General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Christian Pulido
Johnny Harris
comments

Comments by "Christian Pulido" (@christianpulido8360) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

@Alan-ez6ji From June 21st, the Sun moves around the Tropics in a spiral circle, widening every day, until it reaches its destiny on the Southern or outer Solstice. On December 21st
2
@Alan-ez6ji On December 21st, the Sun moves around the Tropic of Capricorn, and during the day it lights up the southern portion of Earth from the Artic Circle to some portion of the Antarctic ice. There is no "sunlight" beyond 80 degrees south, but unknown regions of ice . On the 23rd of December, the Sun commences his northward journey again, returning to his starting place, and thus completes his seasons.
2
You just posted nothing but the indoctrination that you were told. There are no working existing globe maps that match an existing oblate spheroid. All flat maps are based on a flat plane earth. 3D cannot make 2D.
2
Planet means "Wandering Star" and its scientifically impossible to be living on a Wandering Star.
1
@sparehead8911 Planet means wandering star.
1
@therealzilch What science? All Science experiments are models based on assumptions with simplified calculations and left out data.
1
@therealzilch Science experiments are models based on assumptions. Theories use models in their experiments and Scientists make assumptions about those models that they experiment with.
1
@therealzilch There is zero evidence of a globe earth. Also the Helicentric model has so many inaccuracies and it's based on a circle which is 2D. There is no evidence of the sun being in the center of the solar system 93 million miles away from earth. There is no evidence of sunlight traveling through an existing vacuum 93 million miles away from earth in reality.
1
@sparehead8911 You just posted your lie.
1
@penguin82875 You just post nothing but opinions with no evidence to support your claims existing in reality.
1
@penguin82875 It looks like you are crying little buddy.
1
@penguin82875 What facts little buddy?
1
@therealzilch Please present evidence of the sun being 109 times bigger than the earth with sunlight traveling through an existing vacuum 93 million miles away from earth in reality. I'll wait ok?
1
@therealzilch The sun is not at the center of the earth. The earth doesn't rotate in reality. The Helicentric is based on a flat plane circle. We cannot live on a planet which means a wandering star.
1
@therealzilch Yes, we can observe the sun everyday standing on a flat earth. We cannot observe the North star from the southern hemisphere because climate change has shifted the terrain in the southern hemisphere.
1
@Alan-ez6ji That's all you have is math models that are based assumptions. The earth is not 24,000 miles in circumference. Please present evidence of sunlight traveling through an existing vacuum 93 million miles away from earth in reality. I'll wait. Ok?
1
@Alan-ez6ji The stars rotate clockwise around the North Star. The earth doesn't rotate in reality. We cannot observe the North star from the southern hemisphere because climate change has shifted the terrain in the southern hemisphere. It's that simple little buddy.
1
 @Alan-ez6ji Why cant you see the light anymore when you go in the opposite direction?
1
 @sparehead8911 Except that there is no existing vacuum in reality.
1
All the ancient civilizations knew that the earth was flat and non-rotating. The first word map of the world was a flat disk map invented by the Babylonians. Anaximander also invented a flat disk world map.
1
@sparehead8911 There hasn't been 2000 years of proof that we live on a globe. In fact there is zero evidence that we live on an oblate spheroid in reality. Also we cannot live on a wandering star.
1
 @sparehead8911 Aster planetes meaning 'Wandering Star' . There is zero evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality. Also we cannot live on a Wandering Star.
1
 @sparehead8911 I don't care about your wikipedia source little buddy. Wikipedia is not a credible source and they tell you that as well.
1
@sparehead8911 The word planet comes from the ancient Greek (aster planetes), meaning 'Wandering Star'
1
@sparehead8911 I don't read Quora that based on peoples opinions.
1
@sparehead8911 All planets which are Wandering Stars are named after gods or goddesses.
1
@sparehead8911 Yes, it does. Stop being a troll.
1
@sparehead8911 No, you are wrong little buddy.
1
@therealzilch Thor is a falling angel proclaiming himself as a god. There are no scientists today that can build a pyramid and align it with the constellations, Sun, and moon.
1
@therealzilch We cannot live on a wandering star. There is also zero evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality.
1
@sparehead8911 Yes, because I posted what planet means little buddy. Also planets which are wandering stars are all named after gods or goddesses. Jupiter, Saturn, mercury etc.
1
@sparehead8911 planets are just wandering stars.
1
@therealzilch Scientists still don't know how those pyramids were built. They have made assumptions about how those pyramids were built but they claim that they still don't know. The Constellations are still aligned with the pyramids.
1
@therealzilch Well just look at the planets which are wandering stars they are all named after Roman and Greek gods which are falling angels.
