Comments by "Tiago D\x27Agostini" (@tiagodagostini) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

And any data scientist will tell you that correlation of 2 variables is not proof of implication. It is an evidence, but not proof. I am tired of pseudo scientists using the word PROOF when it is not adequate. A proof demands a mathematical demonstration that leaves no space for other option.
11
@mrleenudler But if you cannot transmit your message to the public without distorting it, then do not speak anything. It is part of the job to know how to explain it well. If you do know how to explain something well, you are not really proefficient into the subject as you think. I Never in my career used the word PROOF when explaining things to laymen, except when I meant really PROOF.
4