Youtube comments of Itinerant Patriot (@itinerantpatriot1196).
-
3200
-
1700
-
740
-
696
-
428
-
307
-
300
-
284
-
I was stationed at Hickam in the 1980s and the bullet holes from Dec 7th were still visible in many buildings. I spoke with two Pearl Harbor veterans who were acting as tour guides at the Arizona Memorial, one of them served on the Arizona and was on duty the morning of the attack. I asked them about this movie, specifically if it was an accurate depiction. They both agreed the movie was very accurate. It was an honor speaking with those gentlemen, both of whom I assume have long since joined their comrades in the place where soldiers, sailors, and airmen never age. I have always loved this film. I first saw it as a kid in the theater and was blown away.
Unfortunately, I must admit I also wasted my money and saw Pearl Harbor at the theater. A buddy talked me into going to see it with him. We both came out shaking our heads, wondering how anyone could make a chick-flick based on the attack on Pearl Harbor. Between that and all the inaccuracies we both agreed the time would have been better spent shooting pool at the sports bar. Anyway, cool review.
If anyone finds this comment, which I doubt will happen, I highly recommend a visit to the Arizona Memorial. There is no more solemn monument in the world. RIP guys, I'll be along directly and maybe we can share war stories, though I expect mine will shrink beyond sight compared to yours. Sleep well.
280
-
243
-
228
-
122
-
Communism fails because it works off the premise put forth by Rousseau that people don't have a fallen nature and therefore can be perfected. Starting with the French Revolution, a lot of people have died trying to prove Rousseau right and Locke wrong. I'm with the guy who said if he had a gun with two bullets and Rousseau, Lenin, and Stalin were standing in front of him he would shoot Rousseau twice. The Soviet Union failed for a lot of reasons, not the least being they lacked the resources and capital to make communism work. They went pretty much straight from feudalism into socialism, ignoring the capitalist phase Marx called for in his highly flawed historical dialectic.
That's the highbrow argument, the "it just wasn't tried correctly" crowd likes to point to. Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who lived the nightmare was more on point when he talked about the entire system being based on people's willingness to go along with a lie.
"It is not every day and not on every shoulder that violence brings down its heavy hand: It demands of us only a submission to lies, a daily participation in deceit—and this suffices as our fealty. And therein we find, neglected by us, the simplest, the most accessible key to our liberation: a personal nonparticipation in lies! Even if all is covered by lies, even if all is under their rule, let us resist in the smallest way: Let their rule hold not through me!" ― Live not by Lies. Or as he more succinctly put it: “The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world.”
Lies, like their father, only have power if we grant it to them. But lies, like their father, can do a great deal of damage when they dictate how we manage our affairs. What is a woman takes on much greater importance when viewed through that lens. But hey, don't worry. This is America, land of the free, home of the brave. They could never get away with that sort of nonsense on this side of the pond.
"There is this fallacious belief: 'It would not be the same here; here such things are impossible.' Alas, all the evil of the Twentieth Century is possible everywhere on Earth:" ― Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
Who's right; the academic who comes up with a bunch of theories in a classroom and the unelected bureaucrat who gets paid to put them into practice or the guy who witnessed first-hand what happens when we abandon God and trust the experts. You decide. But remember what John Adams said: "Facts, are stubborn things."
114
-
110
-
98
-
85
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
77
-
75
-
75
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
68
-
63
-
62
-
I was born in Canada. I migrated with my family to the U.S. in the 1960s and was raised in the American system. I became a U.S. citizen, served 20 + years in the military, you could say of my entire family I was always the flag-waving patriot. But I still have relatives living in Canada and I finished my military career embedded with a Canadian unit. I served with a mixed-bag, some good soldiers, some not-so-good soldiers, not much different from the U.S. I then worked as a civilian contractor training Canadian service-members for an additional three years, making my stint a seven-year run. I learned a lot about the culture and a couple things stand out.
First, the myth of government is always a force for good is deeply rooted in the national psyche. I brought up the draconian tax system with one of my co-workers, federal tax, provincial tax, municipal tax, provincial sales tax, federal sales tax, and he responded: "Yeah, but look at all we get." I asked him honestly: "What do you get?" The medical system is a mess. As I say, I lived as a civilian for three years near the country's largest city and I could not find a doctor. I was on several lists but once they hit a certain threshold they stop taking on patients. I asked: "what should I do if I get sick?" I was told to go to the E.R. or one of their walk-in clinics where you might find a nurse on hand if you were lucky. But people accepted it. I did turn my coworker onto Ayn Rand, Thomas Sowell, and a few others and he is now a militant in his home province of Quebec. So good for him. My one conservative apple seed.
That is the second point, the go-along-get-along-don't-make-waves nature of the populace, at least not in any meaningful way. Oh I heard a lot of bitching, but I saw little action. That sheepish nature is a direct byproduct of the first point. Nobody wants to upset the nanny government. I was bothered by the general look-down-our-nose at the racist American attitude that permeated the culture. Truthfully, I heard more racist and chauvinistic commentary during my time in Canada than anywhere else I was ever stationed, including the deepest heart of Dixie. Canadians do like to get on their high-moral-horse when it comes to their neighbors to the south. But they do love shopping here.
I told my fellow workers what they needed, a Canadian Ronald Reagan to come in change the mindset. But it's just not in em. Castro's kid gets away with the nonsense he pulls because he knows he can. Will there even be another election? What if he pulled a Nancy Reagan and just said no? There is no Canadian Bill of Rights similar to the one our heathen forefathers insisted on. See, as a rule, we have a tradition of not trusting government. We don't see it as a force for good. Unless and until that mindset changes, enjoy Hockey Night in Canada...for now anyway. My heart does bleed for my native land, but I'll never be back, not until there is a real change in rulers.
59
-
Most people focus on the Roman Empire and draw comparisons based on Rome post-Caesar. However, prior to that, Rome was a republic, and what we are experiencing now is more in-line with Rome circa 48 BC. The republic had degenerated into an oligarchy with a corrupt senate and a patrician class buying the support of the peasants in their regions. It's where the term patronage comes from. Caesar saw an opportunity to capitalize on the growing discontent of the populace and he promised them the sun and the moon if they would support him. He was taken out by senators who didn't want to lose their power and they couched his murder in terms of restoring the republic to its true roots. Sound familiar? Booth tried to make the same argument in 1865 and saw himself as an American Brutus.
Of course Caesar had influence that extended beyond the popular front and the call went out to restore order and consolidate the gains that had been made. And that meant getting rid of the Triumvirate that had caused all the division. A wise dictator, a leader in the mold of Plato's Philosopher King was what the doctor ordered, and who better to fill that role than Julius's favorite nephew, Augustus. Remember, Augustus was a very popular emperor. The people loved him and they loved that order had been restored, the mythical Pax Romana had been established. After that the die was cast. It took another 400 years but over time, as the quality of the emperor's continued to diminish new forces, forces that were Roman in name only, got tired of trying to join the club and decided to just take the place over. They didn't want the empire to die, they wanted to run the thing. That should ring a bell as well.
I say all of this because we have gotten in the habit of trying to explain deep issues in 10 minutes or less. Anything more than that and people aren't interested. They don't see history as anything more than stories about a past they have no connection with so if you don't give it to em fast and simple they have better things to do, like spend two hours watching Barbie or Mario Brothers at the air conditioned theater with the reclining seats and the seven dollar small container of soda. Our founders were influenced by the old Roman Republic. Cincinnati is named for the great Roman general who returned to his crops once the republic was saved. The man who became the role model for George Washington. Yet if you ask most American's about the Roman Republic they will say they have no idea there even was such a thing and claim our form of democracy was based on the Greek model. That's too bad, because the fall of the Roman Republic isn't the only example we can point at and say hey, that looks quite familiar. Check out the Hapsburg Empire sometime if you want to see what happens when you try to rule a bunch of people who want to keep their own cultural practices and way of life rather than assimilate with a bloated bureaucracy they don't understand and some culture they don't have any special allegiance to. History doesn't repeat as much as it rhymes. Or as the demon Azazel tells Denzel in the movie Fallen: "Take a look around sometimes Hobbs."
I get it, this post won't get a lot of attention, but you really should take the time to learn the whole story on your own. It's like fine tuning the monitor and getting rid of all the squiggly lines. Things become much clearer.
59
-
59
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
A few people have already noted the flaws in the way altruism is portrayed in this video. Having a desire to help other people does not stem from some form of self-hatred nor does it lead to it. That is possibly the most bizarre description I have ever heard and I gotta throw the BS flag. I don't think TIK is particularly religious but Christianity, Judaism, and Islam all require people to care for the less fortunate. That doesn't mean people of faith are by default self-loathing. The only religion I know that frowns on it are the Eastern faiths that believe in karma, that people are basically getting what they deserve for some past sin from a past life, and who are we to interfere with that?
Socialism is one of the least altruistic systems devised by man. People are left off the hook since it falls on the state to provide for the poor. That is the appeal and it's why modern-day cultural Marxists place such a high premium on victimhood. It's not that they have some intrinsic desire to help the less fortunate, it's all about will to power where the so-called marginalized groups have replaced the proletariat as the new grievance-centric base for popular support. If the hardcore lefties ever got the power they desire in the U.S. and other western nations they wouldn't give two damns about those marginalized groups. Hell, they would probably put them at the head of the list for the trains heading to the new camps.
I don't buy that argument at all that altruism is to blame for creating monsters. Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Castro and on down the line, the one thing they all have in common is a rejection of God and a desire for a secular world where man is not held to any transcendent morality. A world where they set the rules, norms, and customs based on their own twisted desires, where justice and equity are arbitrary concepts based on what Rousseau called the general will, what they would call, what I want them to be. That is the essence of the end of history, the day when nothing that came before matters. The only thing that matters is today and what matters is left up to them, not some cultural belief system rooted in thousands of years of tradition. It's just what I say goes. It really is that simple, a pure desire for the acquisition and application of power, nothing more, nothing less. That's what drove very single one of those bastards.
55
-
54
-
52
-
51
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
44
-
43
-
42
-
Thank you Matt. I have been saying for a while that people on the political right have been star-hungry since obama and globing on to people like Joe Rogan and Dave Portnoy simply because they hold one view that lines up with their own. You've got Fox News flattering Bill Maher for calling out woke culture even though he hates the conservative movement a whole lot more than he does censorship. Maher is not a moderate, will never be a moderate, and cozying up to him isn't going to change that, ever. I say the political right is star hungry because I don't think those left in the conservative movement, as few of us as there are, ever bought into Kanye's conversion. Wearing a MAGA hat and calling yourself a Christian doesn't change who you are. Sorry, but flattering Trump should not give someone a lifetime pass.
You are right about the left loving this. You know good and damned well they are busy making commercials for 2024 showing Trump with Kanye and Kanye with Alex Jones spewing out this lunacy. But Trump, who should know better, can't help himself. He won't distance himself from the guy and that's fine so long as he's not running for president. But since he is, he should act like it. But he won't, because that's not in his nature. Oh well. Such is life in the age of stupid.
39
-
Interesting. My best friends are Lebanese, at least that's how they would describe themselves. Their grandparents, who emigrated to the U.S. during the troubled times spelled out here never saw themselves as Lebanese. If anything, when asked, they would say they were Assyrian's. In reality, they were Chaldean's, a Christian sect who were being squeezed by all sides at that time. My friends were raised in the Roman Catholic tradition, same as me, but their grandparents saw themselves as aligned with, but not part of, the Vatican Papacy. And that was their real allegiance,. They saw themselves in cultural, not nationalistic terms and never felt a close bond to Lebanon as a nation-state. They would always simply refer to it as the old country and they said it with a tinge of sadness because none of the family ever returned.
The story of Lebanon is tragic. It's creation was not thought out properly and the idea that France would protect Christian minorities fell flat. One of the tragedies of drawing arbitrary lines based on old maps is that it has put Lebanon smack dab in the middle of hostile powers and as they go to war to with each other they tend to use the place as a highway. It suffers the same type of problems based on geography that Poland has traditionally endured. I think I would have like to have seen it as it was before WWI. From the stories I heard as a child it was a beautiful region with lots of tress and while there was tension, people mostly got along.
Sykes-Picot strikes again. A curse on that fowl agreement between gentlemen.
38
-
38
-
36
-
35
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
There is a large element of truth in the belief that if you tell any group of people they are screwed no matter what they do long enough it will be difficult to purge that mindset in a single generation. That's part of our problem, a collective external locus of control if you will. But our problems run much deeper than that.
Our forefathers believed they had a stake in the country and took their civic responsibilities seriously. That really changed starting in the 1960s. Young people were given far too much free reign, youth began to be celebrated, elder citizens began to be marginalized and the lessons they had to impart started to be ignored. Families not only shrunk, they became disconnected internally. What was once treasured became archaic, part of a past we didn't care about because it didn't belong to us.
But most of all, we decided we were the smartest kids on the block and didn't need some God we couldn't see telling us what to do. If it feels good do it, live and let live, morality is relative and comes from the culture, not some higher authority. We told God to take a hike and because He doesn't force Himself on anyone He said okay. He has never stopped loving us, that is our one saving grace, but we stopped loving Him and ourselves for that matter. Like George Harrison wrote many years ago, it's all "I Me Mine."
We fell victim to the curse of the double-H: Hedonism and Hubris. We became indifferent citizens who gave up our power, figuring somehow it would all work out if we let the experts take charge. We lost our way and along with it, our republic, which as our founding fathers knew, relied on an engaged, virtuous citizenry. We the people became a cliché, and a vacuum was created. Nature abhors a vacuum so a new order took root, one based on collusion between institutions that once had a natural anathema built into them. To borrow from George Orwell:
“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.” ― George Orwell: Animal Farm
We can take it back, but only when we stop seeing each other as enemies and start recognizing the nature of the threat, when we stop letting others think for us and go back to thinking for ourselves. That takes work though and hey, the playoffs start in an hour. While we were looking out for 1984 our overlords snuck a Brave New World in on us. Like I say, this can be fixed, but we have to want it more than our own personal comfort. The days of sunshine patriots has come to an end. A time for choosing is upon us. Choose wisely, you regain your liberty, choose the safe route, you get a nice soft tyranny to enjoy. But hey, why should that matter to me. It's not my kid they are trying trans...at least not yet.
A time for choosing indeed.
26
-
It boils down to shared cultural values and expectations and how those values and expectations are reinforced in the home. I come from a family where there wasn't a whole lot of importance put on education and guess what, very few of us, meaning my siblings and cousins, went on to earn a degree from a university. We were working class and there was an expectation that you would remain working class. It wasn't spoken, it was just sort of assumed. The high school I went to was predominantly black and the black students who worked to get good grades were mocked. Male students were mocked more than their female counterparts. A lot of them graduated because it was easier to pass them than to put up with their disruptive behavior and indifferent attitudes for another year. That's harsh I suppose, but it's what I saw first-hand.
That was fifty years ago and by the looks of things not much has changed. If you aren't supported at home and your peer group ridicules you there is a better than even chance that you will meet the expectations being set for you. But here's the thing, a degree no longer carries the weight and prestige it once did because standards for university programs have followed the cultural plum line and fallen off dramatically. I completed a graduate program not too long ago and I was shocked at where most of the younger students were at as far as basic reading comprehension, math skills, writing ability, and analytical skills were concerned. In my opinion their work was barely at the freshmen level for an undergraduate program yet the professors gave them passing grades anyway and I imagine most of them went on to earn that graduate degree. Why? They had the money to pay for it I guess. There is no way most of them would have survived the first graduate program I participated in years before, not based on the work I saw.
Anyway, that's a long-winded way of saying most people rise to the water level set for them. If you hang out in the shallow end of the pool, you never learn to swim or even tread water for that matter. And test scores don't always tell the whole story. I say that as someone who developed tests and evaluated testing programs. Some people can knock out a test but you wouldn't trust them to make sound decisions or exercise good judgement. Why? Because that is legacy-based skill set as well, but that's a discussion for another day.
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
The problem with Iranian thinking (granted THAT is a subject as large as the solar system, but I digress) is Israel is not full of devout Jews. As for Putin and Ukraine, the Turks and their beefs with the Greeks and the Armenians, or any number of regional disputes, they was foretold by Samuel Huntington more than 30 years ago and expanded on his book; The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order in 1996. He said the the old gripes that predated WWI hadn't gone away and now that the bi-polar alliance system was dead the feuds based on differences in culture, religion, and ethnicity, would start up again because there was no one to hold the crazies in check.
Of course he was slammed by the same globalist bunch who call themselves elites today. They meet every now and again at their demonic WEF pow-wows and that includes the Bush family who was especially furious with Huntington for his intentional play on words, turning George the First's new world order nonsense on its head. And let's be honest, anytime you piss the Bush family off you know you are on the right path. But we had been warned about the dangers of complacency and the nature of authoritarian government's before by people who had actually lived through it:
"There is this fallacious belief: 'It would not be the same here; here such things are impossible.' Alas, all the evil of the Twentieth Century is possible everywhere on Earth:" ― Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
Solzhenitsyn saw where the West was heading back in the 1970s and tried to warn us. The people currently living here who grew up in Soviet Bloc countries are astounded that people here are not only not concerned about the surveillance state, they invite it into their homes with little electronic devices they freely interact with, believing that Alexa just goes into some kind of a sleep mode when they aren't talking with her. People sign up for plans that allows the local electric company to control their thermostat for them. And no one seems curious about the government push to outlaw gas stoves and replace them with electric ranges, something they can control that much easier.
Digital currencies, bio-ID devices at the local clinic. Talk about mark of the beast stuff. Trust me, I am as far from a tin-foil hat guy as you will find. I'm more of an Occam's Razor guy than a conspiracy buff. But like the demon Azazel tells Denzel Washington's character in the movie Fallen: "Take a look around some time Hobbs." Sometimes, people or systems really are out to get you:
“The whole world was filled with wonder and followed the beast…they asked: “Who is like the beast? Who can wage war against it?’” ― Revelation 13: 4
25
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
I appreciate what the gentleman is getting at, but the problem runs a lot deeper than what he calls "Frenchism." It's not a left vs. right issue, and we were warned of the consequences a very long time ago:
“For although they knew God they did not accord him glory as God or give Him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened. While claiming to be wise, they became fools…Therefore, God handed them over to degrading passions. Their females exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the males likewise gave up natural relations with females and burned with lust for one another. Males did shameful things with males and thus received in their own persons the due penalty for their perversity. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God handed them over to their undiscerning mind to do what is improper.” ―Romans 1
“But understand this: there will be terrifying times in the last days. People will be self-centered…abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, irreligious…hating what is good…conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God…Reject them.” ― 2 Timothy: 3: 1-5
“For the time will come when people will not tolerate sound doctrine but, following their own desires and insatiable curiosity, will accumulate teachers and will stop listening to the truth and will be diverted to myths.” ― Timothy 4: 3-4
“But as for cowards, the unfaithful, the depraved, murderers, the unchaste, sorcerers, idol-worshipers, and deceivers of every sort, their lot is in the burning pool of fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” ― Revelation: 21:8
"Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. Woe to the world because of things that cause sin! Such things must come, but woe to the one through whom they come!’ ― Matthew 18
So much for david french's "Christian" arguments and positions. And what about those who try to claim toleration of sin is a Christian Imperative?
“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of Heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in Heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ ― Matthew 7:21-23
“I tell you, on the day of judgment people will render an account for every careless word they speak. By your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned.” ― Matthew 12: 36-37
A time for choosing. Choose wisely. I say this as someone who swam far too long in the Devil's lake. Redemption is possible, but only if you seek it.
23
-
Arbitrary abuse of power isn't restricted to civilian life. When I was in the military a buddy of mine applied for a job that required a top-secret security clearance. One night he showed up for work and was told he had to turn in his flight line badge and was being reassigned to a desk job. He asked why but nobody gave him a reason outside of just turn in your badge. Turns out one of the investigators doing the background check on him spoke with a neighbor of his who said my friend had wild parties where dope was smoked and worse. They yanked his security clearance for that and questioned everyone who spent off-duty time with him, including me. The weenie who interviewed me asked me if I had ever seen my friend smoke weed. I said no then the guy starts asking me how I could be so sure? How is it I know what weed smells like? I saw where this fishing expedition was going and told him I was finished answering his questions. He told me to sit my ass back down unless I wanted trouble. I told him I would sit my ass back down if he read me my rights and there was a witness in the room for the rest of the questioning. He grumbled something and I left.
My friend's clearance was held back for close to six months, until someone finally told him who had made the charge against him that was causing all the trouble. He explained to them that the guy was bonkers, certifiably off his rocker. He used to yell at the sky, argue with everyone who lived nearby, would wear a diaper on his head when the mood hit him, and would put up homemade signs along the road from time-to-time, protesting everything from his girlfriend to the police who he claimed were harassing him 24/7. It took a different investigator about half an hour to confirm my friends claim and since the crazy guy was the only one who had said anything negative about him his secret security clearance was reinstated and he was told they would move forward with his top-secret investigation since he was once again eligible for the job he had applied for. He told em to get bent and got out a couple months later.
Why they didn't tell him sooner about the charge against him is anybody's guess. Why they didn't bother to check out the background of the guy making the claim? Laziness I suppose. Why that jerk-weed tried to lean on me and why they kept my buddy in limbo for so long? Sheer arrogance. I don't go in much for absolutes but when you give small people too much power they will always abuse it. So why are they given that power? Connections, ability to BS the right person, institutional laziness, nepotism, pick your poison. That wasn't the only time I saw that particular investigative service run amok. Later, when I was training recruits fresh out of basic, I used to caution them to never let those guys get too friendly with them during any interview, whether they were the focus of the investigation or not.
People with zero accountability who don't give two damns about the downstream consequences of their actions and could care even less about how it affects people at an individual level are legion, in the public and private sectors. And they are responsible for the vast majority of misery the average Joe and Jane have to deal with. The thing is, you don't know who they are or how they do it. Welcome to transparency, 21st Century style.
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
Empires rise and fall and republics seem to have a shelf-life that varies based on how serious people are about being citizens. One thing that set America apart was most of the early settlers who came here for the long-term placed a great amount of importance on honoring God and living by a code based on Judeo-Christian principles. Even founders who weren't particularly devout like Franklin and Jefferson understood that those principles were a steadying force for good. After WWII this country began a slow but inexorable drift away from those values and here's the thing, if you tell God you don't want Him in your life, on a personal or civic level He says okay, your will be done. We aren't slaves. We allow ourselves to become enslaved either to immoral behavior or comfortable living. I've got mine is all the rage. I get it, not everyone will agree with my take on it and that's okay. But consider what St. Paul had to say on the matter two thousand years ago and look around and see how close he is to describing a day that an ends in Y in today's culture.
"For what can be known about God is evident to them, because God made it evident to them...although they knew God they did not accord Him glory as God or give Him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened. While claiming to be wise, they became fools...Therefore, God handed them over to degrading passions. Their females exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the males likewise gave up natural relations with females and burned with lust for one another. Males did shameful things with males and thus received in their own persons the due penalty for their perversity. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God handed them over to their undiscerning mind to do what is improper. They are filled with every form of wickedness, evil, greed, and malice; full of envy, murder, rivalry, treachery, and spite...They are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know the just decree of God that all who practice such things deserve death, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them." ― Romans 1: 19-32
Anyone can be redeemed, cultures can be restored, but we have to want it. A time for choosing. It's here and it's real.
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
“Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me. If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea…Such things must come, but woe to the person through whom they come! ― Matthew: 18
“But as for cowards, the unfaithful, the depraved, murderers, the unchaste, sorcerers, idol-worshipers, and deceivers of every sort, their lot is in the burning pool of fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” ― Revelation: 21:8
Let those who have ears listen.
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
This was a very refreshing video. I moved to a 55 + community a few years ago and during my time here I have learned a simple truth. In a lot of instances, if someone was a nasty piece of work when they were young, as they age, they just become an older nasty piece of work.
I can't speak for all generations but as I was coming up we had a certain reverence for old people. We saw them as the kind grandmotherly or wise grandfatherly type. So it was almost my default position when I moved in here. But I have seen more than my share of selfish, unruly, ill mannered behavior from enough of these people to adjust that position. I won't get into the specifics but trust me, just because somebody ages doesn't mean they necessarily mellow or age gracefully. There is no magic pixie dust that gets dropped on senior citizens when they hit 55, 65, or even 75 for that matter.
To say somebody poses no threat simply because of their age is a flat out lie. Richard Pryor put it best after he visited a prison. He said initially he wanted to get in touch with that side of the struggle, be down with the cause, that sort of thing. What did he say after his visit "Thank God we have penitentiary's!"
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
"If you don't stand for something you will fall for anything." I just Goggled it and it appears the all knowing search engine isn't sure who coined the phrase, but that is a keeper.
As for the attention mongers, ya gotta hang a big part of that on social media. The web has become the world's stage for anyone with a cellphone. The niece of a friend showed me the Tic Toc page of one of her coworkers who identifies as a fury. What is a fury you may ask? Someone who identifies as an animal and dresses accordingly. But all is not lost, at least according to her page her preferred pronouns are still human (she and they).
This young girl has more than 25,000 followers. How many of these fellow wingnuts are potentially dangerous? Hard to say. What happens to this misguided narcissist when being a fury becomes passé and the mob turns on her? We can chuckle I guess, but I imagine this kid, who looks to be maybe 16, will suffer real pain and a sense of betrayal. Why? Because her loving parents allowed her to dress like an animal and dance around provocatively for any number of people with bad intentions.
How long will all of this madness last?
“But of that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone. For as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.” ― Matthew 24: 36-37
It's coming. It's just a matter of when. And yes, we will all be held accountable for what we have done, and what he have failed to do.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
There were two Bobby's. There was the Bobby before his brother was killed. That Bobby was intense, but to the point of being insufferable because he saw the world in black and white terms and was convinced he was on the side of right. He was clannish to the point where he would punch people who said anything about his family, especially his father who he was always trying to please. He was ruthless as evidenced by the way he went after Castro and Hoffa, willing to break any rules because winning was all that mattered. And he was arrogant, a quality that earned him a lot of enemies not only with outfits like the mob but also within his own party. As Joe Kennedy put it; "Bobby is the most like me. When I hate a sonofabitch I hate him for life." People say he would have gotten the nomination in 68 after winning the California primary but I'm not so sure about that. Most of the people who mattered within the party didn't like him, especially LBJ who hated him, a guy Bobby hated back just as hard. Conventions were still dominated by backroom deals and the powers-that-be weren't just going to roll over and let him win the nomination because he was a Kennedy. They were convinced he would lose the entire South and enough Western states to cost them the election.
Then there was the Bobby after his brother was killed. Who admitted: "We were more energetic than wise about a lot of things, especially Cuba, and we paid a great price for it." He was convinced he was the one who got his brother killed, by making so many enemies. He even asked about Hoffa. He asked if he was doing alright. He said he was tired of chasing bad guys. There was a distinct change and that is where he differed from his brothers. Love him or hate him, Bobby was genuine, and he would admit when he was wrong and adjust accordingly. His brothers were incapable of changing at the molecular level like RFK did. I remember my Dad, who thought JFK was a rich-man's kid, was genuinely upset when Bobby died. Perhaps because he was the most Irish of the bunch. I will say this, he was light-years ahead of his degenerate little brother. That guy...but I digress.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
Left wing academics and politicians have been playing footsie with marxism since the 1920s when they let Stalin take them on his magical mystery tour of all the wonderful achievements happening under communism in the USSR. They were attracted to it because they saw people like themselves being in charge, not the dirty from-the-ground-up types who actually built things. obama was the natural end product of the long march through the institutions, but that's on us. We let our elections become reality TV and yes we can became yes we did and now we have reached a point where we aren't going to ever return to anything close to normal outside of Divine intervention. But how many people really prefer the show to the sacrifices that will be required to restore liberty?
"Imagine one of them is set free from his shackles and immediately made to stand up and bend his neck around, to take steps, to gaze up toward the fire...What do you think his reaction would be if someone informed him that everything he had formerly known was illusion and delusion...Would he, rather, believe that the shadows he formerly knew were more real than the objects now being shown to him?...Now, let’s say that he is forcibly dragged up the steep climb out of the cavern, and firmly held until finally he stands in the light of the sun. Don’t you think that he would be agitated and even begin to complain? Under that light, would his eyes not be nearly blinded, unable to discern any of those things that we ourselves call real?" ― Plato's Allegory of the Cave
And the beat goes on. Enjoy the show.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
The title is more than a bit misleading. The guy talked about the current problems within the CIA, at least as he sees them. What about the Rise and Fall? To begin with, the CIA was not created in response to Pearl Harbor. Harry Truman created it because he realized he needed a spy agency to rival the Soviets, who were always better at that sort of thing than the Americans, dating back to the days of the Czar. Truman didn't like secret police and he didn't want, in his words, "An American gestapo" so he disbanded the OSS. He wanted something sleeker, more professional, an agency that would report to the president, not some commanding military officer. His intent was for the outfit to be an intelligence gathering agency, but he figured out pretty quickly during the Korean War that you had to have human intelligence, not signal intelligence if you wanted to get things right.
So he hired Bedell Smith, Ike's former military assistant to run the thing because of the Allies success with covert ops in WWII. The problem was they ended up with an eclectic group of cowboy-types, outlaws, soldiers of fortune, and former special forces guys from WWII who were bored. They gave em a bunch of money and all they got for the most part was a lot of dead Korean's they dropped behind enemy lines. Then, when Ike became president, he hired Allen Dulles, the mediocre brother of his secretary of state to run the thing and he was a covert action guy, not an intel guy. That's how they rose. The Church Committee neutered them to protect the Kennedy's and their shenanigans in Cuba and other places and from that time forward they were handcuffed and driven to mediocrity. But their track record never was that hot to begin with. Guatemala and Iran were pushovers. Cuba and Vietnam proved to be much more formidable.
As for 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was the mastermind of that, not Bin Laden. Bin Laden provided the cash and helped recruit the evil crazies to carry it out but it was the brainchild of Khalid and his sick twisted nephew Ramsey Yusef. For 20 years Mohamed has been fed, clothed, and housed by the U.S. taxpayer. Timothy McVeigh went on trial in 1997 and was executed in 2001. Why is this POS who killed close to twenty times as many people still vertical? And what about Khobar Towers? People always seem to fail to mention that bombing which was clearly an Al Qaeda operation. Are we still worried about offending "Saudi sensibilities?"
10
-
10
-
10
-
I wasn't alive when Harry Truman was president but I admire a lot about him, his personal integrity, decisiveness, intuition, and his willingness to do what he thought was right even if he knew he would take grief from the press and people in his own party. Of course, his decisiveness was a bit of a double edge sword in that he didn't always think matters through that should have been pondered a bit more closely. He could also hold a grudge like few others and he did have a habit of surrounding himself with people who had no real qualifications and for placing them into positions they had business being in, Louis Johnson and Fred Vinson being classic examples. It was a habit of machine politics he picked up from his days with Tom Pendergast. He also had a bit of an authoritative streak in him but that was typical of New Deal politicians, a habit they picked up from FDR. But he read Stalin better than FDR did and the country dodged a major bullet when the democrat leaders selected him over Henry Wallace as VP. They knew FDR was dying and Wallace wouldn't have sold the farm to the Soviets, he would have just given it to them. Of all the democrat presidents Truman is by far my favorite, the only one in the 20th Century worth a damn.
As for Nixon's recollections, that was classic Nixon having selective memory. Nixon went hard after Truman in 1950 and 1952. It's to be expected, it's politics, but Nixon was an up and comer and he knew the best way to get ahead was to display a willingness to be an attack dog, especially when it came to communism. He was the one who exposed Alger Hiss and Dean Acheson, Truman's secretary of state was one Hiss's best friends, someone who wouldn't denounce him. That put a big bullseye on his back and by extension, Truman. Truman took it personal too. In 1960 Joe Kennedy called Truman in order to get him to endorse JFK. Truman didn't like Joe Kennedy and the feeling was mutual. Initially he was lukewarm about JFK and said as much publicly but after Acheson met with him Truman got on board. He said "Kennedy is young and inexperienced, but that SOB Nixon went around the country calling me a communist." Acheson appealed to Harry's grudge tendency to get him to back Kennedy and it worked. He didn't like any of them, but he liked Nixon the least. And Nixon wasn't too fond of Harry while Harry was alive. Like I say, this is typical Nixon revisionism. He was trying to get people to like him again after Watergate. He became quite gracious at that stage of his life.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
When I was a kid I spent grades 1-7 in a parochial school. I finished up in the public school system and I didn't get back to the seventh-grade level of learning in a parochial school until I reached 10th grade in the public school. That was almost 50 years ago. I doubt the system has gotten better with age. Is there an argument to be made that teachers are up against it because of apathetic parents and lousy administrators? Sure. But as Dr. Sowell points out, a lot of it falls back on how the teachers are prepared. David McCullough brought this point up in an interview he gave, where he said teachers need to be experts in what they are teaching first and foremost. He bemoaned the education degree and I concur 100%. I taught in military schools for a long time and during that time I learned how to develop curriculum. I thought about teaching after retiring from the service until I found out I would have to go back to school and take a bunch of courses in diversity, ethnic studies, and general education then I would have to spend a couple more years as a teachers assistant or some such nonsense. There was a program that allowed you to get fast tracked if you had the right credentials but then you had to agree to teach at a failing inner-city school. Sorry, I went to one of those and I wasn't going to spend my adult life reliving that nightmare, no matter how altruistic that may be. I survived people shooting at me in a series of military campaigns, I didn't want to press my luck.
So instead, I went to work designing courses for various commercial and government entities. I had a master's degree in instructional design and figured the other course designers would have similar qualifications. But guess what I found, a bunch of people with the dreaded degree in education, only this time at the masters level. A lot of folks who couldn't tell you how to develop a proper learning objective or how to measure teaching effectiveness let alone how it all fits in with in with an instructional delivery strategy. To them, course development consisted mainly of building out Power Point slides or, when it became all the rage, making stuff go whiz-bang on a computer screen. The problem I discovered, was systemic and it's not only a problem in K-12 learning, it has infected training programs across the spectrum. Eventually I retired for good because you can only beat your head against that wall for so long before discovering the only thing you got out of it was the good feeling when you stopped.
While I was in the business though, I often thought of the episode of the Simpsons where Homer tells Lisa: "Daddy's gonna be a teacher." Lisa asks: "Will you be teaching from a standardized lesson plan or will you be using a more Socratic method?" Homer replies: "Daddy's gonna be a teacher." Welcome to education in the 21st Century. Wanna fix it? Start by abolishing the Department of Education and then outlaw teacher unions. Until you do those first two steps, all the school voucher plans in the world won't mean a damn thing. Why? Because: "Daddy's gonna be a teacher, and when I am, as long as I do what they tell me and how they tell me I can never be fired."
7
-
7
-
I remember the Seattle Pilots for one reason. Joe Sparma, a starting pitcher for my team, the Detroit Tigers, carried a no-hitter against them into the ninth inning. He gave up a hit and that was the end of that but the game was carried by the local station and would have been the first no-hitter I had seen, on TV or anywhere. Joe was known for being wild and I don't recall how many walks he gave up but he came close.
Staying with the Detroit theme, who could forget the Detroit Wheels of the old WFL. They were bad even by WFL standards of the day. They were so bad the group of 32 owners gave up about midway through their one season in 1974 and the league took them over, charging each other franchise $60,000 to cover their expenses. They finally folded with six games remaining and held a draft for any team that wanted any of the players. I think maybe six guys got picked up by the other clubs. Interestingly, Mike Illitch, Little Caesar pizza magnate and future owner of the Red Wings and Tigers was part of the original Wheels ownership group, his first foray into professional sports. One thing, the Wheels made people feel a little bit better about the Lions. Not much, but a little.
6
-
6
-
When I was a kid I spent the first seven years of my education in a parochial school. Then I went into the public school system and was shocked when I was handed textbooks that looked like what I was issued in fourth grade. I didn't catch up to where I was when I left the Catholic school until I got to 10th grade, and by then, the school I attended passed you along if you simply had the guts to show up to that war zone. That was close to 50-years ago. Now people lament about not even having those p*ss-poor standards.
As for telling people they don't have to stick around, that happened in my neck of the woods too. Detroit elected its first black mayor, coleman young, and after that race hustler got elected he told all the white people who didn't like things like cross district bussing, high property taxes, and rising crime that if they didn't want to hang around they could all hit 8-Mile, the dividing line between the city and the suburbs. Guess what, when you let people know you know you don't want em around they tend to take you at your word. The neighborhoods fell apart within five years and the city never has recovered. It still has the highest percentage of people living in the surrounding suburbs than the hub city in the nation.
Detroit, a city that was #1 in the nation in wealth creation in 1950, one of the richest cities in the world, is now a cautionary tale. If you tell your earners to take a hike they will leave and when they do they take all the actual money with them. The government cheese only goes so far. Personally I hope Seattle goes to hell-in-handbasket because it is what they have said they wanted for decades. Be careful what you wish for Dorothy.
6
-
6
-
I remember coming across an article close to 20 years ago about two Canadian reporters who got a tip that a whole bunch of people who would normally not have a reason for meeting were having some sort of confab at a hotel in somewhere in Alberta (my memory has faded so I don't recall the city). Condoleezza Rice was there along with government reps from Canada and Mexico. They were joined by several Fortune 500 CEO's, various union leaders, ministers from China, Russia etc...just a hodgepodge of people who really only had one thing in common, they were all connected to power at the highest levels and it really covered just about every facet of what you would call day-to-day life. Anyway, the strange thing about this meeting was there was no prearranged press release, just a boatload of security around this hotel.
The long and short of it was, these jokers were meeting to discuss what North America would look like when the borders came down and how the international currency would be set up, along with which unions would run run which groups of workers and how the pie would get sliced up between state and private industry I'm sure. These reporters blew the whistle and there was a string of denials at the time but after that any mention of it became pretty tough to locate. The story just faded away.
This great reset or whatever they are calling it now has been in play for a long time. Make no mistake, it's coming. I said when inflation started going nuts that the reaction to the economic crash would make people long for the good old days of masks and vaccine mandates. Nothing happens by chance, not with these people. Be afraid, be very afraid because you know what, just cause you're paranoid doesn't mean folks aren't out to get ya.
6
-
6
-
I always get a kick out these nihilists claiming to be anti-fascist when they have no clue what the term means. That idiot from CNN, don lemon, even sarcastically told an actual adult that ANTIFA is a freedom loving organization because they are against fascism. "It's in their name," he exclaimed, while the guest just sort of looked at him and probably thought to himself, if you weren't a gay black guy you would be working the drive-thru some place. Stalin, like Lenin before him, liked to keep things simple because, like Lenin, he considered the proletariat to be too stupid to grasp ideological nuance. As much as I despise Stalin, he had a point there, but I digress.
Anyway, like Lenin did with his "bread, land, peace," campaign in 1918, Stalin decided it was a lot easier to define all his enemies as fascists and be done with it. When Truman challenged him about not honoring his commitment to allow democratic governments in Central Europe, Stalin's retort was that any government that wasn't fascist was democratic so he wasn't violating any of his agreements WRT to the socialist states popping up like dandelions in the nations the Red Army "liberated." And, like all good lefties do, the rest of commies across the world adopted the practice and there ya have it.
Give the commies credit, they are a persistent bunch and they do march in lock-step once something is decided. Of course China is leading the way in the 21st Century and there is no telling which way Xi will go in the next 10 years. He has stated a desire to redress past wrongs and he seems to be quite adept at buying American politicians. Time will tell what the next phase of authoritarianism will look like on a grand scale. Stay tuned.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
That was cool. There are so many channels dealing with the inevitability of a universe teaming with civilizations, it is refreshing to find one that simply admits the truth, we don't know. I grew up during the space race, a child of Apollo if you will. We had this stuff pounded into our heads as we watched Gemini and Apollo launches from our classrooms. Space was the final frontier and we were on our way to conquer it. I just took it for granted that by this time we would have a colony on Mars and flying cars and jetpacks would be the norm. I knew we were not alone. How could we be alone? With all those stars out there? I figured that was simply human arrogance and when I learned a bit about SETI and was introduced to the Drake Equation I thought, there ya go. ET will be phoning home soon, probably in my lifetime.
Then I started learning about just how precise the conditions have to be for intelligent life to develop. How our Moon is just the right size and distance away, how Jupiter is just big enough to act as our defender, how our magnetic field is strong enough to protect us from our host star. There is so much more but you get the point. The first time I was confronted with Fermi's Paradox I thought to myself, that's simple, we just aren't there yet, not quite ready to take that extraterrestrial collect call. But that answer didn't work. I had to face facts, we don't know.