1
@therealzilch Those pictures of the earth are all CGI. They are all perfect spheres. Satellites are attached to balloons.
1
@therealzilch But planets are wandering stars. The earth is considered a planet and it's scientifically impossible to be living on a Wandering Star. What part of this do you not understand?
1
@sparehead8911 Those are wandering stars that you are observing from a telescope. Planet means wandering star.
1
@sparehead8911 Thy are wandering stars little buddy. This was already clearly explained.
1
@sparehead8911 Well those are wandering stars and I posted the definition of planet.
1
@therealzilch They are just wandering stars. They clearly specify that planets are wandering stars.
1
@therealzilch Planets are all named after gods. Wake up little buddy.
1
@penguin82875 Do you believe you live on a wandering star? The Astra Planeta were the gods of wandering stars.
1
@sparehead8911 I have they are wandering stars.
1
@sparehead8911 troll.
1
@therealzilch It's not an ancient belief little buddy. You are just posting opinions with no evidence to support your claims.
1
@therealzilch Sundials are flat circles that are designed to read time by the sun. Sundials don't resemble an oblate spheroid. The Egyptians were using Sundials little buddy.
1
@therealzilch 'Planet' comes from the ancient Greek aster planetes meaning 'Wandering Star' and it has nothing to do with Greece .
1
@therealzilch Instead of posting opinions how about you present evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality.
1
@therealzilch Planet means wandering star. I don't care how much you cry about it.
1
@sparehead8911 We can observe a flat plane earth worldwide in reality. There is zero evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality. There is zero evidence of a physical curve existing in reality. We cannot live on a wandering star.
1
@sparehead8911 Troll.
1
@sparehead8911 We observe a flat plane earth with valleys and mountains worldwide in reality.
1
@Alan-ez6ji Sunsets don't prove that we live on a wandering star.
1
@Alan-ez6ji The sun doesn't go down any curve. The Sun disappears from your line of sight. Also there is no evidence of a physical curve existing in reality.
1
@Alan-ez6ji When the sun sets in the evening it appears larger due to an optical illusion. Atmospheric refraction lowers images of distant objects from the bottom up.
1
@randyschissler5791 Atmospheric refraction wikipedia
1
 @Alan-ez6ji Please present evidence of a physical curve existing in reality. Ok? We can only observe a flat plane with mountains and valleys worldwide wide in reality.
1
 @Alan-ez6ji Nature shows an observable flat Earth.
1
 @Alan-ez6ji History is not accurate.
1
 @Alan-ez6ji Peer- review in science the pains and problems
1
@Alan-ez6ji If everything that you mentioned proves that we live on a so-called globe. Then where is that globe observed in reality? We can definitely read about living on an oblate spheroid but in reality it is not observed.
1
 @Alan-ez6ji Read the paper that I sent you. The one that mentions Peer-review
1
@therealzilch The Egyptians divided day and night into 12 hours each summer and winter alike. .... The earliest known sundial was found in Egypt. It is an L-shaped "shadow clock" created during the time of the Egyptian Pharaoh Thutmose 111. The Egyptians did not account for a tilted imaginary axis because they knew that it did not exist in reality.
1
@therealzilch What do you mean it's too expensive to build a pyramid? The so-called scientists still don't know how those pyramids were built. They have made assumptions about how those pyramids were built but they still don't know how the ancient civilizations built those pyramids .
1
@therealzilch The Constellations are still aligned with the pyramids this very day. The constellations are still in the same place in the sky as they were thousands of years ago.
1
@therealzilch What do you mean that it is too expensive to build a pyramid? Scientists still don't know how those pyramids were built. They have made assumptions about how those pyramids were built but they still don't know how the ancient civilizations built those pyramids.
1
@penguin82875 You are just still posting lies .
1
@penguin82875 I'm not running away from nobody little buddy.
1
@penguin82875 You just posted nothing but lies again.
1
@penguin82875 I'm sorry little buddy but it's scientifically impossible to live on a wandering star.
1
@penguin82875 Please present evidence of a working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid. I'll wait ok?
1
@penguin82875 Aster planetes meaning 'Wandering Star' Little buddy. It's crystal clear that you have no idea what you are talking about.
1
@penguin82875 All wandering stars are named after gods or goddesses. Wake up little buddy.
1
@penguin82875 All flat maps are based on an observable flat Earth.
1
@penguin82875 planet comes from Aster planetes little buddy.
1
@penguin82875 Planet comes from Aster planetes which means wandering star.
1
@penguin82875 All flat maps are based on a flat earth. Please by all means try using that desk globe model for navigation and see how that works for you ok?
