General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Iver biggun
LegalEagle
comments

Comments by "Iver biggun" (@daveoc5770) on "LegalEagle" channel.

Because the results don't fit his left wing narrative after he gets them wrong
24
Kyle did eradicate 3 vigilantes, and no they shouldn't have been there armed and rioting
8
@PipBoykin well that's wrong, 2 were armed with a weapon of choices and the first guy was a threat to life.
7
He isn't a murderer as we are in the real world and it was self defence
6
@Ingu.z prove he went there with the intent to use his gun? We can prove that he never used until attacked by rioters giving him the right to defend his life
5
To be fair the kid walking around with a rifle wasn't the problem, the violent rioters were a problem. If you removed them from the scenario then none of this would have happened
5
You should always be prepared to defend yourself, but you can't premeditate an attack, just prepare for it
5
Without reasonable doubt it was self defence
5
So then you would have to die to not be convicted of murder in your fantasy world. You wouldn't be able to protect yourself, that sounds dumb and dangerous
5
Ak15 hahaha out of state hahahaha premeditated hahahaha
5
Not really but that never happened
5
He made all the effort by running away, it was them who gave chase, creating Kyle's right to defend himself. Rosenbaum and Ziminski must have had shoot able faces then 🤣🤣
5
That isn't true
5
Is that murder or self defense?
5
He isn't a murderer by definition
4
I know, especially when they were the attackers
4
Yeah, they wouldn't have taken him to court, the democrats would have brushed it under the carpet
4
@user-none-of-your-business666 haha so us a pistol an assault rifle now? 🤣🤣
4
Millions in the bank
4
@RenegadeVile it isn't vigilante even by definition. The kid was helping his community by cleaning graffiti and putting out fires, and then an armed violent mob of rioters tried to murder him but luckily he was able to protect himself from murder. This created his self defence which was all caught on video.
4
@Bru_Dog1 he dispatched people guilty of assault, them attacking him doesn't make them innocent, they are then guilty of assault, this is why Kyle was found innocent
4
@Bru_Dog1 what murderer?
4
@Bru_Dog1 correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the court trial a murder trial for which he was found "not guilty" by a jury. Therfore he wasn't found guilty of murder because it was self defence making him innocent of murder. Your opinion of the judge being "bias" is just that an opinion, I can easily say the judge wasn't bias making your claim defunct. You are innocent until proven guilty, so did the court find him guilty of murder?
4
@Bru_Dog1 the court didn't find him guilty of murder at all as it was self defence, he was found not guilty by a jury, as he has innocent until proven guilty then being found not guilty means he is innocent. For him to be guilty of murder then he would be classed as a murderer but he wasn't so therfore not a murderer by law and by definition
4
@spelix14 it's absolutely true, this was decided because of all the evidence, he was innocent until proven guilty and he was never proven guilty
4
@spelix14 but proven beyond reasonable doubt that it was self defence, a jury concluded that he wasnt guilty of the crimes he was charged with, therfore he is innocent as he hasn't been found guilty
4
So what was it before a Trump campaign song?
4
I cant believe you are still calling him a murderer, how indoctrinated are you
4
That isn't true though, I could say you're a groomer would you stand by that statement?
4
@OrangeHand it is when he is doing it from a false perspective
4
@OrangeHand yes it is
4
@wander9932 facts can be perspective, what this hack claims to be a "fact" could actually be false because he doesn't know the full case
4
@wander9932 this hack my think something is a fact and give his legal opinion on it but then it turns out its not a fact, can you not understand this? This hack does it all the time
4
You can also call him a defender or a hero then
4
You can when it's self defence, do you want to charge people for defending their lives?
4
@mystikmind2005 that's why none of the 3 shot can claim self defence, they went looking for trouble and found it with Kyle. Well then we are in agreement that Kyle had the right to self defence as he wasn't looking for trouble, trouble came and found him and forced him to defend himself. He was there for good that day which is clear while the rioters were there for trouble.
4
How about self defence hero or commie attackers ender. By the FBI definition it has to be 4 people or more so to call him a mass killer would also be incorrect
4
What made Kyle look bad at all?
4
Imagine being attacked by a violent mob and having to defend your life then bei g called a murderer, it's like a woman being raped and then called a whor
4
Who had an assault rifle? Gaige had an illegal weapon while Kyle had a legal firearm. Kyle was in the right
4
Here in Europe we have guns, what are you talking about? I go shooting all the time
4
It's not murder when it's self defence, and a jury found it to be self defence through evidence
4
But he isn't
3
@RenegadeVile yep, all is possible while carrying a rifle, people actually do a lot like farming with a rifle
3
Because to go against the far left view in any slight way is classed as "far right". Its a far left bullying tactic.
3
@tylerd1297 and the narrative that trumps party is anti-science, racist or anti-abortion was a false narrative created by the media in an act of division
3
@RamsayBolton13 who got away with murder?
3
@RamsayBolton13 obviously not, did you miss the court case where he was found not guilty of murder?
