Comments by "AholeAtheist" (@AholeAtheist) on "Q+A with Jack Tame"
channel.
-
35
-
23
-
20
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
David is either a disingenuous liar, or a low IQ clown. We don't talk about the Treaty, we don't honour the Treaty, we honour te Tiriti, the version the iwi who signed it understood. Every time he says "the treaty" in this interview, he's referencing a defunct, irrelevant document.
When he says "I don't think you should be treated different because you're a treaty partner" he's trying to make out that Maori are treaty partners(as per te Tiriti) but pakeha are not, separating the Crown from pakeha, as if we are not the Crown, but essentially we are.
When he's saying that "one side always gets a veto" he's essentially just trying to lead pakeha in not honouring te Tiriti, but he doesn't speak for all of us, and that is essentially illegal. We can't go back on it now.
When he appeals to other countries that have had essentially apartheid states, he's being completely disingenuous. There's no indication that honouring te Tiriti would lead to that.
When he says he's committed to in education, health and housing, the policies of his party regarding those will all just make matters worse for the working class, which disproportionately includes Maori. So this is either disingenuous, or indicative of his having a low IQ.
Just a bunch of dog whistles to low IQ racists. If he and his supporters hate and fear Maori so much, they should leave Aoteearoa and never come back.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
This analysis about populism is very poor. It's largely focused on the rise of right-wing populism, and doesn't really identify what it really is.. While ignoring left-wing populism which is also on the rise..
It's not just about the economy and the elites with right-wing populists, they're the ones who make it about race and nationality. These guys make out that right-wing populists decry identity politics, when that isn't the case. Likewise with left-wing populism, I don't think we completely decry identity politics, but we definitely state that those things should be weighed against economic issues in terms of priority, and if that was done the economics would seriously help sort out some of the social issues. While other social issues may not be subject to that, but compared to the authoritarian left, the populist left isn't trying to focus on trans issues in a disproportionate fashion. But again, that's the difference between the populist left, and the populist right, because the populist right plays on those identity politics issues under the guise of not being "politically correct". Meanwhile, the populist left isn't as concerned about their lack of "political correctness" like the authoritarian left is, because we want to focus on the economic issues that effect both the populist left and the populist right, which some of the populist right can be pulled further left on.
One of the major problems with this analysis, is that not once in mentioning Duterte, Bolsonaro, or Trump did they use the word "fascism" or "fascist", which is definitely applicable to the first two, and should at least be brought up with reference to some of Trump's rhetoric and aspirations, the checks and balances of the U.S. system the only thing keeping him in relative check.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Where this political commentator is wrong:
0:25 - 0:35 Opinions are irrelevant. You should be able to say what you want, when you want and how you want, without any serious repercussions. Saying that as a libertarian Seymour should be in favour of people living without having hate speech directed at them is a form of doublethink.
3:17 - 3:31 Problem with this claim is that we have examples of people not have a fair definition of hate speech. I say this as a leftist. Perfect example was a incident with Bill Maher recently when he used a certain term and everyone took offence to one word, when that word was in then text of a conversation, and beyond that was used as the second word in a two word descriptor. They chose to ignore or didn't understand the context. And while this obviously wasn't an incident close to inciting violence, how long will it be before a bunch of idiots assumes a fairly innocent statement is actually doing that when it isn't.
3:53 - 4:08 We get to a harmonious society via education and understanding. State education, not state authoritarianism. Fund education more and expand the curriculum. Be proactive, not reactive. This is where the government failed in it's response to the Christchurch shootings, regulating firearms, and I'm not saying that all of those regulations were necessarily unreasonable but some may have been a little heavy handed, but they focused on the technical aspects of the weapons, rather than the processes around buying and licensing of the firearms, and things that relate to that such as police vigilance and white privilege. It was largely reactive and focused on the wrong things.
6:20 - 6:35 I agree with what this National person said there. And he made a good point with out actually saying it explicitly, but we already have laws around harassment etc. that people can be prosecuted for, and if it includes hatred based on race or gender or sexual orientation, then the judge can take that into account when sentencing.
State authoritarianism where social issues are concerned should need to be explicitly evidenced and justified.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1