Comments by "AholeAtheist" (@AholeAtheist) on "1News"
channel.
-
29
-
20
-
18
-
17
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LOL. This is a social issue, nothing to do with left or right, left and right is economic spectrum.
But, now, if this was a left/right issue, so let's for your benefit call social libertarians "left", and social authoritarians the "right", how is this "we" being anything remotely left?.. We're still pretty well right if you look at the facts of what happened here.. This guy has been allowed to enter someone's residence and take someone's property and destroy it, without being prosecuted for any of it, because the items in question are allegedly illegal, even though that illegality is actually in contradiction to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 9.
This is only a discussion in the media about something. To that "we" as a society are getting too far libertarian because of a discussion is ridiculous, other than if you could find me a lefty in NZ far enough left that they consider the theft of personal property to be something that should be legal, which I don't think you could, and if you could, those people have no systemic power. Like, at all.
1
-
Again, the media is "left" in what way?.. Because it's more socially liberal?.. Again, that's not actually left, and even then, it only appears to be to people who are old and stuck in their ways, because the Overton window has shifted over the past few decades. It's not that the media is extremely socially liberal, either. It's just that human society is waking up out of a period in which our governments have been particularly authoritarian, the Nazis and Soviets aside. Some people seem too used to that old way. As you say, they "need to learn the harsh reality".. No, you need to learn the harsh reality, that that harsh reality is human rights abuse, and opinions like yours should be void because your opinion should be considered outside the Overton window permanently. Punishing people for smoking cannabis is just not logical. Just because a law currently is one way, doesn't actually mean that it should be that way.
BTW, all the media in New Zealand is corporate, so it actually has an inexplicably fiscally conservative, or right-wing, slant.. Even far-right, considering the likes of Mike Hosking and Paul Henry have been key media figures in New Zealand over the past decade.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrBrandomized Ok, racist. Let me clue you in on a few facts. There are very few Maori who are part of the economic "elite" in this country, for a start. Most Maori are rather poor on average relative to others. I'm pakeha and I support the movement to stop this government, so it's not just some bRaInWaShEd MaOrI that are supporting this movement, secondly. Thirdly, they're not handouts, they're reparations for past wrongdoings of the Crown that stole Maori land contrary to Te Tiriti, the deal that we pakeha made with Maori then reneged on, and are now trying to do again.
We are not brainwashed, sir. We are educated on the history of this country, and international law with regards to treaties made with indigenous populations. What ACT and National are doing is illegal with regard to international law, and they should probably all be locked up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1