1
@penguin82875 There are no observations of any globe. And if there was we would have been able to observe curvature and that globe existing in reality.
1
@penguin82875 Pilots use flat maps and they make it to all destinations with no problems on a observable flat Earth. There is no flat map that matches an observable oblate spheroid in reality.
1
All flat maps are based on a flat earth little buddy. That desk globe is derived from 2D and it doesn't work for navigation in reality.n
1
@yazzamx6380 Pilots, Army, USGS use Azimuth maps for navigation in reality.
1
@yazzamx6380 Do you understand English? All maps are based on an observable flat Earth.
1
@yazzamx6380 Well I mentioned that Pilots, Army, USGS use Azimuth maps.
1
@yazzamx6380 Azimuth is based on true, magnetic, and grid. Also you cannot make flat maps with that desk globe that doesn't work for navigation in reality.
1
@yazzamx6380 Desk globes are made from a circle which is 2D. Look up how they make desk globes on YouTube.
1
@yazzamx6380 Desk globes are made from a circle.. Look it up on YouTube on how they make desk globes.
1
@yazzamx6380 Why do you globe believers always bring that patent up? That patent doesn't match what Gleason's map or Book specifies. That patent specifies that it is a time calculator and not a map. Alex Gleason's map specifies that it is the new standard map of the world. and time calculator. That patent specifies that Gleason's map is a projection of the globe. Gleason's map specifies that it is a projection of J.S. Christopher. Gleason's map specifies the seasons on a flat Earth.
1
@yazzamx6380 In geometry You cannot make a flat circle map from a sphere. Also You cannot make any flat map with that desk globe model that doesn't work for navigation. A sphere is made from a circle little buddy.
1
@yazzamx6380 All pilots make it to all of their destinations with no problems with those flat maps that are based on a flat earth.
1
@yazzamx6380 Try using that desk globe for navigation little buddy.
1
@yazzamx6380 Projection: The presentation of an image on a surface, especially a movie screen. Projection: The action of projecting a figure. Projection: The representation on a plane surface of any part of the surface of the earth or a celestial sphere. The process or technique of reproducing a spatial object upon a plane or curved surface or a line by projecting its points.
1
@sparehead8911 That London tunnel does prove curvature. Also the curvature is supposed to be worldwide and not in just one location.
1
@sparehead8911 70% of water is level which means flat. Water doesn't bend on an oblate spheroid. We can also observe a flat plane with mountains and valleys worldwide. So I'm not sure why you are lying?
1
@sparehead8911 GPS shows the roads that we travel on so why is it that we don't observe curvature every three miles while using GPS for navigation?
1
@yazzamx6380 Where did Gleason mention that his map is of the globe in his book? Gleason specified that his map is a circular map of the world and not of the globe. That patent specifies that Gleason's map is a time chart and not a map. Also that desk globe is made from a flat circle map it is then put in a machine which molds the disk into a hemispherical shape. That desk globe doesn't work for navigation. So it's impossible to make projections of flat maps.
1
@yazzamx6380 Gleason never mentioned that his map is of the globe in his book. Why are you lying? You cannot make flat maps from that distorted desk globe model that doesn't work for navigation. Try using that desk globe for navigation.
1
@yazzamx6380 That patent was rewritten. You do know that history is not accurate right? That patent doesn't match what Gleason's book or map specifies.
1
@yazzamx6380 How can you create a map from a distorted desk globe model that doesn't work for navigation? A sphere cannot exist without being derived from 2D.
1
@yazzamx6380 Yes, flat maps are accurate and they are based on an observable flat Earth.
1
@yazzamx6380 You can measure any distance from that desk globe right? Now try using that desk globe for navigation. You cannot because it doesn't work for navigation.
1
@yazzamx6380 GPS alone proves that Curvature doesn't exist in reality. GPS shows the roads that we drive on. From San Jose CA to LA there is no curvature observed while using GPS for navigation. From San Jose CA to Texas there is no curvature observed. If we lived on an oblate spheroid then we would have been able to observe curvature while using GPS for navigation.
1
@yazzamx6380 There is no working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid in reality.
1
@yazzamx6380 It's scientifically impossible to live on a planet which means wandering star. GPS alone proves that Curvature doesn't exist in reality.
1
@yazzamx6380 Peer-review in science the pains and problems
1
@yazzamx6380 Read the paper 📜 that I just sent you. The one that mentions Peer-review etc.
1
@yazzamx6380 I have already explained that patent so I'm not going to repeat myself over and over again. Also you cannot make a flat circle map from a sphere. You cannot make flat maps from that distorted desk globe map that doesn't work at all. What part of this do you not understand?