3
@OrangeHand spoken like a true indoctrinated cult member, well done
3
He isn't a murderer by definition, because it was self defence. Well he is welcome in Europe, we do t have the alt left problem that America has
3
Hahaha is this sarcasm?
3
Still waiting on you to answer the question?
3
@Zeroneii3 it's completely bias
3
By hitting him with a skateboard and threatening him? It's clear from the evidence they wanted to hurt him
3
Nope but he can call you a groomer to your face
3
@truephysx2356 it is for a civilian
3
@OrangeHand well he has been wrong so far, on many occasions.
3
@Major Tom he was defending himself and taking out a pedo is a hero in anyone's books apart from groomers
3
@uthinkiamhot yes the demonstrable fack that he defended himself
3
He is neither of them, that's the rhetoric as to why he is suing the media
3
They will probably high five him for being a boss
3
@Danielson1818 OK bot
3
You hate his attitude because of the person you are, there is nothing wrong with his attitude, it's your judgement that's bad. He wouldn't have been there is the rioters weren't there would he, if rioters were not destroying his community he wouldn't have felt that he needed to help his community, he had more right to be there helping that the rioters being there. Thats like saying "why are Ukraine standing up to Russia, if they just let them walk in and take over then there wouldn't be a war" think about it now
3
And they will lose
3
You mean far left nutjob 🤣
3
@somerandomdude4588 like the far left rioters?
3
@Handymancinema correct
3
Once you're black affirmative action has your back
3
Which 3 people did he murder?
3
It funny because 1 violent rioter got shot in the arm and he won the case for kyle
3
@josecipriano3048 wrong. Kyle lived with his father there and worked there. As stated in a previous comment, I can't blame your ignorance due to your indoctrination
3
@alejandrophoenix2287 again its still not murder if its self defence that's a fact
3
But all conclusions would have come to the same conclusion due to the evidence pointing towards self defence
2
We can also call him a hero
2
You need a special license for an ak in the US. Thankfully Kyle used his right to self defence and wiped out a woman beater and child abuser. You know there isn't a god right?
2
@tommyhetrick so you think that's ok
2
Do you think the president of the company you're reading the script for has to do all that..... Nope
2
But in this case B was chasing A so if A was shot by B while B was chasing A then it wouldn't be self defence
2
No one like Gaige to start with 🤣
2
@Ingu.z "I still don't think it was self defence, even though he was likely to get injured or even killed, haha well then that is self defence by your own admission. " rittenhouse put himself at risk knowing full well there might be an escalation" there was already escalation from the rioters the night before that's why rittenhouse was helping the community. "he didn't go there with a cardboard sign" yes like the majority of the rioters, Kyle wasn't there to riot he was there to help. "so not excusable self defence as far as I'm concerned" Well it's not your concern or your call it was the laws call and it found him not guilty of murder due to his act being in self defence, if the rioters hadn't attacked then Kyle would have been found guilty of murder but as they were the aggressors then he had every right to self defence. The law is the law when it comes to self defence, the attackers couldn't claim to be victims because they were the aggressors, it's very simple this is why Kyle is a free man
2
Who did he murder?
2
He will, there will be plenty of people who will employ him, because he was innocent
2
Who?
2
No it boiled down to the violent rioters attacking Kyle which was all caught on video because if you think it boils down to shooting first then you would know the violent rioters shot first
2
What racist ringtone?
2
Michael White proves your ignorance wrong
2
@kevinmorrice where did i state that? 🤣🤣 I'm addressing your racial argument thats disproven with another case
2
@fo3858 the owners of the property that the violent rioters destroyed
2
Like an hispanic defendant shouldn't be tried by an all black jury?
2
And with indoctrination like that, gives Kyle good grounds to sue the media
2
A lawyer representing Kyle Rittenhouse said that their team is gearing up to file "at least 10" defamation lawsuits against large companies and prominent individuals on behalf of Rittenhouse. Looks like they're getting their paperwork in order
2
@Bru_Dog1 he is innocent of murder, he only killed people attacking him, people with the intent to cause harm. He only dispatched violent rioters and never murdered anyone, yes he killed people but he had too for his own protection.
2
He had every right to be there helping the community he worked and lived in, the violent rioters on the other hand had no right to be there and no right to attack someone
2
Who did he murder?
2
Correct, Kyle need light spread on this to highlight the self defence
2
What about HERO KYLE?