I disagree with the concept of other universes existing without life. What would be their purpose? See, that's what we bring to the table, purpose. Someone once postulated that perhaps we are a byproduct of the universe trying to understand itself. I am a person of faith so I come at it from a different angle. But the point about how precious and special we are does remain. That was the one common theme all of the astronauts who went to the Moon shared. When they looked back and saw our tiny blue dot, floating along in a sea of empty space, they realized just how special a place it really is. We ride on a razors edge. Any number of calamities could befall us in the blink of an eye. That is all the more reason to appreciate and love one another because at the end of the day, we may be all we have.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
You can pin that on four people, Lyndon Johnson, Robert Kennedy, Allen Dulles, and J. Edgar Hoover, and to a lesser extent, Earl Warren. Johnson was convinced the Cubans had been directly involved. He got Warren to sit at the head of the commission because he said if the country wasn't convinced Oswald acted alone WWIII would break out. Robert Kennedy put Allen Dulles on the Warren Commission to make sure they didn't stick their noses into areas he didn't want them venturing into, areas that included assassination attempts on foreign leaders, specifically Castro, and other hijinks he was involved in at the behest of his brother. It's why he was in such a an all-consuming depression after the assassination, one he never recovered from. He was convinced one of their several covert plots had backfired. Later he said: "We were more energetic than wise about a lot of things, especially Cuba, and we paid a very high price for it." He also said: "I found out something I never knew, the world I lived in wasn't the real world." Allen Dulles knew all the secrets going back to the Eisenhower administration and made sure locations like Mexico City and New Orleans were simply given a cursory look. Those were secret hot-spots in the Kennedy's secret war and Dulles's job was to make sure they stayed that way. Warren didn't object when obvious leads were simply left unexplored. Hoover just wanted to protect the FBI. I think there was a lot more interaction between Oswald and the Bureau, especially after Marina got cozy with the White Russians in Dallas but Hoover and his bunch were much better at making sure trails went ice-cold than the CIA was.
Anyway, that's kind of a long response but there was no shadow group, no rogue CIA bunch who had the Commander and Chief whacked like Oliver Stone makes out in his propaganda film. He just hatted Johnson going back to the days of Vietnam and doesn't have much time for the rest of the country for that matter. Guys like him and Mark Lane were out making money and grinding axes. As Lee's brother Robert said: "You can't just simply ignore all the evidence against Lee and nobody has shown me any real evidence he didn't do it." He pins it on their crazy mother who is the root of all the conspiracy talk in the first place. I recommend Die By The Sword by Gus Russo. He comes down on the conspiracy side and while I disagree with his conclusions, he gives the best analysis of what the Kennedy's were up to from 1961-1963 and how their own reckless behavior cost them dearly.
5
-
5
-
Wanna read a good book about our future:
“But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power.” ― Timothy 3: 1-5
“Then I saw another beast come up out of the earth; it had two horns like a lamb’s but spoke like a dragon…It deceived the inhabitants of the earth with the signs it was allowed to perform in the sight of the first beast, telling them to make an image for the beast who had been wounded by the sword and revived…It forced all the people, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to be given a stamped image on their right hands or their foreheads so that no one could buy or sell except one who had the stamped image of the beast’s name or the number that stood for its name. Wisdom is needed here; one who understands can calculate the number of the beast, for it is a number that stands for a person. His number is six hundred and sixty-six.” ― Revelation 13:11-18
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Sorry dude, you lost me when you said: "it's conceivable that there would not only by humans living on the surface of Mars today but humans living in the Alpha-Centauri star system over four light-years away." You're talking about doing all of that in a 60-year timeframe, using nuclear power. Living in the Alpha-Centauri star system? I'm not a scientist and I don't play one on TV but beyond the 10,000 or so problems that we know about that would have to be overcome, from what I understand, it's estimated that it would take 6,000 years to get there using our current technology. I dunno man.
Look, I was a child of Apollo. I figured there would already be a colony on Mars by now. But the older I got the more I realized the futility of it. A dead rock? I can think of 100 reasons off the top of my admittedly limited brain why most people would say thanks but no thanks to that sales pitch. And if I understand basic physics correctly, traveling at ludicrous speed does a bit more than make people go plaid.
Like I say, I grew up bathed in this stuff and I still have the explorer spirit in me, but I think the main reason E.T. hasn't come calling is space travel is a real bitch and at the end of the day, as Dorothy said while tapping her feet together, there's no place like home. A 60 year timeframe to sort all that out AND set up a colony? As the great prophet Cris Carter used to say: "Come on man!"
4
-
4
-
I love stories about time travel, I have since I was a kid and some of my favorite movies center on time travel. I would love to go back in the past and change certain events, I think most everyone would, but alas, time is linear. You can skip ahead I suppose if you travel fast enough but moving in the other direction would create loops in the continuum and the universe seems to know that and will not allow it.
Let's say I travel back in time. My new self would have to stay on that path, but when the time came I would have to travel back again, and again, and again in order to make that happen. It's like the final scene in the movie Twelve Monkeys. Madeline Stowe looks at Bruce Willis as a child and smiles because she knows, even though Bruce is lying dead in front of her, that they are going have another kick at the can the next time they send him back.
I know, it sounds a bit off, but it's either that or you create an entirely new reality with each visit, which is even stranger. No, I'm afraid such conundrums are why time travel to the past is a universal no-no. Time is really a human construct anyway since we use it as a measuring device. When we leave this plane it loses its utility and ceases to be. But like I say, I still love a good time travel story.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I've seen this sort of thing with white students as well. The high school I attended basically found a way to move you onto the next grade and eventual graduation if you simply showed up more often than you skipped classes. I got a C in an American history course because even though I pretty much just showed up on test day my test average was something like 96%. The teacher had me stand up and asked the other students how it was possible a chronic truant like me could get it when the rest of them couldn't. My smart-ass side wanted to say it was because I was gone so much but I knew better and just kept my mouth shut.
Later, when I was a military instructor, we had a problem kid with a ton of disciplinary infractions and he failed the final test for the course. When he failed the re-test we were confident that would be the end of that young man's illustrious career. Not so fast. We also had to deal with the worst officer in the United States military. That isn't a title I throw around lightly. He was on record as saying he was the students best friend and short of committing some major felony no kid was going to start his career with a black eye from any of us.
But rules were rules and the rules said you fail the final and the re-test you fail the course and must be placed in another career field or administratively discharged. Well, not in the world this commander inhabited. He asked us how long it would take to come up with another test for little Johnny to take. We asked, okay, but what happens if we do that and he fails that one? We were then asked how long it would take to write a fourth test. We got the hint and left. We gave the kid his certificate, and sent him on his way but a memo went out to his gaining unit from my boss letting them know what to expect. Sure enough, the kid arrived at his duty station, at 4 A.M. so wasted out of his mind on ecstasy and God knows what else that the cops sent him straight to hospital. I won't say what ramifications that episode had but let's say that after spending five years in a training squadron because no one else wanted him that commander was moved out, where more than one sexual harassment complaint followed.
So it's not just black folks and it's not just universities who are engaging in the "friend" game. The thing is, maybe that beneficiary of the friendship program is working on the plane your getting on tomorrow. Just a thought. But hey, as we used to joke, if the minimum wasn't good enough it wouldn't be the minimum now would it? Live long and prosper gang. 🖖
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Nice bit at the beginning but highly doubtful. As you pointed out, Castro knew the plans for the Bay of Pigs invasion well in advance so I don't think there would have been a one-on-one encounter such as that. That being said, this is a fairly accurate retelling, but some points were left out. Khrushchev had talked about putting missiles in Cuba with his son Sergei as early as November of 1961. He talked about it with him as they walked along the beach near his Dachau on the Black Sea. He said it would serve the American's right since missiles in Turkey could reach them as they walked in less than 10 minutes. He didn't think Kennedy had the stones to stand up to him and once the missiles were in place he could demand concessions, not only over Turkey but Berlin as well. Kennedy had let the Wall go up and after he met him in Vienna in June of that year Khrushchev was convinced he was weak. Castro agreed to the missiles not so much out of any moral obligation. Bobby Kennedy was pushing the CIA to ramp up the Mongoose raids and he was leaning on them like a madman to get rid of Castro by the 1962 mid-term elections. The Kennedy's played a very dangerous game with Cuba after the Bay of Pigs. Bobby admitted as much himself after his brother was killed, saying they were more ambitious than wise about a lot of things, especially Cuba.
Anyway, John McCone, head of the CIA had been trying to warn the Kennedy's about missiles and Cuba for months but the Kennedy brothers were hell-bent on getting Castro and didn't want to hear it. The problem could have and should have been dealt with before those U2 overflights. Sergei tried to talk his father out of it, saying a missile doesn't look anything like a palm tree but the old man had set his mind to it. In the end, he felt he got what he wanted. The missiles in Turkey were taken out and he had the U.S. swearing off an invasion of Cuba on record. That didn't stop the Kennedy's though. Right away, Jack Kennedy was asking his legal and diplomatic advisers if he was bound to the deal since Castro wouldn't let the UN inspectors in. He still wanted the guy gone by the 64 presidential election. Johnson was convinced it cost him his life in November of the following year but that is another conversation. There was one Castro fanatic in Dallas paying close attention though and he would later buy a 6.5 mannlicher carcano from a mail order store in Chicago.
The bits about Castro's letter and Che's reaction are spot on. Khrushchev read that doomsday letter and decided Castro was off his rocker. He considered leaving a few of the missiles that were still hidden behind until he read that. Then he was like, oh hell no. And Che Guevara was a murderous thug who would have been more than willing to blow the entire planet to hell. I'm saddened when I see young people wearing tee-shirts with his image like he's some sort of hero. I spoke with some of the older Cuban's still living in Miami years ago and the stories they told me about their family businesses being stolen and their family members being tortured and killed on the orders of that psychopath are heart breaking. The SOB used to show up to personally witness the mass killings. Pardon my language but F**k Che Guevara. In the end he was betrayed by Castro and good on em. I'm pretty sure he had a hard time accounting for his actions when he departed this planet and I will not give him a RIP. Hundred's of millions of innocent people died to prove the ranting of Karl Marx wrong and unfortunately it has taken root with our younger generation. God help us.
Anyway, this was a good video. As you can see, it's a topic I have a bit of interest in. If you want to read a very good book on the background of the Bay of Pigs and the Kennedy's high stakes poker game against Castro, I recommend Die by the Sword by Gus Russo. He uses source documents and while he supports an overt conspiracy in the Kennedy assassination and I do not, it is a very good primer if you want to understand why the Missile Crisis happened and how it was resolved.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
As a child of Apollo and the days when the original Star Trek was shown on prime-time, I have been waiting for the aliens my entire life (actually, I'm still waiting on flying cars and jetpacks, but I digress). I realize the universe is a big place and the odds that we are alone in it are slim, but I don't think these radio radio waves are reruns of Amos and Andy from Vulcan. First, a civilization advanced enough to defeat the problems associated with faster than light travel is probably pretty well past the radio age. So, they were sent 1,000,000,000 years ago and are just now getting to us. The problem with that is, radio transmissions of such a low magnitude would be stretched pretty this by the time they traveled 1,000 light years. It's doubtful we would even notice them. These big blasts come from stars with the juice to produce huge bursts, not the kind Sirius XM transmits.
As for these flying saucers, why is it they spend so much time over corn fields in Iowa? Look, I'm not trying to be a Debbie Downer, but the complexities of traveling vast distances in space are such that even a super-duper smart bunch of folks would have trouble over coming them. I believe the grand designer set it up that way. Sorry gang, but don't look for ET to be phoning any time soon. I say this as someone who used to be pumped up about SETI and what they are doing. But once I learned the truth as far as the mechanics of the the thing is concerned, well, as John Adams said: "Facts are stubborn things."
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
People were enamored by the idea of obama. He was going to be the vehicle through which America once and for all could show everyone we weren't the racists the rest of the world claimed we were. But Dr. Sowell is right about community organizers. Community organizers are and always have been marxists, and marxists never unite, it runs contrary to the almighty creed of the dialectic. The thing is, he's still weakening the country, only now he really gets to put his foot on the pedal because his stooge is there to take the blame. As for how we got here, how gay marriage and the question what is a woman came into existence, that one is easy to answer:
“For although they knew God they did not accord him glory as God or give Him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened. While claiming to be wise, they became fools…Therefore, God handed them over to degrading passions. Their females exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the males likewise gave up natural relations with females and burned with lust for one another. Males did shameful things with males and thus received in their own persons the due penalty for their perversity. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God handed them over to their undiscerning mind to do what is improper.” ― Romans 1
When a culture turns its back on God and says: "We don't need you, we've got this," God's response eventually is: "Your will be done." It's not rocket science. The cure is available to all who seek it. He's always with us, He always has been, and He always will be.
3
-
3
-
We live in a post-truth society. Lies have become institutionalized, usually under the guise of compassion. We were told to lave people be since their delusion didn't involve us, until it did. Now, not only are we expected to play along, we face punishment if we don't. This didn't happen overnight. People have been softened up for this moment for a while now. The question: "What's a woman?" would be absurd only a few years ago. Now? Now, if you know what's good for you, you won't ask it all. You'll just accept that a man can strip next to a little girl or be called a bigot for trying to defend that girl. Lies are evil. The father of all lies is evil. People who lie aren't necessarily evil, but they play an evil game.
I still believe in the end the weight of all these lies will become too much and the contradictions they create will no longer be pacified by cognitive dissonance, a condition which can be sustained on an individual basis but cannot hold up at the group level for an extended period of time. Eventually, the little boy shows up who declares the emperor has no clothes and everyone realizes it's okay to admit the little boy is right. The problem is, not living the lie is the first step. Fixing the damage the lie has done is another thing entirely. It's going to be a big job, one we are not capable of handling on our own. In order to really deal with the problem you have to eliminate the source, and that is trickiest step of all.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I'm a child of Apollo. Those were rocking times. Just about every flight was a first for something and we were going up against the Soviets so we had that added element of competition. But then we stopped. The eggheads prevailed at NASA and the exploration people lost out. Nixon had no use for the space program and threw the manned-flight program a bone with the Shuttle but looking back at it honestly that program never really delivered on its promises. We were assured in the 60s that Mars was next and we would keep on trucking but it costs a lot of money to pull something like that off and between the war on poverty, the war in Vietnam, and the whole stagflation issue there just wasn't enough cash to go around.
Once you stop the momentum it's really hard to get that mojo back. I wish the program all the best, I really do, but I just don't see the public clamoring for it. The young people I have spoken with about space don't have the same fire we did. We stopped doing great things, maybe that has fed into the self-loathing kick we've been on for the past few decades. If there isn't public interest there won't be public dollars and as the man said in the movie The Right Stuff "No bucks, no Buck Rogers." Elon Musk has made some pretty pie in the sky promises about a Mars shot but when the rubber meets the road, and he finds out the government won't back his play, I think he'll question the need to spend his personal fortune. It's a shame, but it's who we've become. If we were going to go, we needed to keep moving in the 70s. We didn't. Going to the Moon is fun and all but spending all that cash just to fly around a place we've already been? Outside of checking off the equity boxes like this video pointed out, what's the point?
But that's me, and I loved the space program growing up. But as I say, we are not who we were then, not by a long shot. Kids these days would much rather be internet influencers than scientists and space explorer's. Our technology is grown up, but we haven't. Oh well, they promised us jetpacks and they bailed on that. I'm really not trying to be Debbie Downer, but don't expect this to amount to a whole lot. Wanna spend your money more wisely? Robots to mine asteroids. You don't have to feed em and nobody gives a damn what color or gender they are.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
"Just like Tatiana, swallow it they must." 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Quips like that are why I love ya Drinker! I just finished watching The Terminal List and it is a great show, a bit of a hybrid where The Fugitive meets Death Wish. It does start out a bit slow and at first I wasn't sure if it was overhyped, but by the time you get to the third episode...hang on tight. I was telling my buddy about it and he said it sounds like a lot of dying going on. I said yeah, but then I reminded him of that old line we used to say in Texas when it was still fashionable to do so: "Some shit just needs killin." Chris Pratt does a good job in the lead and I gotta say Constance Wu, who I had never heard of before this show, does a good job in her role as well. She's tough minded, but she doesn't go around acting like a guy. So if you haven't seen it, take it from the Drinker. The Terminal List is eight hours well spent.
On a side, I'm still waiting for you to review Outlaw Josee Wales and Crimson Tide Drinker. I know, they are a bit dated, but they are both right up your alley and I'd like to hear your thoughts on them. Maybe do a series on gangster movies as well. Lotsa good stuff out there waiting for your review. Just sayin.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I've always enjoyed hearing from people who were involved in historic events. I remember when I was a teenager, this old fella who worked in the same store I did, but in a different department, would tell me stories about his time in France during the great war as he called it (WWI). Later, when I served, I was fortunate enough to speak with gentlemen who were at Peral Harbor on Dec 7 (one who served on the Arizona), two men who suffered through the Bataan Death March, a Marine who landed at Peleliu, and an uncle by marriage who battled the Germans in the hedgerows and during the Battle of the Bulge. These guys lived it. There are only a handful of WWII vets left and then the Vietnam generation will fade. I encourage everyone to hear their stories if they want the straight dope so to speak. As for me, my campaigns were in Central America, The Balkans, and The Middle East but to date no one has asked me about any of it. I'm not one of those whose big on just telling war stories so I suppose they'll sit with me until I pass. I'm afraid we have lost much of the face-to-face tradition where storytelling is concerned. Everyone seems content getting it second hand. That saddens me.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I have a lot of problems with Dick Nixon, but the press absolutely went out of their way to get the guy. Then they gave themselves a major pat on the back and portrayed their role in the whole affair in exaggerated terms. It was a watershed moment because after that suck fest All The Presidents Men came out with Redford and Hoffman reporters started to make a concerted effort to insert themselves into the story instead of simply reporting facts. That movie was to journalism what the Godfather was to the mob. They tried to kick around future republican presidents like Reagan and Bush but they couldn't get them to jump into the tabloid septic tank with them, not the way Nixon did. Nixon liked jousting with them and just like he said in 62 after he lost the race for governor of California: "As I leave you now, just think how much you're going to be missing, you won't have Nixon to kick around anymore." Like Gollum in his woe is me recollection: "And we wept precious, oh how we wept." They needed a villain.
In comes Trump. Almost like he was sent over straight from central casting. They had their boogey man back, someone who was more than willing to jump into the mosh pit with em. Hell, most days he jumped in first and said: "Come on in boys, the water is just fine." And like Nixon warned em in 62, Gollum's lamentation fell on em hard in 2020, when Trump was replaced by a feeble old man who shook hands with people only he could see and his stoner VP who couldn't string three words together in a coherent fashion. It was a target rich environment but they were off-limits so the arrows had to be put back in the quiver. Ratings for networks, especially CNN, tanked when the Orange Man was gone. In their coal black hearts they wanted Trump to return. Or as Colonel Jessup put it it: "Deep down in places you don't talk about at party's, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall."
The question now is, who will replace Trump as the target after 2028? Musk? Vance if he's elected? Maybe, but those guys won't be half the villain Trump is. There won't be a suitable replacement for the show. So grab the popcorn and enjoy it while you can gang, because the celebrity's who pass for journalists these days are a lazy no-talent bunch and if they don't have anyone to aim their vitriol at they have nothing. Reality TV as politics. In the meantime there is a debt bomb just waiting to explode and plunge us into a national tailspin so wild we'll long for the good old days of masks and six-foot separation rules. But hey, where's the fun in reporting on that. Sleep well kiddos.
3
-
3
-
There was a lot of revisionist history written about Japan, the A-Bomb, the role of the Emperor, and the War in the Pacific as a whole after the fact. This was done to keep the Japanese on our side against the Soviets. Men like Hirohito, Yamamoto, and others, got their reputations boosted and a lot of past sins were forgiven.
On the American side, it became popular to say dropping the bomb was the hardest decision Truman ever made. Bullsh*t. Truman called it the greatest thing in history and said he slept like a baby after it was dropped. Oppenheimer went on some TV show years after the fact talking about how he spouted that line from the Hindu Book of the Dead, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds," when the first bomb went off but that must have been between fist-pumps and high-fives with Groves and the rest of the scientists. He was proud that they were able to pull it off. Later, he did try to get Truman not to create the H-Bomb. Truman heard him out, then told his aides he never wanted to that SOB again. There were scientists who wanted to hold off on dropping it, military leaders as well, including Ike, but like Truman said at the time: 'What in the hell did they think we built it for?"
The bomb was always going to be used. And yes, an invasion of the home islands would have resulted in millions of casualties on both sides. The bomb saved lives. That's the inconvenient truth. And based on the way the Japanese treated the Chinese, who can blame the guy for admitting he was happy when the bomb fell. Read the accounts of the rape of Nanking, the Bataan Death March, or conditions on the Hell Ships that carried POW's to Japan to act as slave labor and tell me they didn't reap what they sewed. Thank you Dr. Sowell for helping to set the record straight.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@jasonc0065 They were both social compacts but beyond that they didn't have much in common. The big difference was their view of the State of Nature. The State of Nature referred to human nature and what society would be like if people were left to their own devices. The Hobbesian view is that people are brutish and the State of Nature, a state where one exists outside of a strong government, is a state where might makes right and justice is found at the end of a gun so to speak. Locke agreed that the State of Nature is not desirable but rather than exchange freedom for security as Hobbs recommended, Locke called for the creation of a government responsive to the will of the governed. He believed people had a fallen nature but as long as their material and security needs were met they were capable of handling their own affairs. Locke saw the role of government as a more limited one, that it's primary goal was protecting the rights of the individual.
Rousseau believed people did not have a fallen nature and left to their own devices they would be fine, provided the corrupting influence of society was stripped away. Marx called that the Super Structure, the great lie used to control people. Rousseau claimed the general will should dictate the actions of government as opposed to individual rights and he essentially said government was justified using whatever means were at their disposal to enforce that will. If you look at left-wing governments and political movements they all link back to Rousseau and they all fail because of the misreading of human nature. We do have a fallen nature and the myth of the noble savage is just that, a myth. There will never be a utopia on Earth, no matter how much re-education the unwashed masses receive.
That is why I say Locke got it right and Rousseau got it wrong. Unfortunately, a lot of people continue to die as ideologues try to prove that with under the right conditions and with enough resources the theories of people like Rousseau and Marx can work. Ask the more than 100,000,000 people who have died how it worked out for them and how Rousseau's noble savages act when they are left to their own devices.
3
-
3
-
That is an excellent breakdown on the power dynamic. It touches also on, what for me anyway, is the most disturbing element, the spiritual component. Sure, there are some true believers who see a manmade utopia at the end of the LGB rainbow because they reject God and the notion that people are born with a fallen nature that cannot be overcome by any Earthly power. But the movement is darker than that, it is demonic, not some make-believe hollywood style possession, but real demons empowered and let loose on a culture that welcomed them in. Read Return of the Gods by Jonathan Cahn. Then read Live Not by Lies: A Manual for Christian Dissidents by Rod Dreher. Regardless of your beliefs or worldview, even if you are atheist or agnostic, those two books will provide insight and prepare you for this party, which is just getting started.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Karl Marx, the original basement dweller who has inspired generation after generation of basement dwellers into modern times. One thing most commies have in common is they are all dorks with the social skills of a scorpion and the mating skills of a black widow spider. And they never leave office once they get a hold of power. President Reagan complained that he couldn't get a meeting with any Soviet Premier because they all kept dying on him. Fast forward to today. pelosi, biden, mcconnell, they are all like the old politburo members from the USSR. Feinstein died rather than give up power when she was in her 90s. And none of them, not one, from Marx to castro, to biden and everyone in between left the world a better place for them having been in it. No one will ever know the exact number of people who have died proving Marx wrong but I guess when you get past 100,000,000 what's a few more corpses between comrades. What was it Stalin said, when one man dies it's a tragedy. When 1,000 men die it's a statistic.
And here we are almost 200 years later, watching silently as groups of ignorant children who have no understanding of just how evil communism really is, march in lock-step with the authoritarian leaders of the world they will inherit. I wonder if after their own show trials, when they are in the cells in the gulag they helped create, if they will follow the example set by their predecessors close to 100 years ago, who stared blankly at their executioner and declared, long live the revolution, long live Comrade Stalin. Probably. One thing sociopaths have an instinct for is human frailty and habits. Sleep well little ones, the utopia is just around the corner.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
This idea spread with such certainty, that people are going to Mars and will settle there is based on what? No really, what? Elon Musk's vision? There are more problems associated with this than this video touches, on, problems we haven't even thought to consider. The biggest question is why anyone would want to live on a dead planet? For the adventure? Look, I grew up during the real space race. I was sold the whole program. To me it was almost a given that by 1980 we would have planted our flag on Mars. But it didn't happen for a host of reasons, reasons that still exist in the real world, not the world the futurists seem to inhabit.
Call me a luddite but until we figure out how to share this place peacefully, the notion that somehow we will have a kumbaya moment and unite behind a colony on Mars is a pipedream at best. It's true, we are wired for exploration, but we're also wired for a lot of stuff, stuff that runs contrary to altruistic notions of extending the human consciousness beyond Earth. I hate being the skeptic because I was a true-believer in this stuff growing up, but we came to a crossroad and chose another path. The explorers at NASA lost the funding race to the research gang, and as they say in The Right Stuff, no bucks, no Buck Rogers. The momentum was there, but now it's gone. I just don't see people getting behind it, not like Apollo. Oh well. I'll be long gone by the time someone can prove me wrong. Live long and prosper. 🖖
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@johnwhite5485 You were there??? That's awesome! That Tiger team was the team of my youth, the team that made me fall in love with the game. You're the first person I have, well kinda met, who remembers that game. Not even my friends do. Way cool! Thanks for getting back to me. Old Joe was a bit on the wild side. Former starting QB for the OSU Buckeye's, but we didn't hold that against him once he was a Tiger. He started the pennant clinching game in 68, but he didn't get along with the manager Mayo Smith so Smith basically benched him for the World Series that year. He died young, heart problems. Sad end really. But he did get a ring. The good old Pilots. I imagine I had a few baseball cards from that team, I bought a lot of packs trying to complete my Tiger collection as well as the collectables from the 68 Series. Bob Gibson's 1.12 ERA, Denny McClain's 31-6 record, Mickey Lolich pitching three complete games in the Series, beating Gibson in Game 7, the year of the pitcher. Way cool.
2
-
2
-
I agree, but don't waste your time trying to convince the Trump-cult. Trump is cozy with all the establishment guys he is trying to associate Governor DeSantis with and has called them all great, winners, tremendous, blah, blah, blah at some point along the way. Now? Oh I never liked those guys. Trump goes on about Governor DeSantis shutting down the beaches, "very bad, very, very bad, not good." In reality, Trump got all over the Governor's ass for telling Pence and Trump's boy Fauci to take a hike when they told him he was opening the state too soon.
But none of that matters. They like the show, and Trump is reality TV. They don't care if he lies to them. Ask those poor SOB's rotting jail for simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time on January 6th about all the help Trump has provided them. Ask them what they think about his photo-op "persecution" in NY or what advice they might have given people who were thinking about taking part in the protests he was calling for when news broke about his impending indictment. But hey, only Trump can save us, everyone else is a wimp-loser-sissy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I like Jordan and admire the way he works through a problem but sometimes he over thinks a thing. In this case, perhaps it's cultural on his part. Mr. McWhorter hit upon a fundamental truth and it's nowhere near as complicated as Jordan makes it out to be. There is a certain class of leaders within the black community who don't want to move on because their livelihood is tied into keeping the struggle alive. When race pimps like Jesse Jackson scream "it's another Selma," he doesn't believe that. But it pays well. And kids who perform poorly are, in many instances, living down to the expectations set for them. Single parent homes have been the norm rather than the exception in the black community for decades and that more than any other variable has stifled their growth.
But you can't speak out against the single black mother because in the matriarchy that has been imposed on the culture they hold a special status. It is to the point now where men are no longer expected to play a role. But if you point this out you are called a bigot or worse. And a lot of black kids who excel in school are bullied and teased. I know because I went to mostly black schools and saw it first hand. It's especially true for boys. Girls are given a pass but there is a war on boys in this culture unlike anything that has occurred in the past and boys in the black community are under assault from the people who claim to be on their side. The same is true for white boys.
The old messages of Jim Crowe are alive and well because they serve a purpose for those who don't want the food fight to end. They misuse terms like systemic and institutional racism and convince young people that the game is rigged against them. I had a conversation with a bright young friend of mine about systemic racism and she told me it is everywhere. I asked her to define systemic racism and after she fumbled around for a bit she basically described racism at an individual level, saying that as long as people have racist views the system will always be racist since people make up the system. I tried to point out the fallacy of her circular logic and told her the actual definition of systemic racism but she insisted her version, the one fed her by her lefty friends, was correct.
I could never break that wall. The hijacking of language and the brainwashing of the young is what is at work here. It has nothing to do with notions of virtue. It is simply a case of a lie being told long enough that it gets accepted as truth. Until that changes, until people wake up and see that they are being lied to, nothing will change. It's a story as old as the Allegory of the Cave. Bottom line, there are people who profit a great deal from keeping these racial divisions alive and as long as they have the megaphone, it will never change. That's not complicated Jordan, it's simple human nature.
But that's me.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That was very well done. A very unique, almost Freudian, analysis of Lenin and what made him tick. It could be true he feared being responsible for himself, or it could be a case of him just being a lazy sh*thead who thinks he knows more than others and work is beneath him. Our universities are chock-full of those types. Or perhaps it's a blend of the two. One thing all these tinhorn dictators have in common is a love for the lifestyle of the rich and famous. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Chavez, they all lived large while the rest of the country starved. It saddens me on one hand when kids who just flat out don't know any better wear Che tee-shirts and spout slogans based on Marxist nonsense because they think Che was a hero and Marx was a prophet. What pisses me off is when a U.S. city like Seattle allows a statue of a monster like Lenin to be erected but would tear down a statue of Lincoln if some BLM group or white-haired afro sporting TV revolutionary called for its removal.
I found the stuff Volkogonov had to say about Lenin to be quite interesting. I had never heard of the guy before but I took a peak at his background and I'm going to find out more about him. It appears that he had a large set of balls and wasn't afraid to call a commie rat a commie rat. Maybe I'll try to read his book but to be honest, I tried reading a book on Stalin written by a Russian and man, that guy really had a laborious method of writing. Ya had to really be up on who was who in the zoo to get what he was saying and not being big on members of the central committee of 1920 and first Soviet congress I was lost, and bored. Anyway, maybe I'll try Volkogonov. Cool vid. Thanks for posting.
2
-
2
-
2
-
I remember those hearings where Clearance Thomas was raked over the coals and the image that has stayed with me all these years is Ted Kennedy sitting in judgement over him, accusing Justice Thomas, one of the greatest legal minds to sit on the bench of the Supreme Court of being a shallow, manipulative, sexist. Get that? We're talking about Ted F***in Kennedy passing judgement on another man over his alleged exploitation of women! Let that roll around your brain. Better yet, ask Mary Jo about it. Oh yeah, you can't. I'm telling ya, you couldn't even sell a script like that in Hollywood. Only in democratic America.
Gaslighting and projection is a central part of the comunis...I mean democratic party platform. It plays just as critical a role in them hanging onto power as their plantation system does. I know because I have friends and family who still buy their BS and they ask me why I'm a republican. I have to remind them that I'm not. I just hate the democrats more than the republicans is all because they are bats**t crazy and want to tear the place down and rebuild it in their twisted dystopian image. The democrats caused the first civil war and their shenanigans will be at the root of the second. Sound extreme? Well, so did the idea that a boy could be a girl just a couple years ago.
Here's an exercise you can try with your liberal friends. Have them list the positive changes democratic policies have made in the black community since the inception of LBJ's great society and then have them list the names of reasonable comunis...I mean democratic politicians. Then, compare the two and see which list is longer. If they're being honest about it, the exercise should be a pretty quick brain teaser and shouldn't require more than a half page of paper. I have wished for years that the black community would realize how badly they are being duped by these racialists who, as Candace points out, see them as nothing more than chattel. Kind of like how the republican party views conservatives but that's a conversation for another video.
Very well put young lady. I wondered about your sincerity early on but you're okay. Keep up the good fight.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Gettysburg is one of my favorite war movies. I saw it in the theater and looked over at the three-hour mark to find my wife asleep. That is why it couldn't be made today. Hollywood doesn't make epics anymore. Instead, you get biopics like Elvis that try and put cram a lifetime and an era into a two-hour package. Is that an acknowledgment of today's shortened attention span? Maybe. But the days of Ben-Hur, Gone with the Wind, the 10 Commandments, Gettysburg, and even the Lord of the Rings is over, and that is too bad because those are the truly great films, not some overrated film like Citizen Kane (but that is a discussion for another day).
Anyway, Gettysburg gives a balanced account. Siskel gave it a thumbs down because in his world any film that didn't depict slave-holders as beasts rather than human beings was verboten. I especially like the Sgt. Kilrain character, played beautifully by Kevin Conway. Being Irish myself, I am aware of the number of Irish immigrants who fought on both sides, not for a specific cause as much as proving they were true citizens in the new world. To that point they were treated only slightly better than the blacks. That conversation between Kilrain and Chamberlain, where Conway explains his motives in simple terms is one of my favorite parts. I have heard from historians that the movie inflates Chamberlain's exploits but I don't know enough of the specifics to debate that.
I do think it let's Lee off the hook a bit. Lee took a tremendous gamble, one he didn't have to take, and it was to a large degree ego-driven. Lee had begun to believe his own press clippings at that point in the war and thought his Army of NV had some divine power. Pickett never forgave Lee for ordering that charge and when the old man died a few years later, Pickett was noticeably absent, the only high-ranking officer who didn't visit Lee on his deathbed or attend his funeral. Meade comes off as a secondary character in all of it and I guess that's better than what historians have done to him over the years. Lincoln was furious that Meade didn't chase Lee down and finish his army off once and for all and for a lot of historians that puts Meade into the same timid basket as McClelland, just another general Lincoln had to fire. But the northern troops were beat all to hell after Gettysburg. Even if they had the energy to chase Lee, whose to say what would have happened if they had caught up with them? Lee might have been able to pick ground more suitable to him and finished off the job he started. Lincoln had a keen sense for what needed to be done to win the war but in that case Meade did the right thing. To say otherwise is a counterfactual.
Anyway, Gettysburg is a very accurate telling. There are a few out there like Tora-Tora-Tora, the recent version of Midway, and The Lost Battalion that get things mostly right. No movie is ever 100% true to the facts. Where history-based movies are concerned, there is the book the movie is based on, the movie itself, and the truth. They don't generally line up but if it's a good story that is mostly honest, it's worth the watch. Gettysburg is in that camp. Nice review. Thanks for posting.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It would be nice if people studied up on the candidates and ballot initiatives before voting but that takes time and due diligence, something the majority of Americans aren't willing to invest. At the same time, the gene pool of candidates gets weaker, swampier, and more incestuous with each generation. Most times people aren't voting for a candidate, they are voting against their opponent. I have tried to avoid that practice but the level of craziness the democrats have reached since obama's election in 2008 has forced me to make survival votes along those lines.
Unfortunately, all the republicans seem capable of is taking their foot off the accelerator, slowing down rather than stopping the decay. Nobody has the political will to apply the brakes and stop the bus from going off the edge of the cliff. It's now a matter of do you want to run or do you want to walk off the thing, but one or another you're going over.
As for term limits, they would have been great if they had been written into the Constitution at its inception but now, no way would that amendment gain any traction.
2
-
2
-
2
-
You know something, I have done a lot of research on this topic. I've read everything from Rush to Judgment to Case Closed, the entire Warren Report, loads of declassified documents, and I've gone back to the archives and listened to live accounts from that day, radio and TV coverage from a variety of sources, newspaper coverage and the like. I've visited Dealey Plaza a few times, etc. etc. I went into it a conspiracy guy and I came out convinced it was a three time loser with a $13.00 mail order rifle and a $6,00 scope. Roughly $20.00 to kill a president, a little more than $200.00 in today's inflated market.
Were facts hidden, you betcha. Who did the hiding? Primarily LBJ, Hoover, and Bobby Kennedy. LBJ hid information because he was afraid of igniting WWIII. RFK was trying to keep all the shenanigan's he and his brother were pulling using covert ops, especially in Cuba a secret. He admitted a couple years later that they were more energetic than wise in a lot of areas, especially Cuba, and that they paid a terrible price for it. That's a paraphrase but he said that. Hoover didn't want the extent of the FBI's involvement with Oswald revealed and he certainly didn't want people thinking they dropped any balls. It was all CYA.
The creator makes the claim that the CIA was out running all kinds of assassination plots without any authorization, like a rogue elephant. Thank Frank Church and the Camelot myth makers like Schlesinger for that nonsense. Richard Helm told the HSCA members that if that's how they thought the CIA operated they really didn't understand the way things work. Frank Church had presidential ambitions of his own and he admitted that him and his hack committee were not there to besmirch the reputation of past presidents. That's code for I'm afraid of the Kennedy's. When Helm was pressed about whether or not JFK knew about assassination plots he simply said, the CIA acts at the discretion of the president. Ike actually started the CIA down its activist path.
But while facts are stubborn things they don't sell books or movie tickets. Believe what you want, but if you think I'm the one being duped, I would love to ply poker with you sometime.
2
-
2
-
Man, this thing is like the crew of the Titanic having radar saying: "The hell with what's on that screen, I feel like hitting the damn thing because it just needs to be hit. Someone should have hit that f***in iceberg years ago and by God we are going to be that someone."
I get the ruse, put out the black lady, call any attack racist, and create a built-in reason for the disaster, the bigots and haters. It just seems to me, if the people at Amazon who are in charge of marketing this thing had half an ounce of self-awareness they would have started from the premise that their production is a story of fantasy based on their views and that while the retelling may not appeal to Tolkien's fanbase because of differences between it and the written works they hope people will give it a fair viewing for what is and judge it on that, a stand-alone entity based on the world of Tolkien but not necessarily of the world of Tolkien.
At least then you disarm the traditionalists to a degree and at the same time acknowledge the thing was never built for them. It is aimed at Gen-Z and fellow travelers more interested in subtexts and messaging than storytelling which only acts as a backdrop, something to keep the kiddies coming back. It will no doubt flop with die-hard Tolkien fans but it may do quite well with that younger generation who don't hold Tolkien and his stories in the same regard.
But they are playing a dangerous game getting nasty with that Tolkien fanbase because now it is not that group who are coming off as the bullies, it's the producers of the series and the half famous actors they plucked off the casting couch to act in the thing, not the traditional Tolkien fanbase who have simply expressed an opinion. At the end of the day, nobody likes a bully.
So why set yourself up to be one? Perhaps it was just how they were raised.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheAdvertisement Thank you for taking the time to read them. Sometimes I provide more detail than people want to be concerned with but it's a topic I spent a lot of time reading on and researching over the years. I first became interested when A&E ran The Men Who Killed Kennedy series. That peaked my curiosity and I initially went in on the conspiracy side. I read books like Six Seconds in Dallas, Best Evidence, The Killing of the President and On the Trail of the Assassins. Then I had a discussion with a very smart history professor who's opinion I respected and she told me to read Case Closed by Gerald Posner.
That got me started down a different path and after that I read that book, The Warren Report and a lot of the source material that was released as a result of the JFK Records Act. The Mary Ferrell website was free at that time and it was a great resource for those declassified documents. Unfortunately a lot of that stuff is behind a pay wall now or has been taken down for one reason or another but it's still a good website. I also listened to the live radio broadcasts from that day. David von Pein has a very good JFK channel on YT if you want to hear the event as it happened. Most people ignore that but events in real-time, while they contain some inaccuracies, hold up well. Memories fade and some people change their story for various reasons so it's good to hear what actually happened.
I also went to Dealey Plaza a couple times and when you actually stand behind the picket fence you realize that theory is highly flawed, and that's being generous. My boss actually lived next door to Robert Oswald for many years but he said the topic of the assassination never came up. He said Bob, as he called him, was a good man. Robert pins all the trouble on the grand-dame of all conspiracies, their mother. She was NVTS nuts and as Robert said, if she was even a half-assed decent mother the world would have never heard of Lee Harvey Oswald.