1
@yazzamx6380 When Gleason was alive he argued the fact that we did not live on a so-called globe. Do you even know who your government is?
1
@yazzamx6380 We observe a flat plane earth with mountains and valleys. All flat maps match an observable flat Earth in reality. Nobody uses desk globes for navigation because they do not work.
1
@yazzamx6380 Remember that all science experiments are models based on assumptions. Also you have to take your so-called science with a grain of salt.
1
@yazzamx6380 It's also scientifically impossible to live on a planet which means wandering star.
1
@yazzamx6380 First of all that patent specifies that Gleason's map is not a map But a time chart little buddy. That patent specifies that Gleason's map is a projection of the globe. Gleason's map specifies that it is a projection of J.S. Christopher and New standard map of the world. Gleason's map also specifies how the seasons work on a flat earth. That patent doesn't match Gleason's map or book.
1
@yazzamx6380 Please elaborate how that distorted desk globe model can make a flat circle map? Please elaborate how that desk globe was made without being derived from 2D? You have no argument here. Also you evaded all of my questions.
1
@yazzamx6380 That's why you have to take your so-called science with a grain of salt
1
@yazzamx6380 Please elaborate how you can live on a wandering star. Also try using that distorted desk globe for navigation and see how that works for you. Ok?
1
@yazzamx6380 No, you need to answer my questions First. Also the so-called scientists claim that all maps are distorted because they are projections of the globe. Now try using that desk globe for navigation. You cannot because it doesn't work.
1
@yazzamx6380 You are just posting your own opinions with no evidence to support your claims existing in reality. A sphere cannot make a circle. A sphere is made by a circle. It's called geometry.
1
@yazzamx6380 You don't have a working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid. So I'm not sure what you are talking about?
1
@yazzamx6380 All flat maps are scaled and based on an observable flat Earth . What flat Maps match an existing oblate spheroid in reality? Present the evidence? I'll wait.
1
@yazzamx6380 Gleason's map is accurate buddy. That's why pilots , Army, and USGS use Azimuth maps in reality.
1
@yazzamx6380 Why do you continue to talk about other maps that are not based on the so-called globe. Please by all means try using that desk globe for navigation and see how that works for you.
1
@yazzamx6380 Well you can measure any distance between two points from that desk globe right. Now try using it for navigation. You cannot because it doesn't work and it was Derived from 2D.
1
@yazzamx6380 There is no existing globe which is a wandering star. . OMG how does it prove that you live on a globe when there is no observable globe existing in reality. Also that desk globe doesn't work for navigation. Please make some sense when you talk to me ok?
1
@yazzamx6380 All you have to do is try using that desk globe for navigation so you can see that it doesn't work. Also there is no existing oblate spheroid in reality. It's also scientifically impossible to live on a wandering star.
1
@yazzamx6380 That distorted desk globe was already proven wrong. Also GPS shows the roads that we drive on so why is it that we don't observe curvature while using GPS for navigation? You have evaded all of my questions. Good bye little buddy.
1
@yazzamx6380 Now try using that desk globe for navigation between any two locations. You cannot because it doesn't work at all. So, I'm not sure what part of this you don't understand?
1
@yazzamx6380 Well that's not what Gleason:s book mentions. Gleason's map is accurate. Also you don't know how big Australia is because that desk globe doesn't work or exist in reality. How many troll accounts do you have? You think I don't know who you are? Why are you afraid of using that desk globe for navigation. It's accurate right? Then use it for navigation between those locations. So that's what really matters. Good bye.
1
@yazzamx6380 Well they claim that all flat maps are based on the so-called globe. But that's impossible because you cannot make flat maps from a distorted desk globe that was derived from 2D and doesn't work at all. They also claim that we live on a globe which is a wandering star. They also specify that the desk globe was made from a flat circle 2D map. So you have no argument here unless you can use that desk globe for navigation in reality between any two points.
1
@yazzamx6380 But they are using flat maps for navigation in Australia and not that desk globe. When you can present evidence of pilots or anybody using desk globes for navigation and also present evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality then you can claim that you live on an oblate spheroid which is a wandering star. You know what I'll make it easy for you please try using that desk globe for navigation between any two locations that you measure ok? You know you cannot and that's why you are wrong.
1
@yazzamx6380 Azimuth is based on circle and not a sphere little buddy.
1
@yazzamx6380 All flat maps are based on an observable flat Earth. It's scientifically impossible to make projection from a distorted desk globe model that doesn't work.