2
And follow the correct procedure, he is right, the people who were shit were not victims
2
Who are these "known white supremacists" you speak of? He was never in violation of his bail when them guys wanted to meet a heto
2
@terrywebb3340 wow you're part of the tinfoil hat brigade
2
@tony_25or6to4 in all the footage we see burning of dumpsters, windows bring smashed and threats being made the 3 attackers were all part of this crowd The first guy (Rosenbaum) was threatening people and saying "shoot me nigga" then he was captured chasing Kyle through a parking lot then he went for Kyle forcing his hand to defend his life, then Kyle moved away from the area then Huber attacked him with a skateboard and then went for Kyle's gun this is an act of aggression nd forced Kyle yo defend himself again. Going for someone's weapon after they have defended their life is an act of aggression especially in hubers case because he attacked him with a weapon. The Gaige was disabled after he pointed his illegal weapon at Kyle, Kyle shot him when he was a threat not before. The only people shot that night were the ones who were a threat. For them to think they have the right to disarm someone fighting for their life against their mob is ridiculous. Huber could have walked away and not attacked Kyle and he would have been fine
2
@jaymiddleton1782 he never "committed murder" it was self defence so it doesn't even fit the definition of murder
2
@jaymiddleton1782 so all people who now defend themselves are classed as "vigilantes" in your world hahaha He fits neither definition of vigilante or murderer. He should have been there as he was doing good, the violent rioters shouldn't have been there by every definition in the book. Can you state 1 law where its legal to riot and attack people?
2
@johnsmith-de3tl you talking about proud boys the patriot people who live their country and come in all different races?
2
Who did he murder?
2
@roseanne1466 that isn't a "fact". He has pictures taken but it doesn't mean he is one
2
Just use it, the people who think it's terrible are the problem
2
@richards5855 oh wow that went right over your smooth brain didn't it, i suppose you don't think this hack cherry picks either 🤣🤣🤣🍒🤡
2
@havefaith4382 ok fascist what would you like me to change it to? Would you like your fascist symbol up there?
2
@havefaith4382 "yes" I love it when you Incels agree that you're fascist 🤣🤣🤣
2
@uthinkiamhot by his actions of self defence from the violent rioters attacking him, as explained earlier, he took out a child abuser, that's an automatic hero status in anyone's book unless they support child abuse
2
@uthinkiamhot Hero A person noted for feats of courage or nobility of purpose, especially one who has risked or sacrificed his or her life. His life was on the line when he was attacked by violent rioters, his courage kept him alive. And he took out a child abuser to top it off.
2
@uthinkiamhot it seems that you are seeing as it was used in the right context. This is your defense to divert from the fact that you defend the child abuser
2
@uthinkiamhot he shot a child abuser who was attacking him at a riot not a protest. Well he didn't just show up and shoot people, that would make him a murderer which he isn't, he showed up with his gun then shot in self defence, that can't be argued as its a fact. You can shoot someone in self defence then find out that person abused children and become a hero, its may be subjective but given who he shot automatically makes him a hero. I'm not judging you for your opinion but you believing you're right deserves judgment
2
@uthinkiamhot oh wow you're catching on, what he was called in court was "not guilty" so you calling him a murderer isn't even subjective, it's just outright untrue. But him being a hero is true.
2
@uthinkiamhot if his intent was to kill then how come he didn't just kill, why did it take him being attacked to then kill? He could have easily done it before they attacked him. Where as it did take courage to keep composure under imminent threat from violent rioters. See how mine actually happened but yours is just a fantasy. Deluted hahaha
2
@Major Tom "nartsee boy" hahaha OK fascist
2
@Major Tom "cleaned your clock" with a fantasy scenario hahaha where mine is factual
2
@uthinkiamhot Deluted.......... You wanna double check that?
2
@uthinkiamhot ahh you accuse me of that yet fabricated a scenario so you can call him a murderer and then fabricated a word hahaha. Hey wasn't it awesome that Kyle wasn't found guilty for manslaughter because of all the evidence
2
@uthinkiamhot now you have changed the word haha well in your delusion you think Kyle went out there to commit murder so you think he is a murderer. Your delusion was destroyed in court when through evidence it was proven that he acted in self defence. Who has delusions again? "Deluted" haha and you even tried to give an explanation 🤣🤣🤣🤡 Hey don't forget to get yourself checked out or some therapy
2
The actual reason someone died was because they thought it was a good idea to attack a law abiding citizen. If the violent rioters hadn't attacked then they wouldn't have forced someone to use self defence
2
Hopefully he sues everyone that classes him as a "murderer" because he isn't, he will start with the media, hopefully make his millions then doesn't care what peasants like you thinks, the billions know he used self defence
2
Fair 🤣🤣🤣
2
@jaymiddleton1782 you can't legally get away with murder when it's self defence because then the act isn't murder, it's self defence like in Kyle's case
2
Well thanks to all the evidence its no suprise he is a free man
2
That just makes you an incel
2
Nothing
2
Open carry law states otherwise, this is why you're not a lawyer. The rioters were wrong on all counts
2
The exploded in the barrel right into the attackers
2
He never though, everything you just said is misinformation
2
Black privilege
2
@inny74 we can say Kyle isn't a murderer because all the video evidence shows he never murdered anyone, we don't see OJ having this much evidence to back him up do we, so we can just chalk that down to black privilege
2
The rioters should have been there period. Kyle was invited, they weren't
2
@Exculpatory Shōgun they're so racist that they don't even research on black people using self defence
2
This isn't the place for education. That's clear from your rhetoric
2
That doesn't fit the definition of murder does it
2
Ooh now do BLK people
2
In my opinion you're a groomer
2
Michael White and Da Baby prove you're ignorant
2
@promethaus5116 he did go to a state with a gun the gun was already there, he can go yo any state he likes, that's called "freedom" it isn't illegal to cross state lines. He made the choice to pull the trigger because he was forced to defend his life, the rioters made the choice to attack someone with a gun, not a great choice. If the violent rioters had stayed home then Kyle wouldn't have gone out to help the community
2
No he never, you have to murder someone first
1
@marthahammond1561 and with that response we can see why Kyle wants to sue
1
@marthahammond1561 he isn't murderer, you must ha e missed the whole trial. He defended himself so therfore isn't a murderer
1
@marthahammond1561 clearly you didn't, murder would be premeditated, Kyle couldn't have predicted then violent rioters would attack just him
1
That's misinformation
1
@ZiggyAir that doesn't make it factual though
1
@ZiggyAir so you think the earth is flat?