Like I say, I went in looking for a conspiracy, I came out with a three-time-loser and a $19.00 mail-order rifle, a guy who idolized Castro and was trying to win favor with him in an attempt to get to his socialist heaven on Earth. He acted alone. Was he egged on? Most likely. There are the three unaccounted for days he spent in Mexico City. Someone from the Cuban embassy may have riled him up. But Oswald was no more the kind of guy you would get involved with in an active conspiracy to assassinate a head of state than Jack Ruby was. Governments and the mob don't use unstable people for jobs like that a host of very good reasons.
I know this is a long rant as well but there are polls that claim more than 85% of the country doesn't accept the Warren Report and most people believe Lee Harvey Oswald was part of a vast conspiracy. That needs to be challenged because the truth is under assault all over the place and the truth matters above all else. As John Adams said: "Facts are stubborn things." If Occam's Razor ever applied to any individual or any event, it applies here.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The breadcrumb trail is not hard to follow. And because most American's can't be bothered the-powers-that-be aren't terribly concerned about hiding it or their intentions. You've got a Marxist outfit like the Southern Poverty Law Center getting to decide who is a right-wing extremist and a Justice Department so thoroughly corrupted they are more than happy to sic the FBI on such extreme dangerous groups. You know, like people who attend traditional Catholic Masses. Why? Must be all that hate speech coded in Latin.
The rainbow fascists throw around terms like genocide to describe what is happening to them, even though there are more than 150 days dedicated to that wicked cult. obama has his puppet hanging their demonic pagan flags right along side the American flag at the White House at the same height. You've got biden's handlers telling him to make the sign of the cross at abortion rally's and who could forget his speech in front of that deep red background where he declared anyone who didn't agree with him a threat to democracy. When she was running for president, the wicked queen of the Ozarks whose name shall not be uttered here came straight out and said people of faith were just going to have to park their faith at the curb in order for the progressive agenda to be implemented. She still goes around calling anyone who disagrees with her a Nazi. They don't hide their plans because they know they don't have to and they believe every word they say. State-run media backs their play and bureaucrats within law enforcement and other agencies who are more concerned about protecting their pensions than they are about upholding the oath they swore to protect and defend the Constitution are more than willing to carry out whatever orders they are given.
I'm not saying people on the right should start thinking and behaving like anarchists or BLM storm-troopers but we need to stop automatically assuming everyone in the military or law enforcement is a good guy and a hero by default. The whole "back the blue" concept has always been a central tenant of conservatism. Again, to be clear, I'm not saying we should stop supporting military personnel and first responders but we need to be more discerning and stop assuming that just because somebody wears a uniform that they share our values and will always have our best interests in mind. Regular Germans loaded the trains and made sure they arrived at their destination. I'm not saying the trains are going to be running anytime soon but history teaches us that when it comes to doing the right thing people don't have a great track record.
Does all that sound extreme? Sure, but 10-years ago the idea a man would be allowed to compete with women in college sports and grown men would be allowed to pee next to six-year old girls simply because they say they feel like a woman was a crackpot idea, a false slippery slope argument made by conspiracy-minded right-wingers whose homophobia was crushing the souls of people who just wanted to experience love like everyone else. They would never target a specific baker who didn't want to participate in their charade because of his religious objections again, and again, and again, and again, force him to bake wedding cakes for them as a warning to others. That was more right-wing conspiracy stuff. The idea that they would target people and ruin them financially in a very public manner as an intimidation tactic was just ridiculous. Until it wasn't.
Yeah, this is another of my lengthy posts but some things can't be said in 240 characters or less. They are bringing howitzers to gun fights while we keep showing up with the Constitution, expecting them to behave in a civil fashion. They have no intention of engaging in a debate with you, civil or otherwise, over the first amendment. They hate the document and all it stands for and they are in the process of putting a new world order into place to replace one they see as repressive and out-of-date. This is coming from a guy who is probably the furthest away from the tin-foil hat crowd as anyone. But I can read. I can hear. And I can connect dots. People generally mean what they say, unless they are republicans. Just be advised, the people who have been aiming at changing the way this republic operates have been doing so for more than 100 years and they believe they are entering the end-game. Can you blame them? They think they are close. Where are the rest of us? Inquiring minds want to know.
2
-
2
-
I have been referring to this allegory for a long time now to explain how our culture has devolved and how the role of critical thinking is not only diminished, it's discouraged. Social media has really accelerated this process. People are consumed with pithy soundbites that are shared and attract likes. It's the great distraction, the modern day wall of the cave. The powers that be, the ones pushing the great reset are more than happy to let people engage in the food fight going on in the Twitterverse. It keeps their eyes off the prize.
This saddens me. I'm not ancient but I'm no spring chicken so I won't be around to see the real carnage. This is only the beginning. I do my best to encourage people to step beyond the cave but nobody really listens. I'm not trying to place myself on some kind of pedestal as someone who has all the answers, and who knows maybe it's me, maybe I'm the one who doesn't get it? Maybe I'm just as hung up on my own cave wall. But I do know this, truth has been relegated to the back of the bus for now anyway, and I have always been someone who seeks the truth, however uncomfortable that may be.
Some people want to leave the cave, but like it was in Plato's time, too many do not. But I'll stay at it, Father Mackenzie, writing the words to a sermon that no one will hear. I'll do what I can and pray for us all. Lord knows we need it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
In order to win a battle you must start by understanding the nature of the enemy you are up against and the landscape of the battlefield. This is spiritual warfare. I know not everyone will see it that way, but no other generation of Americans has ever faced a situation where reality itself is at play. But then again, no previous generation has turned their back on God the way this one has. No previous generation of men have abdicated their traditional role as leader in the home and outside of it in such mass numbers. This has always been Satan's domain and we are no match for him.
For those who dismiss that, at least think about the good that comes from a culture rooted in a Judeo-Christian value system. Benjamin Franklin did and he stated that such a value system is a stabilizing force for good on the societal level. Outside of Thomas Paine who was a full-blown atheist, Franklin was probably the most irreligious thought leaders of the American Revolution. Even Richard Dawkins is saying the west needs Christianity to straighten the ship. We will only get out of this mess if we return to God. That has to be step one.
Want to protect your kids? Start by being involved in their lives in a meaningful way. Attend church and live the way God wants us to. There is an old saying that states the family that prays together stays together. There is a lot of truth in that. As someone who fell down in that regard and paid a heavy price I speak from experience. Have a genuine relationship with your kids and be a leader, a mentor, and a teacher. If you don't someone will. Kids want boundaries. It lets them know you care enough to set them. Stand up to teachers and school boards if you can't afford any option outside of public education. Be brave and trust in God. St. Paul wrote about what happens when you try to handle things your own way, when you try to live a life based on your will:
"The wrath of God is indeed being revealed from heaven against every impiety and wickedness of those who suppress the truth by their wickedness. For what can be known about God is evident to them, because God made it evident to them. Ever since the creation of the world, His invisible attributes of eternal power and divinity have been able to be understood and perceived in what He has made. As a result, they have no excuse; for although they knew God they did not accord Him glory as God or give Him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened. While claiming to be wise, they became fools...Therefore, God handed them over to impurity through the lusts of their hearts for the mutual degradation of their bodies...Their females exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the males likewise gave up natural relations with females and burned with lust for one another. Males did shameful things with males and thus received in their own persons the due penalty for their perversity. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God handed them over to their undiscerning mind to do what is improper." ― Romans 1: 18-28.
Even if you don't believe, you can't deny the veracity of Paul's words. That's todays culture in a nutshell. So again, know your enemy and understand you cannot defeat him on your own. We aren't powerless, but we have to want God's help. Otherwise as C.S. Lewis put it, He will say to us; "Your will be done."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Chomsky and the rest of the old school Soviet-style commies are either gone or so old nobody gives a damn what they think about anything. They have been replaced with guys like Neil deGrasse Tyson, celebrity scientists and the like who seem to believe because they know a bit about one thing and have been on TV their opinion on matters beyond their scope should be taken as seriously as they take themselves. Then you've got actual celebrities, like that bill nye character popping up on panel shows discussing everything from global warming to transgenderism while some empty headed TV host stares intently, hanging on their every word as if it was coming down from Mt. Sinai.
I have a friend who was heading out to watch the total eclipse a couple years back and when I told him to be careful he said it was okay because the glasses he bought, maybe online, maybe at the gas station, had the bill nye seal of approval. I was going to laugh and ask him if he was serious but I didn't want the argument. Now he's a reasonably intelligent guy but he is definitely a man of the left and when he talks about settled science and the false efficacy of herd immunity, well he means every bit of it. We've been friends for close to 50 years and we just don't discuss politics, that's how we make it work. But he is of the mind that we would be much happier if we followed the lead of our better's, because by golly, they wouldn't hurt anyone, at least not intentionally. I'm telling you, it's a cult. It's a cult and no matter how much you try to persuade them, you are always wrong if you are one of the deplorables. Ce-la-vie.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
They, and by they I mean the powers-that-be and their mouthpieces in state-run-media, are no longer afraid to say the quiet part out loud. They used to be a bit more subtle in their word appropriation but they believe they are on the ascendency, that their time has arrived so now you get terms like Christian nationalism tossed around and Christian nationalists are, by extension, threats to democracy, which now means equality for those the powers-that-be want to be equal.
I heard some crackpot from some university, think-tank, or maybe it was The New York Times bemoaning the fact that there are people out there actually telling other people their rights don't come from government but from some transcendent God who according to her was as real as the Man on the Moon. The guy considered to be the thought leader for the WEF said he looked into a human corpse and could find no rights at all. Therefore, according to him rights didn't exist. No need to concern ourselves with where they come from I guess.
But hey, March Madness is happening and gas dropped two cents last month so life is good. Rights? We don't need no stinking rights and words can mean whatever they need to mean at any given moment. We've always been at war with Eastasia.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I believe in God so I'm never alone. As for finding some micro life form on some moon, well excuse me if I don't get all gushy. It will prove life exists elsewhere. Okay, but I'm not going to call some primordial bit of floating goo cuz. If I can't have a conversation, I'm just not that impressed. I know life exists, I can look out my window for proof of that. Do I think we are the only sentient beings in the universe? I dunno. But here's a thought, maybe we haven't heard from anyone because we're just not supposed to. Maybe putting such incredible distances between us and our cosmologic kinfolk is part of the design. Just a thought.
Truth is, I don't expect a phone call from E.T. in the time I have left and that's a shame because I was a child of Apollo and I figured we'd already be living on Mars by now. That is what Spock told us, and I mean, he was Spock...come on...of course he knew. Then I grew up and learned about magnetic fields, plate tectonics, cosmic fine-tuning that is beyond mind blowing, just to make this one rock a blue dot in a sea of black. I'm good because like I say, I have faith and if anything, it just goes to show how unique and precious we are. Too bad we don't act like it. We should really learn to like ourselves a lot more than we do. I'll take that over warp-drive. Anyway, live long and prosper gang, just don't expect to hear anything from E.T. anytime soon. I think ever, but that's me.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Saying we the people somehow gives crooked politicians an out because we put too much blame on ourselves is ridiculous. Man has a fallen nature and no form of government, no matter how well intended or planned out will be truly just because of said nature. Locke understood that and accounted for it in the most practical way in his treatise on the Social Compact.
As for our form of indirect democracy as it is called here, it only functions if people take their responsibility as citizens seriously. They used to, at least to a higher degree than they do today, but our system has devolved into reality-TV. Officials don't get removed from office, they get voted off the island, and they get voted off for a variety of reasons by a small portion of the electorate. Too many people are either too cynical, too lazy, or too comfortable to even get involved in the process.
So no, I don't buy the argument that putting we the people on the hook somehow lets the crooks off it. The people are the problem, and when there is nowhere left to go, they'll shake their collective fist at their Creator and blame it all on Him. It can't be our fault. And that is when He'll call the game and sort the wheat from the chafe. Do with that what you will. If that offends your secular sensibilities, as the prophet Bob Dylan once said; "It's a hard rains a gonna fall." Ya'll make sure you have a raincoat now, ya hear.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Nice advice, but life doesn't always deal you the hand that allows you pursue your dreams in that way. I remember seeing a show many years ago where they listed what they considered to be the worst jobs on Earth. The winner for worst job went to working in a sulfur pit. They spoke with a guy who worked in one (I think it was in Indonesia) and he looked to be about 70. Turns out he was 35. Life expectancy for people working there maxed out somewhere around 45. How much energy do you suppose he would have had to devote to higher pursuits? I'm sure if given a choice he would have preferred a job on Wall Street but he had a family to raise and that was where he was at. I'm not saying he should have just accepted his fate but they didn't go into his backstory so who knows what was really keeping him there.
When I was raising a family I had other people depending on me so I did what I had to do. I always made the best of it and moved up as best I could. I was very goal driven. I had to have a goal. Pretty soon I became goal addicted. My first attempt at retirement was a complete disaster because of that addiction. I fought like hell to get back into the workforce and when I got where I wanted to be I came to the realization that it was an empty victory. I was right where I wanted to be, making more money than I had ever seen, and I hated every bit of it. Life isn't about what you achieve, it's about what you value.
Who knows, maybe that guy in the sulfur pit had it right because when they asked him about his lot in life he said he was doing okay, better than some, worse than others. Goal setting is fine, admirable even, but watch out you don't become a slave to it. I did and I wasted a lot of time I can't get back. That's just my take on it though. Remember, life is 10% about what happens to you and 90% about how you respond to it. Just make sure you have your priorities straight. Sometimes you can want something so badly you will sacrifice just about anything to get it and when you get it you find out it really isn't all it's cracked up to be. Just sayin.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kale2149 It confirms what I said earlier, they have been lulled by the nanny state and it's what they know. They are told how well the system works day after day by state run media and they see government as a force for good in their lives. I know it, I saw it, lived through it. Have you lived there? If you have, how was it? How'd state run health care work for you? In practice, not theory, not some data from some poll, how did it work for you on a personal level? You seem to be a true believer so it's a fair question. Are your opinions based on what others have told you or on your own experience dealing with the system and the ridiculously high, regressive taxes such as the GST that were put in place to prop it up? If you've been there, I'll lend a bit more gravitas to your take on it. I say it sucks because I dealt with it, in real life, but that's me.
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm glad you came around young man. It's not easy going against a cult. And he hit on something that is lost in all the chatter about this organization. The idea that anyone or any group who opposes them is fascist. That's an old semantic trick Stalin taught the left. It's why he used to label the nations he subjugated as democratic; for instance calling East Germany The German Democratic Republic. As Stalin explained it, if you weren't fascist you were democratic. And if you weren't socialist you were fascist. See how the circular logic works?
The left still plays these types of word games. It's a form of Orwellian Newspeak and is central to their ideology. It's why you hear a moron like that Don Lemon guy talk about Antifa being a force for good because they oppose fascism. As he explains it, it's right there in their title. And since fascism is bad, Antifa must be good (and I do apologize to any morons I may have offended by lumping him with you, I'm just at a loss for a proper pronoun for him at the moment). Of course, he never explains their origin or what they stand for. But I guess it is hard to explain what a group stands for when in reality it stands for nothing. Besides, I'm not sure Lemon or any of the talking heads and mind dead politicians who back their play either overtly or covertly understand the miscreants out there busting up windows anymore than they understand themselves.
They claim to be anti-fascist but in reality they are simply Nihilists dressed up as Anarchists out there playing revolutionary because it's a kick. But alas, most of them aren't even bright enough to understand the distinction between Anarchy and Nihilism anymore than they understand the distinction between socialism and freedom. They are what this young man described in the beginning, just a bunch of angry young punks lashing out at the world because they have an external locus of control. They aren't accountable for their actions because it has all been forced on them by unseen forces that can only be destroyed by violence. And breaking windows and blowing shit up is also fun, let's not forget that because you know...feelings. They are Satan's vanguard.
Like I said earlier, nice to see you escaped kid. I wish you well.
2
-
Okay, Nixon wants to lay it at the feet of McNamara, Bundy, and Rostow, you'll get no argument from me. Johnson was a creature of the legislature, out his element when it came to foreign affairs and the executive branch's role in it's execution and application. He knew it to. The largest part of him didn't even want the presidency because he knew he would not be good at the job, but his ego and desire to be remembered as a great man got the better of him. What he wasn't though was "helpless" as Nixon makes out. Johnson knew good and damned well Vietnam was a losing proposition. He told Kennedy as much in 61 but he also said if they were going to stay there then they had to stick with Diem because "he's the only boy we've got out there."
So, go ahead Dick, call Johnson helpless, but you claim you knew better and still, a lot of service members were killed under your watch, a third of all the deaths in fact. So spare me the excuse making for Johnson. Sorry dude, you got no credibility on this matter, especially considering you told Thieu to reject any peace proposal in 68 because you could get him a better deal once you were in office. Shame on you sir, you, Kissinger, and the whole stinking lot of ya. But that's me.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The message in this video is a bit dated but given the recent drone/missile strike by Iran into Israel and the way they have spent the money they have gotten from obama, who is friendly to their cause it's a reminder to never take your eye off the true-believers, especially in that neighborhood. The problem with Iran is Russia's history with them and the internecine battle they are engaged in with Saudi Arabia over which view of Islam the next caliphate should be set up under, Shia or Sunni. More than a few of the ayatollah's and their minions are for stirring up the pot in order to usher in the reign of the 12th Imam, their version of the second-coming. That should be more than a bit concerning. It's like the people pumping money into the plan to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem. It's not that they want to see the temple restored, they want to get the ball rolling on Armageddon.
As for Iran in 2024, the optimistic take is that the ayatollah's are not popular with the average Joe, a lot of whom weren't even born when the revolution took place in 1979. If they can get friends in the right places a regime change would not be out of the question. The pessimistic take is the ayatollah's are not popular with the average Joe, a lot of whom weren't even born when the revolution took place in 1979 and they fail to get any friends in the right places but raise enough cane to cause some sort of lashing out by the regime that could escalate out of control, especially given the Russian desire to flex their muscles in the region and the problems between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Maybe the next set of drones and missiles aren't aimed at Israel. Maybe they come courtesy of their sponsors in Moscow and have more than conventional warheads attached to them. It sounds far-fetched, and most-likely is but like I say, ya gotta keep an eye on true believers because they have what Josie Wales would describe as; "Crazy eyes."
2
-
It's all by design, and it was all foretold:
“After this I saw another angel coming down from heaven, having great authority, and the earth became illumined by his splendor. He cried out in a mighty voice “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great. She has become a haunt for demons. She is a cage for every unclean spirit, a cage for every unclean bird and disgusting beast. For all the nations have drunk the wine of her licentious passion. The kings of the earth had intercourse with her, and the merchants of the earth grew rich from her drive for luxury…The merchants of the earth will weep and mourn for her, because there will be no more markets for their cargo…The merchants who deal in these goods, who grew rich from her, will keep their distance for fear of the torment inflicted on her. Weeping and mourning, they cry out Alas, alas, great city wearing fine linen, purple and scarlet, adorned in gold, precious stones, and pearls. In one hour this great wealth has been ruined.” ― Revelation 18: 1-17
Wanna get right? Start by getting right with God. This is coming from one who swam on the Devil's lake far too long. I know addiction and I know the pain and suffering it causes. There is one cure. He's waiting for all of us to come home. Knock, and the door shall be opened.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm an American. I was born in Canada, I worked and lived there for a seven-year stretch not terribly long ago, but I don't know what the pulse of the population is today. I can say that one of the key differences between Americans and Canadians is Canadians have this belief in government as a positive power where Americans, at least until 2008, saw government in less generous terms. Now, at least here in the U.S. it's all about the show, reality-TV as politics. I hear all this talk about how the majority of the population leans conservative. I've heard that for decades. But the movement...well, there isn't one. And it goes deeper than being afraid being called names and getting the online mob on their cowardly asses. At least here in the U.S., there hasn't been a genuine opposition party since Ronald Reagan was at the helm. And even then the conservative movement was running out of steam by the end of his second term. Bush stuck the knife in, the Tea Party twisted it and put the movement on life support, Trump said F-it and pulled the plug.
There is no unified platform, no plan on the right. Trump said he was going to close the border but what happened? Some judge in Hawaii said he couldn't and Trump tucked his tail. He said he was going to cut spending then signed off on trillion dollar budgets. He said he was going to lock Hillary up and then let her off the hook. Why? Because he didn't know how to govern. That is the problem with "The Show." Once the show-types get in power they don't really have a plan and the people they turn to for a plan are democrats in disguise so we end up supporting whatever the left wants done.
It's systemic. It's not that they are afraid of being called names, they don't believe in the stuff they are peddling. Look how many of these jokers win their primaries by 30, 40 points. Why? Republican voters like the show. Why? Because outlets like fox news and so-called right-wing media do their job and sell it to them. Why? Because they make money. Where is the money going these days? To the left. Why? Because they all come from lefty universities. The dots aren't hard to connect. Like the demon Azazel tells Denzel in the movie Fallen: "Open your eyes Hobbs. Look around some time."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I guess if you just like the way this guy makes movies you will like this one. I saw it in the theater and thought it sucked. I saw it again when it showed up on cable, thinking maybe I was too harsh on the first go round and the verdict was the same. Why? Because the director seemed more interested in staying true to his style of movie making than actually telling a compelling story. It is crap storytelling. It's disjointed and if someone with no prior knowledge of the event was to watch it they wouldn't be able to give you any insight into what happened, why it happened, and who was making the decisions, aspects of war movies that are kind of important. I mean, they are in every war movie I have ever seen, even the off-color ones like Catch 22 and MASH.
Sure, this guy uses real planes and such but who cares. Where is Churchill? Where is Halifax? Where are the pitched battles to give these guys time to escape? Basically, where's the beef? The director lays no foundation for the story and assumes that everyone coming to see this already knows the history so he's going to focus on actors who give terrible, uninspired performances of people...🤔...um...doing stuff I guess. Like I say, the guy was so concerned about making an artsy style movie that he neglected to tell a story, and that is what history is, storytelling. Honestly, if you were to read a book on Dunkirk put together like this movie was, tell me you wouldn't put it down less than halfway through.
Sorry History Buff. I have agreed with most of your reviews but you missed the bigger picture here. This director should stick to faux film-noir Batman flicks and stay the hell away from history. But that's me. Dunkirk is a terrible film.
2
-
I graduated from a high school that was roughly 80% black. I remember black boys who studied and got good grades being called Uncle Tom's and accused of trying to be white. But it was always the other boys doing the name calling. Black girls were free to get the benefit of an education if they wanted it and no one called them any names. That was 50 years ago. Between that and the beatification of the single mother in the black community a patriarchy has been established. Single black mom's have always held a high place on the protected class totem-poll. Criticize a single black mother and see how far it gets you. I saw them receive special treatment when I was an undergrad. Professor's would allow them to miss as many classes as they wanted. One white woman called the professor out for this and when he told her that her case was different because she was a single mom the woman exploded, telling the professor she was a single mom as well and that same professor had warned her after she missed three classes that any more absences would result in her being dropped in accordance with the universities policy.
The government did the same, but their objective was to make the family dependent on them since people will vote for the politicians they believe are necessary for their very survival. The liberation movements of the 60s played just as big a role. The sexual liberation movement told young people to do what made them feel good and the women's liberation movement told women they didn't need a man to get by in the world. Young single black girls living on the edge who followed the advice of those two groups were especially vulnerable and were set up for failure. But there was Uncle Lyndon, telling them it was okay because like his hero FDR he would be there to make sure their basic needs were met, basic being the key part of that deal.
I always find it amusing and sad at the same time that the group who claims to be progressive always falls back on old tropes when it comes to dealing with black people. It's always about looking back, righting old wrongs, never looking ahead. Johnson went back 100 years. Jesse simply calls everything another Selma. Compare that to the messaging they use when they are trying to coax illegals over the border to increase their voting base. It's just the opposite. It's all about a better future, a twisted sale of the American dream where they get the benefit of being in America without ever having to become an American. They get to carry their culture with them. Need proof of that? Look no further than all the Palestinian flags being waved in cities like New York as people who have no intention of ever becoming westernized disrupt daily life for everyone else. And what is the response from white America? Shhh, let them be, you don't want to upset them or be called names do you?
Something is gong to give. This country is becoming like the old Hapsburg Empire at the turn of the 20th Century. They had so many different cultures trying to coexist that the internal contradictions caused it to collapse. WWI simply delayed the inevitable. And what happened to those disparate groups? They were either absorbed by other powers willing to crack the whip on them or they fought a series of civil wars over the next 100 years that claimed millions of lives. President Reagan said we were entering a time for choosing. It's here gang. But hey, I'm probably too much of a glass half-empty guy. Sleep well kiddies, the government will make sure it all comes out okay.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Race pimping is an old game:
"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs-partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs." ― Booker T. Washington
I can't speak to the problems in Britain, but here in America, the LGBT movement is acting as a force multiplier. The goal is to feminize men, to make them submissive. Boys are taught that their natural masculine inclinations are toxic and they get confused and don't know what to do with those urges. Simple, become a woman.
It's demonic at its heart. The elites as they call themselves these days are targeting Anglo culture because it is what is standing between them and their rightful place as masters of the universe. Elites, or progressives as they used to like to be called, have been moving like a glacier for more than a century, burying the territory they capture, never ceding it, and pressing onward. Always pressing onward. They are Godless and therefore they have to believe a utopia can be delivered in this world since there is no other for them. And who better to run it. How do you capture a culture and bring it down? You take over the cultural and educational heart of it. Give em credit, they have been busy little commies, and they are so close now they can feel it. It's why the U.S. border has been eliminated. They are following the same model they ran successfully in Europe. Attack, attack, attack, then attack some more.
“The modern age is built on the Myth of Progress…Believers in the Myth of Progress hold that progress is better than the past, and the future will inevitably be better than the present. This myth is a powerful tool in the hands of would-be totalitarians. It provides a transcendent source of legitimacy for their actions and frames opposition as backward and ignorant…Thus does the Myth of Progress become a justification for exercising dictatorial power” ― Rob Dreher: Live Not by Lies: A Manual for Christian Dissidents
Yeah, long post, I know. Won't get read. I get that. But I'm in a mood. Sleep well my fellow citizens, like the careless maidens who didn't have oil for their lamps on the day the Bridegroom arrived. When they did get the oil it was too late, their seats had been taken. Get right with God. Free advice, for His hour is nigh, and Satan knows his time is short.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Sorry Dennis, the Cold War may never have really ended but the rules of the game certainly have. Keeping the Truman Doctrine alive has been a problem for this country for a very long time. I served in the military for more than two decades. I was part of the generation that bridged the gap between the Cold War and the New World Order. American thinking never evolved and I fear we are going to pay a terrible price for it in the not too distant future, one that encompasses a whole lot more than arguing about pronoun's, masks, or bathrooms.
We should still be in Afghanistan? You point to South Korea, Germany, and Japan as examples to support your thesis but I say having troops stationed in any of those places serves no purpose but to make people in the defense industry rich. Our military has an officer class that has become politicized and we are led by people who are either 10 years or more beyond their expiration date or are so lacking in real-world life experiences that it boggles the mind. Our entire infrastructure, especially our power grid, is so vulnerable that we are one good enemy strike away from living in the 1850s and we have lost our way on a moral level. Our culture has become coarse and our online bad behavior is bleeding over into the real world. We are raising a generation of confused children and we facing enemies who are more determined and have evolved over time.
I'm not saying we should pull off the stage completely, but unless we sort out our own house pretty damn quick we won't have anything left to pull back. Getting our troops out of places where they serve no purpose except lining the pockets of those whose pockets are lined well enough is a good start. Again, your way of thinking Dennis had a place when hundreds of thousands of troops were on the borders of our allies, locked and loaded and ready to go, but that's simply not the case anymore. 9/11 showed us the error of our way of thinking and yet people are still living in the 1970s. It's time to rethink everything, before there's no one left to do the thinking.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
Dr. Hanson is a smart guy, as smart as they come, but unfortunately we aren't going to be able to vote our way out of the current mess we find ourselves in. Let's say trump does win. What's really going to change? Take off the blinders for a moment and put away the shirts and skins clan mentality and take an honest look at who trump is, who will be advising him, and what he is up against. What will happen when he tries to shut the border and some judge in Hawaii issues an injunction halting his action? Based on past performance he will say; well I tried but we gotta let it play out. Remember when he banned tranny's from military service and the chiefs ignored him? What did he do? Did anyone get fired? Remember the huge budget increases under his watch? Jailbreak legislation? And of course, listening to that weasel fauci to the exclusion of all others during COVID? The crap appointments he made? The squishy republicans he is endorsing now because people giving him cash to to fund his legal bills tell him to? Or maybe it's because they are running against someone who said something bad about him or supported Governor DeSantis in the primary? What kind of people are going to be willing to work for him after seeing the lawfare the last bunch who got too close to trump had to endure?
Look, I hate the idea of a fourth obama term more than anyone but the fact is we've got problems, REAL problems that require REAL leadership and tough calls to be made. But Americans, especially republican boomer primary voters like the show more than solutions and the grifters in right-wing/alternative media, whatever you want to call them. play along and lie to their voters about polls and such because it's good for clicks. Without trump more than 3/4 of them would be back writing copy for National Review or some other establishment rag. Either that or they'd be back where they started, recording podcasts on the laptop from their garage.
No, trump is going to lose and the grifters will raise holy-hell about cheats and other "swampy" shenanigans while the country goes into a real recession, maybe a full blown depression, and the government addresses the crisis in ways that make us pine for the good old days of COVID, jabs, masks, and tranny's. But hey, don't worry, trump 2028 will be working on a new and improved campaign by 2026. And the beat goes on...the beat goes on. Live long and prosper gang, I'm sure it will be alright, hannity told me it would this time around. 🖖
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
WWI wasn't a spontaneous event triggered by an assassination as some make it out to be. Bad blood between Germany and France over the Franco-Prussian war in 1870 became more toxic over time. There were crises popping up all over in Morocco, Bosnia, even the Japanese-Russo War was a harbinger of bigger things to come. People had been talking about the inevitability of war for a while in most of the countries in Europe, definitely in the cafe's, colleges, and political bodies of the main players. France hated Germany, Germany envied Britain, Austria-Hungary feared decline, Russia feared the people, The Ottoman's were dying, and the Brits looked at Germany with a wary eye and tried to figure out how to keep the peace and maintain the proper balance of power on the continent.
Too many competing forces acting at the same point in time. And while observers had seen what happens when new technology butts heads with old tactics and the futility of frontal assaults against fortified trenches during the American Civil War they failed to learn the proper lessons from that conflict. Everyone thought the thing would be over in a few months and some sort of new order or stability would be achieved, though they were kinda sketchy on the details. So when you ask the question: "Who was truly to blame?" The answer is everyone, though it was Satan who set the chessboard and watched as a century he could truly call his own came to life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've got to believe calling out the Guard and putting up fences was Pelosi's idea. First, Biden's mind is too far gone for him to make any actual decisions and anyone who thinks he is running the joint, well, I suppose you also buy the notion that Epstein offed himself at JUST the SAME TIME as the cameras to his cell failed. Whatever happened to THAT story by the way? Seems like any aspiring investigative journalist would LOVE to crack that. I guess it went into the same media blackhole that swallowed up the story of the BLM maniac who plowed his vehicle into a bunch of kids but I digress.
I will take exception with Mr. Rubin's take on housing prices going through the roof here in my home state as a good thing. So, it's a good thing that the average young Floridian family can't afford to buy a house because high prices will make sure the "right people" come to Florida? Sorry, but that is elitist bullshit and it doesn't surprise me that it's coming from a guy who transplanted his ass here from California. That is the kind of reasoning coastal elites have.
Couple of points Mr. Rubin, since you are a fairly new lefty convert. People who love liberty don't see roadblocks to upward mobility as a good thing, especially if it is framed as a way to make sure the "right" people come here. We wouldn't want any of those smelly working class people on our side would we? And here's another point, but this one is personal and a bit off subject. People who want to see traditional values restored don't typically say things like "I'm okay using someone's preferred pronoun out of respect."
Sorry if I went off a bit here but stuff like that is why I unsubscribed from your channel and only tune in if it is a short bit on a subject I find interesting. But that's just me. Another trait conservatives have is allowing everyone, that includes you and me, the right to express their views. I doubt anyone will read this and if they do maybe they won't like it but that's just me and I really don't care what popular opinion says one way or another.
1
-
1
-
It was interesting to hear that caller from all those years ago try to use the Bible to make his argument. I just had an exchange with a left-wing gentleman the other day who used the same tired trope. He admitted he doesn't go to church, doesn't believe in God, and doesn't accept the notion of sin or a higher transcendent morality, calling religion an outdated superstition from the Bronze-Age, yet he used the same line from scripture that the left had been falling back on for years to create a straw-man for immigration. These guys really should update their tactics. I think they don't because they are lazy.
The truth is obama and his ilk are treating this more like a Soviet-style attack from WWII, a full-frontal assault with the intention of overwhelming the enemy with superior numbers. He knows that even if he is voted out of office this go round the republican president who takes over will never be able to get rid of the millions his stooge has allowed to come in these past three years. What are we going to do; get a bunch of busses, higher a bunch of agents, and drive around the country grabbing these people and then driving them to the border in order to send them back? obama knows that will never happen. His hope is to flood the system until it breaks or to create an internal contradiction along the lines of the old Hapsburg dynasty where it just becomes impossible to manage so many ethnically and culturally diverse groups of people. He needs the existing system to crash in order to complete his fundamental transformation and like all good Maoists he's willing to play the long-game.
The damage is done and the cure is akin to national chemo. Will it come to that? That is hard to say. But at the very least, the infrastructure has been sufficiently weakened. A time-bomb has been set and the clock is ticking, and nothing can be done to diffuse it. It's just a matter of putting together a plan for what a Balkanized America will look like. I wish I could see a rosier future where we all have a kumbaya moment and live in peace and harmony in the utopia the left has promised its true believers for centuries, but I don't. Dystopian nightmares are born from this sort of toxic brew. Free advice, get right with God.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The people in this movement live a life of sin. Disconnected from God, they have attached themselves to the father of all lies. “For although they knew God they did not accord Him glory as God or give Him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened." ―Romans 1
It's not surprising that they would call for violence against people who honor God or those who simply disagree with them or refuse to affirm their lies, to join them in their deception. “The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. "One word of truth outweighs the world.” ― Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
Stay strong until the day of reckoning. “Many shall be refined, purified, and tested, but the wicked shall prove wicked; the wicked shall have no understanding, but those with insight shall…Blessed are they who have patience and persevere for the one thousand three hundred and thirty-five days. Go, take your rest, you shall rise for your reward at the end of days.” ― Daniel 12: 10-13
1
-
I get it. I served in the military for more than 20 years and I worked with these bureaucrats for an additional few years as an independent contractor. I stopped working for government agencies because I saw how poorly they were run and how these functionaries operated like they were untouchable, especially the people I worked most closely with, the ones at GS-15 and up level. I agree with the with the adage: "Mission statement of a government agency: If it ain't broke we'll fix it till it is."
That said, this is just another example of Vivek running his mouth and writing checks with it his ass could never cash. Base terminations on SS numbers? Yeah, that wouldn't lead to thousands of lawsuits and other headaches. I know, Walsh is a big Vivek guy. I can see the appeal since Walsh makes his living off of owning the libs. A moronic solution like the one this used-car salesman offers up is just the kind of thing Walsh can make a video on. It's just like when Vivek said Pence could have held up the election certifying vote by getting some law passed that day. He's a smart guy but I dunno, maybe his understanding of how the government actually functions is so weak he really believes his own BS. He is a Millennial which means he was raised at a time when civics was as dead as courses in Latin in our school system.
We had a guy in the WH already who didn't understand how government actually works. It's how we ended up with fauci, operation warp speed, christopher wray, and eight trillion additional dollars of debt, much of it going to democrats who used the cash to cheat their way to an electoral win. But hey, if you believe you can simply waltz in and arbitrarily fire millions of people based on the social security numbers, Vivek is your guy. If you like the show more than solutions, Vivek is your guy. If you think a convicted felon who will likely be kept of the ballot in a lot of states and will be so busy in court it won't matter anyway, Trump is your guy. And no, I'm not some RINO all in on nikki hailey.
Do what you want. But know this, Vivek is full-of-sh*t. If you like being lied to, him and Trump are your guys.
1
-
I imagine this Oliver character would have told jokes about Jews and other people deemed sub-human by the Fuhrer and Himmler in the 30s if it paid well enough. People like him, who know good and damn well that they are partaking in a lie, and doing it for a buck, are playing a dangerous game with their eternal soul:
“The wrath of God is indeed being revealed from heaven against every impiety and wickedness of those who suppress the truth by their wickedness. For what can be known about God is evident to them, because God made it evident to them…for although they knew God, they did not accord Him glory as God or give Him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened. While claiming to be wise, they became fools” ― Romans 1: 18-22
“I tell you, on the day of judgment people will render an account for every careless word they speak. By your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned.” ― Matthew 12: 36-37
1
-
1
-
There's nothing misplaced about any of this. All churches are under attack by Satan, the demons, and their minions. This is a coordinated action and unless and until Christians of all faiths see and acknowledge this assault for what is and understand the principalities behind this effort, the boundaries will continue to be pushed and pushed some more until authority rests with secular leaders alone, including moral and spiritual standards. Make no mistake, the Devil knows his time short and Hell has been emptied.
“When an unclean spirit goes out of a person it roams through arid regions searching for rest but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my home from which I came.’ But upon returning, it finds it empty, swept clean, and put in order. Then it goes and brings back with itself seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they move in and dwell there; and the last condition of that person is worse than the first.” ― Matthew 12: 43-45
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I am very much for civil liberty and limiting the role government plays in our individual lives. It's why I cautioned my friends who were cheering when that abomination called the patriot act was passed. I tried to warn em, it ain't no fun when the rabbit has the gun so be careful what you wish for Dorothy. As John Adams said, liberty lost is gone forever. Once the government starts limiting or outright taking away basic civil liberties they tend to hang on to to the power they have seized.
So that is where I stand on civil rights. My main problem with libertarians, and I have several, is they tend to be secular by default which results in them not really having a core set of principles based on a transcendent morality. Take a guy like dennis prager. I listened to him for a time but his "libertarian sensibilities" left me shaking my head. Like the time he was interviewing a guy who was on the front-line of fighting human trafficking and prager wanted him to draw a distinction between human traffickers and hard-working pimps just trying to make a buck. As I mentioned, he based that on his "libertarian sensibilities." Just like his stance on pornography and a number of issues he sees as victimless crimes. Another example is john stossel who did an expose on the homeless problem in San Francisco and how the crime spree that was a direct result of it was killing residential and business districts. At the end he made sure to include the disclaimer that while junkies leaving needles lying around, holding people up in broad daylight, relieving themselves where they choose, and stealing so much that businesses are shutting down is a problem, we still had to balance that with the junkies right to shoot up where he wished. More libertarian sensibilities at work. And their candidate for president this year? Chase Oliver, a guy who describes himself as "angry and gay."
Okay, fair enough. If all of that is your thing, by all means, have at it. But that is the libertarian party circa 2024 and it will continue to get more fringe as the world gets more crazy because when you adopt a utilitarian "live and let live" attitude in world where the guardrails are being removed at an alarming rate and you're dealing with people who have no intention of letting you "live and let live" well, you do the math. That kind of thinking works fine in a world where everyone is sane and rational and they respect the rights of their neighbor. Unfortunately, that world has never existed, and the idea that if you just made it all legal somehow people would be pacified...well, if you buy that I've got some lakefront property to sell you. It's 10-feet offshore but hey, the view is spectacular.
1
-
1
-
You kinda hit on one of the problems that I believe to be insurmountable, the whole international cooperation angle. If you could point to one instance where that has ever worked, and please, spare me any UN nonsense, I'd give it maybe a 1,000,000,000-1 shot. And what about bringing the stuff back? You touched on getting to it and obliquely about getting the ores/minerals out, but how does bringing it back work? That's a lot of weight. You thought there was a fireball around the Apollo capsule? I get the feeling that much mass crashing through the atmosphere is going to be a tad bit warmer. And it will take one helluva propulsion system to take off of whatever body we land on.
Maybe, just maybe, if we had stuck with exploration after the Apollo program we would be half a century away. Now? The entire infrastructure has to be built from the ground up. Technologies we don't have will have to be created to overcome hurdles we haven't even thought of. And we are 32-trillion and counting in debt. No bucks, no Buck Rogers.
But hey, I like the optimism. It's why I tune in from time-to-time. Maybe your great, great, great, grandchildren will see it, provided we are still around and something hasn't happened to, as George Carlin once delicately put it" "Kick us off this rock like a bad case of the fleas."