1
@yazzamx6380 It's funny how you always talk about maps when you don't even have a working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid in reality. Australia is not observed on an oblate spheroid. You also talk about measuring distances from that distorted desk globe model that was Derived from 2D and doesn't work for navigation. This is you I can measure any distance between two points from that desk globe and it matches reality. Then why cant you use it for navigation? So if you cannot use it for navigation then it's impossible to make flat maps from that desk globe.
1
@yazzamx6380 All Azimuth maps are based on a circle little buddy. The only distorted map is that desk that doesn't work at all.
1
@yazzamx6380 Now try using that desk globe for navigation in all of those locations that you mentioned. You cannot because that desk globe doesn't work. This is pure comedy gold. Thank you for the comedy.
1
@yazzamx6380 No, you are a the troll. Also there is no evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality. You have never observed an existing oblate spheroid in reality. And it's scientifically impossible to live on a wandering star.
1
@yazzamx6380 Australia is observed on a flat earth.
1
@yazzamx6380 There are no globe maps. That distorted desk globe cannot make flat maps because it doesn't work.
1
@yazzamx6380 Then why cant you use that desk globe for navigation if all flat maps are projections from that desk globe. Answer the question and stop running away from the question. Ok? So you see it's impossible to make flat maps from a distorted desk globe model that doesn't work. What part of this do you not understand?
1
@yazzamx6380 An arc of the horizon measured between a fixed point (such as true north) and the vertical circle passing through the center of an object usually in astronomy and navigation clockwise from the north point 360 degrees.
1
@yazzamx6380 You are changing the subject. If all flat maps are projections from that desk globe then why cant you use that desk globe for navigation? Also how can you make flat maps from a map that doesn't work? That literally makes no sense.
1
@yazzamx6380 How can flat maps be more detailed when they are projections from that desk globe that supposedly is not distorted? They did not change reality because it's too difficult to carry that desk globe model.
1
@yazzamx6380 No, that's a lie you cannot use that desk globe for navigation at all.
1
@yazzamx6380 Well they claim that we live on an oblate spheroid which is a wandering star. They claim that all flat maps are projections of the so-called globe. But you cannot use that desk globe for navigation in reality. So it's scientifically impossible to make projections from that desk globe that doesn't work.
1
@yazzamx6380 That desk globe model is made from a flat circle map. It is then placed in a machine which molds the disk into a hemispherical shape.
1
@yazzamx6380 The USGS doesn't use desk globe models that were derived from 2D for navigation. Please stop lying.
1
@yazzamx6380 Then why arent pilots using that desk globe for navigation? Please by all means try using that desk globe for navigation and see how that works for you.
1
@yazzamx6380 No, you cannot use that desk globe navigation. Also there is no evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality.
1
@yazzamx6380 The FAA handbooks specify that pilots fly straight and level little buddy.
1
@yazzamx6380 All navigation is based on a circle. Compasses, Radar, Gyrocompass, sextants etc.
1
@yazzamx6380 Even the Helicentric model that is inaccurate is based on a circle. They always show the observer on the circle of a sphere as well.
1
@yazzamx6380 Straight: extending or moving uniformly in one direction only: without a curve or bend. Properly positioned so as to be level, upright, or symmetrical.
1
@yazzamx6380 Any FFA hand book. Also I posted the definition of straight and level. You just posted your own opinion.
1
@yazzamx6380 See that's your problem you do not know how to do research. And you are not a critical thinker. We all have been told that we live on an oblate spheroid that doesn't exist in reality in the school system.
1
@yazzamx6380 I have posted what straight means.
1
@yazzamx6380 Straight with no curve or bend.
1
@yazzamx6380 When you tell somebody keep going straight that doesn't mean go in a circle. OMG you clearly make no "sense" at all.
1
@yazzamx6380 I posted what level means. Also they have different definitions of level.
1
@yazzamx6380 Well they tell us that we live on a globe which is a wandering star. Please elaborate on how you can live on a wandering star ⭐? Where is that physical globe observed in reality? You have never observed an existing oblate spheroid in reality. Also you have never observed an existing physical curve in reality. I don't know how many times I have asked you to present evidence of a working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid in reality.
1
@yazzamx6380 Straight: extending or moving uniformly in one direction only: without a curved or bend. So when pilots fly they are not flying imaginary great circle routes in reality. A circle is curved and not straight. Properly positioned so as to be level, upright, or symmetrical. Also Azimuth is based on a circle. A sphere is not a circle. What part of this do you not understand?
1
@yazzamx6380 An airplane rotates in bank, pitch, and yaw, while also moving horizontally, vertically, and laterally. The four fundamentals (straight -and-level flight, turns, climbs, and descents) etc. To master any subject, one should first master the fundamentals. For flying, this includes straight-and-level flight, turns, climbs, and descents. Consider the following: a takeoff is a combination of a ground roll, which may transition to a brief period of straight -and-level flight, and climb. After-departure includes the climb and turns toward the first navigation fix and is followed by straight and level flight. Heading and altitude straight and level.