1
@ZiggyAir that explains it
1
 @Xbox360mIRC that's very true
1
We he also using his right to self defence from a violent mob of rioters like Kyle?
1
Who is a murderer?
1
@Xhumed who is that?
1
@Xhumed well it seems to be a mystery at the moment because you haven't specified who
1
We can't keep him off the streets, he makes them safer
1
@cufflink44 the president doesn't "own" the script, the writer OWNS the script, the company then acquire the right to make the movie. Trump was the president, the commander in chief, the highest ranking position so he has access to everything. So basically "no" the president of the production company didn't jump through hoops like ypu did just like the president of the country doesn't have to jump through hoops
1
@cufflink44 (1) hahaha name 1 writer that is the president of a motion picture company. "sometimes" hahaha but ALL the time the president is the president. (2) yes he does but the president is the commander in chief and has access to all this information, he isn't just some low producer or actor that is being employed by another company to produce a written script, he is the PRESIDENT, in a monarchy the King isn't allowed access to Parliament unless invited, In the UK the Royal family have to be invited into the house of commons. Trump never stole any documents 🤣🤣 this is how manipulated you are, they already knew he had the documents, they still haven't released what was In the documents so you don't know what type of information was in them, plus he was the commander in chief so he had every right to take them, the question is the returning, SO THEY DID BELONG TO HIM. We can tell you hunch is an indoctrinated one as you don't know true facts. This is the "Russian collusion hoax" all over again and you're falli g for it like a muppet 🤣🤣🤣
1
@cufflink44 my knowledge of the film industry is clearly deeper than yours, but tell you what let's all sit back and watch this nothing Burger fade into the background like the Russian collusion hoax that you all fell for and all the other things you fell for for the last 7 years. IRS already stated that Trumps tax records are clear on his end, I can't believe you're still indoctrinated into believing this even after the official people said "he paid over the tax bracket". Tell me you're a cultist without telling me
1
@ShadowMoon878 says definition and the jury
1
It's not murder if its self defence, remember he did what he did to save his life
1
@jimmyanderson1011 anyone would have done what Kyle did to prevent your own death, that's we have a legal right to defend our lives
1
@jimmyanderson1011 Kyle was never grabbing the end of a barrel. We did see the attackers going for his weapon which in turn is an act of aggression, this forced Kyle to use self defence against the attackers because if they did get his gun they would have used it on him
1
@jimmyanderson1011 he will be telling his own chef that when he gets paid out
1
@jimmyanderson1011 they said the same about nick sandmann, look how that turned out haha
1
@jimmyanderson1011 he already has a net worth of $50k that's more than most Americans earn in a year
1
@jimmyanderson1011 he is 19 with 50k in the bank, not many 19 year old have that, let's not forget this could be a lot more if he wins his lawsuits
1
 @MalcolmLittle-pw9dz nice fail racist
1
Black people are also acquitted because of rightful self defence. White people are also in prison for rightful self defence
1
@MaggiesNight it took nick sandmann over a year before he saw anything
1
Who called you that? What low life would call someone that?
1
Michael White disproves your ignorance.
1
Oooh are we talking about biden and his 'disinformation' plan, he is a racist and a murderer and hates freedom of speech
1
Whats their audience?
1
So the true American dream is self defence, we should all strive for that
1
Hahaha how indoctrinated are you
1
Wow that's some misinformation
1
@Exculpatory Shōgun nailed it
1
He was already in the state, and he could have defended himself in any state
1
Not by definition, if I call you a groomer does that mean it's factual?
1
You mean the media made him a public figure to start with
1
@stargateMimhi what about an hispanic tried by an all white jury?
1
@stargateMimhi well Kyle is hispanic so you think his jury wasn't desirable, that's interesting, well atleast it makes the verdict better doesn't it
1
@stargateMimhi well you can't improve the verdict because the verdict was given, it couldn't have been any better. "he passes as white" wtf how racist are you that now you deny someone's history because of your own racist view, should native Americans also be judged on how native they look or a black person be judged oun how black they are, what about a person of mixed race do we then judge them on how white or black they are? Wtf is wrong with you racists! You're part of the problem, a young Payton Gendron in the making.