1
-
What that woman is discovering is something she would have anticipated if she truly understood the DNA of the far left. Rousseau, the godfather of all leftist politics spoke about the general will in the 18th Century and how it's okay to deal with people who buck the general will harshly. Marx said it, Lenin practiced it, Stalin and Mao turned it into an industry, killing millions in the name of progress. The American left is no different. Read the history of the American communist party and how many hoops and barrels they had to jump through during WWII when Stalin first demanded they make peace with the Nazis, their ideological enemies, then demanded they go back to hating them again after the Soviet Union was invaded. No matter where the left grabs power they always engage in the same behavior. It's who they are. They are Godless so the movement acts as their religion and they see the state as enforcers not, not as a body responsible to the people they govern.
This current hard left turn is a byproduct of obama. He was raised by Marxists, he has the Marxist authoritarian mindset, he is Godless, and he believes he can fundamentally transform America, just like he promised. He is the leader of the left and if you are of the left you are expected to follow in lock-step. His edicts and the edicts of his underlings are expected to be obeyed without question and when you question them, like Rousseau said, you need to be dealt with harshly. All you had to do was learn the history of the left Anna, from the French Revolution to America in 2024. They come after you because it's who they are. It's in the political DNA. Just like weak-ass squishiness is in the DNA of the republican party. See, us conservatives are homeless as well. One more thing, if we stay on this current trajectory, things are going to get crazy bad. This isn't crazy bad. This is Satan's foreplay. I wish it wasn't so, but I've been around long enough to know how to read the tea-leaves. Sleep will kids.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sorry ladies, but taking out a guy who is shooting at state troopers is not a tragedy and the fact he identifies as non-binary does not bring any other element into anything. ANTIFA has their marching orders. Start sh*t-disturbing in states with republican governors and/or legislatures in order to create chaos and hopefully a few more martyrs for the cause, somebody to rally around for the next riot. Normally they wait until summer because these lunatics aren't crazy about working in chilly weather but I suppose you go where the boss tells you to go when he tells you to go there.
And that's the thing isn't it? If this was the Proud Boys or any other right-wing boogey man outfit DOJ would be tracing emails and following the money back to whoever is calling the shots and organizing these riots. But nobody is the least bit interested in that. It's all spontaneous you see. People from all over the country just decided at the same time to travel to Atlanta to do a bit smashing and burning.
This is just the start. Georgia, Florida, maybe even South Dakota are all on the hit list (even though kristi noem is down with the tranny agenda she still has that R in front of her name, making SD a target). These psychopaths are the street army for the democratic party, modern-day SA brown shirts. Somebody is organizing and paying these thugs. Of course state-run media is going to call smashing, burning, and looting peaceful. They know their credibility is in the toilet so they don't even pretend to be objective any more. They are not journalists, they are propogandists, sons and daughters of democratic politicians and operatives who themselves were sons and daughters of democratic politicians and operatives. The media has been in the pocket of the democratic party since the days of FDR. They cannot be redeemed at this point.
The question now is, what can be redeemed? It's a question being asked more frequently as the cultural marxists take total control of the democrat party and one that will require an answer sooner than later I'm afraid. One thing is certain, these maniacs who are roaming the countryside, showing up at these staged vents from coast-to-coast are ready for a fight. But the Proud Boys and white Christian nationalists are the greatest threat to democracy. Right?
When one side will tell a lie that flagrant, and face no challenge for doing so, how many steps away from a totalitarian take over are you? Or is it a great reset? That does have a softer ring to it, doesn't it? 🤔Just sayin.
1
-
Dude, I'm sure you're well-meaning and sincere, but you have some, well let's say, innocent thinking on how spending in the swamp works and how governments function in general (I'm being generous when I say innocent). Most of the budget, 55%, is devoted to entitlements. We could have a whole debate on the rights and wrongs of that but you wanna increase your spending in star gazing? Get ready for the "You'll kill grandma" argument from the bunch handing out those checks. Where does the rest of our trillions go? Well, as of April 2024 it costs $624 billion to maintain the debt, which is 16% of the total federal spending. That's just paying on the interest, even though no one will really call out the collection agency anyway. Tack on another $820.3 billion, or roughly 18.3% of the budget for military spending. Add up just those three pieces of the government pie and we are at roughly 89% of all spending. Wanna see how spending federal money at the state level works. Michigan's governor just announced she is going to spend $250 million they got for COVID relief on prettying up the state parks. I mean, those lakes and trees were certainly affected by that killer virus.
Sorry, I'm not trying to be snarky, but it's not as easy at that gasbag degrasse tyson makes it out to be. In fact, damn near every opinion that narcissistic windbag burps into existence is so full of crap a heard of cows would have a hard time matching his production, but I digress. And calling NASA a fine example of good government at work, well, you gotta stretch that definition pretty thin to fit it into the conversation. Look, don't get me wrong, I'm a space guy, but the will isn't there. The people aren't pumped like they were during Apollo and stuff you find cool is lost on the average product of our stellar education system. They're so lost and confused they don't what bathroom to use.
If I sound overly cynical, well it comes from years of heartache. As George Carlin put it, inside every cynic beats the heart of a disillusioned optimist. I was THE true believer once upon a time. Now? Now I worry if we'll even have a country in the timeframes NASA is laying out there. And no, it's not the climate that's going to end us, it's our own indifference to being good citizens and our desire for our own personal comfort above all else. But that's me. Live long and prosper my brother. 🖖
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dr. Peterson makes some good points and the vision he outlines does have the potential to provide a more stable state of affairs at the macro-level. Three are however two points I think he should have elaborated on or incorporated.
The first is the acknowledgment of God. He danced around it with references to objective truth, natural law, and Abrahamic traditions but the vision is largely secular in nature. Perhaps that is by design. As C.S. Lewis put it, "Aim at Heaven, and you will get Earth thrown in. Aim at Earth, and you will get neither.” I know the arguments for against because I spent a considerable amount of time in both camps and the conclusion I came away with is we are better off when we have a relationship with our Creator. I'm not talking about religion and dogma, I'm talking about an active relationship with the living God. “For although they knew God they did not accord him glory as God or give Him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened. While claiming to be wise, they became fools…And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God handed them over to their undiscerning mind to do what is improper.” ―Romans 1 Look around and consider the validity of those words. Put your views on religion aside for one moment and consider what Paul is describing in relation to what is happening today.
The second point I'd like to make is that Dr. Petersen left two attributes off his list which I believe lie at the core of much of the problems we face today. The first is virtue. Our Founding Fathers put great stock in the importance of virtue. Did they fall short themselves? Of course. I'm not here to debate that. But they understood the need for virtue in a self-governing society. We take self-government as a given but in the 18th Century it was truly a revolutionary idea. Democracy was seen as too messy and unwieldly and the assumption was at some point people would look for a strong hand to maintain order. That didn't happen because great men like Washington gave up power voluntarily. Civic duty meant something once. Now it is an arcane notion. I was in a university classroom when I heard a professor say that anyone who joined the military or some other low-paying profession out of some misguided sense of altruism was a fool. And that was decades ago. Things have only gotten worse.
The other attribute is courage. The advent of social media and cancel culture have made cowards of too many people. This is not some unique phenomena. Alexander Solzhenitsyn tried to warn us about this tactic in an address he made at Harvard University in 1978: “A decline in courage may be the most striking feature that an outside observer notices in the West today. The Western world has lost its civic courage, both as a whole and separately, in each country…Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling and intellectual elites, causing an impression of a loss of courage by the entire society. There are many courageous individuals, but they have no determining influence on public life.” Want to know why people who ought to know better can't define what a woman is? It's not that they believe it, that's not the point. It's not that they are trying to make you believe anything that is patently incorrect, that's not the point. The point is to get you to participate in the lie when you know it's not true or to remain silent out of fear. That is power. That is the lifeblood of tyranny. “The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. "One word of truth outweighs the world.” ― Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Anyway, that was a rant. I doubt anyone will read this but I felt like saying it all the same. We are at a crossroad as a society. I believe nothing short of Divine intervention will get us through but that's me. I'm not saying you have to believe that. All I ask is that you consider the points I made and judge them against the way things are, not the way some say things are. When all else fails, fall back on Nancy Reagan's old rule: "Just say no." Imagine what would happen if one day everyone who sees the world for what it is did that. What an amazing day that would be. God Bless and stay safe out there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So I'll never get a chance to write Hey Jude or buy gold at one dollar an ounce? Oh well, we all live the hand we're dealt. Who knows, maybe we are already in a time loop and I'm typing these words for the 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, time. If that is the case, can I get a better heart on at least one of these journeys? It's a simple ask.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We are getting some great rulings during this session, the likes of which I never thought I'd live to see. Thank you President Trump for winning and appointing justices who, while I haven't agreed with every decision, have done a helluva lot better than previous republican appointees who have usually disappointed (yes CJ Roberts, I'm looking at you). And thank you Hillary for, well, being Hillary. Trump most likely would have lost to anyone else. Props to you Gollum!
I like this decision but I wish it would have rebuked the Chevron Deference (Doctrine) in stronger terms. The administrative/regulatory state is the biggest threat to individual liberty and the strongest governor keeping our economy in check. We could get out of most of our messes in a year if the unelected fourth branch of government went away. I did some contract work developing training for the DOT a while back. The mountains of regulations I had to plow through to make sense out of what it was federal and state inspectors and crash investigators needed to learn was unlike anything I had ever seen, and this is coming from someone who served more than 20 years in the military, the single most regimented outfit this side of Cuba.
The Chevron Doctrine was one of those areas Scalia was weak on. With these justices, especially Gorsuch, maybe we have a chance of ridding ourselves of the blank check the Court gave these agencies once and for all. Maybe, and I'm just spitballing here, just maybe, Congress could actually be forced do their jobs. 🤔 Nah, but a man can dream can't he?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
People were invested in the idea of obama. You had the New York Times writing glowing articles about how he was going to change history and those jokers who hand out the nobel prize gave it to him for stuff he might do when he becomes president. obama then showed just how arrogant he is by accepting the thing knowing good and damn well he hadn't done a thing to earn it.
obama ushered in the era of politics as reality TV. He built a cult of personality that allowed him to do a half-assed job because nobody dared criticize dear leader. A good friend of mine asked me how we ended up with Trump. I told him obama led the way. People on the right got tired of the high-handed insults obama would direct at regular working class people and wanted their own personality who would call the other side names.
But obama was more consequential than that. He cut our military to pre WWI levels and placed lefty officers in key positions. He populated the alphabet agencies, especially the DOJ and FBI with fellow travelers, creating an enforcement arm for the democrat party and he ushered in the age of the degenerate. The disgusting pagan ritual that was recently carried out on the WH lawn is the best example of that, all while the rainbow flag was given higher status than the American flag, a violation of Federal law.
But laws never concerned obama much. He wasn't that interested in them when he dropped off pallets of cash at the airport in Tehran without approval from anyone, giving that group of thugs billions that was then used in terror operations carried out by the palestinians and the yemeni's. He wasn't much interested in them when he sicked the IRS on his political opponents and had the FBI go after reporters who had the temerity to criticize him. Yeah, he is a peach, and as we suffer through his third term people still put the guy on a pedestal while he basks in the glory at his compound on Martha's Vineyard. Not a bad outcome for a community organizer. Yes we can became yes we did and we are the ones paying the price for his fundamental transformation of America.
Comparing what happened to Detroit with what this guy did to the country is actually quite fitting. coleman young played the race-baiting-divide-and-conquer game as well and ran that city into the ground. I lived there and witnessed it first hand. It wasn't the taxes that chased the people who had jobs out, it was young's declaration that anyone who disagreed with him could hit Eight Mile. Everyone knew who he was referring to and they took him up on the offer. Suddenly there was no one left to pay those city taxes and the formerly middle class neighborhoods were trashed within a decade. Cities, like countries, rot from within. Helluva job. Pay attention gang, because Detroit should be a cautionary tale to everyone who buys into the progressive, I mean regressive, agenda.
“People fascinated by the idea of progress never suspect that every step forward is also a step on the way to the end.” ― Milan Kundera
And the beat goes on...the beat goes on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well there's always the "Billy Bob Thornton" solution for why we haven't had our "Jody Foster Moment" (always appreciate a good movie reference): "Our budget allows to track about 3% of the sky and begging your pardon sir but it's a big-ass sky." Lotsa open space out there still yet to be looked at.
Personally, I think it's just a case where the conditions for intelligent life are a whole lot more rare than the scientists who bloviate on TV make them out to be and if there are smart folks who are able to talk and stuff out there they are no closer to figuring out how to break the laws of physics than we are. And at the end of the day, that's what you would have to do to boldly go where no man has gone before. Unless Einstein got it all wrong and Bill Nye is actually a scientist, but I digress.
Trust me, nobody used to believe in E.T. more than me and nobody was more geeked about having him in for a cup of tea than I was but the more I learned about the universe as it is, not as we were told it was when I was a kid, the more I have come to to the conclusion that we are pretty damned special. Or is it just especially damned? 🤔 I get confused on that point from time-to-time. But there I go again.
Anyway, it's late, and while this stuff is fun I'm gonna have to put it to bed for now. Let me know when Spock stops by for a chat. Until then, as always, "Live long and Prosper." 🖖
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kimobrien. Are you sure they're not extending the capitalist revolution? Are you sure people aren't looking to better themselves rather than serving some collective? I think that is more in line with what is happening in the world today. One of the chief reasons communism failed to take root in the industrialized nations of the 19th and 20th Centuries is because workers didn't want to dismantle the middle and upper classes, they wanted to join them. Isn't that the case now, especially in the third world? The place I see socialist ideology being promoted is college campuses in the West among children of privilege, all of whom were born after the Cold War ended, where it is soft-peddled as democratic socialism, a term which is an oxymoron. The class struggle now has shifted to pitting race against race, a reset of the dialectic. Isn't that more indicative of competing interests in the 21st Century? I mean, Netflix and smart-phones are more important to most Chinese citizens than spreading the world revolution, which, at least according Marx,. there really is no need to spread anyway because the communist utopia is a historical inevitability. That is the way story ends right? Again, just asking, not trying to be difficult.
1
-
Why do I get the feeling this ongoing child abuse issue, be it the sanctioning of surgical mutilation of kids or the normalization and promotion of pedophilia, will become for the republican party what Obamacare was for them a decade ago. Remember that? Send us money so we can take the house and repeal Obamacare. That was done. Then it was, send us more money so we can take the senate and repeal Obamacare. Roger that. Then, when they had both chambers they passed legislation repealing it while obama was in office, knowing good and damn well he would veto anything sent his way. And when they had all three branches and could actually repeal the thing?...crickets.
I could see them doing something similar with this nonsense while harris and mayor pete are in charge in 2023. Then, when someone like Ron DeSantis gets elected and tells them to send that same bill to him all of a sudden the votes won't be there. All of a sudden the big bad filibuster will become an issue. Can't touch those social issues ya know. Not the third-rail of politics. Bad for business don't ya know.
My hope is this time it's different. I believe this nonsense has touched a genuine nerve within the population and maybe just maybe, the rights of children will become for the modern day republican party what slavery became for the Whigs in the 1850s, the hill they die on because they lack the moral fortitude to do what is right. If that does happen and a new party comes about as a result, this time there should be no realignment, no taking in leftovers from that dead carcass of a party simply to boost numbers. That was the fatal flaw with the republicans in 1856. They absorbed a bunch of wishy-washy Whigs for the numbers and that gene never went away. It's still alive and well. Lincoln had trouble with the simps. So did Reagan. So did Trump.
Enough. If some new coalition does come about, and I believe this issue may force it, the wimps and the simps need to go back to their country clubs and enjoy martini's with Muffy, Tad and Biff. A time for choosing folks. It is upon us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The crazy greenies, the pampered celebrities, they all have something in common, they are all leftists. Anger, resentment, bitterness, nastiness, pettiness, these are traits all leftists share. They always have. And no, I'm not talking about old-school liberals, I'm talking about the cultural marxists and their fellow travelers who are small in number but big in mouth. They are like locusts, all they do is leave destruction in their wake. Charge people who defame art with an act of terrorism and sentence them accordingly. It fits the crime.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm glad they restored that aircraft to its original mission configuration. Some may take this the wrong way, but it was built to bring destruction to the enemy, not fly around a rich guy, or even a group with a noble purpose. I worked on military aircraft for many years (the good old C-130 Herc) and I can tell you, they have their own personalities (at least the older ones did). Again, some may not get it, but if you've worked with the same bird night after night you get to know its quirks and habits and how to deal with them in ways not always found in the technical orders.
The men of the 8th Army Air Force were true heroes. That outfit had the highest casualty rate of any group during the war and they accounted for more than half of all Air Force losses during that timeframe. To put it into further perspective, they lost more men than the Marines. Before the 25-mission rule went into effect the flyers knew it was just a matter of time before their number came up. Yet they kept at it. They kept bombing in the day in spite of the warnings of the British because in their way of thinking daylight bombing offered the best chance of success. While I served, I was fortunate enough to speak with several flyers who served with the 8th and they were all humble guys who just did a job that needed doing. Most are gone now, but if you are ever fortunate enough to meet one, give him your thanks. Those men, and their brothers and sisters in arms from all allied branches and nations truly did save western civilization.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Come on Dick, damn near everything was personal with you, especially the feud between you and the media. That said, it's not like it wasn't understandable. It was just as, if not more, personal with the media. There were politicians they disliked but they hated Nixon. The deep seeded resentment was cemented during the 1960 presidential campaign. The media had a love affair with Kennedy rivaled only by obama. And we all know every hero needs a villain to take on. The thing is, Nixon did well with the voters, but his insecurities were amplified by his treatment at the hands of the east-coast establishment as a whole, and the media, which was part of that crew, was his boogie man.
No matter how much he succeeded, no matter how much money he made, they never accepted him. LBJ suffered the same fate but he was more prone to just moan and feel sorry for himself. Nixon was a brawler, and he wanted to get even with the SOB's who looked down their nose at him. Nixon was the brightest of the bunch and he had the most natural talent, but his insecurities got the better of him. He believed he was cheated out of a win in 1960 and he was damn sure going to make sure nothing like that ever happened again. That led to the plumbers and Watergate. Then, as he said, he gave the media all the ammo they needed to hang him and talk about a valued scalp. The scandal made careers and created the celebrity journalist. Just like trump, the media hated Nixon, but they loved the fight.
1
-
Well said Drinker. I used to get criticized for saying everyone is full of shit, it's just a matter of degree. But the Hollywood types prove on a regular basis that most of them peg the needle far to the right on a regular basis. Maybe it's because they work at playing make-believe so much that some of them actually buy their own bullshit, like the pathological liar who eventually loses the capacity to discern between what is true and what is a lie. I suppose it also has something to do with being surrounded by sycophant's whose job is to kiss their ass all day long. I used to teach and that can be a stage, especially when you have 250 people in the audience. A lot of my colleagues thought they were all of that simply because their students told them they were. I would remind them that most of those people have one goal, to get through the course with as little pain as possible and get as far away from them as they possibly could. Needless to say, that take didn't make me popular with the fellas but it was the truth. I can only imagine what it is like at the actual star level. People buy their own BS easy enough but once you start buying what other people are peddling your ability to think for yourself disappears.
I remember a few years back when Tom Hanks snuck away from his handlers long enough to give his leftie half-ass opinion on how the war in the Pacific was especially harsh because we were fighting people with slanted eyes. In his world, people of color or with slanted eyes can do no wrong because they are at the bottom of the oppression totem poll so all the bitter fighting on Okinawa, Iwo-Jima, and Peleliu had to be the fault of the evil white man. This was right after he had been involved in filming an HBO docu-series on that very war and he had worked with Gary Sinise to raise money for the WWII Memorial. I worked to raise money for that as well but after Hanks little ant-American diatribe I was like, the hell with him and the hell with his series on the Pacific. I did peek at a few episodes but truth be told it was nothing but a poor-mans Band of Brothers. I've seen his movies since then and liked some of them but I have no respect for the man. I'll give Sean Penn credit. I disagree with damn near every word he says and every cause he backs but at least he's authentic. He IS Jeff Spicoli.
As for the rest of em, beyond Gary Sinise and a few others I wouldn't give any of them the time of day. That has always been a failing of America. We have no royal family so we transferred our hero-worship onto Hollywood stars. The problem with putting your faith in people is they will always let you down. I'm not saying down with people, just the opposite, our flaws are what make us so intriguing. But if you're looking for someone to admire there are better places to shop than Hollywood and New York. I still stand by my assertion, everyone is still full of shit, it's just a matter of degree.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dude, I dig your enthusiasm. And I certainly enjoy videos like this over the one I just watched about habitable zones around stars that are just a tad warmer than my broiler. But before you go beaming anyone up, who's going to bankroll all this? I've said it before, the line from The Right Stuff is applicable to any generation: "No bucks, no Buck Rogers." Space exploration is all based on political will. We went to the Moon because the will was there and the people rallied behind the cause in overwhelming numbers. All this stuff about building permanent settlements on the Moon and nuclear powered rockets, man, I love it.
But do you realize how many trillion's, with a T, it's going to cost to pull off a play like that? Don't get me wrong, I love the idea. I grew up on this stuff and when I was a kid, I figured we would be on our way to Jupiter by this time, that the Mars landing would already be well in the rearview mirror. But we stopped after the Moon. And we stopped for a very simple reason, the will just wasn't there. Momentum is something you have to feed, we stopped feeding it. The eggheads beat the explorers at NASA and we got telescopes and probes instead of starships and intrepid space travelers. I love the idea of going to Mars, but honestly, if you asked me to quantify the ROI on a project like that I wouldn't be able to.
In my opinion, the only way to pull off an undertaking like you are describing would be to make it a worldwide thing. Get everyone involved. Share the cost and the brainpower. It might do us some good. Maybe we'd figure out that at a basic level we aren't the enemies the powers that be want us to believe we are, and I'm not just talking about differences between nations. But that's a conversation for another day. For now, keep dreaming big dreams big guy, and know that I'm in your corner, even of I put the odds at 100,000,000 to 1. But as Jim Carey put it: "So you're telling me I've got a chance."
1
-
1
-
That commie in the beginning of the video is NVTS nuts but even a blind squirrel can find an acorn. There is an element of truth in his argument that corporations outsourced working class jobs overseas, taking away a good chunk of employment possibilities for unskilled workers, but they didn't send them all away. There were still plenty of them around into the 70s but by that point the exodus out of Detroit was in full bloom. I know because it happened to my neighborhood. It started with the riots in 1967. People got nervous after that and then they tried to institute bussing. Nobody ever talks about the impact that had on white flight as it came to be called but it did, and a lot of those people who split for the suburbs were the middle and higher end earners, people with jobs. When Coleman Young was elected in 73 that was it. He came out with his race baiting BS and told everyone who didn't agree with his policies to hit Eight Mile. Everyone knew who he was talking about and they took him up on his invitation.
By the mid 1980s the neighborhood I grew up in was almost unrecognizable. I took off in 1984 and outside of one drive thru in 1992 to satisfy my wife's curiosity I stayed away. A couple years ago I did another drive thru and it broke my heart. It was like I was visiting a place I had never been too. There were only two businesses still standing from my childhood and one of those, a theater, has a fenced in parking lot with security guards. The other is a shoe repair store that I swear must be some kind of front. The rest of the business district is pretty much vacant land. The parks I used to play in are weed covered fields. No swings, slides, or baseball diamonds. My high school is long gone and my elementary school is boarded up, the baseball diamond and playground are obliterated. And the worse part was, there were no people. It was a sunny Saturday afternoon in the late Spring, the kind of day that used to bring everyone out of their homes in the 60s and we saw two people, both walking with their heads down, like they just wanted to be left alone. My house is gone. In fact, there are only three houses left on my street.
People can talk economics and tax rates all day long but the bottom line is people stay where they feel wanted and where they have a stake. We were told in no uncertain terms to get out and never come back. Would you have stayed? That is my neighborhoods story, and it was repeated all over Detroit. That city died from the inside out, and it wasn't just the taxes that drove people away. That may sound harsh, but it's the way things worked in my neck of the woods.
1
-
1
-
@nancysexton4364 Lindsay is one of Fox's go-to guys. Just ask his BFF Hannity. Beyond one or two hosts Fox is the mouth piece of the RNC and Mitch McConnell. They are also on board with normalizing sexual deviancy. Bruce Jenner is a regular and Bush's squishy former press secretary did a glowing piece on the fairytale transition of a mentally disturbed child in California, praising the love the kids parents were showing by offering their child up as a sacrifice on the pagan altar of progressivism.
Fox is not an ally to the conservative movement. I am truly disappointed that two men I once admired, Mark Levin and Dan Bongino took the money and came on board as the token conservatives for Fox. Notice where they stuck them? Late Saturday night and Sunday evening? That's not by mistake. I no longer follow either of those guys. The lure of being on TV and making a quick buck got to them. Tucker is the only straight shooter on the network and I imagine the suits that run the network hate that he's too big to take out. I don't always agree with him but at least he says what he believes and isn't afraid to challenge the sacred cows of the RNC.
Fox always pimps for the establishment candidate in every primary and goes out their way to trash any conservative who has the temerity to run against a swamp creature. If you consider yourself to be a conservative and you are still watching Fox, you really should consider a leave of absence. I'm not trying to be snarky or confrontational. I mean it with all sincerity. Your brain will thank you and you won't miss Karl Rove and his little white board at all. You remember Rove, the squishiest of swamp creatures left over from the Bush dynasty, the one who made a total ass of himself the night Romney got his clock cleaned by Obama by running around claiming his boy still had a chance because some county in Ohio with four farmers and three cows hadn't come in yet? That guy? The man Hannity sucks up too and praises as "the architect." That is Fox News in a nutshell. The fact squishes like him still have a voice says it all.
As for Watters, he is a lightweight kid who used to carry water for O'Reilly. He'd host a drag queen story hour if his bosses told him to. Hell, he'd probably dress up and read to the kiddies himself if it meant keeping his gig.
Sorry, didn't mean to rain on any Fox fan's parade. If you want more of McConnell, more of Rubio, more McCarthy and Graham, by all means, keep tuning in and voting the way they recommend.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I saw an interview yesterday with Ralph Martin on Matt Fradd's channel and he mentioned that a province in Australia has made it a crime to provide what they call conversion therapy for anyone who is gay, even if that person goes to a psychiatrist's office and wants help overcoming their same-sex attraction. The counsellor can receive up to 10 years in prison for trying to help that patient out. He or she is gay and that is the end of the discussion, period. Don't expect them to stop there. It's only a matter of time before governments in these western countries like Australia, Canada, and the UK that don't have religious protection built into their constitution will start coming after clergy who refuse to go along with the gender madness and gay agenda. And I can see states like Kalifornia, Oregon, and Washington passing similar laws to that one in Australia and locking up people like Dr. Grossman for holding views that run counter to their demonic agenda of the state. If these people posing as doctors are successfully sued protection for them will be built into the law as well.
This is why I say, don't look to the courts for protection against this assault on all that is holy, good, and beautiful. Only God can help us now. He's willing, but what about us? We have to repent and humble ourselves before Him. If this country doesn't get their act together soon that national divorce politicians casually talk about will become a reality and here's a newsflash, divorces tend to be messy affairs. We better pray it doesn't come to that because if it does, as Bob Dylan put it, a hard rain's a gonna fall.
1
-
I think societies breakdown when they trade liberty for security and comfort. The Roman Republic gave way to Empire. Most say the Empire at its height was the zenith of Roman civilization but really, the day the republic caved and allowed Caesar to become a dictator marked the end of that society. Virtue and an altruistic sense of civic responsibility are the markers of a healthy society. When those give way, it's only a matter of time before some form of tyranny sets in.
For the west, it will be globalism delivered in the form of corporatism. The unholy alliance between commerce and government is already in place. I'm not talking some form of exploitation via Marxism, it's really more of a Randian dystopia taking root, the kind she detailed in Atlas Shrugged. We have shown the globalists we can be easily sacred and led pretty much any place they want to take us. To borrow from Bernadette Peters in the movie The Jerk, you can have the money, just don't take the stuff.
Anyway, that's how I see it. By the next decade we will have digital currencies and social credit scores on a global scale. Civilizations don't collapse, they evolve. They move from freedom to slavery and back again. The American Experiment had a nice run. Franklin said we had a republic if we could keep it and for a time we did. But now more and more people are saying they don't want it. We are becoming atomized and isolated even as we become more interdependent. The great paradox of the digital age. All hail the experts, our new overlords.
To be honest, I'm glad I'm on the back end of the journey because the future on this rock is coming to an end. Get right with your Creator while you still can. That's my advice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
I agree Rand, the republican party is the Washington Generals of politics. But how about calling out the other senator from your state, one of the guys with his hands on the wheel of this bus we call an economy, the turtle of the senate. It's really tough to get behind a party that just elected him for another term as your leader. Remember the good old days, the days when guys like Ted Cruz weren't afraid to call him a liar right on the floor? Those are the kind of stones I'd like to see from someone, anyone.
If that a-hole decides to run again because he figures him and his chi-com wife haven't stolen enough for their retirement fund he better face a primary opponent, I mean a real opponent, one with the cash and wherewithal to take that SOB out. Otherwise, this is all just a rhetorical exercise, isn't it Rand? I luv ya man, but I gotta call it as I see it.
1
-
1
-
Cool stuff. A bit disappointing to the Bill Nye types who play scientist on TV and make claims of a galaxy chock-full-of life because that's what the script tells em to say. Or the Neil DeGrasse Tyson types who have a few more letters behind their name and make similar claims because it pays well. But none of this will stop either of them from living long and prospering.
I imagine these findings might make it a bit tougher to pull funds out of NASA, especially if they get into a heated competition with Elon Musk and China over who can get to Mars and lay claim to the Moon. To borrow from the movies, they might use the Billy Bob Thornton argument and say they need a bigger telescope because: "Begging your pardon sir but it's a big-ass sky." Of course NASA, staying with the movie theme, could respond to the false findings and go all Jeff Specoli on them, responding: "We can be bogus too."
Money always carries the day and while ROI isn't something any government agency is that concerned about, public perception is. What's more exciting? Finding a planet they may know more about in 50 years after building a few more new generations of telescopes that may or may not deliver or seeing old glory flying over a patch of dirt on the Martian surface. Can we do anything of real value with that patch of dirt? Not really. But it does look cool and the public does prefer cool to nerdy, and as the man from the press office told the astronauts in the Right Stuff when it came to public perception: "No bucks, no Buck Rogers."
I'm gonna most likely be off this rock when either milestone gets reached but I'm betting on exploration beating out discovery because we are explorers by nature. Sorry planet hunters, that 24 billon dollar telescope ain't getting off the drawing board, not with a 30 trillion dollar national debt and a corrupt money laundering regime in Ukraine that needs propping up. Maybe if the Russians settle down some time soon. In the meantime, enjoy those Bausch & Lomb's.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Christopher Nolan is more concerned with making a film than telling a story. That works in some instances but history requires storytelling and when the storytelling is weak or disjointed the product suffers. I'm one of those who hated Dunkirk because while it was visually interesting, if you didn't know anything about the evacuation going in, why it happened, how it was put together, why it worked, you didn't learn anything coming out. It sounds like he did the same thing here. I was hesitant about spending money to see this one, and this review sort of confirms my fears. I'll wait for it to stream, then wait for the price to drop.
Sorry, but as someone who has studied history and read quite a bit I have learned that the narrative makes all the difference. I don't demand complete fidelity, since license is always taken, but just like I steer clear of Ron Howard bio-pics because of his cookie-cutter style of filming and cowardly character assassinations of people who aren't around to defend themselves simply to create an antagonist because that was what he was taught at film school, I steer clear of Nolan because he sucks at storytelling and just doesn't seem that interested in it. And yes, that is a run-on sentence dedicated the Drinker who is a master at their application. Cheers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A preacher named "Creflo Dollar?" If that isn't just inviting trouble I don't know what is. I've never seen that character before and hopefully I never will again. I recognize several of these charlatans though, including Osteen and Paula White who was one of President Trump's "spiritual" advisors. I never gave any of these people one moment of attention, not even when I was searching for a way back into Christ's good graces after years of swimming in the devil's lake.
The number of people taken in by these huckster's is amazing. I get it with Trump. He didn't exactly have a Road to Damascus moment when he suddenly discovered the Bible in 2016 so he would have a natural attraction to people like White and Robert Jeffress who are themselves attracted to power, fame, and money. These false prophets may want to consider what the actual Gospel, not the prosperity gospel has to say on the matter of mixing religion and politics. They are sowing seeds alright but the Gospel says you will know a tree by its fruit and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. In fact, in another passage, the master tells the servant to cut down the tree that fails to bear good fruit and burn it. Then there is the one instance where Jesus truly lashes out, when he overturns the money changers tables in the Temple.
Say what you will about the Catholic faith but you won't find Mass being said in mega-churches with rock bands and light shows. When I decided I wanted to reestablish my relationship with God I was adamant that I wanted nothing to do with the Catholic Church. But the more protestant services I attended the more in dawned on me that a lot of the preachers were just sort of making it up as they went along. I didn't go to any of these mega-frauds but there was a hit and miss element to what I was hearing.
One day, after being disillusioned for a third time, I decided to attend Mass, something I hadn't done in more than 40 years. Within the first five minutes I knew I was home. The liturgy played a big role in that. I'm not saying all protestants are on the wrong path or that all protestant churches have bad intentions and I admit the Catholic Church has had its share of scandal. But I would encourage anyone who is a former Catholic and who feels maybe a bit out of place with where they are currently at to consider coming home. Jesus has left the light on for you and we would love to welcome you back.
1
-
1
-
@JS-ki5yq Help me to understand something, you seem to be saying the capitalist system lies at root of the problem, that unless you put a cap on how much people own you will end up with a larger government. So how do you regulate wealth and impose the caps you recommend? Sounds like you need a large, intrusive, apparatus to pull that off which is exactly what you get with a socialist system. Or will people just naturally give back what they have earned (or stolen for that matter) and say, you're right, we need to share the wealth in order to shrink the size of government, my bad?
It sounds like you are railing against crony capitalism, which I agree is a problem, but to pin it all on capitalism is a false assertion. Plenty of people enriched themselves in the socialist paradises they were claiming to be working on while the average person starved or was imprisoned for asking uncomfortable questions about how the whole thing was supposed to work. Is our government broken? You bet it is. Is it broken because of the capitalist system? There, I respectfully disagree. There are plenty of billionaires drinking from the government trough, but that game is as old as humanity itself. You know who would get rich off a system that imposed caps? The cappers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MoonshineH Well okay, the dialectic, dialectic historicism to be more precise, a concept he ripped off from Hagel and then, in Marx's own words; "turned it on its head." And socialism isn't the end of history according to Marx, communism is.
Now, getting back to my original post, communism fails because it's based on the social compact as Rousseau framed it, where man doesn't have a fallen nature and if left to his own devices would have been just fine. It was society and its corrupting influences, including religion which both Rosseau and Marx had a major axe to grind with, that messed him up. In order for a proper course correction, Rousseau argues for the general will to prevail. Marx goes a step further and argues that eventually communism will prevail, that capitalism will fall under its own weight because it is at odds with the general will. The problem of course is, when you make a case like that you have to provide evidence and Marx used notions like the super-structure and the labor theory of value which are based on nothing more than Marx's thoughts.
And what about the ultimate revolution? The rising up of the working class? Workers of the world unite and all that horesh*t? Why did the world-wide revolution not materialize? That's easy. The proletariat decided they wanted to work within the capitalist system instead of tearing it down because it had the best track record for upward mobility. Put more simply, since people are self-interested by nature, not collective-minded, they chose option A, the thesis over the antithesis put forward by Marx and Engel. Marx understood that reality deep down which is why he argued for the need of a dictatorship of the proletariat. Lenin, Stalin, and Moa agreed in the authoritarian approach and went one step further, deciding that those peasants and the damn middle class bourgeoisie who just weren't getting on board needed to be properly motivated. So what so you end up with? Re-education camps to adjust their thinking and mass graves for those who won't take the reprogramming no matter how many lashes you gave em. For Marx it would be necessary to overcome the corrupting influence of the super structure. For Locke, you would have to force that kind of thinking on people because they're just not wired for it.
And because you have to force people into it, communism will never be achieved. So much for the Marxist inevitability of history. Socialism fails because of its centralized nature and the tendency for people like the halfwit professors who spout that crap in the classrooms to be put in charge of the means of production. It's a bit like going to the janitor for open heart surgery.
I could go on, but I'll stop there. Marxism can't be boiled down to fortune-cookie wisdom and simple slogans. That much I know. I've read Marx. I just reject him because, well he's wrong. You really should expand on your thoughts a bit more. Maybe not as much I have here, but simply stating a definition isn't exactly defending a position. If you are going to come at someone and say they don't understand something, a well-reasoned argument comes in handy. Just sayin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thank you Tulsi, that was fantastic. Like you, I served this nation for more than 23 years, spending Christmases sleeping in foreign lands, away from friends and family, being shot at by people who meant it, and doing it all for less money than my civilian counterparts. Now the FBI has added me to their enemies list for the secular sin of being Catholic.
On January 23, 2023, the FBI released a document on "Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists" and their interests in “Radical-Traditionalist Catholics” or RTCs. Apparently, Catholics who prefer the Latin Mass are more likely to hold traditional views that amount to an “adherence to anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBTQ and white supremacist ideology.” The document goes on to recommend monitoring Catholic Masses and developing sources within the parishes to snitch on those who may hold extremist views.
And where does all of this originate from? What source did the FBI use to determine Catholics pose a threat to state? The good old Southern Poverty Law Center and their list of “Radical Traditional Catholicism Hate Groups.” You might remember the good old SPLC. They are the group who put a target on the backs of the people working at the Family Research Council in 2012 by calling them a hate group. Some maniac picked that bit of info up and decided to buy 15 Chic-Fil-A sandwiches before heading over to the D.C. office of the group with a rifle, one for each person he planned on killing that day. In case you forgot about that incident, you may remember hearing about how the SPLC worked with big tech and the feds to determine standards for misinformation and hate-speech on social media platforms.
And let's not forget the recent FBI raid on the home of the pro-life advocate in Pennsylvania for violating the FACE act. In 2021 he defended his son from a 72 year old man who was harassing and threatening the kid. The local DA determined there wasn't enough there to press charges and the matter was dropped. Fast forward a year and here comes the FBI, storming the guys home on the orders of biden's DOJ with enough firepower to bring down a well-armed militia. The thing is, even if he beats the charges, his legal bills are going to ruin him. That is how this works, the process is the punishment. Ask Mike Flynn about it.
When he was President, Harry Truman was very wary of national police forces, especially the FBI. As far as he could tell, they seemed a whole lot more interested in getting dirt for Hoover on politicians and their extramarital and drinking habits than solving actual crimes. I think he would have disbanded it if his colleagues weren't so scared of what that little weasel had in his secret files. And they still have a building named after that cross-dressing fascist. Wanna learn about how the FBI operates, particularly at the upper level, where the decisions get made, read 1000 Years for Revenge by Peter Lance. That will show you how incompetent management is at that outfit when it comes to fighting real crimes, how they dropped the ball prior to 9/11, and punished agents who tried to warn them about the threat these Middle Eastern guys training at flight schools and firing ranges really were. But now, based on raids like the ones at Roger Stone's place, Mar Largo, and Mr. Houck, it appears the street agents are finally getting the message. Go along or face the consequences or as we used to hear on the street, snitches get stitches.
Our Founding Fathers would weep openly if they saw what their sacrifice led to, how these alphabet soup agencies run by unelected bureaucrats have taken over the country and how the congress has been more than willing to let them do it. I think if they could have jumped into a time machine in 1774 and saw America in the 21st Century they would have told the King, "It's okay, we'll pay a bit extra for tea and playing cards, but only if you promise right now to never give us independence."
Thanks again Tulsi for speaking up on this real threat to our liberty. And thank you Patrick Henry for insisting on a Bill of Rights after Hamilton and Maddison said it wasn't necessary because everyone respected natural law. I want it in writing before I'll agree to your damned constitution was a great contribution to that document and the forging of a free nation. It's the only thing standing between us and the kind of tyranny countries like Canada and Great Britain are enduring. But as Tulsi points out, it needs defending 24/7. Progressives have been trying to scrap the thing since the days of Teddy Roosevelt. People who love liberty need to embrace what people who crave power hate with a passion. As President Reagan said in his greatest speech, we have a rendezvous with destiny and have reached a time for choosing. Let us hang together to avoid hanging separately.
