Comments by "Itinerant Patriot" (@itinerantpatriot1196) on "Academy of Ideas" channel.

  1. 740
  2. 26
  3. 17
  4. 9
  5. 6
  6. 5
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. Nice advice, but life doesn't always deal you the hand that allows you pursue your dreams in that way. I remember seeing a show many years ago where they listed what they considered to be the worst jobs on Earth. The winner for worst job went to working in a sulfur pit. They spoke with a guy who worked in one (I think it was in Indonesia) and he looked to be about 70. Turns out he was 35. Life expectancy for people working there maxed out somewhere around 45. How much energy do you suppose he would have had to devote to higher pursuits? I'm sure if given a choice he would have preferred a job on Wall Street but he had a family to raise and that was where he was at. I'm not saying he should have just accepted his fate but they didn't go into his backstory so who knows what was really keeping him there. When I was raising a family I had other people depending on me so I did what I had to do. I always made the best of it and moved up as best I could. I was very goal driven. I had to have a goal. Pretty soon I became goal addicted. My first attempt at retirement was a complete disaster because of that addiction. I fought like hell to get back into the workforce and when I got where I wanted to be I came to the realization that it was an empty victory. I was right where I wanted to be, making more money than I had ever seen, and I hated every bit of it. Life isn't about what you achieve, it's about what you value. Who knows, maybe that guy in the sulfur pit had it right because when they asked him about his lot in life he said he was doing okay, better than some, worse than others. Goal setting is fine, admirable even, but watch out you don't become a slave to it. I did and I wasted a lot of time I can't get back. That's just my take on it though. Remember, life is 10% about what happens to you and 90% about how you respond to it. Just make sure you have your priorities straight. Sometimes you can want something so badly you will sacrifice just about anything to get it and when you get it you find out it really isn't all it's cracked up to be. Just sayin.
    2
  12. 2
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. I think societies breakdown when they trade liberty for security and comfort. The Roman Republic gave way to Empire. Most say the Empire at its height was the zenith of Roman civilization but really, the day the republic caved and allowed Caesar to become a dictator marked the end of that society. Virtue and an altruistic sense of civic responsibility are the markers of a healthy society. When those give way, it's only a matter of time before some form of tyranny sets in. For the west, it will be globalism delivered in the form of corporatism. The unholy alliance between commerce and government is already in place. I'm not talking some form of exploitation via Marxism, it's really more of a Randian dystopia taking root, the kind she detailed in Atlas Shrugged. We have shown the globalists we can be easily sacred and led pretty much any place they want to take us. To borrow from Bernadette Peters in the movie The Jerk, you can have the money, just don't take the stuff. Anyway, that's how I see it. By the next decade we will have digital currencies and social credit scores on a global scale. Civilizations don't collapse, they evolve. They move from freedom to slavery and back again. The American Experiment had a nice run. Franklin said we had a republic if we could keep it and for a time we did. But now more and more people are saying they don't want it. We are becoming atomized and isolated even as we become more interdependent. The great paradox of the digital age. All hail the experts, our new overlords. To be honest, I'm glad I'm on the back end of the journey because the future on this rock is coming to an end. Get right with your Creator while you still can. That's my advice.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. I don't think what is described here is restricted to the hollow man as he puts it. Circumstances change and people who once had a purpose-driven life can find themselves suddenly cast adrift due to forces beyond their control. Every time a fundamental shift has occurred, whether it was the Reformation or the Industrial Revolution, there has always been a segment of the population who get left behind. Those who can adapt prosper but I think it is unfair to characterize those who do not as hollow. And the notion that spending time alone is a good thing is also somewhat fallacious. It's okay to spend some time alone as it allows you to gather your thoughts and think things through but we are social beings who were never intended to live a life of solitude. Too often when you are alone you are in lousy company. The problem is, as we shifted from an agrarian-based society to an industrial-based one the generational family became less important. Then, as we moved from an industrial-based society to a services-driven culture the nuclear family became more atomized. Now, the age of information has reduced the importance of the family unit even further. Online communities are replacing physical ones and as people connect digitally they become more isolated physically. The reason these digital communities leave us empty is because, in our hearts, we know the digital world is one we created. That is what is truly hollow. Loneliness has become a problem for a great part of society. Young people who typically weren't as prone to it's negative effects are becoming more and more detached, unmoored from the connections that separate us from the beasts of the earth and the code of the machine. The best way to combat loneliness is to build a relationship with the only one who will be with you for better or worse and will never desert you: "Be still...and know that I am God." ― Psalm 46:40