1
No that isn't murder haha It was self defence no matter how you look at it as he only fired when he was attacked and feared for his life, hence it being self defence
1
But they made the right decision
1
You're a white supremacist groomer who has crossed state lines. See how easy that is, now is everything I say true?
1
@jaymiddleton1782 hahaha so no word can be held by their definition hahahaha omg what a fool
1
@havefaith4382 so now the liberals back Trump and want the FBI disbanded, that's interesting
1
Has he? Any evidence to show me, I mean he did give up his salary
1
@brianmi40 he is billionaire, I'm sure he has enough savings in his account to live a comfortable lifestyle
1
@brianmi40 no he isn't but I hope he becomes a millionaire from suing the media for their portrayal of him, just like nick sandmann
1
@brianmi40 are you ignorant, this guy also thought Kyle would lose his right to self defence, talk about not knowing this guy is bias
1
@brianmi40 irrelevant, we have seen this play out before with Nick Sandmann. I don't need a law school to see the facts, we have history and this guys videos that have been wrong for that
1
@brianmi40 wow maximum ignorance engaged. We know from previous cases that Kyle stands a high chance of winning, this has played out before. We also know that this "lawyer" has a bias opinion as we can see from the evidence in his videos. If you think you're going to be a lawyer then you're in for a shock, you may as well start studying the art of cleaning sewerage pipes
1
@brianmi40 hahaha sure buddy, hey if we are lying then I'm a Barrister for the top legal company in the world 🤣🤣. Actually Kyle has a very good case, he has nick sandmanns lawyer taking control of it and even he stated that he has a case or he wouldn't have taken it on. So history tells us that this lawyer has won millions for another young man who experienced defamation from the media thinks that Kyle has a very good standing. Oh but please Mr make up you fantasy what you think because its absolutely hilarious that you think he doesn't when a top lawyer does. This lawyer has gotten a few cases wrong and removes the videos when they are wrong 🤣🤣🤣
1
Just think, if the violent rioters weren't there then none of this would have happened. The are the catalyst, if Kyle wasn't there the violent rioters would have attacked someone else
1
Is a solder who fought the Nazis a killer? If yes then you can call him one
1
@josecipriano3048 how can you get away with murder when you never murdered anyone?
1
No because it was the evidence that proved he wasn't guilty and not his race. The biggest problem is racists like you who make it about skin and not evidence
1
@d33j4ybf oh wow you think all colored people are "tokens" tell us you're racist without telling us
1
What symbol is that?
1
Who attacked oj?
1
@kakizakichannel funny because I can't find any source to say that happened with oj. Luckily Kyles case was different then because we have videos of his, thankfully he had the right to self defence because it saved his life from them violent rioters. Yeah its the Ukrainian army's badge, oh you think that of Ukrainians, you must be a Russia supporter then.
1
@kakizakichannel still part of the Ukrainian army, fighting for Ukraine. And its not just 1 that has a badge like this, there are a few other battalions.
1
@kakizakichannel yes it is
1
@kakizakichannel great I'm so happy you have given me your opinion, its about as stable as your OJ scenario
1
Source for that please or your opinion is projection
1
Rosenbaum was rightfully shot in the act of self defence, also it was a double one because he was a predator
1
He is actually hispanic but I understand what you're saying
1
Well that isn't factual is it
1
@TurfToken2222 he hasn't murdered anyone, the only people to die at his feet gave consent
1
@TurfToken2222 who did he murder? He can't just become a murderer, he has to murder someone first
1
They go for a briefing, and then leave after a couple of hours free men. Sometimes they might have a police escort, it depends on how many crazies are outside
1
@BrianFreemancomedy tax payers, I know he couldn't because of all the nutters who don't believe in the rule of law
1
Well legally he isn't a murderer and by definition he isn't a murderer. But we do know that Rosenbaum was an abuser of children and skateboard guy was an abuser of women. Great work on Kyle's behalf
1
Yes, he sued the View and has been awarded 22 million
1
Yet he can show the words are having consequences on his life, people said the same about nick sandmann, how did that work out?
1
Isn't it the democrats that state freedom of speech doest give you freedom of consequences? I mean how do they want it?
1
@earllsimmins9373 nothing, if you take a self-defense rifle with you and people attack you, what are you going to use to defend yourself against fascist attackers?
