General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Christian Pulido
Sabine Hossenfelder
comments

Comments by "Christian Pulido" (@christianpulido8360) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

Previous
1
Next
...
All

@tatonemio6388 Einstein specified in the 1900s that gravity was not considered a force between masses or a force at all. Einstein claimed that gravity was the curvature of space and time without a force. Search: Newton's Law of gravity was wrong, claim Scientists
4
@jaymethodus3421 The standard Big Bang theory is based on the assumption that the universe is, on sufficiently large scales homogeneous and isotropic. This assumption under the grand sounding name of the cosmological principle. How did the Big bang that's based on assumptions arrive into existence? Did the Big bang just appear naturally out of nowhere like magic 🪄? How did the energy arrive into existence? The mathematical models are not 100% correct though they are subjected to several assumptions. Also it is difficult to represent real-world systems in terms of mathematical relationships. Data are often unavailable or inaccurate. Assumptions and estimates must be made at every step of the process.
4
OMG evolution is based on an assumption and not reality. Also how did the Big bang arrive into existence? "Did it just appear naturally out of nowhere like magic ✨? "The so-called scientists claim that they still don't know how Life began. Quantum mechanics is considered incomplete and its based on assumptions as well. Science experiments are models that are based upon assumptions with simplified calculations and left out data etc.
3
@markb3786 Well science is considered occult science that is based on assumptions and natural magic. Also many assumptions proposed in quantum physics resemble key concepts from ancient spiritual systems. Photons do not exist and they have never been observed in reality. And this video clearly specified that. The bible is the most accurate book in the world and the most read book and sold book with more than 5 billion copies sold worldwide. Search what is the most accurate book in the world ok?
2
@smeeself Search: what is the most accurate book in the world ok? Science experiments are models based on assumptions with simplified calculations and left out data. Theories use models in their experiments that are based on assumptions and not reality. "What you read about is not observed in reality."
2
@smeeself Well if that was the case the Bible wouldn't't be the most accurate book in the world. In your world you have things appearing naturally out of nowhere like magic ✨. And it's all based on assumptions and not reality. Science is occult science that's based on assumptions and natural magic. The question of how life began is one of the most profound in science, and although many theories that are based on assumptions exist, scientists still cannot agree on an answer. Scientists know that God created everything that we observe on earth . The modern theory of chemical evolution is based on the assumption that on a primitive earth a mixture of simple chemicals assembled into more complex molecular systems, from which, eventually came the first functioning cells. This describes magic that's based on assumptions and not reality. How did those chemicals arrive into existence? "Did they just appear naturally out of nowhere like 🪄🪄?" You believe in Satan's fables that were established in the so-called educational system by the Rockefellers.
2
@snowthemegaabsol6819 OMG you "copied and pasted" what you posted from a website that is taking the bible out of context. This website doesn't change the fact that the bible is the most accurate book in the world.
2
 @Annou7la Well God created nature and that's how the Bible is the most accurate book in the world.
1
@luckybag6814 What reality? The so-called scientists claim that we don't live on a perfect sphere they claim that we live on a Spheroid. So where can we witness that spinning Spheroid in reality? Where can we witness the ground curving as a Spheroid in reality?
1
@zacharyparis No, you wouldn't see different sides of the moon cause the moon is flat and it's considered plasma not a rock. Also the moon moves around in a circle just like the sun moves around in a circle around the earth.
1
@ronpapi9539 What videos and photos of earth's curvature? Where can we witness the earth curving as a 🏀 in reality? Also the so-called scientists claim that we don't live on a perfect sphere they claim that we live on a Spheroid. So where can we witness that spinning Spheroid in reality? NASA has photoshopped pictures of a perfect sphere but they claim that the earth is shaped like a Spheroid?
1
 @zacharyparis But that's all we can witness is a flat non-rotating Earth worldwide. We are not standing on a 🏀 or spheroid in reality.
1
@spakeface9752 The earth is flat with mountains and valleys and curvature is not observed in reality. Also the oceans, ponds, lakes, and rivers etc are level with no part higher than another. Please present the evidence of water curving as a sphere or Spheroid in reality ok? I'll wait ok?
1
 @spakeface9752 Earth is flat and we can witness a flat non-rotating Earth worldwide. It's clear that you have no idea about what you are talking about?
1
@zacharyparis Atmospheric disturbance, Geo engineering skies and optical limits of our eyesight are the reasons we cannot see across the ocean. Please present the evidence of water curving as a Spheroid in reality ok? I'll wait.
1
@MrCmon113 The earth is a flat plane with mountains and valleys. There is no evidence that we live on a spinning 🏀 or Spheroid in reality? Where can we witness the ground curving as a Spheroid in reality? Also the so-called scientists claim that we don't live on a perfect sphere they claim that we live on a Spheroid. So where is that spheroid located in reality? What you read about is not observed in reality?
1
@cyrnoz1803 Search: Newton's Law of gravity was wrong, claim scientists Also Einstein in the 1900s explained that gravity was not considered a force but the curvature of space and time. Unfortunately Newton's and Einstein's theories started fraying around the edges, which means uncertain, unknown, and not to be relied on.
1
@wilsont1010 Yes, I know about Gyrocompasses they are flat disks that match the flat earth..
1
Sextant clocks are flat discs that match a flat circle earth in reality. Sextant clocks don't match a perfect sphere and the so-called scientists claim that we don't live on a perfect sphere or 🏀. They claim that we live on a Spheroid. Also you wouldn't be able to determine the angle of a star, or ☀️ etc with a sextant if the sun or stars were really trillions and millions of miles away from the Earth in reality? The oceans, lakes, rivers, and ponds are level which means flat with no part higher than another.
1