1
-
1
-
Referring to biden as someone who provides a calming influence is kinda like saying a burning trash pile provides comforting heat. The guy is a senile old coot who stood in front of that devil-like red background and called half the country a threat simply for disagreeing him. He talks about nuclear war like it's some kind of video game and looks for dead people in the audience. He shuts down energy production and prints more money than in a year than has been printed in 200 and then blames high prices at the pump and inflation on gas station owners and Putin. He is a cranky creepy old man who yells at anyone who disagrees with him and if you lived next door to him you wouldn't allow your kids or grandkids anywhere near him. He wanders around on stage after his speeches like he has no clue who or where he is and he has a press secretary who is more than half a moron and a cackling VP who is a total moron. 70% of the country believes we are headed in the wrong direction under this Bozo. Sorry, that's not exactly what I would call calming.
The communists did well in the areas where their indoctrination over the past century has been effective. Those regions will never vote republican and are lost for all time. The republicans did run crap candidates but there's nothing new there. Trump contributed to the poor showing but most of the blame falls on the republican leadership. mcconnell is an evil old man who is still stealing cash at the age of 80. The last thing he wanted was a bunch of new senators who owed him nothing and might vote him to the back bench. He held the purse strings and funded candidates based on who would be personally loyal to him. As long as the turtle of the senate is in power nothing will change in that chamber. And he is the kind who will stay there until he's 90. Him and that chi-com wife of his have been bleeding the system dry for decades. They are pure greed on wheels yet the voters of Kentucky keep sending him back anyway. At this point they would be better off electing a democrat because no one will ever primary the old thief.
And his boy in the house? mccarthy? He's been angling for that gig for twenty years and the half-a-commie out of Kalifornia finally got it by going down to Mar-Largo and kissing the ring. Trump would endorse Satan for speaker if he flattered him. Who else did Trump help elevate to a leadership position in he house? That stefanik chick out of NY who votes half the time with the democrats. Why? She made a speech defending Trump during that BS impeachment. Trump endorses squishy sell-outs like these weasels and faux conservatives like Oz, appoints christopher wray to run the FBI, appoints bill barr as AG, lets pence and fauci take over when COVID hit, but according to Trump-cult DeSantis is the establishment guy. I could run for office and get the guys endorsement if I kissed his ass hard enough and his cult would sing my praises. A week later, if I said Trump really lost in 2020 I would be the devil.
But that is the state of the GOP in 2022. 35% of the base just want the rally's and the laughs, 25% are satisfied with mcconnell and mccarthy running things, and 40% get screwed by both factions. That is why the only party I hate more than the democrats are the republicans. We need a REAL third party in the worst way. The GOP needs to go the way of the party they bumped off, the Whigs. Only this time, we need to tell the squishes to get lost. That was the mistake they made in 1854 and we have been paying for it ever since. Trump will most likely get the nomination because at least 10+ candidates will run again the presidential primaries of 2024. Some, like haley and pompeo will do it to try and jockey their way to the VP slot. Some, like pence and hogan will try to raise their profile to get a gig on Fox News. Trump's hard-core base will let him win primary after primary with 30-35% of the vote and by the time the filed clears out DeSantis will be facing an uphill battle. Trump will prevail, make a run at Tulsi Gabbard for VP, who will string him along a while before turning him down, raising her profile in the effort, and Trump will look to Kristi Noem or Kim Reynolds as VP, leaving poor nicky to wonder why she's not the hot girl of the party anymore. She'll get the gig on Fox pence wanted. pence will go home and become a footnote in the annals of history, becoming the Hannibal Hamlin of the 21st Century.
Then, Trump will rail, bash, rail, and bash some more and at the end of the day he will energize the marxist base enough to keep those margins within the area of cheating in swing states like PA, MI, AZ, and WI. They will count until they win and Trump will go back to Mar-Largo and start the I was cheated bit all over again. Meanwhile, we will be stuck with four more years of obama and yes we can. By 2028 it most likely won't matter who runs because the fundamental transformation that commie talked about implementing in 2008 will be so deeply entrenched it won't be able to be undone. It will be like going after a tic that has burrowed past the skin and made it into the central nervous system. I hope I'm wrong, but sometimes, ya just see it and it is so obvious you have to acknowledge it.
I'll keep up the good fight, but the calming influence we all crave will kill us in the end. While we were all looking out for 1984 they slipped a Brave New World in on us. Shame on us for letting it happen. Get right with God. That's my advice, because at the end of the day, He is the one who will save you.
1
-
The moderates in Iran made a deal with the devil when they got into bed with Khomeini and his fundamentalist fruitcake followers. Now? Now a lot of the fruitcake followers regret getting into bed with the mullah's. Dr. Sowell is correct. There is no way to deal sanely with people who love death more than life.
I saw this CIA agent on some show years ago, before 9/11, and he talked about his time in the Middle East, how he spent his first two years in the region trying to understand the hardcore Jihadists, what made them tick, what their beef was. He said he spent the next five years trying to figure out how to get rid of them. He put it this way, if you go into a room with one of them that guy already has it in his mind that if he gets his way only one person is going to get to walk out. His warning was simple, accept that reality about them or pay the price.
What have we learned since 9/11? I'll leave that up to you to consider, but a lot of the same bad guys are still there, doing what they do best, being bad guys. And how many have made their way over here? Millions? Whose to say. Like I say, just something to consider.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The thing about the Sudetenland crisis is it could have led to Hitler's defeat if Chamberlain had stayed out of it entirely. The German people weren't on board for war and Hitler's generals were prepared to overthrow the Führer, expecting the Czechs, who had a decent military, to put up stubborn resistance. If the war went badly they felt the public would have been on board or at least stayed largely neutral during a coup. They communicated as much to British intelligence, telling them to ignore Mussolini's call for a summit. But Chamberlain had it in his head that he could prevent war and he truly believed if Hitler was able to restore the German border to what it was prior to WWI that he would be placated, at least long enough for Britain and France to arm up properly.
For his part, Hitler was pissed when Mussolini recommended a peace conference. He was ready to go to war and believed the Sudetenland Germans would rise up and help him defeat the Czechs. The real shame of it is, if they could have put their differences aside, and if they would have read the tea-leaves correctly, the Czechs and Poles could have entered into an alliance, forcing Hitler to fight a two front war right off the bat. That would have given the generals all the impetus they needed to stage their coup. Unfortunately, after Munich, Hitler's popularity was through the roof and the generals willing to stage a coup lost their heart. We all know what happened next. One of history's great what if's I suppose.
1
-
1
-
I like honesty. I was an Apollo kid and we bought the whole program lock, stock, and barrel. Star Trek wasn't just sci-fi for us, it was the future. NASA had a great PR team and they had us convinced we'd be on Mars by 1980. We even went on a field trip to the science museum and saw a really neat documentary about tera-forming the place narrated by Leonard Nimoy. I mean, it was Spock, the smartest guy in the world. But then disillusionment kicked in, as reflected by the band that took the name: "We Were Promised Jetpacks." No bucks, no Buck Rogers.
I say all that because I was on of those people who was absolutely convinced life was teaming all around us and it was just a matter of time, a short time now that we were boldly going where no man had gone before, that we would be having coffee with E.T., or at least exchanging phone calls. Then I grew up and learned just how unique our little rock really is. Along with the stuff mentioned here you've got our magnetic field, a Moon at just the right distance, plate tectonics, and a big brother Jupiter to keep the cosmic riff-raff out of the neighborhood. There's other stuff too but when you factor it all in, you realize just how rare planets like ours are. Besides, we're so far from any planet like ours we'll never hear from our cosmic cousins. I believe it's set up that way by design but that's me.
Sorry, finding some amoeba swimming around in some primordial ooze on some Jovian moon isn't going to move the needle for me. But it will prove life exists outside our planet! Okay, life exists. I can look out my window and see that. A lot of hype is put out there about these habitable zone discoveries. It keeps the funding flowing I suppose. I read an article where JW spotted a new system forming around what looks to be an infant that will develop into a G-class star. Now that's cool. If I could hang around for 3-billion years or so I might be impressed. Until then, call me Irish and color me skeptical, very skeptical.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tulsi's description of the democratic party is right in line with cult behavior. Elite's at the top setting the agenda, no room for debate or discussion, be aggressive in defending the cult etc. The LGB crowd has always been very aggressive. Their flamboyant in-your-face shenanigans over the years is proof of that. I remember seeing a news clip where a bunch of them were out in front of Mike Pence's house, performing fake sex acts, wearing large dildoes, twerking, yelling obscenities etc. and some news reporter asked them why they were there. The guys response was straight to the point: "because he needs to see this." The reporter asked why and the guy said, "he just does."
Where were the cops? What about the rights of the people in the neighborhood who weren't the target of these gay Nazi's? They didn't matter, not to law enforcement and certainly not to the freak show participants. The power to act this way without impunity should have alerted everyone as to how they would behave with every issue. Think a group of Christians reciting Bible verses would have gotten away with a demonstration in front of some gay activists house? They'd be tossed in jail and the story would run for a week on CNN and MSNBC.
This fight is far from over. Cults don't fade away, they tend to crash and burn. Where did they get this power? We gave it to them. Every time we shut up we give it to them. Tyranny of the minority. Our founders saw the dangers of it, but we are too smart to listen to a bunch of dead slave holders aren't we? Welcome to the party pal. Coming to a lawn near you.
1
-
I have mad respect for Dr. Carson but I disagree with him on black voters having their eyes opened. I have spoken with numerous black friends and colleagues over the years and while a handful seemed willing to vote for candidates other than democrats, most of them told me they would never vote for a republican, no matter what. The most common reason I got when I asked why was "my family always votes for the democrat." I asked, what if the democrat sucked? They told me they would simply stay home. Those roots run so deep that I'm not sure that bond will ever be broken. Republicans may move the needle a bit, but 20% would be the highest percentage of the black vote I could ever see a republican getting. Of course, the republicans don't help themselves by never going into black neighborhoods and actively recruiting the vote but the suits at the RNC are all about fund raising and if they don't think they can milk a group for money they tend to shy away from them. That's one of the reasons I tell people I hate the republicans more than the democrats. But that's okay. I'm a conservative so they hate me right back.
As far as that school changing the name, Dr. Carson is 100% correct. That is politics plain and simple. Here you have a man who has accomplished great, historic things that have benefitted mankind but because he's not a democrat they can't have their kids looking up to him. Instead, they are lobbying political leaders in Washington DC to display a bust of Coleman Young in the Capitol Building. Coleman Young, the most divisive, crooked mayor in the history of Detroit who single handedly accelerated the demise of that city by 20 years. I know, I lived through it. When I saw what they were trying to do with that bust I almost threw up. That SOB should have gone to prison. Instead, he gets a statue while Dr. Carson gets his name scrubbed. What a city. 🙄
1
-
Truth be told I had never heard of this Olivia Wilde person until I clicked on this video but then again I'm not very hip anymore. I rarely go to the movies because more than 90% of what is produced is garbage and by extension I'm not aware of who's who in Hollywood. I do know who Jordan Peterson is because he is smart, sincere, and genuinely gives a damn about people and he is doing his best to try and warn the West about the dystopian future it seems hellbent on running toward. I don't always agree with his positions or arguments but they are authentic and based on rational intellectual reasoning, not emotional BS not rooted in any truth whatsoever.
Anyway, I looked up this Wilde woman's bio and it looks like she has a son. I wonder, is he doomed to be an insel? Excuse me if I misspelled it because again, up until just now I didn't even know what that was. I do know this, most people in Hollywood have 1/10th of the brain power they think they have and as a rule, most of them come off as insufferable bores. I suppose that is one thing Twitter has done, it has allowed these dimwits a platform free from their handlers where they are able to self-identify as the shallow narcissist's they truly are.
Back to this Wilde woman. In her bio she claims to love motherhood above all else. How does that square with being an angry feminist? She seems to have adopted that role because if she didn't she would be out on her ass, trying to land work in infomercials. The true hardcore feminists I have met, and I have met my share, are bitter, hateful people, hardly the kind of woman any man with any dignity would want to be around. Maybe they get the impression that men are just after sex because in their case it's true. The men they do attract mostly are just looking to get laid because they are as shallow and Godless as the feminists.
And that is why the "peace, love, dope," movement really failed. I know, because I witnessed it first-hand. It was nothing more than hedonism gone mainstream. Self-love has its limits. But then, I guess I'm just an old un-hip insel myself so what do I know. Stay at it Dr. Peterson. That movie of hers bombed because people are getting fed up with this I am woman hear me roar bullshit. If that makes me a pig, guilty again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Stevenson got his creds from Elanor Roosevelt. To a lot of party leaders he was seen as cannon fodder, someone who would make a good punching bag for Ike who they knew was going to whip any candidate they ran against him. And what did the Kennedy team do in 1960, paint Ike, the man who led campaigns across Africa and Europe and kept America safe and prosperous (for the most part) during the 1950s as a dithering old man who lacked the imagination intellectual capabilities to handle the challenges of the 1960s. By extension Nixon was painted as just more of the same, not one of the best and brightest JFK was going to bring to Washington. You remember that crew. McNamara, Bundy, Sorenson, and JFK's ruthless little brother? The guys who brought us the Berlin Wall, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the Vietnam War?
They painted Truman as a simpleton because he wasn't a college graduate but we dodged a serious bullet when he was named VP and FDR kicked the bucket. FDR always had this inflated sense of himself and he thought he could handle old uncle Joe Stalin using his charm and wit. Truman saw Stalin for what he was, a paranoid thug who liked murdering people and wanted a Soviet Europe if the opportunity presented itself. FDR's team of geniuses went to the USSR in the 20s and were bamboozled by Stalin's arranged tour. They thought communism was the wave of the future. FDR had a soft spot for Mussolini and wished he could rule like him. FDR also had some pretty crappy ideas for how the U.S. economy would be set up once the war ended. The party bosses were scared of Wallace as VP because they knew he was a commie at heart and Truman was seen as the safe choice. He was a helluva lot better than any other democratic president of the 20th Century. I don't agree with everything he did, but he was more capable than playboy JFK, smug FDR, insecure LBJ, ineffective Carter, and the original super-genius Woodrow Wilson who thought he was smarter than God.
There is an old saying with a lot of truth to it, those that can't do teach. There is a line form the movie Biloxi Blues that sums it up best. Matthew Broderick asks this recruit he considers to be smart what he would recommend he do to become an intellectual. "Read the entire second floor of the public library." Then again, given the abilities of today's writers to produce good books, maybe stick with the Bible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sorry, I don't buy it. It seems like theorists spend more time creating new theories instead of proving the ones already exist, like they're all fighting to be the next Einstein. Then, once something is out there, it takes on a life of its own and because someone takes the time to write it down it becomes fact.
It reminds me of the story that Mike Nesmith put out concerning the Monkees. In 1967 he told a reporter he was going to make up a story just to prove that the press will report anything and claim it as fact without really looking into it. Then, in a later interview, he said that the Monkees had sold 30 million records that year, more than double what the Beatles and Rolling Stones sold over that same time period. It was all BS but that myth still lives on to this day and is reported as fact in articles and documentaries.
I stopped watching the Science Channel because they engage in the same practice, presenting theories as though they are fact. The truth of the mater is, this nonsense about multi-universes is impossible to prove, making it a convenient myth to propagate. How did it gain traction and why does it receive the attention it does? Because somebody with too many letters behind their name spoke it into existence. String theory was all the rage for a time. What's next? Stay tuned campers.
1
-
1
-
obama, like the original economic meddler roosevelt, extended the recession during his time in office far longer than it should have lasted. If you look at economic downturns over time, the rule was, the harder the crash, the bigger the bounce. Kind of like throwing a rubber ball at high velocity. obama's stimulus money went to greenie schemes that didn't pan out because they were based on pie-in-the-sky BS but it sure made the people who promised they could get them to work a boatload of money. Ask Elon Musk how that scam worked.
Guys like obama and even that dithering mumbling Alzheimer patient pretending to be president get away with this tax the rich nonsense because since the days of fdr when Keynesian economics became all the rage the middle and lower class have bought into the lie. It's a lot easier to blame economic downturns on greedy capitalists than it is to explain how regulatory agencies shrink markets and run the price of everything from toilet paper to gasoline through the roof. Just point a finger and say see, it's Sam Walton's fault. We need more of his money because it's just not fair that he should have so much. Like Margaret Thatcher put it: Socialism works fine until you run out of other people's money."
The Fed played three card monte with fiscal policy for a long time thinking they could control the market but as Milton Friedman said: "There is no such thing as a free lunch." Well, the waitress has arrived with the check, and nobody seems to have enough room on the credit card to cover the bill. We haven't seen the worst of the ramifications for our irresponsibility, not by a long shot. Meanwhile, as that waitress is standing there, your elected reps are telling her: "Hold off a bit longer honey, we haven't had desert yet." Babylon is falling, and: " The merchants who grew rich from her, will keep their distance for fear of the torment inflicted on her." ― Revelation 18
1
-
The democrats keep black voters on the roll because they appeal to emotion and a lot of black voters vote democratic simply because their family has always voted democrat. How do I know this? I did like the guy in the video suggested and asked a lot of them. I also got the same response from more than a few white folks I know so the family-tie angle cuts in all directions.
As for education, I was in the game for a long time so I am well versed in the maxim that it is whole lot easier to lower the test standard than it is to raise the teaching standard. People have this thing with math. If you can quantify something most people will take it as fact. It's where that old line about lies, damn lies, and statistics comes from. How do I know this? I used to run numbers as part of my job. It's like the old bit about the world being flat or round and the teacher responding, how do you want it taught?
The problem is, once a lie gets planted and it has time to grow generational roots it's an awful hard weed to it out. There are some people who will never come around. Leftism is a cult and they will drink the Kool-Aid before they surrender their allegiance to it. You see it with these woke companies being willing to crash and burn if it means furthering the message. They are zealots, the vanguard of the great reset, hoping they might get a shot at the priesthood one day. But alas, most of them will discover they are what Lenin termed useful idiots and once the reset is complete and they are no longer needed they will have two options, shut up or die.
Gloomy? Maybe, but it is where we are. I don't see the true believers ever believing anything differently so at the end of the day the great reset just may precipitate the great division. I defended this country for the better part of my adult life so I hope that's not where we are headed but as John Adams famously said facts are stubborn things. Ben Franklin said you have a republic if you can keep it. The Boomers said we don't want it and did their best to break it. Now Gen-Z is coming up fast saying, hold my beer. Again, I hope I'm wrong but I fear I am not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Was Churchill an idiot or the greatest Britain ever? A bit of both. Certainly he was a major pain in the ass for every military commander who had to deal with or placate him. His COS Allan Brooke is quoted as saying: "Winston had 10 ideas a day, one of which was good and he didn't know which one it was." Similar quotes have been attributed to Lloyd George and FDR but the general consensus seemed to be he was an idea man, not really concerned with the application. Eisenhower threatened to quit as SCAEFE because of Churchill's insistence that landing craft needed for OVERLORD be used in Italy and that ANVIL, the attack on southern France be abandoned while attacks into the Balkans be carried out. It was part of his obsession with the soft underbelly concept he carried over from WWI. And, he was more concerned about maintaining the British Empire in the post-war-world which Eisenhower didn't give one shit about and FDR was opposed to.
The best no Ike used against Churchill was when he told him his forces would stop short of Berlin and leave it to the Russians. It held zero strategic value since it was already agreed it would be in the Russian zone after the war but Churchill had an18th/19th Century mindset about capturing capitals. Ike saved thousands of US lives by standing firm on that one. You would have thought the lack of ROI the Brits got for taking Philadelphia in 1777 would have taught him that lesson but Churchill was a man of the past in a lot of ways.
I will give him credit, though not as much as he gave himself, for getting Marshall and Ike to give up their notions of attacking France in 1942. Marshall was hellbent on it and saw the North African campaign as a distraction, a way to further British interests. Ike was afraid the Russians would make a separate peace with the Nazis if they didn't open a second front in Europe by 1943 at the latest. But Churchill understood sending a handful of divisions against the Wehrmacht at that time was suicide. Personally, I think the botched landings at Dieppe were criminal on his part but that's me.
But he did stand up to Hitler when most of the world thought he should back down, even forces in his own government. He did rally the people of London during the Blitz by visiting bombed out cities, something Goebbels tried to get the Fueler to do with no success. That counts for something. Another leader would have buckled. In that sense, he really did save western civilization. If Britain had fallen in 1940 or 41 the game would have been up. No way the Americans could have done what they did without Britain being a launchpad. Britain was the only major allied power to fight all the way, from 1939 to 1945. Churchill played a big role in that.
Was he a sucky military commander? Sure. But that wasn't his job. His main job was to keep Britain fighting until the Americans came in. And he pulled that off so I'm a big fan of Winnie. The world certainly use statesmen of his stature and resilience today. RIP Winston, even though that disgrace of a president from Kenya didn't like ya for throwing his commie old man into jail (if he even was his daddy) you still have plenty of fans this side of the Atlantic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
I gotta believe Netflix only canceled this show because somebody noticed. The fact they would allow something like this to air tells you all you need to know about where their corporate heart is at. This is just another part of the rainbow jihad's tactical attack plan. Throw stuff out there, see what you can get away with, retreat only when necessary, then come back next time with an assault even more intense. Disney laid out how to corrupt kids years ago.
I grew up with Looney Toons. But they won't show that stuff on Saturday morning anymore because Bugs likes female rabbits and promotes the evil patriarchy where women are nothing more than objects. They aren't portrayed in their proper light, you know, the one where woman is just a made up construct. The proper thing for them to do in the new world order is to let men steal their trophy's and their positions of honor. Then they have to let those same men strip in front of them as they gloat about it in the locker room.
But hey, there's nothing wrong with throwing a bunch of terminology that didn't even exist outside the bowels of Hell and UC Berkley at four-year old kids because damnit, they need to be ready to enter the "real-world" and the quicker they learn about sexual sin the easier it will be to groom them for their proper role, satisfying the desires of male pedophiles.
I remember when we were called extremists and kooks for pointing out where all this stuff was headed. Men dressing as women and reading to kids, that was just right-wing fear tactics designed to defame people who just want love and insurance benefits. Now, you're damn skippy men can be women. They can be whatever they want. Get used to it bigot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nathanielalderson9111 You are correct. It's more zealotry on their part than anything else. The woke agenda is a religion to them, and they see themselves as modern-day Puritans, out to set up a shining city on a hill. It is their cause, one more based on Moa than Christ but the passion burns within them as deeply as it did within the zealots of The Great Awakening or The Cultural Revolution.
The message must come first. It's the same thing that kills a lot of faith-based movies. They get so consumed by the message that they lose sight of what it is that brings an audience in, the story, not the storyteller. Unfortunately, for the woke Puritans, slash and burn is a standard tactic. As I say, that is what bothers me. Want to make a woke Middle-Earth? Fine. Just admit as much and respect that people like me, who grew up with those books, just aren't going to be into it. That would be the wise strategy, but they just can't help themselves and I have just never suffered fools easily. Being ignorant is one thing. Doing something you know will not do you or your project any good is foolish. Unless your out to make a point or pick a fight. Then it devolves into the realm of stupid, and as the great southern philosopher Larry The Cable Guy put it: "Ya can't fix stupid."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've paid for the car behind me a few times just because I felt like it. That said, if the person working at the window said it's a thing that's going on, trying to get me to join in, my contrarian nature would kick in and I would politely say no thanks, not playing. I do let them keep the change at the checkout sometimes but it depends on my mood. Just like I give certain people who are panhandling a buck or two now and again but it is a case by case thing. If I think they are legit, I'll do it. If I think they are like this family I see outside church and near the grocery store on a fairly regular basis I move on. The father of that bunch pisses me off. I look at the shoes. There are other tell-tale signs but actual street people tend to have lousy foot ware. It doesn't mean I haven't been taken, maybe I have, but that's on the cheater, not me. I did give this one guy a couple bucks outside the ballpark a while back who admitted he had no intention of buying food. "I'm not gonna bullshit ya all" he said. "I'm not hungry, I want a beer." I laughed and said okay, fair enough.
As for the bikers in the road, I'm with you Matt. When I was a kid we had the good sense not to play in traffic. They put these bike lanes in near me and I hate em. That's all I need, to get dragged into court and charged because some inebriated or clumsy bike rider lost his balance and fell in front of my car. It's the same thing with the kids near me who wear dark clothing then walk out in front of cars at night just because.
But what really gets my goat are the people who leave the damn shopping carts in the parking spots. I was at Lowes recently at there was one parking spot available, with a cart smack in the middle of it. The thing is, the drop off was right next to the parking spot. It was literally a three step journey to put it up. It was so annoying I took a picture and sent it my friends, something I had never done before. The cart people are the worst, but that's me.
1
-
"We should probably know what's going on there." Okay, I'll bite. Why? Don't get me wrong, I'm not against knowledge for knowledge sake in every instance. I did take courses about mythology and English literature which outside of providing some enjoyable reading and teaching me a bit about formulating an argument based in antiquity didn't really come in handy in my day-to-day job. But it was part of the whole person concept back then so I got it. But that experience only cost a few bucks. Sending probes to Venus is a tad more expensive, meaning the ROI should matter. Are there plans to colonize the atmosphere? I've actually heard a case for that one. Are we going to mine the surface?
I actually like the idea of space exploration, being a child of the age of Apollo, but I just don't see the value in checking out that place. I think our general knowledge of how that place functions is enough for the time being. In case anyone is interested, we are beyond broke. Spending cash on a joy ride to Venus to measure temperature, pressure, and the like doesn't really move the needle. It's a nice to have, not a got to have, and right now we need to focus more on got to have. This whole thing sounds like a money grab by NASA. If Elon Musk or some other uber-rich guy wants to float a probe in the friendly skies of Venus, by all means, have at it dude. Just don't ask me or my fellow taxpayers to pick up the check. I know we waste 99 cents out of every dollar as it is so I won't dispute anyone who makes that claim.
Venus just doesn't do much for me. Knowledge about Mars may come in handy when we need to run from the expanding Sun in a billion years or so but Venus? It's beyond Africa hot and outside of a few oohs and ahhs from some geek in a lab some place going there is waste of time and money. But that's me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Okay, so I waited a while to watch this one, waited for it to be free with my Amazon subscription because I was so pissed off about wasting my money and time on Dunkirk that I made myself a promise never to spend another dime watching any history-based movie by this guy. That said, it was okay. The Drinker is right, the best part is the middle when they are making the bomb. I actually give Matt Damon credit for that. I thought he was a weird choice to play Leslie Groves but he pulls it off pretty well and it seems like the other actors upped their game to keep up with him. Never thought I'd say that.
As for the rest, yeah, I'm with the Drinker. It had too much of a beautiful mind feel to it in the beginning and the end was highly moralistic. One thing I don't like is for a movie to lecture me. And that weird sex scene between Oppenheimer and his dead girlfriend in the middle of the Spanish Inquisition style interrogation Nolan created was just flat out off-putting. Is it too long? Yeah. Are the visuals great? Absolutely. But if you don't know much about the Manhattan Project don't expect to know anymore about it after seeing this film. Nolan is just incapable of telling a coherent story. I guess because he's not really interested in that. He likes making movies, not telling stories. That's his thing and if you like that, he's your guy. I give this one a passing grade and while I'm sorry I didn't see the explosions in the theater, I'm also glad I didn't spend any extra money to watch it.
Hey Drinker, on a side, when are you going finally honor my request and review Outlaw Josie Wales or Judgment at Nuremberg? Just askin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, the red wave turned out to be a red trickle. Want to learn some lessons from our mid-term election Australia? First, keep your promises. A lot of people who should have come out stayed home because republicans still have the stink of betraying their base on them. Second, fix any quirky election rules that favor one party over another. Third, look at the election through the lens of independent voters and run candidates that can actually win, not celebrity types or boot lickers that someone like Trump likes because they flatter him. Fourth, have a message that goes beyond I'm not a democrat and therefore I'm not crazy. Five, don't let pu**ies run your party. Find leaders who actually fight and inspire people.
As for the rest, I have been on record saying biden was toast after the mid-terms but since the republicans have once again snatched defeat from the jaws of victory biden may have gotten a reprieve. But no way he runs in 2024. kamala will run against buttafudge and some of the commie governors out there in the godforsaken hellscape that is blue America but get ready for the return of Gollum. The woman from Arkansas who's name shall not be uttered here is going to run. She will follow the precious unto the fires of Mount Doom. Those tricksy little Hobbitesses stole it from her and she wants it back. Grab some popcorn because when that old gasbag starts swinging at the mental lightweight playing the role of VP it will be funnier than hell to watch. kamala got where she is because she did what men told her. Gollum got where she did because she hates men. Should be a barnburner good for a more than a few laughs.
Trump is running but his cult has shrunk in size and influence. He's out there painting Ron DeSantis as an establishment guy and his loyal Trump-cult is echoing their master's message but there are fewer of them and that message is falling flat. People know better and more republicans than ever have Trump-lag. I really thought he would wax DeSantis in a primary because of Fox News and Trump-cult but outside of Trump's butt-buddy hannity Fox is off the Trump train. Independents and democratic cross overs in Florida showed that Governor DeSantis can more than make up for the loss of Trump-cult so I think party bosses are going to be less afraid of the guy.
Despite his delusional claims that every republican who won owed their seats to him the reality is a lot of Trump selected and Trump adjacent candidates lost races they should have won. Why? Because independent voters were reminded of Trump and either stayed home, voted democrat, or just left that bubble blank. If the republicans do run Trump in 2024 he will lose and he will lose well beyond the margin of cheating. Trump-cult is loud and cranky like their leader but their numbers have diminished. Trump will be 78 in 2024 and the American people are getting fed up with these old Boomers who just won't go away. We will be coming off four years of dementia-joe and replacing him with a lame duck grumpy old narcissist is not going to appeal to many people outside of MAGA world.
That view may be unpopular but THAT lesson needs to be learned on this side of the Pacific and it needs to be learned quickly. My hope is Fox stops covering his rally's like they are some rock show and that sane republicans stay away. I am as far away from an establishment guy as you can get and I'm telling you so is Ron DeSantis. Trump-cult may paint him that way but that's only because they are mindlessly echoing their dear leader. If Trump told his cult followers that woman from Arkansas was on their side they would sing her praises. They will follow him off the cliff the same way cult members in the democratic party will follow them off the cliff. But Trump is playing his cards too early. His ego is out there trashing Governor DeSantis before the Governor has said what his plans are WRT to a run in 2024. All he has to do is remain quiet and let Trump show his ass while he alienates more people.
I liked a lot of what Trump did as president, but when we really needed him, when that COVID BS started he gave the country over to pence and fauci. Why? Because he wasn't up to the job. That is a huge fail and a huge reason why I could never vote for him again. It's not a popular position, but it's mine and I own it.
1
-
1
-
@DanC-go9lc I'm familiar with Posner's book on the MLK assassination but I've never read it. Admittedly, I haven't done much research into that case but again, James Earl Ray isn't exactly the type one would hire for a hit. From what I have read, there was a lot of talk about a $50,000 bounty on King's head and it seems most likely that Ray heard about it and thought he could collect. As I understand it, when it turned out to be a lot of talk Ray headed for the hills. He used to run drugs between Canada and the U.S. and he was had a history of crossing the border between Detroit and Windsor Ontario. He spent so much time running contraband in that area that he became a fan of my team, the Detroit Tigers. You'd probably know more than I do but it appears he was trying to get to South Africa where he thought he would be safe but he ran out of cash in London and some half-assed robbery attempt got him pinched.
I do remember seeing him answer the King family directly when they asked if he was involved in the shooting and Ray, who wasn't known for stammering, stuttered when he told them he didn't. Could be nothing, but I grew up in the city around some of the best liars you'll ever meet and the ones who aren't very good give themselves away through body language or a stammer, a lot like what Ray did. And he loses eye contact for a brief second, another tell. That's just my observation though.
And yes, I agree that there was a lot of shady stuff going on in Mexico city that will never come to light. Johnson was trying to prevent a war, RFK was trying to prevent a scandal, and the CIA had no desire to give up assets or methods over a guy who was dead. The reasons are straight forward, the path each took created the conspiracy cottage industry, which was just fine for all parties involved. As long as people chase the shiny object they don't look for the darker one. I should read Posner's MLK book.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Prior to WWI there were a few dust-ups but no major conflict in Europe since the Napoleonic Wars ended in 1812. By the time WWI came along the leaders of the belligerent nations were old and had no memory of the days of Napoleon. Fast forward to us. Our leaders are old and were not around during WWII. Most of them dodged the Vietnam War by hiding out in college or were too young to be drafted. We haven't been involved in a real existential level war since 1945 and these corrupt crime families run by codgers like mcconnell and biden are motivated by a desire to protect their money laundering partners. The baby boomers will go down as the worst generation ever produced by this nation. I say this as one of them.
I spent most of my adult life standing a post defending this nation. Now, if I had children of military age, I wouldn't let them serve even if it meant going to jail. This country is being destroyed for a specific reason, to serve the interests of the western global oligarchy and to make way for what they are calling the great reset, a plan for tyranny on a level not seen since the days of the Roman Empire. We haven't even gotten to the birth pains of the end-times yet. The 2030s will be a dark period, one where wars and rumors of wars will be so common people will just treat it as another day ending in Y. But this is what we wanted. Like the Israelites of antiquity, we told God we didn't need Him anymore. We wanted our own king. Israel got Saul, what will we get:
“After them another king will arise, different from the earlier ones… He will speak against the Most High and oppress his holy people and try to change the set times and the laws. The holy people will be delivered into his hands for a time, times and half a time. But the court will sit, and his power will be taken away and completely destroyed forever.” ― Daniel: Ch. 7
Stay faithful, stay strong. Trust in God and look to Him for your salvation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MelissaR784 The point I was making is the crazy fellow travelers who have taken control of the democrat party mean what they say and say what they mean. When they have the reigns they use that power to further their agenda because they are true believers in their cause. There is a religious fervor to their actions. When obama said his goal was to fundamentally transform America he meant it. Republicans on the other hand lie to their base. Look at the voting record of most of the party. They keep voting to forward the left's agenda, not to offer any legitimate opposition. They say they are conservatives yet they add trillions to the debt. They say they are pro-life yet they offer no meaningful legislation to protect the unborn. You've got guys like jim jordan who are all sizzle and no steak, running all kinds of investigations that amount to nothing as they get some middling bureaucrat in front of their committee's and pull their pants down so they can get their face on fox news and show everyone what bad-asses they are.
There are a few good members of congress in the party. I'm lucky to have one in my district. But most of them are just sheep in wolves clothing. They'd be democrats if they could but they run in districts where they need the R in front of their name to get elected. Republicans are great and fundraising and lousy at governing because they prefer fundraising to governing and it's easier to do that when you are in the minority. For every Chip Roy and Rand Paul there are 10 mitch mc'connel's and joni ernst's voting for progressive crap. And they do that as they cry; "We did what we had to do because need to work together" or "We can't let the government shutdown so we had no choice" or "We don't have the votes. We need both houses" and then there's my favorite, "But the Courts." In the meantime they go back on their promises, when they have the power they don't do anything with it, and we end up with Justices like kavanaugh and barrett who delivered on one issue then voted in lock-step with their lefty colleagues on other matters.
That is what I mean when I say "People generally say what they mean unless they are republicans." The left is serious about tearing the system down and replacing it with their dystopian vision. When they say a man can be a woman they believe it and when they say they want to pack the Court and abolish the Electoral College or the Senate they mean that too. They also mean it when they say religious liberty is just going to have to take a back seat to the progressive agenda because the arc of history bends in their favor. These are all statements and positions people with authority in that party have made or held. And they'll get around to it too, in due time. Republicans? They stand for nothing for the most part, and lately it's all about the show anyway. Reality-TV as politics.
I dunno, maybe you believe in the republican party, I don't. I've been around too many blocks with them and they have burned me too many times on the big stuff, the stuff that matters, for me to believe anything they have to say. To me, that makes them worse than the democrats. At least the democrats give their base what they want, even if they have to tell them what they want at the same time.
This has been a lengthy response but you claimed my comment didn't make sense. I just wanted to add clarity. As a conservative I'm homeless. The only party that hates my kind more than the democrats are the republicans, I'm not welcome around the MAGA campfire, the libertarians lack any moral center and based on the recent selection of their standard bearer for 2024 tradition has been totally thrown out the window by that bunch. But that's me. You're free to disagree but I mean what I say.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rocky II is okay but Die Hard 2 was crap. The scene in Die Hard 2 that had me scratching my head the most was when Bruce Willis uses the ejection seat to escape from the cargo plane just before it explodes. Sorry Bruce, cargo planes don't have ejector seats. And what happened to the roof of the flight deck? Did the seat just blast through it? I'll be honest I thought Rocky III and Die Hard 3 were both better than the sequels. Yeah, Rocky II had more of the feel of the original and the overall acting is a bit better but when Rocky finishes off Mr. T that should have been the end of the Rocky franchise. If you disagree grant me this, at least it's not Rocky V. I saw 2010 in the theater, it was okay as far as sequels go. I would have put Terminator 2 on the list. Yeah, it's a bit hokey, but aren't all sequels not named Godfather II? Like Rocky III, that should have been where the Terminator was terminated. Terminator 3 had a chance to be something but the casting for that one was just beyond horrible. That nerdy loser kid they picked to play the future savior of the human race, where did they find him? And his girlfriend was almost as unbelievable in her role as future heroine. I'll give Kevin Costner credit, he was offered big money for Bull Durham and Field of Dreams sequels and he turned them down. Good for him. Most things are best left alone. Porky's Two: The Next Day ring a bell? For the most part, sequels suck.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I believe in sharing the blame equally but the people have been the problem for quite some time. Maybe we've always been the problem and Divine intervention more than anything else has kept us afloat for the past 235 years. I do know this, the teachers union didn't show up with tanks and machine guns saying let us have our way with your kids or else. We just couldn't be bothered. The unelected fourth branch of government didn't create an out-of-control bureaucracy and tell people the Constitution is just an old document that has outlived its usefulness. We decided to hand things over to the experts.
And the people didn't clamor for politics as reality-TV but when they got it they fell in love with it. It allowed us to take part in the ultimate game of shirts and skins and we they leapt at the opportunity. We not only rejected any chance of getting off the ride, we did so vehemently, lashing out at anyone who dared try to stop the show, calling them traitors to the clan, losers of the highest order. When the German's took over Austria in 1938 reporters referred to it as the rape of Austria. One astute newspaperman pointed out that if that is the case Austria seems to like being raped. We seem to prefer lies to truth, problems to solutions, just so long as the games continue.
We have always had a thing for shiny objects and with social media, 24/7 news cycles. and elections that last for years there are plenty of shiny objects to go around, or as the author Neil Postman put it in the 1980s, we truly do seem to be amusing ourselves to death. But it's all fun and games until someone loses a way of life, especially in a country with a well-armed populace. We really should spend more time considering such things as what we are actually going to do about trillion dollar spending resolutions passing every few months or what we are actually going to do about these millions of illegal immigrants when they start doing what they have to do to survive and less time laughing at our president having conversations with imaginary friends or carrying on about the salacious revelations of the porn-stars his opponent paid off. Like I say, just something to consider.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
fauci gave the chi-coms the money to create that virus so of course he will defend them. Hey tony, you like em so much why don't you buy a retirement condo over there. If justice was still a thing in the U.S. you'd be up on charges. Maybe the chi-coms will give you a better deal.
As for funding Ukraine, no one is stopping the European countries from sending that crooked regime all the cash they want. Hell, raise an army and fight the Russians if you think Putin is such a threat. As for me, and most of my fellow citizens, we've had enough. 90 billion is a pretty big chunk of change Doug. I think we've done our bit. If you want to give that comedian more cash to help him balance his budget and pay their government pensions, like I say, have at it.
I'm sick and tired of paying for European social programs. If I was king for a day NATO and the U.N. would both find themselves where they belong, on the ash heap of history. Stalin has been dead for close to 70 years. I think the threat of the Bolshevik herds marching into Brussels and Paris is kinda diminished. Here's a thought, start defending your damn selves and get out of the habit of running to us every time some Ruskie starts saber rattling. Find a better way to heat your homes than Russian natural gas.