1
@earllsimmins9373 yet trouble hunted him out as the video evidence pointed out, he was just lucky he had a personal defence weapon on him and he stopped the fascists
1
@josecipriano3048 so you accept that yours is showing
1
So much misinformation you're spouting, this is the exact reason why he should sue the far left wing media
1
@martinwakefield8138 thank you for showing everyone your ignorance
1
Only the indoctrinated, everyone with a high IQ knows he is hispanic and a good lad
1
Well we can class the rioters as that
1
@halvarmc671 of course you're confused, you still haven't pointed out the white supremacist but that doesn't suprise me. Again he was never in violations when them guys wanted to meet him
1
If its the media or the president then yes
1
Correct he can. And that's why Kyle can
1
But the evidence in the video pointed towards that, they atta ked Kyle so they couldn't be called "victims"
1
@tony_25or6to4 yes they should as they were seen rioting and burning stuff. They tried to disarm a person who just used his right to self defend, that's not very clever is it. Also we have seen on video that they tried to disarm him with violence and threats and that isn't very clever is it, as then that forces someone to defend their life, Huber attacking him with his weapon of choice then going for his gun wasnt a wise move as it was a threat and offered Kyle the right to defend his life
1
@tony_25or6to4 no there is evidence that they were rioting and not protesting that's why they were called "rioters"
1
Never removed
1
@aces92E yeah you got totally owned here, run along with your tail between your legs
1
OK Karen
1
You can also say the earth is flat
1
Doesn't every race use the "OK" hand gesture?
1
@jaymiddleton1782 yeah maybe you should watch the case because it's clear you're ignorant towards fact
1
Because its self defence, here in Europe the same would happen if we saw someone being attacked by a violent mob and they defended themselves
1
@vaxx-1161 why didn't Hillary pay the price? Why didn't Obama when he left office?
1
@jayunito evidence points towards that
1
@jayunito of course, try google
1
@jayunito then you think it's a tyrannical government to let their party get away with it but investigate the opposition, interesting.
1
@jayunito yes, just like they investigated the Russian collusion and found it was fake but no one was held accountable for that, it seems as though its a 1 sided thing doesn't it?
1
@jayunito how do you live with yourself?
1
@davechongle who was a criminal?
1
@vaxx-1161 well isn't that suspicious, Hillary didn't even get raided. Obama started wars, that's what makes a good president in your eye, so you're a warmonger
1
How long did it take mick sandmann before he got paid out?
1
Not by definition or by legal outcome
1
They didn't make him the hero, the left wing media made him the hero with their lies. The gun wasn't the problem as you have a legal right to open carry in the state of Wisconsin. The gun wasn't the problem and saying it encouraged the behaviour of the rioters is a moot point because they had guns also. So why is it OK for them to have guns but good citizen like Kyle can't have them?
1
If you see the evidence he was fleeing from the start, that's why it was self defence from the beginning
1
Why?
1
@jaymiddleton1782 hahaha OK easy with your indoctrination. White supremacists thinks he doesn't, what do you think?
1
@jaymiddleton1782 what do you think? Of course you wouldn't know you're indoctrinated, that's the whole idea.
1
It dies if his actions don't fit the definition of murder. Plus it was self defence
1
Who?
1
Who is Kyle shittenhouse?
1
That's isn't true, there is plenty of employment for him, but if he wins his cases then let's face it he will never have to work a day in his life
1
The view has already paid rittenhouse. He is now a millionaire and rightfully so. Don't be talking about black people's problems when your information is coming from the news and not first gand experience. You're a typical white karen
1
Only if murder was committed
1
@havefaith4382 duh, you don't even know what a Liberal is 🤣🤣🤡
1
Where?
1
@joshridinger3407 yeah you got that one right but I'm still working out who you're referring to?
1
@Nortius Maximus you're absolutely correct
1
Long barrelled gun and open carry
1
It's authentic
1
@josecipriano3048 showing up to a meeting doesn't mean criminal intent if the gun is legal. But showing up to a riot with illegal weapons like the violent rioters did is illegal.
1
It would be a good investment for the people that believe in justice
1
@carroux4050 oh did you forget about "defund the police" they were told to stand down by the governor, they they did as instructed, the community had had enough and took a stand against the rioters, do you think Kyle was the only good samaritan there that night? Nope there were a few of them but Rosenbaum wanted to attack another kid like he had done before. Kyle never "seeked for trouble" they attacked him that's why it was classed as self defence, that's why it also wasn't vigilantism, plain and simple case of self defence. The capitol protest also had a fundamental flaw, and that was police presence, who's job was that?? Nancy palosi' job and she halved the work force that day, why?? What kid got an assault rifle, Why are you bringing assault rifles up? "why are they not sending troops in" well duh that would start ww3 and that would lose the US money, it's more profitable to supply them weapons rather than bodies you pay for.
1
@josecipriano3048 imagine anyone turning up to a peaceful protest like Jan 6th with a loaded semi. But then it's fine if it's legal like Kyle was. Oh you're one of them who thinks it's not his community even though he lived and worked there, I understand your ignorance, it seems to be common with the indoctrinated
1
You "think" this is a fact, to "know" you would have to back it up
1
Of course not, why did any president want them files? Why did Bush and Obama want them?
1
And? If its self defence do you think people should be charged?