@tatonemio6388 Well you wouldn't be able to measure the sun, or stars at an angle with a sextant clock if they were really trillions and millions of miles away from the earth in reality. Sextant clocks are flat discs that match the shape of a flat circle earth. Also the so-called scientists claim that we don't live on a spinning 🏀 they claim that we live on a spheroid. And a spheroid doesn't match a perfect sphere. Where can we witness the ground curving as a Spheroid in reality? Why do you believe in fables?
1
@Magnum-Farce In general relativity gravity is not a force between masses nor a force at all. Einstein proved Newton's Law of constant force wrong in the 1900s. The equivalence between floating and falling is what Einstein used to develop his theory. In general relativity, gravity is not a force between masses. Instead gravity is an effect of the warping of space and time in the presence of mass. Without force acting upon it, an object will move in a straight line. Search: Newton's Law of gravity was wrong, claim scientists
1
@Magnum-Farce Newton's equations have never been observed. Also Newton's Law of constant force has been declared wrong by Scientists. Where does general relativity specify that gravity is considered a constant force or a force at all? It's crystal clear that you have no idea what you are talking about?
1
@Magnum-Farce That's what I thought you cannot show me where General relativity specifies that gravity is considered a force. You are just making stuff up with no evidence to back up your claims.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Thank you for your opinions. Also can you present the evidence of general relativity specifying a constant force?
1
@Magnum-Farce Well gravity doesn't exist. And it's not considered a Force. Weight is not considered a force. I know that's the indoctrination that we are taught in the so-called educational system. Also the falling apple was based on assumptions and not reality. How did that invisible magical force arrive into existence? "Did it just appear naturally out of nowhere like magic 🪄?" Also, how are they using Newton's made up equations when his constant gravitational force has been declared wrong?
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Thank you for your opinions. But it's crystal clear that you don't understand basic English.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Well Einstein proved Newton's Law of constant force wrong in the 1900s. Also the so-called scientists declared Newton's Law of constant force wrong. Gravity is a myth and it has never been proven in reality.
1
@Magnum-Farce Hello?
1
@wilsont1010 Gravity doesn't exist and it's based on assumptions and not reality. Newton's Law of constant force has been declared wrong. Search: Newton's Law of gravity was wrong, claim Scientists
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Are you dumb? Newton's Law of gravity has been declared wrong. Einstein also specified that gravity was not considered a constant force or a force at all. Things fall because the air cannot hold them up. It's common "sense "
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Things fall because the air cannot hold them from falling. Newton's constant force has been declared wrong by Einstein and scientists.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Newton's constant force of gravity has been declared wrong by Einstein and scientists.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner You can use kinematic equations for constant acceleration etc.
1
@Magnum-Farce Static electricity has a stronger force. Also Einstein proved Newton's constant force of gravity between masses wrong in 1915. Scientists have declared Newton's theory of gravity wrong as well. It's very clear that you have no idea what you are talking about.
1
@Magnum-Farce Einstein specified that things fall in 4 dimension space as geodetic circles without a force. You know the objects that bends the fabric in space.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner No, it hasn't been corrected because Einstein specified in 1915 that gravity was not a force between masses or a force at all. So, please stop lying. Ok?
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Kinematic equations is what they use in reality. Also the Canvendish experiment was based on assumptions and Henry did not account for static electricity. Henry only used controls for temperature and air currents . Gravity doesn't exist in reality.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner No it doesn't act as a force so, stop lying. Also Newton's made up math doesn't work. They use Kinematic equations.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner That constant force of gravity has been declared wrong by Einstein and scientists. They use Kinematic equations but carry on with your indoctrination.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner You do know that Newton's so-called constant force of gravity cannot be measured right? Every experiment has different inconsistencies of the value G. Also you don't know more than Einstein about gravity.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Yes, it's been proven wrong.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Sure, kid.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Well you are just posting your own opinions with no evidence to back up your claims existing in reality. Newton's constant force of gravity was declared wrong by Scientists and Einstein.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Canvendish experiment did not use controls for static electricity. Also every other experiment of gravity doesn't have the same results but instead inconsistencies of a gravitational force. Static electricity is way stronger than gravity. Electro magnetism has a Force. Gravity only exists in your head.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner The Canvendish experiment did not use controls for static electricity. Every other experiment of gravity has had inconsistencies of a constant force. Where is your evidence of gravity existing as a force in reality? There are no experiments that prove the existence of gravity.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Equations are math models based on assumptions with simplified calculations and left out data. Do you not know this?
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Einstein and scientists proved Newton's constant force of gravity wrong. What part of this do you not understand?
1
@Cosmic-Spanner No, it doesn't work. They use Kinematic equations.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner Yes, theories use models that are based on assumptions with simplified calculations and left out data. That's why we don't observe what you read about in reality.
1
@Cosmic-Spanner why don't you search for it.
1

Previous
1
Next
...
All