I say this as someone who spent the better part of his adult life helping defend your deadbeat asses so I think I'm allowed to have an opinion on the matter. You want Putin out? Push em out. I could give two sh*ts. We've got terrorists and drug dealers pouring across our southern border like it's an open kegger down there and commies in our own government flushing our democracy down the crapper. That's enough to deal with as far as I'm concerned and yes, it takes priority over Ukraine, even Great Britain for that matter. How about this, you do you and we'll do us. The Cold War is over. We won. Get over it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The problem isn't the prison-industrial-complex, it's the recidivism rate. Once someone does time, regardless of race, their chances of returning to that cell are high because they wear a scarlet letter. People in fashionable places don't like to talk about that aspect but the truth of the matter is they wouldn't let an ex-con within 50 yards of their home or business. I have a bit of experience with his because I grew up with guys who went away. The coach of my little league team did 30 + years and I went on a few trips with him to halfway houses and meetings of ex-offenders. It's not that prisons exist, it's that we don't let most people leave them, even after they are free.
How did they get there? That always starts in the home. I didn't know one kid from good stable home who got wrapped up in the life. My home life wasn't Ozzie and Harriet but I had a bit of sense. I had my opportunities but I never crossed that line. Single mother homes are a leading contributor but above all you have to have parents who give a damn. That is the starting point. Sadly, a lot of these kids don't have that. As Denzel Washington put it, they get raised by the court and educated in the juvenile halls. You would be hard pressed to find a six year old who will say, I wanna be a felon, a junkie, or a prostitute when I grow up. It's not a racial problem, it's a spiritual one.
1
-
1
-
Sorry, but the idea of finding microbial life on Mars or Europa or Titan or wherever someone decides to send a probe just doesn't move the needle for me. I'm sure people who make their living on these Johnny Quest's get excited but spending billions to discover some clump of cells in the frozen region of some distant rock sounds like a helluva waste of time and money. Oh, but it will prove life exists in the universe!!! I can look out my window for proof of that. And this nonsense about building ships that will take hundreds of thousands of years to get to some distant planet in the hope of finding a new home, that is possibly the most narcissistic self-centered idea of all the bad ideas ever put forward. You would be willing to doom generation after generation, longer than we have been building civilizations to an existence of servicing some ship they can never leave and eating and living off what? Warmed over piss from their great grandparents? Eating recycled fecal matter and genetically malformed plant-life? Over time they would forget why the hell they are going to wherever it is they are going and would just give up and die off. The problem with futurists is they are dreamers who discount human nature entirely or act like it just doesn't matter since there is no God or no purpose to anything anyway.
So let's say you decide not to doom your children to some lonely existence hurtling thorough space. Let's say we send some microchip hurling through space at ludicrous speed. Supposing it is able to make it to its destination, I imagine there wouldn't be a whole lot of people left who wouldn't even remember let alone give a sh*t. "Hey, we got a phone call from the USS Bill Gates." "What the f*ck is a USS Bill Gates?"
And please, spare me this BS about these tidally locked planets around red dwarves being good candidates for intelligent life. The only reason these astro-grifters spend so much time obsessing about them is they are the most common star around and they can point to them and say; "see, they have planets in the habitable zone. Give us some more money to study them please because it's really important that we do" Why? "It just is you silly man. How else can I write my ground-breaking peer-reviewed paper Space.com will put out as the next great thing? Just shut-up and trust the science you knuckle-dragging luddite."
If I sound like a total cynic...well, maybe I am. I grew up during the age of Apollo and Star Trek. I bought all the BS NASA and the rest of the scientific community fed me. I believed in going to Mars, that we would be talking with ET by now, and that going to the Moon would be a common and every-day event akin to flying to Pittsburgh for the weekend. Now? Okay, I liked the stuff Hubble found, I even find the stuff Keppler and JWST have spotted interesting. But spending a bunch of cash on some propulsion system to get us to these far off worlds? To boldly go where no man has gone before? I don't know if anyone else has noticed but our country, the U.S., is in a simple term, f*cked right now. Trillions, with a T, in debt, crazies crossing our open border, talk of "national divorce" in the halls of congress. If Europe or even China wants to spend a bunch of time, energy, and resources on these futuristic boondoggles, have at it.
But they won't because they are in a worse place than us. Sorry dude, no bucks, no Buck Rogers. There is just too much stuff that has to get fixed right here on our home rock. There is a sh*tstorm heading our way in the 2030s. The sooner we get out in front of that the less impact it will have, but it's going to be bad, worse than anything that has come before it. There, my contribution to the future. I wish it wasn't so, but I just don't see how it can be avoided. Not that anyone will ever read this post but live long and prosper all the same gang. 🤟
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You know what scares me? That all of this stuff about polls and brutha's be flippin for trump is just a psyop. trump has moved to the left on a lot issues like abortion and immigration. He has endorsed all the squishy establishment republicans and said just the other day that any immigrant, legal or illegal, who graduates from a U.S. college or university should automatically get a green card. Why? Because he needs the establishment money. Why are you hearing talk about guys like eyebrows out there in North Dakota or tim scott being potential running mates? That's hardly the move of a disruptor. trump put his flippin daughter-in-law on the RNC because she's married to his kid and she goes on fox all the time. That's it. That's what passes for being qualified in the mar-lago court.
I like Dr. Hanson, he's a smart guy, but he's got blinders when it comes to trump and where the electorate is really at. democrats aren't worried about white voters disrupting their little burn it down party because they keep racking up wins in off-cycle election years and their incumbents are just as safe as the swampy republican incumbents who are down with their program, the people trump is endorsing. In the meantime the debt is getting to the point where paying the interest on it will be the largest expenditure in the budget and as much as people want to point at these polls and pump up their idol, we are looking down the barrel of a fourth obama term.
And what will they do in the aftermath of that? The right-wing pundits will yell about a steal, fox news will have even more tranny's on their shows and they will run trump again in 2028, maybe even 2032. If not him by that time, it will be his brain-dead kid. And the republic will continue to crumble until the weight of the thing causes it to go super-nova like a dying massive star and we are all living at the beck and call of our Chinese overlords while people like pelosi, schumer, mcconnell, the evil witch of the Ozarks whose name shall not be uttered here, and trump are fighting over the single spigot in Hell that doles out the single drop of water every 2,000 years or so. That's what scares me. I got lumped in with the tail end of the boomers and let me tell you something, no generation has done more damage to this country than that self-entitled bunch. Have a nice day.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Custodian's of Tolkien's vision with a baby-mama dwarf, black hobbits, African nomadic gardening tribes, and some good old LGBT action to satisfy the alphabet mafia? Wait until season three for it to improve? Sounds like taking a quart of sour milk and putting it back in the fridge anticipating it will be better in a week or two. I thought I had heard enough about this debacle to convince me never to look at it but give the woke creative bunch credit. Just when you think they can't get any worse somebody is there waiting for that "hold my beer" moment.
I do think this is the final word on this mess, at least for me. As I've said, Tolkien fans were never the target audience. Amazon just needed a name to attach to to their version of Game of Thrones. This stuff was made for Gen Z and you know what, it will probably do well with that crowd. Amazon can then claim that Tolkien fans are just a bunch of narrow minded bigots and the numbers show that enough hip people get it. They get to dump on the traditional fanbase, promote the woke agenda, and spin it in a way that they will be able to claim a win. Well played I suppose.
You know, the Soviets made movies too, but people only watched them to avoid the gulag. Anyway, thanks for the final word on this hot pile of dung.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well that explanation beats the congresswoman from Texas who said we wouldn't be able to land on the Moon because it is made up primarily of gas. I think she went to the same school as the other congressman who was concerned about Guam tipping over if everyone stood on one side of the island.
But here's why we aren't going to the Moon. It costs a sh*tpot ton of money and people don't give a damn if we go or not. I lived through Apollo. We were battling the Ruskies. We were going to Mars. We were the Star Trek generation, live long and prosper and all that stuff. Then we made it to the Moon and people said, hey, all we're getting for our money is a bunch of rocks. Tax the rich, feed the poor, all that stuff. The science crew at NASA were A-Okay with that reasoning since they wanted to send probes out into space. They won the argument. Nixon tossed the explorer types a bone with the Shuttle but that thing never had a real mission, no end goal, and it was dangerous as f*ck. It's amazing more people didn't die in that deathtrap. Even after Challenger NASA knew there were other problems that they just chalked up to the cost of doing business. The crew of Columbia paid the ultimate price for that.
Space travel is hard, really hard. Musk was all enthused about Mars until he found out there wasn't going to be enough government cheese to make a buck off of that little cosmic adventure. He'd have to pony up a lot of the cost and well, it's all fun and games until you lose your fortune for, wait for it, a bunch of rocks. What exactly is on Mars that would make it worth the trip? As someone put it, it's like Utah without the state parks or Mormons. And who the hell would want to live there for any length of time. This is coming from someone who was all-in for this stuff as a kid. Now? No bucks, no Buck Rogers as they said in The Right Stuff.
The public could give two sh*ts. Therefore the politicians could give less than two sh*ts. Sorry world, if this thing is gonna get done it'll have to get done either through international cooperation, good luck there, or through the altruistic nature of Elon Musk, that makes the first option seem likely. No, we'll stay right here and eventually we'll have so much crap circling the planet we won't be able to leave orbit if we wanted to, not without smashing into some piece of leftover space trash.
But hey, somewhere in the Oort Cloud is a big old chunk of rock and ice with our name on it anyway. So we got that going for us. Maybe Elon can work on a plan for that, one that doesn't require Billy Bob or Bruce. Those guys are a bit long in the tooth anyway.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thank you Mr. Prager! This chat is getting bookmarked. I said from the very beginning of the COVID business that people were acting irrationally and it was all driven by fear, and fear is a terrible emotion to take advantage of. The people who have will have some splainin to do as Ricky Ricardo would say when they are standing tall before God. I live in a 55+ community and fear has had a devastating effect on so many of my neighbors. A man who was my best friend here has been so consumed by it that he has basically cut him and his wife off from any human contact that isn't absolutely essential. I tried to tell him he couldn't keep her in bubble wrap but he is so afraid she will die before him that he is doing everything in his power to shield her from the disease. I drove them to the pharmacy and got them vaccinated but it didn't matter. I think he just got so used to living in fear that it became his new normal. But worse than that, it made him mean. I see what fear has done to him and several other people here who used to be social and I made myself a promise that I will never live a life based on fear. I never have and now that I have seen it up close I am more determined than ever.
I think it's largely a matter of faith. Now, I'm not ultra religious and I am only now getting reacquainted with the Catholic Church after a very lengthy separation but I have always trusted in God. People I know who have little or no faith tend to get scared when the end comes near. I'm not saying that happens to every agnostic or atheist, but I will say this, people who have genuine faith don't fear death. As you point out, we don't rush headlong into it and take unnecessary risks but I have never found a single person of true faith who is afraid to die. Death is something like 10,000,000,000 -1 but I trust in the one man who defeated it enough that when my time comes He'll be there to welcome me home with open arms. It's a simple faith, but it's mine and you know what, it keeps fear at bay. 🙏
Finally, I love that line: "Don't behave the way you feel." That is sage advice. I used to explore this with my students when I was a leadership facilitator. I would mention how we often confuse thoughts with feelings. For instance, how many times have you said, "I feel like going outside?" How can you "feel" about going outside? You are THINKING about going outside but what are you FEELING at the time? Too often we let our emotions drive our thoughts and when that happens the machine is running backward. That is how decisions with tragic consequences get made.
Anyway, loved this video maybe more than all the rest and you have made some dandies. Please keep up the good work. Emotional people like me need to be reminded not to act on them.
1
-
Every time I see that Shuab character I think of Dr. Strangelove. I keep waiting for the extended arm and a good old Zieg Heil Mien Furher!
The reason you can't just dismiss these fruitcakes though is they are legion, and they have a boatload of money. I look at them and think about what they are doing in eschatological terms but then I realize they are not bright enough to actually pull off Armageddon. Take a guy like Kerry. The only thing that makes him one of the "special people" is his ability to become whatever he needs to be at the moment and to marry well. That doesn't take a great deal of brain power. Besides, that Brahman accent of his is so especially annoying there is no way he's a world leader on anything except maybe spending too much of his wife's money on Botox and haircuts. And no one would have any clue who the hell Al Gore is if his daddy hadn't been a senator first. He only globed on to this climate nonsense because he saw no one else gave a shit. He framed it in a way these Bond villain's like though, a means to control people and get rich.
The sad thing is, decent people who actually do care get roped into this BS. I'm not talking about the bartender and her little Twitter bot army, I'm talking about average Joe's who have had this crap pumped into their heads to the point they declare it to be settled science, which is an oxymoron but I digress. But when a patent thief like Bill Gates puts his money behind it the cult thrives.
The bottom line is, these people shouldn't be dangerous but they are. I don't think they have the brains to breathe life into the Beast, Satan's wicked kingdom on Earth that will go to war with the Saints, but they are softening things up for the Antichrist who will. But, in the end, Satan will have people like them eating ze bugs for eternity. Zieg Heil that one Claus. Maybe you can get a spot next to Hitler and the two of you can talk about how you came this close in between having your flesh ripped apart and being burned forever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I guess ya have to be a child of Apollo to understand how disillusioned our generation is, how we feel we got robbed, like that band titled "They Promised us Jetpacks." We were told with basically 100% certainty that the galaxy was teeming with life, that by the time we reached adulthood, colonies on Mars and the Moon would be a reality, that we would continue to move up and out, that we would boldly go where...
Then we find out that it is actually really tough to go to these places and that if NASA hadn't been so risk averse, and sent a man instead of a monkey up in 1961, Alan Shepard would have made it to space before Yuri Gagarin and the whole Moon shot might never have happened in the first place. I guess mostly we just grew up, and the more we learned about the real world the more science fiction became just that for us, fiction. Thanks Einstein! Thanks for breaking my heart!
I've gone from believing we would have had several long-distance calls with ET by now to believing that will flat out just never happen. The distances are too great and the laws of physics are just too tough to overcome. I now believe if there is life out there, we are separated by design. We each have our own destiny to live out, distinct from one another. Maybe in the next life we get to meet our cosmic cousins, but for now, I guess I'll just have to settle for those old Star Trek reruns. Live long and prosper ET. Hope the weather is fine wherever you are.
1
-
Tucker, I like ya but you have a bit of a habit of telling your version of history in a demonstrative manner, even if your version is a tad off the mark. You make it sound like Russia is Tennessee. White Christian strong traditionalists? Close to a century of socialist rule put a pretty big dent in that one. I have met people who grew up in the USSR and they are decent enough folks but Christianity isn't really their thing. The Orthodox Church has a following here, but it's mostly second and third generation expatriates whose family's fled Stalin's terror. The folks who stayed? Most of them remained atheists' or agnostics at best, even after the Wall came down.
As for Nixon's visit to China, he didn't make that trip to make sure China and the Soviet Union wouldn't team up. He did it to exploit the split that existed between them in order to end the Vietnam War on the best terms he could get and to open China's market to the U.S., a dream this country has been chasing since its inception. See Admiral Perry and the annexation of Hawaii for proof of the historical facts on that one.
Like I say, I like ya Tucker, but you tell a version of history that ain't always precise. Maybe it's a trick you picked up at CNN or maybe you just have crappy researchers. Or maybe you know it's BS, like your JFK conspiracy crackpot stuff, a narrative that fits the iconoclastic persona you adopted when Fox slid you into that 8 PM slot and you replaced your moderate bowtie for a necktie. I like the edge, but I'm calling BS on that take. I'm not a fan of the war in Ukraine but I'm a bigger fan of the truth. As my man John Adams said: "Facts are stubborn things."
1
-
1
-
1
-
That recent bi-partisan abomination the senate came up with tells you all you need to know about how political leaders on both sides feel about the open border. They let that cinnamon woman from Arizona sponsor it from the left because she pretends to be an independent and while she's up for re-election she's running against the news lady who has decided being trump in a skirt is a winning strategy. Kinda like it did for the book she wrote, the one that sold in the dozens. The cinnamon lady knows she will have no trouble dusting the maga queen bee off so she was willing to take one for the team, most likely in exchange for the committee chair of her choosing come 2025. That lankofrd joker out of Oklahoma who was the republican sponsor for the bill did what his master ditch ordered him to do. Then he stood back and watched as mcconnell, in true mcconnell fashion, tossed him under the bus and rocked it from forward to reverse and back again a few times for good measure. But he's not up for re-lection until 2028 and he can always lie about his conservative credentials because his is from Oklahoma after all and people will have long forgotten this traitorous bill. Fox News will make sure it gets buried properly.
The thing is, I think it was just a trial balloon anyway. The little weasels got together and drafted a bill so obnoxious they knew it was DOA before it even saw the light of day. Now they are gauging just which parts were deal-breakers and which parts they can slip into the real bend-you-over bill they will pass in 2025, when democrats will have the WH and both chambers of congress. You think things are bad now? Wait until you get a load of obama's fourth term.
But hey, the republican voters have spoken. They want trump and his flying circus with it's bruce jenner freak tent and carney-barkers like roger stone more than some boring candidate who can't even come up with any good nicknames for his opponents. I mean, the man has never had a reality-tv show or cheated on his wife. What exactly qualifies him to be president? What qualifies him to play ringmaster for the greatest show on Earth? Why, I didn't hear any tv-evangelical tell me DeSantis is a Godly man. Not like trump who according to preachers on his payroll is God's son in whom he is well pleased.
But hey, I'm probably over reacting. Of course trump will win. He will beat all those black robed meanies who want to lock him up and will capture 35% or more of the black vote because as Fox News has pointed out, the brotha's be flippin for trump in Rhode Island, and we all know what a bellwether state Rhode Island is when it comes to race in America. The man is loved from sea-to-shining-sea after all. Just ask him. Or better yet, learn to speak Spanish, or Uzbek or whatever the preferred language of your new neighbors is. It will help you out as you ask them to stop pissing on your lawn and to take their tent down because it's blocking your driveway.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"A tyrants power derives from the citizenry"? Where does that nonsense come from? Tyranny is by it's nature a condition where the will of the people is not a consideration. I tried to make it all the way through this video because past videos produced by this channel have made sense. This one is chock-full-of BS. This idea that decentralized power has been the norm throughout history is a load of crap. History is dominated and defined by periods of empire, not small city states singing kumbha as they battled back the Hun's. Believe me, I'm no fan of large overreaching government but that has been the end result as long as people have organized themselves into groups. Initially it was done for protection, then people figured out they liked power and dominating others so that became the driving force. The narrator says he's not pushing a utopia here but that's exactly what he's peddling. And this assertion that small city states and tribes have some sort of natural tendency to of band together to fight off a larger power trying to intrude upon them is ridiculous. Ask the Gaul's how that worked out for them against Rome, or the tribes of Asia against the Mongols. Want a more modern example? Ask the Czechs how things went for them in 1938.
Like I say, I would love nothing more than for the world to operate the way this guy says it did in his imaginary past and I agree Federalism is the best hope for liberty in the United States but the truth of the matter is we are headed in the opposite direction. The world is more interconnected than at any time throughout the history of civilizations and guess what, tyrants love to grab the levers of power when the foundation is already set up for them. If you think we are somehow immune to that because we are more enlightened, I've got a nice piece of real estate to sell you just south of me. It's buried under 10 feet of water but that shouldn't be a problem, you can always get your neighbor's to help man the pump.
I hate where we are going and while the solution being offered here is very appealing, it is as realistic as terraforming Mars and starting over on that planet. Dark days are on the horizon, I wish it wasn't so, but that's the world of the way things are and we better wake up to that and the nature of our true enemy pretty quick or there won't be anything left to save.
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm old enough to remember your father. My dad thought your uncle was a rich man's kid, a playboy with no depth, but he had a grudging respect for your dad because he believed in the causes he was fighting for. I'll give you credit, you seem to share that with your father, but sorry Mr. Kennedy, this isn't the party of JFK and Harry Truman anymore. It's not even the party of Bill Clinton. This is obama's party and we'll cry if we want to. The fact you had to turn to Fox for airtime kind of sums it up.
I give ya props for running, and I hope you make at least a few people examine why they still support that Godforsaken party that has literally, not figuratively, forsaken God and all that is good, decent, and holy. The republicans aren't really much better, but there is a dark force that has grabbed hold of the reigns of your political party and it will not relinquish it. I wish you luck sir, but I'm afraid your on a it of a Quixotic quest going up against the powers that be on that side of the aisle. Maybe President DeSantis will put you in charge of a criminal inquiry into fauci and that bunch. Wouldn't that be something.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I grew up in Michigan, most of my friends and family still live in Michigan, I still consider it my home in a lot of ways, I guess I always will. But I will never even consider moving back to that state. Whitmer has turned the place into a police state and everyone hates it. I have been back a couple times during the COVID BS and I have never felt more anger in the air in my life. I have travelled the world as a member of the military, spent time in places where people openly despised us, yet I felt an even more negative vibe during my last visit to the Metro-Detroit area. Everybody is on edge, people flip you off and worse on the roads (taking pot-shots at strangers has replaced run-of-the-mill road rage), and have a nice day is met with a skeptical stare (like who the hell are you to wish me any kind of day).
I am convinced that evil tyrant's draconian policies warped the state to such a degree it may never recover yet they are going to re-elect her. Part of that is because she is really, really, REALLY, good at cheating, and part of it is Michigan is essentially a one-party state. They have a GOP, but they would qualify as a lefty party here in Florida. And they put the "P" in...well, let's just say that they would give any spineless batch of republican's anywhere a run for their money when it comes to wimpism. That AG is nothing more than Stretchin Gretchen's little attack dog.
What has happened to that wonderful state saddens me beyond despair. I'm not the only one who has expressed these feelings. Other Michigan escapees have expressed the same sentiment. As one put it it, it's like she shot everyone's dog. Wanna see what happens when you are a union state with one industry and one party? Look no further than the former Water, Winter, Wonderland. RIP Michigan, it was fun while it lasted. Give my regards to the Great Lakes, Vernor's, Better Made, and a thousand other memories I have to sustain me as I grow older. Your likes will never come this way again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The neighborhood I grew up in was a decent place when I was a kid. It wasn't perfect or even idyllic, but you could play outside, walk to school, and nobody had bars on their windows. Then, when I reached my teens, it started to turn. It went from bikes getting stolen to cars, from shoplifting to armed robbery, from someone getting beat up now and again to people getting killed. The businesses responded to the new reality. First it was keeping a weapon behind the counter, then the bulletproof glass came up, finally, they just left because trying to conduct business in an ugly place as Matt put it just ain't profitable.
And that is what will happen there. It's not a matter of if, just when. In my neighborhood they blamed it on racism. They said there were no grocers because Kroger and other chains were racist. No mention of the fact that half the merchandise was walking out the door prior to the stores all leaving. Nobody stays in a sh*tbox unless they like the smell of sh*t and there are a lot of people, dope addicts, prostitutes, thieves, who like the smell. A lot of people on the street have mental issues but you'd be surprised, if you ever took the time to ask, to find out how many are there because they like it. A pastor once told me nobody is in Hell who doesn't want to be there. I thought that was nonsense at first. But the more I looked around and considered the human condition, how broken we are, the more it made sense. There are people who prefer wicked to righteous, evil to good. Why would they change simply because they passed over to the other side?
Here's the thing, right now it's the normies leaving hellholes like Kalifornia and New York. What happens when the lefties wake up and decide they want to move too? Are they gonna come down here to Florida where we have turned a corner and we end up with a socialist mayor of a small town who likes sniffing coke off male hookers asses in the Governor's office? Because we already looked out over that abyss. We came within 40,000 votes of having just that in 2018. Please, by all that is good, decent, and holy, I beg my lefty brothers and sisters. Stay put. Fix your neighborhoods. Deal with your sh*t. But please, I beg you, leave us alone. You do you, we'll do us, don't start nothin, won't be nothin. THAT is my Christmas in July wish.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've never been big on labels. I didn't know I was a conservative until I attended university. I knew I voted differently from most of my friends and family, but I just attributed it to liking a candidates record or disliking the record of his opponent. I always had this thing for voting for stuff that works. I grew up in a city dominated by unions and I was a long-haired club musician but I voted for Ronald Reagan, even though I was told he was out to destroy the working man. Well, I stood in the eight-hour unemployment line under Carter so I figured I may not know what Reagan will or won't do when it comes to the working class, but it didn't take a rocket scientist to see what Carter and his policies had done. Then again, I was the kid always sticking up for the cops in the 1960s.
Even now, most of my family and friends are still left-wing and me, well I'm still in the camp of stuff that works versus stuff that doesn't. They are wrapped up around fairness, I know fair is a place where pigs get judged. I was a leadership facilitator and I used to challenge my students to find the word fair in our founding documents. It's not there because our founders knew it was unattainable. The real difference boils down to the social contract and which camp you fall in. The Hobbesian camp see's people as absolutely irremeable, in need of a strong hand to keep the unwashed masses in check. Right-wing police states in South and Central America during the Cold war were examples of that.
If you believe Rousseau, you believe our nature is not fixed, that it is corrupted by the ruling class and with the right training we can return to our original state, which was basically a worldwide kumbaya moment where everyone got along. Of course, there is no evidence for this but feelings play a large role for people in this group. Socialists fall into this camp, but socialism is actually a stage of history to a true believer, not an ideology in and of itself. Communism is the natural end of history for this bunch, the dissolving away of government because it is no longer needed. A return to our proper nature, Heaven on Earth if you will, which why you can't be a Communist and believe in God. Communism only works if people are perfectible, a belief that runs contrary to most religions, at least the Abrahamic ones.
The third group follows Locke's view of the social contract. Locke is the middle way. Yes, people are mean and brutish by nature, but if they have enough resources and are allowed to govern their own affairs they will figure it out and get along based on self-interest, which is how we are wired anyway. The American system is based on Locke, at least it used to be when people played by the rules set out in the Constitution.
If you get the three interpretations of the social contract you get the left versus right argument. Feelings versus results, the belief in a better world to come after we die or while are alive, the need for God or the need for people to just be a bit better educated. Build a better man you get a better world. Years ago, after the Berlin Wall fell, the idea was floated that we had reached an end of history, that we had outgrown ideology and were about to enter a golden age. We all believe the lies we want at some point don't we.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Seeing videos like this are heartbreaking for me. My family immigrated to the States in 1965. We moved to Detroit and for a time it was wonderful. I was a kid and the neighborhood had everything, clean parks to play in within walking or bike riding distance, several grocery stores to choose from, a nice little shopping district with a drug store and a five and dime, each of which had a lunch counter, a great little hamburger joint, a clean greasy spoon with great food, a theater, banks, a police precinct and firehouse centrally located, good schools within walking distance that focused on teaching kids properly and they had annual fairs where people could meet and mingle, churches of different denominations within walking distance, I could go on and on. And as he said, people looked out for one another. If you got stupid a neighbor could correct you on the spot (not violently of course) and you stopped doing what you were doing because respect for adults and law enforcement was a given.
That was how it was then. I drove through the neighborhood for the first time in decades a couple years back. I really wish I hadn't. Not only were many of the houses gone (mine included) the shopping district was no more, businesses were shuddered, burnt out buildings and houses and piles of trash were all over, the schools were closed or torn down, the library was closed and boarded up, the fire and police houses were gone, the parks we once played in were now empty fields covered in weeds ranging from knee to waist high, no swings or slides, and most disturbing, no people. It was the middle of the afternoon on a Saturday in June, a time when I was a kid that the streets would be teeming with life, kids riding bikes, people mowing grass, neighbors chatting, shoppers roaming around. None of that was happening. My friend and I drove for several miles and saw maybe 10 people total and they were all walking along alone with their heads down minding their own business. That was the largest heartbreak of all.
After that experience I decided I would never return. I would rather remember things as they once were, when people cared for the neighborhood and each other. RIP Old Friend.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, give her style points for admitting she did it for the money. The thing people who treat porn and prostitution as victimless crimes miss is the market for human traffickers these sites and street corners create. For every wanna be exhibitionist with an entrepreneurial spirit there are most likely 10 who are forced into it by their slave masters. Online porn has done as much, maybe more, damage to the society as any of Satan's other nefarious plots. If you're engaging in it simply as a passive participant taking in free content, take a moment to really ask yourself what you are doing, what you are promoting, what you are getting out of it. Then look at these girls from broken homes and girls who are forced into the trade through a human lens, as children of God. If you haven't seen Sound of Freedom you need to. Unless you are just too far gone you will never look at these victimless crimes in the same light again. There are more enslaved people around the world than at any point in history and the United States is the largest market for human trafficking in the world. Let that roll around in your brain for a bit.
The term victimless crime is as absurd as the term virtuous sin. We all answer for what we do in this life, whether it's here or after we check out, but just like the old economist said, there is no such thing as a free lunch. Actions have consequences. You may not experience them in the moment, but as this young lady discovered, they do catch up with you. I pray for her and for everyone who thinks the devil is their friend and that we can somehow walk between the raindrops if we choose. Sin hurts everyone, but it hurts God more than us. I hope she figures that out. The school district was within it's rights to fire her. Life isn't a Burger King commercial, you can't always have it your way. The wages of sin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Couple quick points of order. First, Elon is a visionary, when he can get governments to foot the bill. Musk is great at sniffing out the government cheese. Prior to getting into pissing contests with the left after he bought Twitter, Musk was one of the prime targets for obama greenie backs. Tesla was built with government funds and the private investors who bought into his B.S. ended up having their money slid over to Space-X without being told. If Musk is behind something, check the funding. Second point, who the hell wants to live on Mars? The best description of the place I heard was it was a lot like Utah without the state parks and Mormons. No offense Utah, but I've traveled the western part of your state, there ain't a lot there appealing. Mars has no minerals or ores we can mine, meaning the ROI for a project costing trillions of dollars would be squat. That dog don't hunt.
And Musk knows this. He's out there spewing that bullshit about how he'll go first to set it up because he knows it is all garbage. No, he's not going anywhere that doesn't have a five-star hotel, no, he's not going to build any ship able to take people on some magical mystery tour of the Oort Cloud. What he will do is bilk the taxpayer out of a boatload of money while his crappy car company goes kaput and his gigantic Moon rocket crashes and burns. Sorry, if you get taken in by that huckster, you may get to live long, but you certainly won't prosper.
1
-
1
-
1
-
"You are Gods, little g." Saying we are exactly like Jesus because we share the same DNA? There is a simple term for that sort of talk, blasphemy. These preachers who profit from the Word ought to remember the incident in the Temple where Jesus overturned the tables of the money changers. It was His greatest display of anger. As for their flock who follow the doctrine of the prosperity gospel, consider what Scripture has to say on the topic:
“My brothers, show no partiality as you adhere to the faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ. For if a man with gold rings on his fingers and in fine clothes comes into your assembly, and a poor person in shabby clothes also comes in, and you pay attention to the one wearing the fine clothes and say, ‘Sit here, please,’ while you say to the poor one, ‘Stand there,’ or ‘Sit at my feet,’ have you not made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil designs? Listen, my beloved brothers. Did not God choose those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom that he promised to those who love him? But you dishonored the poor person. Are not the rich oppressing you? And do they themselves not haul you off to court? Is it not they who blaspheme the noble name that was invoked over you?” ― James 2: 1-7
“There was a rich man who dressed in purple garments and fine linen and dined sumptuously each day. And lying at his door was a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who would gladly have eaten his fill of the scraps that fell from the rich man’s table…When the poor man died, he was carried away by angels to the bosom of Abraham. The rich man also died and was buried, and from the netherworld, where he was in torment, he raised his eyes and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus at his side. And he cried out, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me. Send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am suffering torment in these flames.’ Abraham replied, ‘My child, remember that you received what was good during your lifetime while Lazarus likewise received what was bad; but now he is comforted here, whereas you are tormented.” ― Luke 16: 19-25
Beware of false prophets and Earthly comforts. That's free advice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Marx and his ilk aren't really atheists. They hate God. I don't believe in Santa so I don't spend a lot of time on him one way or another and I certainly don't care if others choose to believe in a jolly old guy living at the North Pole. A true atheist, as Jordan points out, is neutral on the matter. Because they don't believe they don't get riled up one way or another. Communists see religion as their main competition for the hearts and minds of the masses but more than that they know deep down there is a God and they hate Him. I have a friend who, while he's not a communist, falls into the same camp. He claims to be a bit of an agnostic but when the subject of Christianity comes up he is usually hostile or incredulous in an eye-rolling way.
Wanna know where you are at on the spectrum? Get honest for a moment and ask yourself what your initial reaction is when God or Crist are mentioned? The heart always reveals and if Satan has taken up residence in your heart, or even if he just stops by because he knows you're okay with him hanging out now and again, he will generate a natural revulsion at the mere mention of God's name. I know because when I swam in the devil's lake a negative reaction at the thought or mention of God or His Son was my default setting.
The Marxists are running amok in the West because we told God we didn't need Him and God responded; "Your will be done." Where you have Marxists Satan is always along for the ride. They are like peanut-butter and jelly. People die, morality gets thrown out the window, and souls get corrupted because that is Satan's agenda. Marxism is just the vehicle he uses to create separation between God and us. People go along with it because they believe in secular humanism. Make no mistake, it's every inch a religion as Christianity, it just has an evil deity. Follow him at your own peril.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
When I was a kid epics like Ben-Hur were all the rage. Epics became mini-series with the advent of TV and that watered down most of them. LOTR is, in my opinion, the last true epic cinematic event, and will probably remain the last. The thing is, it is true to the spirit of the book but the content actually varies quite a bit, and it still works because everyone respected Tolkien's intent when he first told the story. Jackson blew it with the Hobbit, which seemed like a money grab, redeemed himself with They Shall Never Grow Old, then got greedy again and f*cked up Get Back when he took Disney's money and turned what should have been a proper reshoot of Let it Be into what Let it Be was, a f*cking snoorfest. Oh well, he gave us the LOTR trilogy and for that he will always get two thumbs up from me.
1
-
1
-
There are plenty of examples that some people are currently living in a post-truth world and they do it for a variety of reasons. Some do it to fit in, not only going along with a litany of lies but championing them as well to show the other members of the club their loyalty first and foremost is to the clan. It's the kind of behavior adolescents exhibit during the stage of development where association with a group is the central point of focus. Most people grow out of it, some people become angry cynical loners. They are the argumentative type because they never did find a group willing to accept them during that stage of development so they carry those resentments like luggage and lash out at the world until they find some sort of internal resolution.
Others don't believe the lie but they don't speak out against it either because they are afraid of the consequences. The Soviets employed intimidation to control people and the lie was a big part of it making it all work. They didn't care if you believed the lie, so long as you lived it. In fact, that was the ultimate exercise of power, making people act like they believed things they knew were not true. They did so because they were afraid of what would happen if they dissented. The LGBT fascists picked up on that and are doing their best to employ those tactics in pursuit of their agenda. The thing is, they are being controlled by an even more insidious and nefarious faction who use them as a bludgeon to brow-beat their political and social rivals into submission. And with each small victory, they inch further ahead, the whole frog gradually boiling in the water routine.
Again it's not the lie, it's not a matter of you believing the lie, it's a matter of you living it, saying nothing when you know you are being lied to, accepting the lie as a cultural norm. We all know a man can't be a woman, yet most of society just looks the other way, unless it directly affects them, then they are forced to deal with it. But they almost always find themselves on an island because the institutions that used to protect society from demonic contagions have either abdicated that role, like the church, or have gotten in league with the demons, like the government.
But at the end of the day problem is always the same. The problem is us. The problem is always living the lie and accepting that this is just the way things are in a post-truth, post-constitution, post-faith world where the father of all lies is now allowed to operate in the open.
"And thus, overcoming our temerity, let each man choose: Will he remain a witting servant of the lies (needless to say, not due to natural predisposition, but in order to provide a living for the family, to rear the children in the spirit of lies!), or has the time come for him to stand straight as an honest man, worthy of the respect of his children and contemporaries?... If we shrink away, then let us cease complaining that someone does not let us draw breath—we do it to ourselves! Let us then cower and hunker down, while our comrades bring closer the day when our thoughts can be read and our genes altered." ― Alexander Solzhenitsyn: Live Not By Lies
A time for choosing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As a kid who grew up during the age of Apollo, videos about exoplanets hold a certain amount of interest. But as we learn more about these alien worlds it seems Drake's Equation becomes more of a pipedream. Like that tidally locked planet they mention as a candidate for life. What life? Bacteria? Sorry, I'm not that jazzed about the prospect of finding microbial life on an alien world, even within our own solar system. What does it prove? That life can exist? All the proof we need that life can exist is found right here.
Intelligent life, life that is conscious of itself and its surroundings, now that is an entirely different matter. When I was a kid, I was absolutely convinced the galaxy was teeming with civilizations and it would only be a matter of time before we met up with our interstellar cousins. I figured it was pure human arrogance to think it's just us. But the more I learned, the more skeptical I became. The balancing forces that allow intelligent life to exist on our planet are so precise that it is actually mind boggling. If our moon is just a bit smaller, or just a bit further away, our oceans behave entirely differently. If Jupiter isn't exactly where it needs to be the solar system itself becomes chaotic. If not for plate tectonics we end up with a big land mass that is mostly arid and inhospitable. And then there is the great life sustainer and guardian, our magnetic field. Take that away and you get a bigger version of Mars.
There are so many other factors, too many to get into. Suffice it to say ET ain't phoning anytime soon. I still think stopping our manned exploration of the planets after the Moon landing was a mistake. We are explorers by nature and we need big dreams and goals to advance as a society. But as far as finding our cousins go, I am now regrettably in the camp that believes it will never happen. The cosmic speed limit is set and no matter how many movies about worm holes and such that we make, some limits just weren't made to be broken. And that, may be our greatest blessing. Some things, we just weren't meant to know in this lifetime.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The media has always been biased, going back to the early days of the republic. The problem in the 20th and 21st Centuries is the democrat party has had a virtual monopoly as far as that bias is concerned and with mediums like radio, television, and now the internet, more people get that one-sided message than they did prior to their existence. Guys like Cronkite and Murrow built up this myth of being impartial but if you check the record they were far more favorable to democrat politicians and hostile to republicans who failed to act as democrat lite. This didn't start with Trump and it's not going to end with him. They savaged George Bush and he was as milquetoast as you can get. Whoever runs on the republican ticket is going to be the devil and things have only gotten worse over time. Look who populates newsrooms across the country. Check the background of these on-air personalities. You will find deep roots to democrat politics, generational level. The NY Times, the supposed paper of record was printing fluff pieces on the USSR under Stalin. It doesn't get much harder left than that.
Fox is no better. They are the mouthpiece for the RNC and outside of a few guys like Tucker and Dan Bongino they tow the party line. The reaction from the left is quite telling though. One station goes against the orthodoxy, one network has a different viewpoint and their collectivist heads explode. chuck schumer stands on the senate floor and declares Tucker Carlson a threat to democracy, an enemy of the state, demanding he be silenced and fired for doing actual journalism. Self-awareness is dead because the dems no longer feel they have to put on a charade. Years of left-wing indoctrination in the education system, the arts, and the mass-media has created a situation where brain dead lazy journalists of today just go on the air and parrot what their overlords at the DNC determines is the narrative for that moment in time. Don't take my word for it, listen to them. Listen to how they all use the same phrases and stay on message until directed to do otherwise. That's not journalism, that's propaganda. That's PRAVDA and TASS. The guy who blew smoke up their collective keister's when obama was cutting the Iranian nuclear deal admitted counting on the kids covering the story to be too lazy and stupid to properly fact check him.
And when you point any of it out to someone who is a true believer you always get the same response: "Yeah but Fox..." One station out of all the cable and standard news outlets, that's the equivalence. And Fox doesn't even rock the boat, not on the big ticket items. Tucker's release of the January 6th tapes is the furthest they've gone and look at the freak out. Not only is schumer going full Himmler, his lackey mcconnell is out there carrying water for his partner in crime as well.
Like I say, the media doesn't have a Trump problem, they have an integrity problem. But they don't see it as a problem at all so there ya go. It can't be fixed because the will to fix it isn't there, it never was and it never will be. Independent journalists are the only ones telling the truth, and how much air time do they get? Solzhenitsyn said the first step to resisting authoritarian rule is to not participate in the lie. But we no longer do that. We pick sides based on lies. But hey, at least we get to own the libs every now and then and our champions do sell a lot of books so we have that going for us. Yes we can indeed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I tried listening to all of that stuff that whistleblower wrote but I had to stop. I have heard enough about these wicked doctors and cult leaders to last a lifetime. I get it, I get why Matt is exposing it, and God bless him for it, but for my own peace of mind, at least tonight, I had to put this stuff down.