1
@somerandomdude4588 and attack people
1
Like killer Kyle the famous sniper chris Kyle, that's a good person for rittenhouse to be associated with, both did something brave for their country
1
@briandunlap3243 his analysis was far from fair
1
@havefaith4382 aww look at you all hurt
1
Imagine if the violent rioters hadn't attacked him, he wouldn't have had the 15 minutes of fame
1
@OrangeHand that's strange because this guy got every "legal fact" wrong about Kyle rittenhouse and also about the "Russian collusion hoax"
1
That's because he was a good president
1
@OrangeHand yes, he was. The democrats have proven that and the numbers are also proving that
1
@richards5855 nobody has "weaseled" their way out of anything, it's called Lack of evidence. This is why they can't pin any of their fantasies on Trump
1
Haha you think black people are racist?
1
Hahaha good joke
1
@jaymiddleton1782 he never "enforced" a law, can you name 1 person he had arrested or enforced a law upon?
1
@jaymiddleton1782 no, what he did would be considered self defence in all first world countries because we all have self defence laws. Name 1 first world country where it is illegal to defend yourself?
1
@jaymiddleton1782 in all of Europe you're allowed to defend and preserve your own life if threatened, just like Kyle did. Now in Europe if you have a gun licence and someone attacks you while you're out with your gun then you're allowed to use it to defend your life, this is the same for Kyle as he was legally carrying the weapon. Now I'm still waiting for you to name a first world country where it is illegal to use self defence
1
@jaymiddleton1782 haha you're getting owned in every comment
1
Rittenhouse is a legend. He didn't want any fame, the violent rioters took it too him if you remember
1
So a black racist can help a white defendant?
1
Not by definition, not guilty of murder and used self defence, he is a dam hero
1
@blazeofglory6721 wrong, it isn't murder if it's self defence, have you ever looked up the definition
1
Whats a well known white power sign?
1
It's doubtful, they said the same about nick sandmann, look how that turned out
1
Most people are, he did it in self defence bolstering the right to defend yourself
1
@AmericanChoirboy like Gaige and Ziminski? They were rioters and both gad illegal weapons and both had their fingers on the trigger, it seems that Kyle having his defence weapon was right as it saved his life.
1
He is going to heaven, God is watching over him
1
@far2noble386 cells? What cells?
1
Yet eople with the right mind and sound judgement watches Tucker because its the closes truth you can get on American TV. The insane will follow cnns Don lemon or Brian steltsa
1
You don't have anything to worry about if you don't attack him forcing him to defend himself
1
@Handymancinema nope, more like a riot, as usual
1
Zero, do you have any evidence he did?
1
It's not murder if its self defence, clear case of self defence
1
@manueldelgado5336 well clearly not, if it was his intention to kill then he would have instigated it but it was the rioters who attacked him first forcing him to defend himself. So that in turn creates the act of self defence
1
@manueldelgado5336 so you're saying that he knew the rioters would attack only him in that night and not the other people with a gun? You're saying that he knew the violent rioter would chase him and try and take his weapon? That doesn't make any sense, because then you admit that it was self defence because it was only him that was attacked and he had every legal right to be there that night
1
The guy went out there looking to help a community, then violent rioters decided to attack him and he defended himself brilliantly, then suffered ptsd in the court room but made a full recovery. I fixed your comment for you
1
Hahaha omg you're still spewing misinformation, there has been a whole court case with all the evidence and you are still spewing out left wing nonsense 🤣🤣 how much of an indoctrinated cultist are you 🤣🤣
1
He was the good, he stopped the riots singlehandedly
1
Who did that?
1
One of the heroes
1
And the judge said "you did well son, thank you"
1
If he was then surely he would have let Rosenbaum be called a "victim". Is this why he was elected by democrats?
1
"invading an area" seems to be what the violent rioters did, Kyle is more like a Ukrainian defending his area from the violent rioters. So saying that the violent rioters are the Russians
1
Kyle had every right to be there doing a service for the community. Kyle had every legal right to open carry in the state of Wisconsin. Kyle could fire as many times as he liked if the act was saving his life which is what happened. He killed 2 people and maimed a 3rd in the act of self defence with a self defence weapon. The 2A does give you the right to protection, that's exactly what it's designed for
1
@starbase51shiptestingfacility he only shot rioters that were attacking him, that's factual. Them attacking him in an aggressive manner was enough for him to defend himself. The judge did everything by the book, the prosecution could have brought up that claim of yours so at the moment it's just a conspiracy. After seeing his actions and his composure it's clear that his gun management was very good under extreme pressure from violent rioters. He was attacked first, he didn't attack first
1
@starbase51shiptestingfacility the judge wouldn't have called a "mistrial" as it went to a jury so again that's just a guess, we know far a fact that it was concluded. The rioters tried to, that's why it was self defence. The judge didn't have to because he conducted the case and the courtroom to the book. Do you have any evidence to back up your claim that "they must have known him"?