1
@yazzamx6380 I posted what the FAA handbook specifies straight and level little buddy. The USGS doesn't support your claims because you cannot make a flat circle map from a sphere . Also all Azimuth maps are based on a circle.
1
@yazzamx6380 You cannot make flat maps from that distorted desk globe model that doesn't work for navigation.
1
@yazzamx6380 What Globe? And what books are you talking about that support that so-called globe. How can you live on a wandering star. Where is that globe observed. What about a physical curve existing in reality? Why doesn't GPS show Curvature on the roads we drive on? Answer these questions ❓❓
1
@yazzamx6380 How are maps projections from that so-called globe when you cannot use that desk globe for navigation. Also how can you flatten a desk globe into 2D when that distorted desk globe doesn't work for navigation? That literally makes no sense.
1
@yazzamx6380 All navigation is based on a circle. That's why navigation is shaped as a circle.
1
@yazzamx6380 No, the FAA handbook doesn't say the earth is a globe.
1
@yazzamx6380 Why are you lying?
1
@yazzamx6380 The north Pole is a red poke that was planted in the north.
1
@yazzamx6380 You just posted nothing but lies with no evidence to support your claims existing in reality. You did not answer any of my questions as well.
1
@yazzamx6380 What globe? When have you observed that globe in reality? How can you live on a wandering star?
1
@yazzamx6380 Look up how they make desk globes little buddy. That desk globe is made from a flat circle map. A sphere cannot exist without being derived from 2D.
1
@yazzamx6380 You cannot make flat maps from a distorted desk globe that doesn't work for navigation or work at all.
1
@yazzamx6380 But it doesn't mention anything about a globe. It shows a globe. They also show a flat circle.
1
@yazzamx6380 Weather and time zones are based on a flat earth.
1
@yazzamx6380 And it mentions theory which is based on assumptions.
1
@yazzamx6380 Airplane Flying Handbook Federal Aviation Administration chapter 3
1
@yazzamx6380 You cannot fly straight and level living on an oblate spheroid. Also you posted nothing but lies and you evaded all of my questions.
1
@yazzamx6380 Chapter 10 as well.
1
@yazzamx6380 What you are lying. It doesn't mention that.
1
@yazzamx6380 Where does it say that?
1
@yazzamx6380 Straight and level that's flat.
1
@yazzamx6380 Where does it mention flat, globe, or concave? Straight and level cannot work on an oblate spheroid little buddy.
1
@yazzamx6380 Where does it say the earth is a globe? And how did you read that handbook that fast when I just posted it?
1
@yazzamx6380 Pilots handbooks assume a flat earth little buddy. And straight and level doesn't work on an oblate spheroid.
1
@yazzamx6380 Where does it say that? Why cant you show me where it says that? All the pilot handbooks I have read assume a flat earth. You cannot fly straight and level living on an oblate spheroid. So why are you lying?
1
@yazzamx6380 Straight: extending or moving in one uniformly in one direction only: without a curve or bend. Properly positioned so as to be level, upright, or symmetrical.
1
@yazzamx6380 Well they do assume a flat earth. I would have to Read it again to find the chapter. You cannot fly straight and level living on an oblate spheroid. GPS shows the roads that we travel on so why is it that we don't observe curvature while using GPS for navigation.? Where does the FAA handbook mention Globe, concave , and flat earth? What Chapter does it mention that?
1
@yazzamx6380 Well space doesn't exist. Also satellites are attached to balloons.
1
@yazzamx6380 Why do you lie so much? I understand that English is not your first language as well.
1
@yazzamx6380 The entire time of the video he described a circle. Also he forgot to mention how the desk globe was made. A flat circle map is placed in a machine which molds the disk into a hemispherical shape. The hemisphere is united with its opposite counterpart to form a complete globe.
1
@yazzamx6380 Maps-Definitions, Types, Difference Between Globe and Map-Topper
1
@yazzamx6380 I just sent you a document that specifies the difference between maps and globes. The paper 📜 specifies that you cannot use the desk globe for navigation.
1
@yazzamx6380 Flight Dynamics summary manual
1
@yazzamx6380 Read the Flight Manuel that I just sent you. Good bye 👋
1
@yazzamx6380 The Earth is flat. I don't care about what that indoctrinated so-called pilot said. Also you cannot make projections from the desk globe that doesn't work. 3D cannot exist without being derived from 2D.