These people know they committing a grave mortal sin, they flat out don't care. I don't even know how we got here or why the rights and wrongs of this evil is even open for debate. That is the sick part, the fact we have to push for legislation preventing this wickedness says more about where we are than the evil itself and this phenomena seems to be almost exclusively restricted to western culture. A bit of payback for decades of hubris? I dunno. I do know this stuff has its roots in the 60s, and the whole peace love dope movement. I know because I saw it. I was exposed to the hedonist counter culture as a kid and bought into it for a time, until I saw it consuming people I loved, and taking me down along with it. Fast forward almost 60 years and what have we learned? Nothing. What should we have learned? If you tell God you don't want or need Him He will say fine, your will be done. I may not be the brightest bulb in the fixture but I know that much.
I doubt anyone will read this post but if you do, get right with God, then fight this evil anyway you can. Understand the nature of your enemy, because he has spent a long, long, long time studying and understanding yours. Do with it what you will, but own up to your role in all of this, because we are all under judgment, and rightfully so.
1
-
1
-
Unless they repent these doctor's bragging about butchering those young people will feel the torment of their victims for eternity. No rest, nothing to ease their pain, no compassion, just wailing and gnashing of teeth. The documents and guidelines referenced here may have been penned by man but they were conceived in the pit of Hell by Satan. Anyone following such doctrine should reconsider their actions before the time for reconsideration passes them by.
"You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” ―John 8:44
“But as for cowards, the unfaithful, the depraved, murderers, the unchaste, sorcerers, idol-worshipers, and deceivers of every sort, their lot is in the burning pool of fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” ― Revelation: 21:8
1
-
When I was a an on-the-ground supervisor in the military I had a running joke going with a colleague about what we called "Orange Monkey Stuff." It was a reference to the orangutans in the old Planet of the Apes movies, the orange monkeys who kept the secret scrolls none of the other monkeys were allowed to see. Whenever an order that seemed a bit goofy would make it's way down from some meeting the upper echelon held that we weren't invited to we would shrug our shoulders and call it "more orange monkey stuff from on high."
You know something is BS when the left decides it needs a new name. Global warming became climate change because the fish weren't swimming in the streets of Miami like the high priest al gore had predicted and temperatures were either staying constant or in some instances cooling down. I remember hearing about a U.N. sponsored study of the ice cores from Greenland that indicated the climate had pretty much stayed within the range of the standard deviation for the past 6,000 years. Word is that study got buried deeper than Jimmy Hoffa and the scientists who carried out the study either kept their mouths shut or found their career had gone as dry as the Salt Flats. I want to vomit when I see a complete fraud and lifetime grifter like john kerry standing up in front of the rest of the global super-villains making claims about how 2023 was the hottest year in the history of the planet and if people don't start getting with the program the whole place is going to look like a spent charcoal briquette in the next however many years.
It's all about control and raw application of power. Nothing more, nothing less. These elites aren't super-geniuses, they are just your run of the mill demonic types that have been around since the dawn of creation. For thousands of years they got their way and were able to lead people by the nose. Then people embarked on a grand experiment called rule by the consent of the governed. It was sloppy, but it worked for a time. Now the pendulum is swinging back the other way. COVID showed them just how soft and pliable people have become. It's like that scene from The Jerk where Bernadette Peters says: "I don't care if they take the money, I just don't want them to take the stuff." As long as people are given their stuff they seem to be toots-cool with whatever half-baked plan groups like the WEF, WHO, and CDC have in mind for them. Of course those plans also include a massive reduction in the surplus population. In their way of thinking, the place would be a much more enjoyable place to rule over if it wasn't for all of those pesky people they have to deal with. Eliminate vast swaths of them, keep a reasonable amount of drones to allow the Borg to function, and bingo, you have paradise on Earth.
Of course it's not their hand guiding things. They use science because people have applied this word-from-on-high reverence to it. If some scientist says it's so, who are we to argue. The scene at the end of the movie Twelve Monkeys sums it up best. Bruce Willis turns to the guy who was sent back to make sure he did as he was told and he says: "This part isn't about the virus at all, it's about following orders." The thing is, the center can't hold and in the end the elites and their benefactor, the father of all lies who was a murderer from the word go lose. But they are going to raise a lot of cane along the way. Stay strong, get right with God, and remain faithful.
1
-
I think the last time I watched the Oscars was...🤔...fuck, I honestly cant' remember. I know the Jerry Lewis Telethon was still a thing and I think people were talking about some new arcdade game game called Space Invaders. Anyway, my point is, I never was much on slurpfest stuff like the Oscars, Emmy's, or Grammy's, but like The Drinker I love a good movie. When I was a kid it was the only escape we had. There was no internet, no social media, no video games. You climbed tress, played baseball in the summer, football in the fall, and hockey in the winter, all with busted up equipment because you had no money to buy new stuff. But you could occasionally get 75 cents from the old man and go see a show. Or better yet, jump in the car and go to the drive-in as a family. Movies like Patton, Planet of the Apes, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, even creepy shit like The House That Dripped Blood or The Exorcist. Those were the days. Here's to a golden age that maybe never was but I like to think existed. Yeah, my passive voice is pervasive, but so is my nostalgia for days that will never come again. RIP Hollywood, I'm gonna miss ya. 😥
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You know what, I grew up during the age of Apollo. Loved Star Trek, Lost in Space, even I Dream of Jeannie got in on the act, live long and prosper all the live long day. 🖖But a funny thing happened when I grew up, or at least got older, I learned about actual science. Wanna know why we don't go zipping around the solar system? Because space travel is a bitch. Weird stuff happens if you even get 90% of the speed of light, which is 186,000 MPS, second, not hours. How far do you think that translates to when you stretch it out to a year? Wanna know what kind of stars dominate the galaxy, especially in our little corner of the Milky Way? Red Dwarves, which have about as much chance of having habitable planets as you have of finding a black actor in Andy Griffith reruns. What does any of that mean? It means if these little gray guys do exist they have figured out how to break, not bend, not manipulate, break, every law and principle we know concerning how space, time, and matter function. And spare me warp drives and worm holes. They come with their own unique set of problems. And of course EVERYONE has kept this secret for more than 70 years now. Within government agencies. Okay, call me Irish but I gotta have a sit-down with ET myself before I buy any of this nonsense. A happy E=mc2 to everyone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
God's not looking for slaves. He has given us the free will to accept or reject Him as we see fit. Some people pin the blame for what we do on God, asking how a just and loving God could allow injustice in this world. That's us, not God. Why does an innocent child come down with a fatal disease and die before reaching adulthood? I'm not going to pretend to have the answer for that. I know this much, God is a loving force in my life and He has welcomed me home after years of swimming on the devil's lake. I know the emptiness of living a life without God. Not everyone feels that way and that's fine. But a world where God is acknowledged is better than a world where He is not. I say this because I have seen both first hand. But God leaves it up to us. We have a relationship with God whether we want to acknowledge it's existence or not. CS Lewis put it best: “There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, in the end, 'Thy will be done.'" ― Mere Christianity.
"If it is displeasing to you to serve the Lord, choose today whom you will serve, the gods your ancestors served beyond the River or the gods of the Amorites in whose country you are dwelling. As for me and my household, we will serve the LORD.” ― Joshua 24: 15. Peace be with all of you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think a lot of times, people who say they are spiritual but not religious are looking for a God on their terms, not His. I know that was the case with me. I could be wrong I suppose, my own baggage clouding my judgement, but I say this because when I ask what they mean by that statement the responses are similar in nature. I just don't think it works that way. I still struggle with this and perhaps I always will but I keep at it, searching for the truth I mean. I have found bringing the subject up with family, friends, and coworkers can elicit a highly emotional response. For instance, I was discussing what was happening WRT God being taken out of the public square and when I told him I believed a lot of people on the left are at war with God he lost it. I felt like saying, I rest my case. But he's still a good friend and I do for him what I do for myself and everyone else, ask God to forgive us. I just try and keep it simple is all. It's the only way it works for me. I want to read his book. Sounds interesting.
1
-
1
-
Matt, to borrow from vernacular that may or may not still be in vouge, I feel ya dawg. But with so little context I can't say whose side I fall on. Could I see some woman living on the edge who finally had enough of Gen-Z and their needs? Sure. If that's the case, that email was a I know I'm gonna fired and I want it now moment. I could also see some over bearing bi*ch who is a tyrant devoid of empathy? Yeah, based on the language she used. And there are plenty of them out there.
I remember many many years ago when I was a kid looking for work and I took a job late in the season with this landscaping outfit. The first week went okay. I went out and did Fall clean-ups with these two other guys who seemed okay. We even stopped off at a bar one night after work and pounded a few back. Then we went on this job laying sod, which is nasty ass work if you've never done it, and the owner of this rinky-dink operation decided to directly supervise this job. He was yelling, cursing, throwing tools around, just acting like a total dick for most of the morning. He took off around lunch. I would have left sooner but I rode in on the truck carrying the sod so I was stuck. Needless to say me, and the two other new guys recently hired, all quit as soon as we got back to the little shack acting as this jokers office.
When I went to get my check the next day he started in on me again, telling me what an ingrate me and the other two guys were and how he was looking for career minded people. Career minded. Laying sod, cutting grass, and blowing leaves for minimum wage. I actually laughed when he handed me my check and when he got up and looked like he was going to come round the desk at me I told him to look out because I didn't work for him anymore and I had the money in my hand so I didn't have anything to lose. If he wanted to go at it I invited him outside but he just growled and went in the back room.
A long tale I know, but like I said Matt, context matters. She could have been stressed out, or she could have been like that little twerp who ran that lawn outfit, just a F-N A-Hole. They exist too dude, always have, always will.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The commies are gonna dump biden before any impeachment vote can be taken and the republicans can run all the investigations they want. There is no way in this or any other parallel universe that any democrat will be prosecuted for any serious crime, not with the DOJ as it is currently staffed. As for the FBI, that whole edifice needs to be ripped down. They have been a threat to liberty since their inception under Hoover. If the founders could have somehow foreseen a future with agencies like the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the DIA, and the rest of the surveillance state they would have told King George, look, we'll pay ya back for the tea, give us a third of what we want and let's call it a day.
He is right about the country being on a precipice, but I don't see the republican party as the white knight that is going to save it from itself. The unibrow in D.C. is too strong. It will not allow self-correction any longer. I wish it wasn't so, but I fear it is. We need a real leader, not squishes like McCarthy and McConnell. Do they seem like the Lincoln or Washington types? Because that is the kind of leadership this country needs right now, not two years from now. Think biden was a mess? Wait till you get a load of that cackling hen harris when she's in charge. God help us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Vivek is full of sh*t but every now and again he's amusing, like the smart-ass kid in the class who gets a rise out of the teacher. That's what I thought when I saw him getting under Hailey's skin. If you like entertainment over substance, Vivek is your guy. Hopefully last night is the last night Scott and Christie are on the stage. Last night Scott's sudden right turn was basically a rip-off of what Governor DeSantis has been saying for months. The problem is, he doesn't believe any of it and has never acted that way as a Senator. Two of the shortest books in the world, the accomplishments of Hailey and Scott. That's why she never talks about her record as governor, it doesn't exist, at least not anything worth bragging about. Christie is like that comic you see who keeps peddling the same jokes out day, after, day, after day. Romney's niece isn't the only loser Trump backed. Christie's political career was, to borrow from Samuel L. Jackson, as dead as fried chicken until Trump breathed life back into it. Christie's great contribution to the cause? Recommending wray to head up the FBI. Another stellar Trump pick because we know he only picks the best people.
I get it, a lot of people like the show so they think Vivek won because he tossed around the most insults. The thing is, insulting the media and Niki Hailey is kinda like winning the gold at the Special Olympics or being vaidectorian at a community college, not exactly a high bar to clear. But hey, do what you want, believe the polls, believe Vivek, hell, believe in Santa for that matter. It's all about clicks, and owns, and memes anyway on the right these days. It's been that way since Trump became the reality star for the right and it will be that way until he's done. The republican's don't enough core values to overcome it or him. That's why they suck and why they are the only party I hate more than the democrats. The democrats are demonic, but they deliver on their promises, even if it is to wreck the country. What do republicans do? They play Washington Generals to the democrat Globetrotter team and fund raise.
That's why we suck anymore. We have leaders who deliver but they aren't flashy enough and don't make good click bait for sites like the Daily Wire and the Blaze, so they get ignored. But hey, Tick Tock is always there to poke fun at. But that's me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sound of Freedom is not a faith-based film. It is a gritty portrayal of an evil so unspeakable it should anger every decent citizen of this country to know the United States is the largest consumer of child porn and the biggest customer when it comes to sex trafficking. Angel Studios rescued it from Disney and quite frankly I'm surprised Disney even allowed it to escape. Some in the media may have simply assumed because Angel Studios released the film that it is a faith-based by default and their disdain for Christ is such that it evoked a natural sense of revulsion in them, but if you actually watch the movie, God certainly plays a role in inspiring the heroes to act heroically but there isn't some pastor delivering sermons and redemption is rare. It is found in the people doing the right thing. The scum-buckets remain scum-buckets and while there is a bit of a happy ending knowing a lot of children were saved, it's effect is tempered by the knowledge that so many other children are still enslaved around the world.
How is that a right versus left thing? The reaction just shows how far we have slipped down the slippery slope people talked about for years. If you can't get behind a film like this because Donald Trump watched it you might want to have a deep, meaningful, conversation with yourself and discover just how deep your attachment to the cult runs. There are more than a few movers and shakers in hollywood who don't want any spotlight shining anywhere near the subject because so many elites within their circles and the circles that fund them use children for their own perverted pleasure. Then there is the alphabet crowd who has been fighting hard to liberate children so they could snatch them up, going so far as to push for pedophiles to be rebranded as MAP's, minor attracted people. Think about that. Ten years ago would such a suggestion even be entertained anywhere beyond academia, seedy theaters, and west-coast bath houses? They are against the film for the most obvious reasons, and isn't it illuminating to see just how many people stand with them and not the children they exploit.
hollywood used to make epic faith-based films like The Ten Commandments, Ben Hur, and The Song of Bernadette but that was a different era. A time when God was central to our republic. A darkness has crept over the land and satan has captured many and corrupted them. His demons are prowling the Earth trying to ruin souls and in the end, when it comes time for the wheat to be separated from the weeds, the people currently buying into his lies will realize just how badly they were deceived, and they will learn that in Hell, no one is accorded a special place. Every soul suffers equally. I do pray that people will repent but they have to take that step.
Like I said, if you honestly won't go see a movie like Sound of Freedom, one of the most important films to be made this century, simply because your echo-chamber is against it, you may want to find a better set of friends.
1
-
1
-
Democrats don't go to jail. The quicker you get your head around that the lower your blood pressure will be. I know, it's wrong, wicked, evil, all of that, but the there is a better chance of finding an advanced civilization on Venus than there is that the SS, sorry, Freudian slip, I meant DOJ, will prosecute anyone with a D in front of their name. And where would the trial be held? D.C.? That would be like trying a case in the Stalin's Russia in the 1930s, more show than anything else. I wish it wasn't so, but is, and that's not changing anytime soon. Is it mcconnell?
1
-
I like your channel TIK. I have seen enough of your stuff to know you are sincere. I haven't always agreed with your assertions and /or conclusions and I'm not familiar with a lot of your sources but that is what makes it cool. I have a traditional liberal arts degree, roughly split 50/50 between history and political science. I think in order to get one you need to study the other. But I attended school decades ago and I went to a school that wasn't dominated by left-wing professors. We had em, but there were more conservative and professors who played it neutral so it wasn't hard to avoid the lefty's.
That said, history is one of those disciplines you don't need a ton of formal training to be good at. It's story telling. David McCullough was a very good historian who had a degree in English. Based on what I've seen you prefer the more technical writers, guys who get into more into the weeds with the data. That is okay provided they don't just take their brain out for a walk and toss a bunch of useless facts out there to seem smart. I read a terrible book called The British are Coming where the guy actually broke down the number of knots on a British mooring line and how much cannon shot each ship held, ad nauseum. Then there was a book on Stalin where the author just assumed you knew all about the makeup of the Politburo in the 1930s and just tossed a bunch of names out there. It was so thick it actually injured my brain.
As for the History Channel going Ancient Alien, I think that had more to do with production costs than anything else. The age of reality-tv killed channels like the History Channel and A&E. It killed politics too but I digress. Reality-tv was cheap and there was an audience for it. TV has been dumbing down western civilization for close to 80 years now. As time has gone on, attention spans have shrunk and sound-bites are all the rage. Then there is the built-in bias. People like information that affirms them and are less likely to listen to opposing points of view. And commentators on both side play fast and loose with the facts. You are just as likely to hear BS from Tucker Carlson as you are from MSNBC. I heard Tucker say, in absolute terms, no question about it, that the CIA killed JFK. Now, he has no facts to back that up, but I'm sure someone on his staff told him the demographic he was appealing to held that belief so he puts it out there and people are like: "Well, if Tucker said it it must be true." I call it "The Mr. Spock Affect." When I was a kid, anything Leonard Nimoy said was taken as gospel. He was Mr. Spock, the logical super-genius who bailed the emotion-driven Captain Kirk out of jams every week. So, if he was a genius there, he must be a genius in everything. I saw a film at a science museum in the 1970s that talked about tera-forming Mars. Now, you know NASA was behind it because people were bored with Apollo and funds were drying up. So they made up a bunch of BS and paid Spock to sell it like soap. Us kids were impressed that's for sure. Neil de Grasse Tyson is the latest version of Mr. Spock. He's a TV celebrity astrophysicist completely full of himself so he comments on everything from climate change to transgenderism, always falling on the side of the camp he belongs to because we are tribal.
This has been a long rant and I know no one will read it but I say all of it because as Orwell said: "He who controls the past controls the present. He who controls the present controls the future." It's important that people fact-check what they hear, but information is so manipulated anymore it's getting tougher to do it, at least digitally. My advice, by books, hardcover books. They are the best reference sources and the way things are going they may be worth their weight in gold, at least if the ones calling themselves the elites get their evil grimy paws on power. Like I say, long rant, but keep up the good work TIK. We need more like you and less "professionals" and "experts."
1
-
1
-
1
-
Admitting you don't know is a reasonable position. I get annoyed when people, some of whom study the subject, others who are simply well-known, show up on TV and claim: "Oh yeah, there is life all over the Universe; how could there not be?" That's an absurd position, one I held as a child who was wrapped up in the space race and watched a lot of Star Trek. Personally, they could find microbes on some Jovian moon and it wouldn't move the needle for me one iota. Great, simple life exists somewhere else, bravo. Until I can have a conversation with someone from another world I'm sorry, I'm just not going to get that fired up. I can look out my window for proof life exists. Intelligent life is another matter entirely and the man is right, we only have one model to work with so everything is largely conjecture.
I personally believe we will never meet our extraterrestrial cousins in this life because if they are out there, something tells me the rules of the game are set so we don't meet. It's why they are so far away and why space travel is such a bear. Einstein once famously said "God doesn't play dice with the Universe." I believe that, unless the dice are loaded of course. Yeah, I know he was referring to Quantum Mechanics but my point is, there is a philosophical component to all of this and as random as the Universe may seem, everything in it, from the largest star to the smallest particle serves a purpose. If it didn't, it would have no reason to exist.
I think it's cool and all that we are able to look out deeper into the cosmos and ponder such questions about rare Earth's and the like, I just wish we would focus a bit more on how we as individuals fit into the scheme of things, how our relationship with our Creator is supposed to work. If we sorted that out a bit more fully perhaps we'd have a greater appreciation for each other and God's creation. But that's me. I know others will believe what they want, but that's my story and I'm sticking to it. It's as reasonable as a lot of the other theories floating around out there, certainly more grounded than the opinion's of pretend experts like bill nye the science guy (boy, does he annoy me, but I digress).
Anyway, keep on postulating and I'll keep on listening. In the meantime, live long and prosper. 🖖
1
-
Why are they targeting children? To carry out the will of their father, the father of all lies.
"Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!” John 8:43-45
“If anyone causes one of these little ones, those who believe in Me, to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. Woe to the world because of the things that cause people to sin! Such things must come, but woe to the one through whom they come!” ― Matthew 18:6-7
He may lie to them, but lets not lie to each other about the nature of what we are up against. Don't be afraid to call it what it is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"As soon as we started thinking for you it really became our civilization, which of course is what this is all about, evolution." ― The Agent explaining the Matrix to Morpheus
"Then I saw a beast come out of the sea with ten horns and seven heads; on its horns were ten diadems, and on its heads blasphemous names...the whole world followed after the beast. They worshiped the dragon because it gave its authority to the beast; they also worshiped the beast. saying: 'Who can compare with the beast or who can wage war against it?' The beast was given a mouth uttering proud boasts and blasphemies...It was allowed to wage war against the holy ones and conquer them, and it was granted authority over every tribe, people, tongue, and nation. All the inhabitants of the earth will worship it" ― Revelation 13: 1-8
God explaining the future to us. Huxley tells us in Brave New World how our pursuit of comfort will do us in. We are warned time and time again, yet like Icarus, we just can't resist that flame. Mark Twain said: "History doesn't repeat itself but it often rhymes." It's also linear and it does have an end, just not the one Hagel envisioned.
1
-
1
-
So where is the U.N. in all of this? 🤔 Oh yeah, I forgot, Israel's not involved. That explains it.
That, and the fact Putin and Jinping have veto power over any actual action that might make a difference. How much more of this do we need to see before understand the U.N. has the same built-in flaw that killed the League of Nations? This isn't the first time they've been exposed for the fraud they are and it won't be the last. This was always in the cards for Putin. He's been waiting for decades to put the Soviet band back together and he knows he's running out of time.
My heart aches for the Ukrainian people, it truly does. Right now, your best option is to be what Khrushchev liked to term: "A bone in the throat," or, as John McClain put it in Die Hard, be: "The fly in ointment, the monkey in the wrench, the pain in the ass." Don't look for a lot of help from the U.N. or anyone else for that matter. I wish is wasn't so, but alas, I fear it is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
That law in Tennessee made me think of a comedy bit I saw years ago where the comic made a crack about the need to pass a law saying it's not okay to have sex with dead animals. Some things used to be a given. But those days are gone and they aren't coming back. Satan is not going to give back ground he has gained. I imagine the next step for these women who are sitting in the front row smiling as they expose their kids to this filth will be to pimp their kids out to the pedophiles when they reach puberty. It's hard to imagine anyone doing that but hey, just a few years ago the idea that a mother would take her kids to one these strip shows was equally abhorrent, just another example of the right overreacting to the free love moral relativism of the hip crowd.
Matt is right about the need for republican politicians to openly run against this wickedness but we are talking about republicans here. Most of them are such moral cowards that they would cringe at the very mention of having to take a stand. And I'm sorry, things have reached the point where you cannot call yourself a Christian and be a member of the democratic party. This is a political party that booed God at their convention, littered the executive branch with twisted perverts dressing as women, lowers penalty's for criminals while emptying jails, and fights against laws aimed at protecting children from sexual groomers and predators. If you support that sort of thing, you can't say you follow Christ and practice what He teaches us. That level of cognitive dissonance is just too extreme even by today's standards. If you support their insanity and lawlessness you have more in common with the satanist who performed his satanic ritual on national TV at the Grammy Awards than most of your fellow citizens. That's where the democratic party of 2023 is at. The party of Harry Truman and even JFK is long gone, buried in the ash heap of history. It has been replaced by a Godless belief system that seems hellbent on finishing the fundamental transformation obama promised in 2008. How's that looking by the way? Honestly?
The republicans are just as guilty because they offered no real resistance or opposition. We have a false two-party unibrow system in D.C. that will sell us out after they milk what they can get from this republic, a republic that is fading fast. Our churches have failed us even worse as more and more of them open their doors to Satan in the name of inclusivity, hoping to fill the seats and the collection plates. The others are sitting by silently as this Romans 1 movement destroys lives and steals souls.
I wish it wasn't so, but look around and ask yourself what chance a nation like ours has moving forward. If you're honest, your answer should scare the hell out of you. May God have mercy on us all for we are all to blame. Sorry John Adams, your greatest fear was realized, your sacrifice and the hardship your generation endured was wasted after all. Franklin said we were given a republic if we could keep it. I guess we answered that question. We have reached a time for choosing, and the choices are tough ones indeed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"I'm going to replace your arbitrary and oppressive social hierarchy with a new and improved arbitrary and oppressive social hierarchy." That seems to be creed. But will they, as true revolutionaries, continue the struggle like good little Trotskyites and rebel against the new thesis in accordance with the dialectic, or will they declare an end to history like a good Stalinist and focus on consolidating their gains, like the pigs in Animal Farm? My money is on the latter because it's all about the pursuit of power. When you reject a higher transcendent morality you end up serving your own self-interest. As Dylan pointed out you're gonna have to serve somebody, even if it is your own hedonistic desires.
I wonder how they would handle the young sh*t disturbers they riled up if they were actually able to pull it off and some group of people were stupid enough to hand the disciples of these crackpots the reigns of power? Would it be a repeat of the Night of the Long Knives or would the bomb throwers win the day and tear it all down for the sake of watching what they helped build burn? In any event, movements like this always end up in one place, dictatorship. This has been true since the days of the French Revolution and the last time I checked, our fallen nature hasn't changed. That's the problem these pseudo-intellectuals always come up against, those pesky uncooperative critters called humans. They just never seem to get on board with the program, no matter how well laid out the plans are or how efficient the reeducation camps operate. They just don't get it do they?
Anyway, the one thing all of these post-modern gobble-de-gook prophets have in common is this. It's quite simple really, they are all full of sh*t and there isn't a one of them who would be able to manage a shift at McDonalds let alone reorder a society. The bad news is, every now and again one of these wannabe secular messiah's gets a crack at it and while they are good at generating work for the gravediggers they aren't any good at anything else. I guess you can sell this crap to the kids with parents rich enough to send em to Ivy League schools. Unfortunately, that is where the current batch of woke CEO's and tech entrepreneurs come from. It will be interesting to see where it all ends up. It'll be chaotic, but interesting all the same.
1
-
1
-
Here's the thing though, American voters across the board have been so dumbed down by social and corporate media that they vote for a letter, R or D rather than the person running under said banner. The Somali queen and the rest of her marxist running buddies will be reelected by large margins because people running the republican party know they can't squeeze any money out of their districts. The only thing that annoys republicans more than elections is winning them. Democrats like to win because their base is full of modern-day political puritans but more in the tradition of Jim Jones and Uncle's Ho, Joe, and Mao, their version of the unholy trinity. Republicans like to fund-raise. The problem is, they're running out of stuff to fund-raise off of and will soon go the way of their spiritual grandfather's, the Whig party.
But the democrats are hitting critical-mass and what sane people there are left over there are going to have to finally acknowledge that the party is now the party of obama and it has decided to die on the hill of sexual politics. The party demands lock-step compliance and if you don't buy the whole platform you get othered, sent to the virtual cornfield like the characters in the Twilight Zone episode. They are going to have to do one of three things: kick the commies out, join up lock-stock-and-barrel and go over the cliff with their marxist pals, or form a new party, most likely with people who are sick of being lied to by squishy republicans.
The ones promoting hate for America on the 4th of July are irredeemable. They have bought obama's yes we can fundamental transformation line completely and nothing but the complete and total obliteration of the USA and all of it's traditions and cultural norms will suffice. That is a harsh assessment but if you have a better option let me know. I'd really like to hear it because as someone who came here legally, became a citizen, and served defending the place for more than 20 years I'd really like to know how these two diametrically opposed cultures can exist under the same roof.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Okay, I'll give ya the benefit of being young and reliant on MAGA clicks but this subject is so old it's biblical. Alberta has been burping out separatist threats longer than the crazy French part of Quebec. It ain't happening and no, Canada would not just stand back and say: "Okay, you win...eh. Go ahead and take our most valuable piece of real estate." Go to the flip side of the coin, how popular would a shooting war with our northern neighbor who also happens to be the country with the largest border be with the average citizen? Do you really think there would be some national clamor for a "Free Alberta" campaign as some kind of a manifest destiny revival? That people would say: "Sure, that sounds like a battle worthy of my son's life."
Benefit of the doubt aside, your entire argument has so more holes in it than a block of Swiss cheese. Hey, there's a thought. While we're pimping wars over Alberta, Greenland, and the Panama Canal, why not make play for Switzerland? I mean, how hard would it be to climb the alps and take on a fight with those guys? 🤔There, let me the first to declare a "Free the Swiss" campaign! If I seem a bit overly sarcastic, it's because sometimes that's required. And no sonny Jim, I am not a lefty. Don't worry though, I won't be back, not even for a chuckle.
1
-
1
-
You can change the narrative all you want dude, that's not going to alter reality. You can investigate everyone from Hunter to Fauci, that's not going to bring justice. You can talk about stopping biden and his pen but how will you do that exactly? I didn't hear anything in there about cutting spending. I didn't hear anything in there about putting legislation forth that would protect children from the demonic butchers lopping off their body parts for cash. I didn't hear anything in there about forcing these jokers to close the borders. All I heard was elect republicans and we'll put on the brakes. Then what? I get it, they won't have the WH but make no mistake. If the republicans in congress pick McConnell and McCarthy as their leaders, meet the new boss, same as the old boss, and this wave of new republican voters who expected real action will stay home in droves in 2024 when they will be needed most.
Sorry if I'm overly cynical, but I'm old enough to remember all the BS tea-party promises about getting rid of obama care. How'd that work out for us? I truly believe that unless and until the unibrow party is smashed into 1,000 pieces this country will continue to have one of two choices. Walk to the edge of the cliff or run to it. Forget the parachute though, those are reserved for the people presenting you with those choices. I don't agree with Tulsi on 80% of what she stands for but she is right about one thing. Nothing is going to get repaired until the sane, average working-class American is put front and center again. That is what made America exceptional, not a bunch of elites who think it's trendy to support drag-queen story hours and ANTIFA riots. And I didn't hear anything about that in that segment as well. So again, forgive me if I don't put a lot stock in the great red wave saving anything or anybody.
1
-
1
-
I have family members who go apoplectic over biden saying; "I can't believe he's doing this." I tell them I don't get my stuff up in a bunch because he's not. In a functioning republic he would be in an assisted living facility, not the White House. Everyone knows this. But we don't have a functioning republic. We have reality-TV as politics and an indifferent oligarchy who doesn't care what happens to the country as long they are taken care of. Anyone who doesn't believe this is obama's third-term is either in denial or so far gone they would back anyone wearing their team's jersey no matter what. obama said he would love it if he could find a guy to prop up as Manchurian president and he found one in the dithering old man, with a wife whose ambition and greed is so over the top she will let him whither and die rather than do the decent thing.
We have entered into the final phase of the republic. What it looks like on the other side is hard to say, but the center cannot hold. When you have a significant portion of the country who genuinely believe you can select your gender by declaration and that white people have some grand scheme to commit genocide on the LGB crowd and oppressed people of color, you have reached a tipping point that cannot self-correct. I defended this nation for a large part of my adult life and it breaks my heart to admit this is where we are at but facts are stubborn things. My concern is the casual way people discuss a national divorce. The term is even tossed around on the floor of the House like it's part of...well, some reality-TV show. Divorces tend to be messy. National divorces tend to be REALLY messy. And who benefits? At the end of the day, who wins? Here's a hint gang, it's not the average Joe or Jane.
But here's another sad reality, the average Joe and Jane don't care much. They prefer the lie. Alexander Solzhenitsyn said: "The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world.” He also had a warning for us here in the West who thought Marxism might work if it was implemented properly, you know, by the "right" kind of people: "There is this fallacious belief: 'It would not be the same here; here such things are impossible.' Alas, all the evil of the Twentieth Century is possible everywhere on Earth:" Bob Dylan once wrote: "It's a hard rains a gonna fall." The sheep will stay asleep. The wise will not act like the foolish maidens who had no oil for their lamp and by the time they did, the Bridegroom had already arrived and barred them from joining the feast. Get right with God folks, that's free advice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This isn't new. Teddy Roosevelt wanted football banned from colleges at the turn of the 20th Century because he thought it was too violent. So much for the rough rider with the Gucci saddle bags eh. Third wave feminists or whatever they are calling themselves now have been coming after football for a while because it is the one party they can't crash and they hate anything designed for men, anything they can't take over. What is it Rush used to call em, Fem Nazi's? He had that right. Hockey is more violent than football and has a higher rate of concussions but nobody says squat about that. Maybe because it's Canadian. 🤔
Anyway, nobody is asking the question that should be asked. How many COVID jabs was this guy forced to take to keep his job? Incidents of cardiac cases ranging from myocarditis to sudden cardiac arrests like this young man suffered are up 1700% among athletes in his age group. Not just in football. Soccer players have dropped dead as well. Young men in peek physical shape, just dropping dead. Wanna have a national dialogue? Let's talk about the poison people like this guy were forced to take, drugs administered with no formal testing. Incidents of heart problems and blood clots in young people who were never in a high risk group for such health issues until COVID came around and sports leagues and other institutions demanded you get jabbed or lose your job. I'd rather point to that than the fact that straight males tend to like football and therefore, by extension, it is misogynistic and should be banned because you know, it's better for gay men and girl power and stuff if we get rid of it. Let's all play badminton.
Here's the bottom line. Football isn't going anywhere, at least not until after the country is divided. I suppose when it is, the lefty's can outlaw it and replace it with spelling bees. We'll take it and make men great again. That's what it's all about isn't it girls? Feminizing men so you can be on top? See how you like that when the barbarian's are knocking down your door and your effeminate man says "do what you want to the girl just leave me alone." Until that time, I say let the games begin!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The more this will thomas character got people to play along with him the stronger hiss demonic desires became and the more sexually aroused he got. Well done NCAA, ESPN, and the rest, you helped some demented pervert get off while he laughed about it with his boyfriend the whole time.
Satan is at the heart of it all. At least guy at the grammys was straight up about who he worships and where he wants to spend eternity, not like will thomas who plays games and lies about who he is and who he considers his spiritual father to be.
“There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, "Thy will be done," and those to whom God says, in the end, "Thy will be done." All that are in Hell, choose it. Without that self-choice there could be no Hell." ― C.S. Lewis.
These people are going to find out Satan is an equal opportunity hater when they are tossed into the lake of fire with him, and they will have a very, very, very, long time to think about how they arrived where they did.
1
-
You can't understand modern-day marxists without studying the beliefs of the founder of their movement. That would be like trying to understand the story of the United States without studying American History. Marx believed in the inevitability of communism based on the concept of dialectic historicism. He took the concept from Hagel but the basic working of the model is centered on two opposing systems clashing to form a new system (thesis versus antithesis). Marx saw this in terms of class struggle based on economics whereas today's communists see it along cultural lines but the objective is the same, a new system replacing the old with commies running things in the end.
That is the real quiet part they never say out loud. All of the groups currently being pandered to will be assimilated or crushed, but they will submit like everyone else. Marx referred to it as the dictatorship of the proletariat but a more accurate descriptor for what the modern globalist crowd has in mind would be a dictatorship of the experts. In their utopia, they upend the crass group who create capital and assume the role of new masters of the universe not because they have earned it but because they are entitled to it based on their superior intellect. Any meritocracy, especially one as strong as the U.S. must be taken out.
The progressives have been working at it for a long time and they are so close they can taste it. COVID was just a dry run. Wait until you see what they have planned for the great economic crash they are creating. You'll long for the good old days of arguing over masks and vaccine mandates. Look around. See what is happening in China, Canada, Australia, and other countries. The funny thing is, it looks like Putin may be the only one playing by his own set of rules, the last great independent tyrant. Go figure
Anyway, that's just me. Want to understand why commies do what commies do? Easy, study communism, not what The Wall Street Journal has to say on the subject.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Since hip-hop/rap or whatever it's called these days isn't really my thing I've never heard of this guy. But he makes two points that get to the core of this nonsense that's been going on for a while. First, he is 100% correct. People like Piers Morgan are cowards who want to maintain a certain standing within the left-wing ecosystem. In order to do that, you have to buy all of what they are selling, because cults are all about zero-sum behavior, or you have to keep your mouth shut when they reach peek stupid. As the gentleman here points out, this guy is trying to ride the middle and the left does not allow that. Eventually he will have to bow the knee entirely or remain silent if he wants to stay in the good graces of the cult.
He also makes a critical point when he refers to the slippery slope we are going down. It's not a matter of the powers that be pushing this nonsense believing any of it, it's a matter of getting you to believe the lie. The bigger the lie, the bigger the victory. And what could possibly be a bigger win for them than getting you to somehow acknowledge that reality itself is relative and up for grabs? Nobody actually believes a man can give birth and everyone knows the differences between boys and girls from the time they are born. Yet, you have a woman who is now a Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court on record saying she is unable to define what a woman is. How much farther down the rabbit hole do you need to go before declaring victory?
I believe the entire mess is intrinsically tied to social media. Twitter mobs, most likely made up of bots, and Tic-Toc maniacs who should be receiving some sort of mental therapy instead of being given a platform to spew their insanity, attack people in waves and for whatever reason, people buy into it and back down. It's the whole madness of crowds phenomena. Satan was provided a playground and his demonic team is circling the bases. Want to know why this is a fairly new thing? Look no further than the rise of social media. Everyone refers to followers and likes, and retweets and blah, blah, blah. When I was a kid, if I said something maybe five people heard it on any given day. Now, millions see what we say and adolescents who base a lot of their self-worth on group attachments get shredded if they stray from the Northern California left-wing orthodoxy. That is why there is such a sharp increase in teen suicides and why 20% of Gen-Z identifies as gay or trans (of course, those polls reflect coastal culture so those numbers should be taken with a grain of salt).
But the cultural pariah's like Pierce Morgan who play this game for their own end are the ones who should really be called out, not that crazy guy who dresses up like a woman and storms off because he just came on his show to have a bit of fun, not engage in a debate. That person either has a true mental illness or he is a lost hedonist who has fallen into the clutches of Satan. Because those are really the only two options for people like him. They are either mentally disturbed or morally corrupt. There is no middle ground there.
Solzhenitsyn said; “The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world.” Until we stop being moral cowards and stop taking part in the lie we will never be free of these left-wing bullies who use words the way Al Capone used the Tommy Gun. Is being called a transphobe really that bad? I'm with Miss Parker. If speaking the truth makes me a transphobe, guilty as charged.
This has been a long rant and I doubt anyone will take the time to read it. But if it survives the You Tube digital hall monitors and you do take the time to read it, thank you and let's try and get a win for the truth. The damage has been done, now we must pick up the pieces and start again.
1
-
1
-
You aren't going to see violence in the streets over Donald Trump. The entire thing is a staged event from stem-to-stern. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it was prearranged by every party involved, especially the media since everyone benefits. This low-level DA gets to raise his profile, Trump gets his photo-op and gets to fund raise off it. He also gets to call his opponents who don't sufficiently kiss the ring names. The media gets a bunch of viewers who are more interested in the show than what actually matters, lifting their numbers to at least pond-scum level. And Congress? Well, they get to do what they do best bloviate and maybe even run an investigation that will result in a huge nothing burger, their specialty. The whole thing is reality TV, nothing more, nothing less. It will generate a few headlines then sit dormant until the Iowa Caucus when, during the first debate, some Trump-Cult moderator will ask DeSantis why he didn't lay down in front of a tank for Cheeto Jesus as Nikki Haley jumps up and down saying she would thrown a high heel at the commies. Forgetting of course that Trump went in willingly. BTW, Clinton lied to a grand jury, not Congress. Lying to Congress isn't even an impeachable offense to the bozo's running things on this side of the pond.
As for calling biden the worst president in history, hate to burst your bubble on that one too but he's not president. Someone else is pointing that senile old man around and he gets his marching orders from obama. If you honestly believe that guy runs anything I've got a nice piece of land to sell you, right down the street. It's covered by 10 feet of water but it is still a prime location. And yes, if the U.S. goes down that's it for the West, at least as it has been since the end of WWII. Maybe Europe coalesces and gets cozy with the chi-coms and Putin. But you better believe they won't be the senior partner in that little arrangement. But don't worry, I'm sure it will all turn out fine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That bitcoin guy conned the left the same way blm conned the left, by appealing to their emotions. blm even went so far as to come straight out and admit their leaders were trained marxist agitators and if you looked at their website they were way more interested in promoting the rainbow jihad than they were in helping black people. But, they had a nifty title and they had the media 100% in the bag for them. You even had blm crap stenciled on baseball diamonds in MLB ballparks. That little fat kid just saw how stupid cult members are and took advantage of it. Not much skill required for that shell game. It's kinda like playing keep away with a 3 month old pup.