    1
  23. "A tyrants power derives from the citizenry"? Where does that nonsense come from? Tyranny is by it's nature a condition where the will of the people is not a consideration. I tried to make it all the way through this video because past videos produced by this channel have made sense. This one is chock-full-of BS. This idea that decentralized power has been the norm throughout history is a load of crap. History is dominated and defined by periods of empire, not small city states singing kumbha as they battled back the Hun's. Believe me, I'm no fan of large overreaching government but that has been the end result as long as people have organized themselves into groups. Initially it was done for protection, then people figured out they liked power and dominating others so that became the driving force. The narrator says he's not pushing a utopia here but that's exactly what he's peddling. And this assertion that small city states and tribes have some sort of natural tendency to of band together to fight off a larger power trying to intrude upon them is ridiculous. Ask the Gaul's how that worked out for them against Rome, or the tribes of Asia against the Mongols. Want a more modern example? Ask the Czechs how things went for them in 1938. Like I say, I would love nothing more than for the world to operate the way this guy says it did in his imaginary past and I agree Federalism is the best hope for liberty in the United States but the truth of the matter is we are headed in the opposite direction. The world is more interconnected than at any time throughout the history of civilizations and guess what, tyrants love to grab the levers of power when the foundation is already set up for them. If you think we are somehow immune to that because we are more enlightened, I've got a nice piece of real estate to sell you just south of me. It's buried under 10 feet of water but that shouldn't be a problem, you can always get your neighbor's to help man the pump. I hate where we are going and while the solution being offered here is very appealing, it is as realistic as terraforming Mars and starting over on that planet. Dark days are on the horizon, I wish it wasn't so, but that's the world of the way things are and we better wake up to that and the nature of our true enemy pretty quick or there won't be anything left to save.
    1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. In the U.S. politics has become reality-TV. People don't want solutions, they want to be entertained. People don't want to unite, they want to be in one camp or the other. People don't want to honor God, they want to worship idols. Huxley is spot-on in that regard. I have often commented that while we were keeping any eye out for 1984 the powers-that-be slipped a Brave New World in on us. COVID was a test run. People not only submitted, they clamored for more rules, punishments for people who failed to conform. and have adjusted to a new reality where working from home is quickly becoming the norm in a lot of industries. This isolation makes it easier to control people, and that is what it is always about, power and control. I can see where Huxley's vision slides into Orwell's in an almost seamless manner. If you were to poll the entire country, "I just want to be left alone" would be the chart topper of any list of desirable circumstances it appeared on. When you just want to be left alone you are in a perfect position for just the opposite to befall you. When the-powers-that-be can convince you that everything, including basic truths like male and female are up for grabs you are already violating Alexander Solzhenitsyn's first tenant of resisting totalitarianism: “The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world.” Orwell may have tried to warn the people of Britain that a Stalin-like leader could emerge anywhere but he and his fellow-travelers were the useful idiots Lenin declared essential to the ultimate success of communism. Well-intentioned liberals lent their name and prestige to the movement and even ignored the cognitive dissonance necessary to accept the obvious contradictions of most leftist positions. Some did it out of naivete, others did it out of self-interest, but the genie is out of the bottle and there is no putting it back in now. We are now producing a generation that believes obvious false-hoods and values collectivism over individual freedom. The term democratic socialism is just another lie put forth by a group who lie so much they now fail to see the distinction between what is true and what is false. In other words, like all pathological liars, they buy their own bullshit. Men are becoming weaker and more passive, women are given higher positions in a hierarchy that is becoming more matriarchal every day. I'm not a chauvinist, but such a system is not sustainable. Call me names but men have an instinct to lead and protect. Those instincts are now called toxic. Men aren't looking for wives, women aren't looking for husbands, but children are looking for parents. When the traditional family doesn't provide them, the state will. And when the state does, you have given your children over to demonic forces. Something's gonna give at some point. The center can't hold because there isn't much of it left. People are choosing sides, and where that leads is always unpleasant. Get right with God. That's the best advice this old coot can give anyone.
    1
  32. 1
  33. 1