1
@yazzamx6380 You can use a map for navigating from one place to another. However, globes don't provide enough specific details to help you in navigation.
1
@yazzamx6380 Maps -Definitions, Types, Difference Between Globe and Map-Topper
1
@yazzamx6380 I just sent you the 📜 again that specifies that you cannot use the desk globe for navigation. The one that mentions Maps -Definitions, types, etc. Do not lie that you don't see it.
1
@yazzamx6380 They clearly specify how the desk globe is made from 2D and you continue with your ignorance.
1
@yazzamx6380 The Earth doesn't look flat. The earth is flat. Also your video forgot to mention how the desk globe was made. The entire time of the video was describing a circle.
1
@yazzamx6380 Well duh, all equations or math models are simplified calculations with left out data. They are all based on assumptions. Also you said that you have never read a flight manual that specifies an assumed flat earth.
1
@yazzamx6380 Take a geometry class so you can learn how 3D is derived from 2D.
1
@yazzamx6380 It mentions Flat Maps can show the whole earth or part of the earth. No, there is no globe and you cannot make flat maps from the desk globe that doesn't work.
1
@yazzamx6380 The paper also mentions the difference between globes and maps.
1
@yazzamx6380 I'm sorry little buddy but they specify how they make desk globes. They are made from a circle 2D map.
1
@yazzamx6380 You cannot make flat maps from a distorted desk globe that doesn't work. 3D cannot exist without being derived from 2D.
1
@yazzamx6380 It's made from 2D and you also lied what the paper 📜 mentions. You cannot make flat maps from the desk globe that doesn't work for navigation or work at all. I don't have time to have a conversation right now but I'm going to post what the paper mentions and what other papers specify about globes and flat Maps.
1
@yazzamx6380 A map is a representation or a drawing of the earth"s surface, or part of it, on a flat surface, according to a scale. It could be hand drawn or printed. It helps us identify the places and locations within an area helping us to navigate from one place to another.
1
@yazzamx6380 The globe represents the whole earth, whereas a map may represent the whole earth or just part of it. A globe can be used to get a broad- level picture of the world while maps provide more specific information about different places.
1
@yazzamx6380 You can use a map for navigation from one place to another. However, globes don't provide enough specific details to help you in navigation. If the paper was talking about a globe we would have been able to use it for navigation. Flat maps are based on 2D and they are used for navigation.
1
@yazzamx6380 I don't understand why you always lie. Also the desk globe is made from 2D . All the sources you look up specify that as well.
1
@yazzamx6380 Broad-level describe something in general terms, without going into too much detail.Giving or having no specific details.
1
@yazzamx6380 I don't care how much you cry and lie because you are not going to change the fact that you don't have a working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid in reality. Also I won't be responding to you anymore. Good bye 👋
1
FAA flight handbooks specify that pilots fly straight and level.
1
Pilots fly straight and level. Also we can observe the flat earth when traveling in an airplane looking out the window.
1
@sparehead8911 All the maps that pilots use are based on a flat earth. 3D doesn't make 2D in geometry. A sphere is made by a circle. That desk globe model doesn't work for navigation and it has longitude and latitude lines of circles because it's derived from circles which is 2D.
1
@sparehead8911 There are no commercial pilots that fly over Antarctica. They claim that it is too cold and there are no landing zones in Antarctica.
1
@sparehead8911 You have no idea what you are talking about?
1
@sparehead8911 They were not using a desk globe model to fly by Antarctica. Also pilots use aeronautical charts that are based on azimuth which use true, magnetic, and grid.
1
@penguin82875 Poor little buddy believes he lives on a wondering star.
1
@cardinalRG Straight and level doesn't mean flying in a great circle that's for sure little buddy. You have no idea what you are talking about.
1
@cardinalRG Science experiments are models that are based on assumptions little buddy.
1
@penguin82875 Thank you for your opinion.
1
@penguin82875 Running away from what? Your opinions?
1
@penguin82875 Where can I observe your reality?
1
@sparehead8911 What globe projection? That desk globe model doesn't work for navigation in reality. Also you cannot make 2D from 3D. Please elaborate how that desk globe model was made without being derived from 2D. 3D doesn't make 3D in geometry. 3D is derived from 2D in geometry and not the other way around.
1
@sparehead8911 There are no pilots that fly imaginary great circle routes.
1
@penguin82875 The Word ' planet' comes from ancient Greek (aster planetes) meaning 'Wandering Star'
1
@cardinalRG So when you tell somebody to go straight that means go in a great circle. Again you have no idea what you are talking about. You are just posting your own opinions with no evidence to support your claims existing in reality.
1
@cardinalRG Read any FAA handbook or would you like me to post it in this thread?