1
@starbase51shiptestingfacility The only people shot were people that attacked him, not very good friends if they were attacking him were they. Is the one with disbelief on his face the first attacker that said he would kill him, the second one who attacked him and struck him with a skateboard or the 3rd that pointed his gun at him? Correct people were trying to stop him shooting but tried it by attacking him and threatening him which was the wrong move. If the rioters were in a different part of kenosha then how did a full mob come across rittenhouse? If the 2 parties were kept apart then how did the rioters end up in the spot Kyle was looking after? Your proof isn't proof it's an opinion, if they would have done that then Gaige would have been arrested and the first shooter would have been arrested. Now, you still need to provide proof because you haven't provided any yet
1
@starbase51shiptestingfacility well if the cops wouldn't allow the rioters to have guns than can you explain why 2 of them were concealing their weapons which is illegal in the state of Wisconsin? Fact: every shot that Kyle fired was at an attacker and an attacker only, each shot was targeted at someone putting his life at risk They let the others carry because they were within the law as they were open carding and I. The state of Wisconsin that's legal, so what you're saying is the right wing follow the gun laws while the neo left dont. Fact: rittenhouse killed 2 attackers and injured a third in the act of self defence Fact: the judge conducted the court in a professional manner and played everything by the book, if he didn't then he would have been called up by the bar and the case would have had a retrial but that never happened because his code of conduct was professional, fact. The prosecution could have any evidence they wanted as long as it followed the rule of court, fact They couldn't use hearsay testimonials because those are opinions and not facts, that's how a court works, facts
1
@starbase51shiptestingfacility fact: the judge was not bias, he conducted the court in the correct manner, by the book. Who knew who isn't evidence its hearsay, opinions if you will, that doesn't stand ground when evidence is the main factor. Correct rittenhouse could have stayed, but the rioters decided to attack so it was them who made everyone else worse off. So how were there rioters there with guns if the police wouldn't let them have them? Are you now saying that Gaige who had a concealed weapon which is illegal in that state wasn't on the rioters side?
1
@starbase51shiptestingfacility no what I stated is a fact, what you're stating is misinformation because you don't know why the information you thought was evidence wasn't allowed to be heard. So yours is neither facts or opinions, it's misinformation
1
@starbase51shiptestingfacility you haven't stated any facts, you have given your conspiracies and misinformation. Nothing you have stated is factual and its laughable because you haven't once backed up your conspiracies
1
@starbase51shiptestingfacility I can't fact check your comments because there are no facts to check, it's just misinformation and conspiracies. All you need to do is post the website where you got this information from
1
He had every right to be there and every right to defend himself
1
@mobabyhomeslice the young man was attacked and luckily had his weapon on him, he was forced to defend himself
1
@mobabyhomeslice that's not an opinion that's a fact, did you miss a whole court case defining that?
1
No, that isn't the definition of a murderer. His was self defence
1
@kimberelydavis379 I have looked it up. Law. the killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered in law. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson. None of which fits Kyle's scenario, what say you?
1
@kimberelydavis379 you're entitled to an opinion but not entitled to change the definition of a word to fit your own rhetoric. So therfore he never murdered anyone. You were not on the jury and if you were then you would have been out voted or kicked off because you let your opinion rule over facts.
1
Openly displaying arms in the state of Wisconsin is legal, the violent rioters are fascists if they don't want people to follow the law. Now what about the violent rioters who concealed their illegal firearms at a riot?
1
Whats a wp sign?
1
@dongquixote7138 you're absolutely correct
1
People also have the opinion that the earth is flat
1
@bwana-ma-coo-bah425 hahaha like an AG thinks she can take on Trump who is far richer than whoopie
1
It's a fictitious being that the left created to scare each other and create hate, just like the democrat did with black people
1
He doesn't
1
Who were the white supremacists?
1
@redobsidianobsidian they're not white supremacist haha they have all colours in their group, they're patriots
1
@redobsidianobsidian proud boys leader is Enrique Tarrio, a Cuban. So clearly you have your groups mixed up
1
@redobsidianobsidian anyone can sue anyone in the US over anything, the black churches haven't won any cases because they haven't got any evidence of white supremacy. They only have them burning blm signs which isn't racism its a political stance, anyone can burn one of their signs
1
@redobsidianobsidian I've already seen Trump denouncing White supremacy but never biden who spoke at a klansmans funeral. They have not been sued yet, The District of Columbia has filed a civil lawsuit seeking harsh financial penalties against proud boys but nothing has been won yet.
1
Kyle the legend, Kyle the paedo slayer, Kyle the great
1
Innocent until proven guilty, so therfore he is innocent
1
He never murdered anyone and he never had an assault rifle. Anything else you would like corrected?
1
He can't be 100% a murderer if his actions don't 100% fit the definition
1
@freepalestine4192 you said it
1
@freepalestine4192 ahh you're on of them who stands with Russia hey
1
@freepalestine4192 they are part of the Ukrainian army, so you don't support the whole of the Ukrainian army hey
1
Yeah well the video evidence clearly points out it was self defence, so how he acts has little affect on the video evidence
1
@josecipriano3048 it seems that you havent understood either comment. Try improving your reading comprehension.
1
Well if you have read American law then you would know for one its not illegal to cross a state line, also if you had concentrated on this case you would know that he worked in this state. Maybe you should read more laws
1