because it has the prefix "anti" in it?!
    1
  55. The one who has no clue is you. Your complete post is highly nonsensical.
    1
  56. There is nothing evil about scientific research. And financing CERN costs the tax payer in the member countries less than a cup of coffee - per year!
    1
  57. OK Christiban
    1
  58. CERN's scientific efforts already lead to improvements in medical imaging and radiation therapy, although their main focus is foundational research that doesn't necessarily lead directly to a practical application. Also they're not hiding anything - they explain in detail what they do, everyone can access all data from their website, there are tours of CERN's premises, etc. And Hinduism is the third largest religion in the world with just as much legitimacy as every other belief.
    1
  59. Ā @AloneInTheParkĀ  Sigh. Always the same, nonsensical old stories. Here's the short version about the points you and the OP bought up: 1) The CERN logo doesn't look in any way similar to three sixes. Or to say it more precise than necessary: If there were three sixes, there were three circles and three lines. It's two circles and five lines and matches exactly the schematics of the used particle accelerators. 2) Antimatter isn't anything nefarious just because its name (that CERN didn't choose). It's called that way as its electrical charge is the exact opposite of normal matter. 3) The "portal" story is really absurd. A silly claim someone made somewhere on the net and despite being obviously fictitious you really believe in the existance of such nonsense? 4) No scientist called the Higgs-Boson "god particle". A book publisher invented that dumb term as a marketing ploy for a book. How's that CERN's fault? 5) Shiva isn't anything evil but one of the most important deities of the world's third largest (..and one of the oldest..) religions. The statue was a gift from India in commemoration of a long successful partnership, it's not "out the front" but inside their premises by the guest house and it's just one of many pieces of art exhibited on the area.
    1
  60. šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    1
  61. Ā @joseluisdaniel446Ā  Oh vatnik... šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    1
  62. That was directly before the unicorns got extinct. But at least Elvis is still alive!
    1
  63. Ā @thf1933Ā  What I wrote was still way more believable than the nonsense you posted.
    1
  64. That's just nonsense. The LHC isn't dangerous at all.
    1
  65. Black holes are collapsed stars and antimatter is like matter but with the electrical charge reversed. And it's beyond me where you suspect a connection between these two different things.
    1
  66. Because, of course, YOU know better...
    1
  67. They did prove the Higgs-Boson, and that's a huge achievment.
    1
  68. Ā @RandzeĀ  Correct, it's not a coincidence, but a typical consp....y theory making it's rounds among people gullible enough to believe them.
    1
  69. Ā @RandzeĀ  It is a c.t., a very silly one to be precise. Strange allegations, most of them not even possible, mixed with some pseudo-religious terms and absurd claims - of course all without any real evidence. One has to be very gullible to believe such obvious fantasy stories.
    1
  70. Ā @RandzeĀ  What are you even talking about? This has nothing to do with religion at all. The ct.s about CERN are completly nonsensical and they lack any evidence.
    1
  71. Far away, I hope.
    1
  72. Ā @agarrikr2996Ā  le post moronoo
    1
  73. So you're scared about antimatter because you think its name means it's something evil. Correct?
    1
  74. No.
    1
  75. Having a stroke?
    1
  76. No one is "trying to prove god doesn't exist". First someone would have to prove that god exists... Nevertheless: both is not the purpose of CERN.
    1
  77. Get well soon and don't forget your pills again.
    1
  78. Ā @HeresTheThingOfItYoutubeĀ  And what should that have to do with the yearly particle collider restart? Nothing.
    1
  79. Ā @HeresTheThingOfItYoutubeĀ  Yeah, that's what all consp....y theorists say when they don't know what to answer. And pretty funny given the fact that your 'prediction' about the 8th turned out to be false.
    1
  80. Ā @HeresTheThingOfItYoutubeĀ  šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚
    1
  81. creepypastas =/= reality
    1
  82. Get well soon.
    1
  83. Ā @ak101farhanĀ  The fact that you don't even have what is considered general knowledge about this does not mean that it doesn't exist or you even know better than top notch scientist. It only proves the Dunning Kruger effect.
    1
  84. Ā @ak101farhanĀ  It's foundational research. If, when or for what it will be useful is normally not known. And your generic rant about schools and all that BS is just ignorant. Btw: How do you even think you know where I got which information? smh
    1
  85. Ā @ak101farhanĀ  Don't know where your obvious hatred against CERN comes from (I was literally just waiting for you to start talking about opening "portals" to hell or nonsense like that), but research about the very essence of what matter is is the perfect definition for foundational research. But because YOU can't imagine any purpose of research anyone has to agree that it's a waste of money. Because YOU know best and YOU are the only instance entitled to make such a determination that everyone else has to believe. Plonk & EOD.
    1
  86. No.
    1