1
@sparehead8911 when did they start making 2D from 3D in geometry? Also how was 3D made without being derived from 2D? Please elaborate. I wait ok?
1
@sparehead8911 I have used a telescope those are wandering stars that's what planet means.
1
@sparehead8911 It doesn't just mean that. If you want I can post exactly what it mentions.
1
@sparehead8911 And they were not using any desk globe model between those locations that you mentioned.b
1
@sparehead8911 Yes, they are all based on a flat earth. There is no working map that matches an existing oblate spheroid in reality.
1
@cardinalRG GPS shows the roads that we travel on so why is it that we don't observe curvature every three miles while using GPS for navigation? Also it doesn't matter if you have a GPS set in 2D or 3D.
1
@cardinalRG More opinions.
1
You are just regurgitating the indoctrination that you were told? How are flat maps projections of that desk globe model? How does 3D make 2D? How was 3D made without being derived from 2D? That desk globe model doesn't work for navigation in reality.
1
@sparehead8911 There are no working globe maps that match an existing oblate spheroid in reality. All flat maps are based on a flat earth and they make it to all destinations with no problems. There is no evidence of a physical curve existing in reality as well.
1
@sparehead8911 But how was that desk globe model made without being derived from 2D. 3D doesn't make 3D in geometry.
1
@sparehead8911 3D cannot make 2D. A sphere cannot make a circle. They call it geometry. There is no working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid. Also you cannot live on a wandering star.
1
@Alan-ez6ji There is no existing working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid in reality. All flat maps are based on a flat plane earth. That desk globe model doesn't work for navigation.
1
@Alan-ez6ji What globe? You have never observed a so-called globe existing in reality little buddy.
1
@Alan-ez6ji What Globe? The first map of the world was a flat disk map invented by the Babylonians. Anaximander also invented the first disk map of the world. All the ancient civilizations knew that the earth was flat and non -rotating.
1
It's scientifically impossible to live on a wandering star.
1
@Alan-ez6ji Gyrocompass is a flat disk spinning wheel that senses the the rotation of the plane like roll and pitch etc.
1
@Alan-ez6ji Ocean currents and weather pattern have nothing to do with a so-called globe.
1
@Alan-ez6ji Pendulums are flat circles that don't resemble an oblate spheroid. Also they have Foucault Pendulums that are electrically propelled.
1
@Alan-ez6ji Sagnac effect was never proven in any experiment. If anything he proved that an Aether existed. Isaac Newton and Aristotle believed that Aether existed in theory.
1
@Alan-ez6ji The Coriolis force is fictitious.
1
@Alan-ez6ji Stellar parallax is based on math models that are based on assumptions.
1
@Alan-ez6ji The centrifugal force is fictitious and it's based on a circle.
1
@Alan-ez6ji Also I was born in the year of 1974 little buddy.
1
@max5250 I never mentioned anything about NASA publication etc. what I mentioned was the FAA flight handbooks.. Also the Centrifugal force is fictitious which means it's not real.
1
@sparehead8911 I used a telescope many times before and I used to believe that those stars were planets until I found out the truth. Wandering Stars don't look like the other stars little buddy.
1
@max5250 A bowling ball is curved . If we lived on an oblate spheroid we wouldn't be flying straight and level at some point the earth would curve. Scientists claim that we can only see three miles away due to the curvature of the earth. Pilots don't fly imaginary great circle routes in reality.
1
@max5250 Fictitious is not real . The earth doesn't rotate on an imaginary axis.
1
@max5250 Scientists claim that we can only see three miles away due to the curvature of the earth.
1
@max5250 A bowling ball is curved. So if we lived on an oblate spheroid we wouldn't be flying straight and level because at some point the earth would curve.
1
@max5250 Pilots don't fly imaginary great circle routes in reality.
1
@randyschissler5791 Straight extending or moving uniformly in one direction only, without a curve or bend. Property positioned so as to be level, upright, or symmetrical.
1
@randyschissler5791 Read the FAA flight handbook because it doesn't just mention altitude as being straight and level.
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 Stop lying little buddy.
1
@jeebus2313 Another Globe believer Liar.
1
@jeebus2313 Present evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality. Also Planet comes from Aster planetes meaning 'Wandering Star'.
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 Then present evidence of an oblate spheroid existing in reality.
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 What did I say that is untrue? Please elaborate ok?
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 How is it untrue?
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 Explain how everything that I mentioned is untrue?
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 You are just posting your own opinions with no evidence to support your claims existing in reality.
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 You are just posting your own opinions with no evidence to support your claims existing in reality.
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 How so? Why do you continue to lie?
1