Comments by "Axxe" (@Axxe80) on "документальные фильмы imineo" channel.

  1. ​ @Dylonely_9274  Creationists are always providing some satire - albeit involuntarily. 😂
    1
  2. Evolved from an earlier species.
    1
  3. Nope, evolution is a fact.
    1
  4.  @Beastly_SD  Reality isn't affected if you just deny it. Evolution is proven beyond doubt.
    1
  5.  @Beastly_SD  That's just a claim without any evidence, while evolution is proven.
    1
  6. It's not fake.
    1
  7. 🤦‍♂
    1
  8. 🤦‍♂
    1
  9. It is not.
    1
  10. A scientific theory and a colloquial theory are two very different things. Abes (<YT) are a biological family with humans being one of them. The non-human species have of course evolved too. But evolution is not a process to turn everything into humans.
    1
  11.  @vickylanka  Why should they?
    1
  12. We do share a common ancestor with them.
    1
  13. There is not a single piece of evidence for a literal understanding of genesis - not one! Evolution, one the other hand, is extensively proven.
    1
  14. In Asia.
    1
  15. Wow! Amazing that people think that this joke is still funny after having it already millions of times posted 🥱
    1
  16. It's not fake.
    1
  17. There are a lot more than three.
    1
  18.  @dopedreamz  Which is just plain and simple incorrect.
    1
  19.  @dopedreamz  So you don't give an explanation for your incorrect assertion that just 3 fossils had been found, only to jump to the next thing... No, there are not "millions of years unaccounted". Actually nowadays we have a really clear picture of the development of most species, including humans.
    1
  20. There is more than enough proof.
    1
  21. You don't know anything about evolution.
    1
  22.  @volkan8810  Your argument from incredulity is fallacious, it proves nothing and it means nothing. Especially as you don't even know what evolution is (but still reject it).
    1
  23. Evolution is exhaustively proven to be true.
    1
  24. No, facts.
    1
  25. What a nonsense.
    1
  26. YouTube's weird algorithm has hidden your replies so I haven't got a notification. Regarding your previous post: "How can one species of animal literally give birth to a completely different species?" <- It can't. That is not how evolution works. If something like that could happen it would be evidence against evolution. "How in 9 months do the genes of a species change" <- Same thing: They don't. About your new post: "Evolution theory states..." <- No. Evolution is the development of populations and species through hereditary changes. It is not a conscious process, it has no predefined paths or goals. If a mutation occurs that gives an advantage for the chances for reproduction it will be inherited more to the next generation until it becomes "the standard". "Why our species lost every aspect of possible natural adaptation to the enviroment" <- Because it's not a pre-planned development. If some change provided a benefit for the possibility of reproduction it will prevail, even when it might be disadvantageous in other aspects or in the longer perspective. "the Bajau people (...) Why they have not grown gills along with their lungs or webbed hands or feet?" <- Their population is not isolated from other members of their species, the time scale is too short and evolution is not about perfection. "Whales and dolphins are (...) as smart as men" <- They're not. "but have not changed in millions of years." <- They have. "Why they have not transformed into a biped kind of animal?" <- Why should they?
    1
  27. It's not.
    1
  28. Never heard of evolution?
    1
  29.  @Elzimbabwe.  Funny how you claim to know something about "the scientific world" while not even knowing what the word "theory" means 🤦‍♂
    1
  30.  @Elzimbabwe.  The basis for what I wrote is your absurd post that clearly shows that you don't know what a scientific theory is.
    1
  31.  @Elzimbabwe.  Well, in contrast to you I do know the difference between a scientific theory and a colloquial theory...
    1
  32.  @Elzimbabwe.  Stop lying. It's a scientific theory and no neither guesswork.
    1
  33.  @Elzimbabwe.  Lol. Everyone being able to look into a thesaurus what a scientific theory is can clearly see that you are lying.
    1
  34.  @Elzimbabwe.  It is a scientific theory.
    1
  35.  @Elzimbabwe.  Of course it is. It fulfills every part of the definition of a scientific theory. It's not a guess like a colloquial theory.
    1
  36.  @Elzimbabwe.  So some weirdos making nonsensical claims are now the indicator for the definition of a scientific theory? 🤦‍♂
    1
  37.  @Elzimbabwe.  Addendum: And not to forget that there's no evidence for creationism in contrast to evolution being proven...
    1
  38.  @Elzimbabwe.  Oh the irony... an evolution denier talking about science's consensus and accusing others of "commenting on matters (they) clearly fail to understand" 🤦‍♂ And no, there is not a single valid argument or even evidence against evolution - not one!
    1
  39.  @Elzimbabwe.  What are you rambling about now? Your post makes zero sense. Hilarious - no, it's rather dumb what you're doing here. So finally present any piece of evidence for the invalidity of evolution (enough to challenge all the proofs evolution has) or just be quiet.
    1
  40.  @Elzimbabwe.  Grow up and stop trolling, kiddo.
    1
  41. Wrong.
    1
  42.  @kingofmariokart64  Have you never walked to a zoo? Every other animal has not such a thick, protective skin than an elefant. Have you never walked to someone having a cat? Every other animals has not that agility and ability to jump that high in relation to their size. etc. etc. Got it now, why the OP is right?
    1
  43.  @kingofmariokart64  So you didn't get it. The point the OP was making it that there is no species more advanced than any other. Because every species is suited to its ecological niche. You are judging just from the human point of view, measuring listed by intelligence. The list changes its order if you sort by another criteria like speed, time it can be under water, how high it can jump, etc. All species have a last common ancestor, therefore having the same temporal length of their evolutionary path that is different from others leading to adaptation of the different species to their specific ecological niches. Therefore there can't be any creature be "more evulutionary advanced" as any other.
    1
  44. haha 🤡
    1
  45. Oh well... 🤦‍♂
    1
  46.  @Just_M7MD.F-15  You couldn't find anything more dumb as a reply after your insincere question was answered? You want me to list thousands of thousands of scientific studies here?! Everything I mentioned has enough evidence, go look it up in the databases. I provided more than enough to demonstrate the undeniable scientific foundation evolution has.
    1
  47. haha 🤡
    1
  48. Get well soon.
    1
  49. " as there is no evidence that monkeys turned into humans" <- Or in other terms: you don't know what evolution is.
    1
  50. What a nonsense.
    1