As for Trump, he's gonna run and his cult is going to be just as loud, mean-spirited, and cranky as their dear leader is. But there are fewer of them now and his ego is already submarining his chances in 2024. People have Trump-lag, especially independent voters, and one thing the red trickle did was save biden. If that wave had taken place the party would have had justification for giving him the axe but now he will more than likely get to finish obama's third term. It should be fun watching that brain dead VP who got where she is because like peanut butter she is easy to spread going up against the woman from Arkansas who's name shall not be uttered here in the primaries. Gollum isn't done chasing the precious, not by a long shot. She'll be back and gassier and nastier than ever.
And all of that will work against Trump. Trump will be 78. The country will have gone through two more years of a nasty old man in the WH and Gollum will remind people that these boomers who will not relinquish power have got to go. Ron DeSantis can more than make up the loss of the die-hard Trumpers by brining along independents and cross over democrats who are sick of the groomers coming after their kids as they pay $6.00 for a gallon of gasoline and pay $600 each month to heat their homes in the winter. Trump will make a lot of noise, probably show up on CNN and MSNCB bashing the republican party and whoever beat him in the primary but at the end of the day he won't run any kind of meaningful third party challenge. He won't be able to afford it and no one will back him financially. He'll be busy paying court costs to fight his political enemies in NY who aren't going away.
I think Trump did a very good job prior to COVID. I think what the left has done to him and is doing is disgusting and represents the real threat to democracy. I also think they swiped the election from him 2020. But I also think his time has come and gone and the country needs a younger man who has proven he can govern effectively. It's time to end cult-of-personality-reality-TV politics and let younger more capable people who love this country every bit as much as Trump take a crack at fixing it. I see comments linking DeSantis to Bush, Cheney, mcconnell, the chamber of commerce, blah, blah, blah, blah. This all runs 100% contrary to the evidence but it doesn't matter to the Trump cult. They do what their dear leader tells them and if he says Ron DeSantis is a squishy republican that's good enough for them. But I believe their numbers are much smaller than they were in 2016 and 2020 and as Trump continues to attack all threats, real or imagined, in his paranoid egotistical fashion he will lose more and more support. I watched the election coverage on Blaze TV and he called in and gave an interview with Glenn Beck. That was the first time I had heard him speak in a while and I gotta say, his narcissism was on full display and his shtick has not gotten better with age. He told Jason Whitlock how much he liked him because Whitlock made some complimentary remarks about him just before he came on but he had no idea who Whitlock was. I'm sure I've heard you somewhere before, was all he said. But I bet he would have endorsed Whitlock for the senate if Whitlock said the same thing at some rally in a half empty parking lot.
I doubt anyone will read my little rant but I'm willing to bet if some die-hard Trumper does they will accuse me of being a mcconnell, bush, cheney guy and worse. For the record, I go back a long way with the conservative movement. I thought LBJ was an idiot, Nixon was a snake, Ford was a wimp, and I was a long-haired club musician who voted for Reagan twice. I never liked either bush and spent too many Christmas's away from home fighting wars those two got us into. I think rumsfeld and cheney should be tried for crimes against humanity and yes, I voted for Trump when he ran last time. But that was because he earned my vote. Like I say, he did a good job, but it's time to move past him. He'll run, he'll call Ron DeSantis all kinds of names based on nothing more than his paranoid egomaniacal cranky old nature but the Governor is strong enough to handle it.
I believe, as Douglas Murray pointed out, the red trickle was the best thing that could have happened. It stirred up the wrath against the right people, namely mcconnell and his house lackey mccarthy, and took the sheen off Trump. I know he is taking credit for every republican win everywhere for every job from postmaster to dog catcher but like it was with Whitlock I doubt he could tell you most of the winning republican names. He only remembers the ones who, in his mind, have betrayed him by failing to kiss hiss ass 24/7. Sorry, he owns Oz and Walker, and a lot of other candidates who were even Trump adjacent outside of MAGA world. People are fed up with both sides and the petty squabbles of boomers and if the republicans are smart they will find someone other than mccarthy for Speaker and look at the next election through the lens of the voters who will matter, independents. Facts are stubborn things and the facts are Trump does not play well beyond his base. If they run him in 2024 they will lose and obama will get to put his finishing touches on his fundamental transformation of America from a once great republic into a submissive sh*thole ready to be taken over by the WEF and the great reset. THAT is the real threat to our democracy, not the chamber of flipping commerce. Go ahead, attack me if you will, but that is life in the world of the way things are.
1
-
1
-
That was a good talk. So much Monday morning quarterbacking went on after the war with regard to Ike's strategy. I suppose that's a natural hazard considering the wide front approach, plenty of generals, a lot of ground to cover, and egos just as expansive. The bottom line is the strategy worked and Ike made it work by balancing competing egos and nationalities with a clear eye on the objective, killing Germans and ending the war. That same confidence in himself helped Eisenhower resist the calls to beat the Russians to Berlin. If it didn't fit in the big picture, it wasn't worth exploring. Ike did a helluva job for the role he was given. I don't think any general, Marshall included, could have pulled it off any more smoothly. Good analysis and no, I don't think you are pro-British, Canadian, or German for that matter, as some have accused you. I don't always agree with your conclusions but you certainly do your homework, a trait sorely lacking in a lot of other videos. Well done.
1
-
1
-
1
-
I grew up in one of those neighborhoods in Detroit that went to hell in a handbasket after the 67 riots. The riots were just the opening shot. Bussing ran most of the white people out of our neighborhood. There were only a couple high-schools left at that time that weren't predominantly black but the communists and their fellow travelers running things determined bussing needed to happen anyway because it was happening everywhere else in the country. For Sale signs littered the landscape. I had a paper route and I had to solicit house-house to replace my customers who were bailing out in droves. And who were these people who were fleeing? Middle-class mostly blue-collar workers. Bye bye tax base. There was a vibrant shopping district, theaters, parks, schools, police and fire stations. but as the tax base went away the parks became overgrown with weeds and the police station and firehouse went away. So did the stores when it was no longer profitable or safe to operate.
Of course it was all racism. It had nothing to do with the rise in crime and the deterioration of the area. Race pimps make a career off keeping the trouble alive. Clowns like jesse jackson and al sharpton run around calling everything another Selma and pin the blame on whitey and his Jew buddies. It's a lot easier to point the finger out than it is to point it in. Unless and until the real systemic racist attitudes that prevail within the black community are dealt with black people will continue to lag behind in every meaningful metric. I'm not saying white folks are clean in all of this, white culture is falling apart just as fast but the race problem could be an easy fix if people wanted it to become a reality. But that requires a change of the heart and a full-stop to marxist notions that racial discrimination is a social construct based on power and that only the people in power can hold racist views.
The twisted cognitive dissonant language and reasoning of the left needs to be challenged, now more than ever, but there is no opposition. There is reality-tv masquerading as politics and demagogy being passed off as commentary. Principles are exchanged for clicks and book sales. The right wants to own the libs, the left wants to own the country. That is a fact, and as John Adams said: "Facts are stubborn things." There is no subjective truth. Speak your truth is a demonic slogan. There is that which is true and that which is not. But we do like our comforting lies, yes indeed we do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Men and women are different...🤔now now Matt, there you go again.
The thing is she actually believes what she is peddling. She believes it because for progressives history always begins whenever they decide it should and in the age of stupid, Hollywood celebrities have ditched their handlers because they believe they are a helluva lot more clever, intelligent, and interesting than they really are. It's why a guy like Tom Hanks, who is generally presented to the public as Mr. everyone, the All-American boy, says stupid sh*t like America's war against Japan was especially violent because of the racial aspect associated with it. Of course he conveniently left out the whole fight-to-the-death-never-surrender Bushido Code mindset of the Japanese soldiers. Nah, it was all the evil doing of the wicked white man oppressing people who look different just because. And he does this while promoting an HBO series he produced on the fighting in the Pacific. But nobody called him on his BS so he gets to continue walking between the raindrops without getting wet.
When their handlers aren't around you discover a lot of these people have some seriously twisted views about life, a sort of nihilism mixed in with their narcissism. I imagine most celebrities have always thought along similar lines but there was always someone to protect them from themselves. The guardrails are gone now, especially with social media driving everything. I'm not surprised about Jennifer Lawrence spouting such ridiculous crap. I do wonder about the bobble head conducting the interview. She has to be thinking that the woman she is speaking with is a total clueless ditz but hey, I guess she's getting paid too so what the hell. Lights, camera, action.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Exercising your right to free speech and interfering with the rights of others as you get into their faces are two separate issues. I blame it on whoever keeps bailing these little commies out. A good long prison stint in a REAL prison, say in Siberia, might test the steel of these pampered brats playing revolutionary.
The ones defaming President Lincoln's statue and calling him a colonizer are simply suburban white kids who got roped into the marxist cult. I imagine most of them wouldn't be able to tell you more than two or three actual facts about the man or his accomplishments. All they know is what their communist professors have taught them.
This all goes back to the 1940s and 1950s. The country had a real problem with all of these commintern infiltrators Stalin was able to bring in through the front door during WWII. Roosevelt, being the narcissist he was, thought he could control uncle Joe and his bolshevik herd so he gave them complete, unfettered access to people within our State Department and the academic types who had a soft spot for the commies going in. Joe McCarthy was on to them but he was a loose cannon who spent most of his time drinking and doing anything he could to accumulate power. Moscow was able to use him as a stooge. Make a bunch of noise on one side of the room while you sneak in the godless professors who would get to the next generation on the other. McCarthy built up sympathy for the red bas*ards in some quarters and incredulity for his cause in others. KGB officers admitted he was their greatest weapon.
Then Sputnik hit like a 50 megaton bomb and everyone had a melt down. Ike did a poor job managing that one and all the money started going into STEM. Other areas of study, such as history, went by the wayside and over time they became less, and less important. They weren't hiring at the philosophy factory so kids weren't interested in learning what they had to say. Now, the Howard Zinn school has taken root and these kids are taught that the only history that matters is the history they make today. Mao and Marx took over the classrooms by the 1980s and now people wonder why these kids hate their country.
I would be willing to bet their wasn't a Native American within 100 miles of that statue when those little ANTIFA sh*ts were spray painting that marxist crap. These little basement dwelling anarchists aren't interested in hanging out with Native Americans or anyone of color for that matter. They are mostly bored nihilists who couldn't give you a good reason for any of the crap they do. They just like to wreck stuff. It's how they were raised.
Good luck sharing a country with that bunch. The break will come. It breaks my heart to admit it since I fought like hell to keep this country untied and safe but the people who were entrusted with running the place were more interested in accumulating wealth and power than being caretakers for liberty. Now their grandkids are coming up fast, and being good little maoist's they are kicking off a new cultural revolution, American style. We haven't even SEEN the beginning of the real bad stuff yet. Get ready because I'm afraid like it was in the 20th Century, the dirty 30s will be a time of great suffering and with no spiritual roots, the fruit that tree will bear will be quite bitter. God help us. Pray for your republic if you care for it. It's our only hope of salvaging any of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Disney's problems run deeper than the guy steering the ship. The development team has been taken over by true believers, and for true believers, the cult matters more than profit. Just like Musk is talking about the need to go nuclear at Twitter and rebuild the entire platform from the studs up, Disney is going to have to come to some sort of reckoning with their employees at all levels, and that means shit-canning all those true believers even if the company has to take it in the shorts for a bit (pun intended).
Disney is a brand, and that brand has been damaged. The video of those trendy execs talking about transing their kids and the gay writers taking pride in being able to sneak their views into content where it didn't belong had an effect on parents, most of whom don't want their kids transed up or exposed to girl-on-girl action. But those people don't give two shits because they are the vanguard of a revolution. Wanna fix that? Stop the revolution. That means pink-slips on an epic scale, and probably more than a few lawsuits, but it's gotta happen. Otherwise, some other bright young fella is going to figure out a way to give people what Disney won't. Don't believe me? Ask what's left of team Sears about how Amazon took their empire from them. It was all there before them, but they were wedded to a system and Jeff Bezos said I'll take that thank you very much. Disney is wedded to an ideology. Same same dude.
Personally, I could give two dams if Disney goes under now or later but I think it needs killing all the same. I've been saying it for close to 30 years. The rot at Disney started a long time ago. Unlike you Drinker, I do wanna see em fail. But that's me. Okay, I'll go away now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm not a subscriber to your channel but I enjoy enough of your content to watch one if the title catches my attention. You seem sincere so here's some free advice learned through bitter tears, lose this desire to reach the unreachable. You used the term "I need" a lot. Maybe it's a bit of that old socialist gene at work. One aspect you didn't touch on is a lot of socialists are crusaders. They see saving people as part of their mission. I was embedded with a Canadian unit for a time when I was in the military and I remember having a cup of coffee one morning with a colleague. He was a good guy, best of intentions type, and this clip came on the TV showing this guy who was I imagine homeless, sitting on a grate trying to stay warm. My colleague said: "We have to help that man" and I asked him a simple question; why? Maybe he didn't want to be helped. Maybe he preferred being outside to being in a shelter. Maybe he just wanted to be left alone. It's the same way with the socialists you are trying to educate. Instead of using Genesis to make your point, I recommend Plato's Allegory of the Cave. I think it's more in-line with your worldview and it does a better job explaining why people prefer living a lie to knowing the truth. If you want a Biblical reference, think of yourself as John the Baptist or one of the earlier prophets who tried to warn Israel about their fate if they continued on the path they were on. They were all killed for their effort as well.
I also think, based on what I heard in this video, that there is a not insignificant gulf between European and American ideas on socialism and left-wing politics in general. Britain has a longer history of being a nanny state so I imagine that explains some of it. American left-wing politics is less about economics and more about cultural issues. Where socialists in Britain may think it is the exploiting capitalists who are stealing from them, in the U.S., we see the state playing that role, taking what they haven't earned and giving it to people even less deserving to win votes and ensure political loyalty. We call it keeping people on the government plantation. Your description sounded more like a bad case of external locus of control resulting in a nihilistic outlook, more black than red-pilled. Here, the middle class is feeling that way but again, it is because of a sense that our government has become an oligarchy of elites who don't care what the voters want, they want to give our sovereignty away to globalist elites who they have more in common with. That is what that commenter meant when he said socialists want to control others. They largely have on your side of the pond for the past century, so perhaps you are more adapted to it. Here, it is a relatively new phenomena, at least to the level it has risen to since obama turned yes we can into yes we did. Government has been growing since FDR, but at a leisurely pace.
Now the left has stepped on the accelerator and the governor has been switched off. It's full-speed ahead, damn the torpedo's kind of stuff. That has a lot of people freaked out over here, especially when you throw in the demonic element of the LGB storm troopers transing the kids and insisting that us religious bigots bake the cake and celebrate their abominations. When he talks about the desire to have power over others, that is what he is getting at. Like I say, this authoritarin approach is still fairly new to us. Anyway, thanks for taking the time to break it down. Most of my friends are left-wing but they are left-wing in the same sense that Kennedy and Truman were left-wing. They vote democrat out of habit and are largely in denial about what that party has devolved into. But us older coots are moving along, even though they cling to power in our legislature. We have left quite a mess for millennials and gen-z to clean up. God help us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sure, she is parroting lines fem-nazi's like her handler standing next to her have taught her since she was able to burp on her own, but she also believes all of it. You give her too much credit Drinker. See, I think her head is too empty to actually engage in discernment and reason. The good thing is, this little poster child for the woke spoiled suburban gen-z crowd is acting like such a little narcistic bitch that she's setting herself up to be the fall-girl disney can blame everything on when this movie makes like 38 bucks and change at most theaters. The blame it on the audience trope is falling faster than the strong female character so disney will need to have something or someone to pin this disaster on when the stockholders start calling for scalps. Enter little miss entitled spoiled little brat. They'll say she did such a hatchet job on her own film that no amount of salve could have fixed the boo-boo.
Hopefully, if there is two functioning brain cells in that septic tank called hollywood, this will be the last time we have to endure her obnoxious lectures to the unwashed masses because her days in actual movies will come to an end. She'll make the rounds of shows like the view and oprah might toss her a bone and let her weep on her couch over the way the man has kept her down and punished her for being brave or something but no studio will let the little twit anywhere near an actual film. Maybe she goes the porno route, or does commercials for taco bell. Most likely she'll marry some rich guy who just wants a cute little piece he can show off to his buddies as he bangs whoever he wants on the side.
Am I being bitter? Probably, but I'm old, I'm tired, and I've had it to here with 20 somethings trashing everything older than them because history only began when they came into existence. disney is dying, and their demise can't come fast enough.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here is an actual headline from today; source: Detroit Free Press website: "Many Black Americans speak African American English. But is it embraced in schools?" Kinda says it all. I got sick while back, too sick to commit to any professional projects, so I used what was left on my GI Bill and enrolled in a maters program, primarily because I needed to do something while I healed. Anyway, I was shocked at where a lot of the younger people on the program were at with language and mathematic skills. Poor grammar aside, most of them could not interpret simple data and explain how it affected the outcome of the research they were supposed to be analyzing. When you combined that with their inability to express themselves at a level beyond that of a high-school freshman, well, you see what the education system is producing. And a lot them were just lazy. They were used to putting in the minimal effort and receiving maximum recognition and the sad part is, that is what this university gave them. Maybe it's because they are a for-profit school and one way to keep customers away is to make it difficult for them.
Mostly though, I was saddened by the reason's most of them gave when I asked why they were pursuing a graduate degree. Just about all of them said they were only doing it to get a raise and improve their resume, which is fair and I don't hold that against them. That was the primary driver behind my first graduate degree. But only a few said they wanted to learn something. One young lady approached me about halfway through a course and asked me if this was how most programs were. Were they all just an extension of undergrad learning, only where everyone passes no matter what? I told her if she was really interested in developing her skill-set this program wasn't for her and she did leave after that term was up, choosing to do an online program rather than sit through a class where she was not challenged at all. Why did I stick around? Like I said earlier, it was something to do and it was the only in-house option close to where I was living.
But this isn't a slam on that school. What it is is an indictment of a system where kids can reach that level with such poor rudimentary skill-sets. And the worst part is, most of them really don't care that they have been cheated out of an education, or they are blissfully ignorant of the fact. Sleep well gang, these Gen-Z class-struggle warriors will be calling the shots when a lot of you reach my age. I wish you luck.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I get both sides of the argument. People don't want junkies shooting up on the streets in their neighborhoods. They don't want people taking dumps on their front lawn. And there are people who prefer living on the street to conforming to the rules most people live by. I had a good friend growing up who was the most responsible, hardest working person in my circle of friends. He smoked a bit of weed, drank a bit but he was far from the worst of us. He had his own landscaping business at 18. A house by the time he was 22. Then he got involved with this girl who introduced him to cocaine. That was it. I ran into him about 20 years later and he told me he had lived on the street for 10 years. He said there was a certain rush he got from it. I couldn't get my head around it. He was not the same guy I was friends with so many years before.
But there are also people who end up homeless because events happen that are beyond their control. To say there are maybe five people in that circumstance is absurd. But then again Matt Walsh does like to get on a moral high-horse. I watched an episode where he got ass-holier-than-thou about people who were divorced, basically calling them scum bag losers who unlike him failed at the most important thing in the universe. His take was beyond insufferable. I'm not into Eastern religions so I don't subscribe to Karma but Walsh might want to watch what he says a bit more closely. In the Gospel of Matthew Jesus warns us that we answer for every careless word we say. I dunno, Matt see's junkies and low-life's, I still see children of God. Maybe that's why I'm a soft touch when people approach me for money. But then again, I listened to Walsh when he was interviewed by Matt Fraad and the answer he gave on his faith sounded like it could have come from a fifth grader who skipped too many catechism classes.
Yeah Matt, helluva solution there. Lock em up. Hell, lock em all up. And when they get out and can't get a job because they have a record? Sh*t, just lock em up again. And put the kids into foster care. That'll create a stable society down the road. I like the work Matt Walsh did on the transgender issue, but the more I listen to him speak on other issues the more I realize he is really just a blowhard moralizer with a platform that allows him to say anything he wants. Any guy who dedicates entire episodes to reading comments that criticize him just so he can call them stupid and backward in return has a major ego problem. He was the last of the Daily Wire bunch I hadn't blocked but now I think I'm gonna turn him off as well. He's milked the tranny cow for all it was worth and now, just like his boss Shapiro, he simply owns the libs and looks down his nose on us plebes who should feel honored to have him grace our screens. Up yours Walsh. Not that it matters to ya, but you won't have me clicking on your click-bait nonsense anymore. Maybe I came in to this one expecting you to come off as a pompous ass based on the title. Well, you didn't disappoint. Auf Wiedersehen dude.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Angela Davis got a teaching gig at a university, so I have a hard time understanding why Dr. Peterson has a hard time understanding how that woman was allowed to keep her job.
This stuff has been going on for a long time. Back in the olden days, when I was an undergrad, there was a young woman who showed up maybe three times for class. The school was big on enforcing it's policies, especially where attendance was concerned, but this young lady was able to pass the course. One of my classmates, another young lady, brought this up on the final day of the class, and the professor told her straight up that since the young lady in question was a black single mother, the deck was already stacked against her and he wasn't going to pile on. This other young lady went berserk. She was a young white single mother and let this guy have it with four barrels. Truth be told I was ashamed I didn't join in.
That's just how things go in the world of affirmative action. It's been that way for a long time Dr. Peterson, and as the old saying goes, the more things stay the same the more they stay the same.
1
-
Okay, there are some valid points made here but there are major flaws in most of them that just could never be overcome. The first is the notion that Germany was going to be able to avoid a war with the U.S. In order for that to happen, Hitler would have had to stopped fighting everyone and pulled his armies back to Germany. FDR was hellbent on fighting the Germans, by hook or crook, and if the Japanese hadn't attacked some other incident in the Atlantic would have triggered it.
The bit about treating the Eastern Europeans better, especially the Ukrainians, holds the most water except the Nazi's couldn't help themselves. The idea that the people in the East were subhuman had been drilled into the heads of the German soldiers since they were kids in the early and mid 1930s. For Hitler to change his tune at that point, after already blowing people's minds with his Soviet non-aggression pact would have been an ideological bridge too far. There was no way the Führer was going to hold back. He called for a war of annihilation right off the bat and he was going to have it. That land was meant for German's in his eyes and that meant depopulating the area. Otherwise, what's the point of the war? It would be like buying a car in the Amazon Rain Forrest. You could say you have a car but without any roads what's the point of owning it.
Finally, Japan was just as racially driven as Germany. It wasn't in their cultural DNA to get too cozy with any European power. They had been in the business of cleaning out imperial powers and taking over as the new landlords for quite some time. Everyone who wasn't Japanese was inferior, including other Oriental races. No way they were going to fight along side white folks, not at that point in their history. Like the German soldiers had been taught to hate Eastern Europeans, Japanese soldiers had been taught to hate all imperial powers. That BS line they were selling the people in the lands they conquered; "We are clearing out the Europeans and Americans and creating a prosperity sphere in the East for everyone to share in" was jut that, BS. Of course nobody outside of Japan bought that nonsense but it didn't stop them from selling it. If they were suddenly fighting alongside whitey, a whole bunch of Japanese soldiers and civilians would have said WTF.
I'm not a big fan of counterfactuals so maybe that colors my views, but some things just can't be overcome. Anyway, it was an interesting video and at least the arguments were well developed for the most part.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have no idea who any of those people criticizing Matt even are. Are they the new thought leaders of the conservative movement? If so, it confirms my belief that the movement is dead. It died on the altar of celebrity. It died because of the desire to get influencers on the side of the right, people who may agree with conservatives on one or two issues but are really as deep as mud puddles and are just charismatic. I did notice they were all kids. Kids to me anyway. The right was so hungry to grab hold of social media stars in order to generate clicks, likes, and attention of any kind. It's why Bill Maher gets talked about as some kind of moderate and Joe Rogan is seen as some champion for right-wing causes. Maher is an atheist who hates Christians with a burning passion and Joe Rogan is a Bernie-Bro who is down with abortion, weed, and a long list of other destructive and sinful behaviors. But Maher said a few nice words about the right and freedom of speech and Rogan was against the jab so bam, instant membership into the club. Fox News has that freak-show Bruce Jenner on as a regular guest because he said he was a republican. But then again, they sent that bushie dana perino out to Kalifornia to do a fluff piece on a family having their children's body parts lobbed off in the name of love but I digress.
One thing this current madness has done is separate the wheat from the chaff. Sorry, but I'm a bit of a one misstep consumer where this stuff is concerned and once someone reveals themselves to be on the side of the enemy or at least willing to bend the knee to this wickedness I'm finished listening to them on anything. Dave Rubin said he used preferred pronouns for men dressed as women and vice-versa out of politeness. Done. Clay Travis said he had no problem with men dressing as women or transgenderism as a thing. Done. I imagine Rubin does so because these are his people at the end of the day. His movement gave birth to this abomination so I'm sure in his heart he sympathizes with his fellow sinners of the flesh. Travis is just a huckster who saw an opening on the right because most of his colleagues in sports talk were on the left. He said he was okay with transgenderism as a way to protect himself after he interviewed a female athlete speaking out against it, his attempt to have it both ways and avoid the rainbow-jihad from blowing him up.
Those are just two examples but there are more as this video illustrates. I get the kids. They were raised by a system that preached relativism and that truth is malleable. Adults who attack Matt for being rude are the same squishes that landed us here. Matt is the only DW contributor I listen to on even a semi-regular basis because guys like Shapiro and most everyone else over there are more concerned with protecting the brand as well. I'm surprised they let Matt get away with what he does. Mat is 100% correct. This isn't about winning hearts and minds. Satan and his ilk cannot be bargained with. This is good against evil, plain and simple and anyone who doesn't get that, well keep using those pronouns and practicing tolerance. See how much grace that gets you when you end up in their sights. Like I say, if these children are the future of the conservative movement, any chance of resurrecting it from the dead is hopeless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Most of the teachers who fall into line and see themselves as influencers instead of educators have no children of their own. I believe a great number of teachers don't buy the marxist claptrap being foisted on kids but they lack the moral courage to speak up. I get it, they need a job. But knowingly allowing a 20-something with seven different blends of hair color and even more personal pronouns to corrupt these children is akin to allowing Satan himself into the classroom. Until the teachers who know what is happening draw a line and call these little maoists out for who they are nothing will change. Some do it to corrupt the children, others do it to groom them into playthings for pedophiles when they reach the age where they will be attractive to those sick SOB's but all of them are doing Satan's bidding. This isn't right vs. wrong, this is good vs. evil.
“At that time the disciple approached Jesus and said, ‘Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?’ He called a child over, placed it in their midst and said, ‘Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoever receives one child such as this in my name receives me. Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. Woe to the world because of things that cause sin! Such things must come, but woe to the one through whom they come!’ ― Matthew 18: 1-7
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The fact this guy is a sitting U.S. senator says a lot about a lot of stuff. First, it tells you all you need to know about the people in Pennsylvania who voted for this guy. The lemmings who actually voted for him sent a loud, unmistakeable message, namely we don't give two sh*ts about the country and do not take our responsibilities as citizens seriously. To those who didn't vote for him, If you have the ability to do so you really need to move. Your state is gone and will eventually morph into the Kalifornia of the east coast.
Second, it sort of blows the myth that Donald Trump knows how to pick the very best candidates and surround himself with the very best people. Dr. Oz was one of his handpicked boys. When I said they were crazy for going with this guy in the primary I got called all kinds of names and was told I didn't know squat about electability. How'd that work out for ya? Kinda like Herschel Walker down in Georgia? One couldn't beat a human cumquat and the other couldn't beat a communist in a state where the republican governor won by a landslide. Add those two to the very best people he surrounded himself with like fauci, christopher wray, bill barr, mcconnell's wife, romney's niece, and his latest endorsement of mccarthy for speaker and well, you get the picture. Or maybe you don't. I don't care. If you don't, you are just a die-hard trumper and like he said in 2016, he could shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue and still get your support. Wanna lose to another incompetent? Run him again in 2024. Of course he'll be back in 2028, and, you get the picture. Or maybe you don't. Call me names, I don't care. That is the hard reality of where we are at in 2023.
It also says a lot about the democrats but then it doesn't say anything anyone doesn't already know. fetterman's wife will vote for him and act like a senator in all but name, doing exactly what the bosses tell her to do. The guy would have been a crap senator even without the stroke, now his Marxist wife will be looking after the best interests of the state of Pennsylvania. Like I say, if you are reasonable and sane, you really should move.
Finally, it pulls whatever vestige of credibility state-run media had left. First biden, now this guy. Tell me with a straight face they wouldn't have been whooping up and down, pounding tables about fitness and party integrity if either of these vegetables had an R in front of their name. Yeah, right. They don't even try to hide it anymore though, so I guess that point is moot.
And you wonder why the Chinese feel safe flying balloons or whatever they feel like over our airspace. God bless the good old USSR, I mean USA, I get confused.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The notion of collective security and a world-wide community failed on an epic scale so what does Roosevelt do in response? Insists on giving it another go. His arrogance, combined with his misguided admiration for Woodrow Wilson played a large role I suppose. Outside of Korea, which was primarily driven by the U.S. anyway, how has the U.N. delivered on the idea of collective security? Collective security and world-wide communities fail because nations, like people, are self-interested.
Honestly, if China was to invade Taiwan tomorrow, what would the U.N. do to stop them? Sanctions? Yeah, that'll work, right up until the minute after they are instituted and nations and corporations start finding backdoors to keep the trade going. Armed conflict? Don't count on that. Europe would never agree to send troops to defend Taiwan and the U.S., while still a potent force, would eventually be faced with the choice of using nukes or letting the Chinese have their way because our navy has been gutted to levels not seen since the days prior to WWI. Besides, our armed forces are too busy making promo films for which pronouns and bathrooms to use. Look what happened when Russia invaded Ukraine. Their position became stronger and their ruble increased in value because of the rise in the cost of energy. That was great long-term strategy there. But hey, we did sick McDonalds and Master Card on em. That had those oligarchs shaking in their boots as they sipped champagne on the Mediterranean.
Like the opening line from Fellowship of the Ring declares, a dark force has been let loose in the world and things which should not have been forgotten are lost. God have mercy on us all because I think the 2030 version of the dirty 30s will make the 1930s look like a yabba-dabba-doo time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
I haven't seen this video but Dan is right when he says there are cops out there who have bad intentions and probably shouldn't be wearing the badge, just like not everyone who wears a military uniform is a hero. These outfits draw from the general public and in case you haven't noticed, the general public isn't populated by a bunch of saints.
When I was a kid, there were anti-gang units that used to cruise our neighborhood. They were known as the big four because they drove in black cars and always traveled in a group of four. They were notorious for coming up on any group of young people, 20 and under, and getting rough with them. They came up on me and a group of my friends one night when we were just walking into a party store. They throttled one of the guys who was with us pretty bad. His father wanted to press charges and when I went down to the precinct to give my statement the cops interviewing me treated me like I was a criminal. They cursed at me, called me a liar, and reminded me that they knew where I lived. They did that in the precinct, so you can imagine what they were like on the street. I held my ground and stuck to my story but the complaint didn't go anywhere, and neither did the big four.
I say all that because I do have sympathy for people who have run-ins with bad cops. But as Dan said, calling for their disbandment isn't a solution. Maybe if the same politicians who call for that kind of reaction supported policed a bit more strongly they wouldn't end up recruiting guys who just want to get off on wearing a gun and having a bit of power. Think incidents like Ferguson haven't caused good people to think twice about signing up for the job? It's only going to worse I'm afraid and the people who will suffer the most will be the people most in need of protection. Those cops in black cars in my neighborhood may have been a-holes, but there was a reason that squad was created, and it wasn't because there wasn't a gang problem in my city. I just hope justice is served as best it can be in this case. Condolences to any innocent people hurt by the actions of this particular crew.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Russell Crowe, Rene Zelwager, and Paul Giamatti give great performances in Cinderella Man and the boxing scenes are some of the best ever done but I will never watch it again because of the hatchet job Ron Howard did on Max Baer in that film. He made Max out to be a monster who killed guys in the ring almost for kicks when in reality Max was a solid guy who felt so bad about the guy who died in the ring during that fight that he couldn't box for a long time afterward. He gave the guys widow all kinds of support and even helped send his kids to college. But Howard does that. He did the same thing to Jack Swigert in Apollo 13, portraying him as a stumbling klutz who the other crew members doubted. In reality, Swigert was a great pilot and engineer who knew the Apollo command module so well NASA had him work on the training software for the simulator. Howard is a punk and a coward because the guy's he trashes are always dead and can't defend themselves after the fact. He claims he does shit like that to add drama and tension to the movie. That's film school BS. He feels the need to create an antagonist because that's what he was taught in film school. His movies have a cookie-cutter quality to them and I don't watch his crap anymore. And BTW, Braddock made Joe Louis give him 10% of his future earnings before agreeing to give him a shot at the title so he isn't the saint he's made out to be either. Ron forgot to mention that bit though. Guess there was no tension to a guy taking advantage of someone else is there?
Personally, my favorite Russell Crowe movie is American Gangster. Him and Denzel are so good they play off each other without even being in the same shot until the movie is about over. Truth be told, I found Master and Commander a bit boring and I didn't like the ending, but that's me. I apologize for the Ron Howard rant. The Drinker brought up the movie though and I think Opie is nothing but a punk. I hated the Beatle thing he did as well, Eight Days a Week. There isn't a single new take/slant in it and when he said he was going to make it my first question was why. After I watched it my next question was why. There were plenty of antagonists available for that one but he passed on mentioning any of them. And no, I don't give two shits what Whoopie Goldberg thought about The Beatles. Okay, I'll stop now.
1
-
1
-
Here's what's most likely to happen. Russia annexes Ukraine by force and we impose some economic sanctions that will amount to squat since our European allies will do what they always do and pick up the slack, buying and selling stuff we don't to them. This dilemma has existed since the dawn of the nuclear age. When we are up against a third-rate power the doctrine of flexible response works. When it comes to the big leagues, war becomes a zero-sum game. Until now, most Russian leaders have picked their spots carefully. With uncle Joe in the office they are emboldened. Ask yourself this, if you were on the other side of the power equation, would Biden or Harris put any fear into you? Seriously, how would either of those hacks handle an invasion if it happened right now? The scary part, as senile as he is, Biden still has more sense than his affirmative action hire sitting in the VP chair. No, we are going to Hell on the installment plan here. Russia and China both know it so they are content to wait. But every now and then, they'll push the envelope. Ukraine has a history of being part of the old Soviet/Imperial Russian system Putin loves so much. They'll be home soon and as for us, well don't look for much beyond a few sanctions and a sternly worded letter on this end.
1
-
1
-
Okay Dick, I'll grant ya the point that Carter was inept and the wrong guy to handle Iran or any other global problem for that matter. But ya can't say "I would have stopped the Shah from being overthrown" without explaining how you would have done it. What was the plan? Send in American troops? The Shah was already getting a sh*tpot bunch of cash to prop up his military and police forces. What was the next step to keep him going? And people knew all about Khomeini. This stuff about finding out what he was about? Hell, the man had been producing media pimping the Islamic state since the 1960s. The moderates in Iran were the ones who made a deal with the devil and got into bed with him, figuring they could use him to whip up public support while they charted a more reasonable path. Well you lie in bed with dogs as the old saying goes.
The Shah was going down and there was nothing the U.S. could do to stop it. Carter should have shut the embassy down after the first time the loonies stormed it but he kept it open like a big kick me target. It was Kissinger, Nixon's soulmate, who invited the major-league level trouble when he pushed Carter to let the Shah in at a time when anyone with two functioning brain cells knew that was like throwing gas on a gas-fire already burning like nine sonsabitches.
Sorry, maybe it's not the most popular take on this page but Nixon was playing Joe Montana level Monday morning quarterback on this one. Carter made a lot of mistakes and by the sound of it Nixon would have made the same or worse. Nixon has this rep for being some genius on the world stage but Reagan saw his Détente strategy with the Soviets for what it was, a one-way street where they got to break every agreement and America just said, "uh, okay." He went directly against it and kicked their commie asses inside of a decade. And Nixon's grand opening of China? His big foreign policy trophy? Well we see what kind of fruit that has produced. Nixon was smart, but not as smart as he thought he was. If he was he would have burned the tapes. Just sayin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In the U.S. politics has become reality-TV. People don't want solutions, they want to be entertained. People don't want to unite, they want to be in one camp or the other. People don't want to honor God, they want to worship idols. Huxley is spot-on in that regard. I have often commented that while we were keeping any eye out for 1984 the powers-that-be slipped a Brave New World in on us. COVID was a test run. People not only submitted, they clamored for more rules, punishments for people who failed to conform. and have adjusted to a new reality where working from home is quickly becoming the norm in a lot of industries. This isolation makes it easier to control people, and that is what it is always about, power and control. I can see where Huxley's vision slides into Orwell's in an almost seamless manner. If you were to poll the entire country, "I just want to be left alone" would be the chart topper of any list of desirable circumstances it appeared on. When you just want to be left alone you are in a perfect position for just the opposite to befall you. When the-powers-that-be can convince you that everything, including basic truths like male and female are up for grabs you are already violating Alexander Solzhenitsyn's first tenant of resisting totalitarianism: “The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world.”
Orwell may have tried to warn the people of Britain that a Stalin-like leader could emerge anywhere but he and his fellow-travelers were the useful idiots Lenin declared essential to the ultimate success of communism. Well-intentioned liberals lent their name and prestige to the movement and even ignored the cognitive dissonance necessary to accept the obvious contradictions of most leftist positions. Some did it out of naivete, others did it out of self-interest, but the genie is out of the bottle and there is no putting it back in now. We are now producing a generation that believes obvious false-hoods and values collectivism over individual freedom. The term democratic socialism is just another lie put forth by a group who lie so much they now fail to see the distinction between what is true and what is false. In other words, like all pathological liars, they buy their own bullshit. Men are becoming weaker and more passive, women are given higher positions in a hierarchy that is becoming more matriarchal every day. I'm not a chauvinist, but such a system is not sustainable. Call me names but men have an instinct to lead and protect. Those instincts are now called toxic. Men aren't looking for wives, women aren't looking for husbands, but children are looking for parents. When the traditional family doesn't provide them, the state will. And when the state does, you have given your children over to demonic forces. Something's gonna give at some point. The center can't hold because there isn't much of it left. People are choosing sides, and where that leads is always unpleasant. Get right with God. That's the best advice this old coot can give anyone.
1
-
I can see Tampa relocating to Orlando. St. Pete is not a good spot for a ballpark. The traffic control is crap and the parking situation outside of the reserved spots is lousy. The roads are two, maybe four lane in spots and the cops rely on the lights to control the flow which, as anyone who lives in Florida will tell you, is a dumb idea because the lights are timed like crap down this way.
I'm not following the logic of moving Jacksonville to Austin and moving the Texans out of Houston. Houston was very loyal to the Oilers. I can't speak to the current situation since I moved out of Texas a while ago but having a team closer to the Cowboys fanbase is, well just not a bright idea. Oklahoma City, maybe. As for the Chargers, they never should have left San Diego. They actually started in LA when they were an AFL franchise and figured out pretty quick LA is primarily a baseball and basketball town. The Rams left and I'm not sure people really cared too much. It's not the kind of city that will support two NFL franchises, at least not based on what I've observed over the years. But what are the Chargers going to do, tuck their tale and move back to San Diego? Seemed to me they had a solid fanbase, not sure how they'd feel about welcoming them back though. Maybe they can go to Oakland. Al Davis would roll over in his grave, that alone would make it worth it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
$100,000,000,000,000,000? No problem, write a check. Shoot, stick around a few more years and there won't be a whole lot of difference between that figure and our national debt anyway. Then again, I suppose that is a pretty hefty price tag for a sticky floor. To borrow from Chris Rock, how about I give ya 1,000 bucks for a neat pair of magnetic boots, lace ups of course, with good arch support.
Interesting video. Just more proof that long-term space travel is a lot harder than they told me it was when I was a kid and Kirk and Spock were warping around the galaxy and still managing to make it back to Earth occasionally to enjoy a home-cooked meal every now and again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wow. What else can ya say. Well for starters guys, and this is free advice, don't marry a porn star. She is exhibit A for why you wouldn't but some things should just be a given. That girl is damaged goods in a lot ways. I imagine she was abused as a child. I say that for the obvious reasons but also for the fact that she behaves and largely communicates like a 12 year old. People get stuck at a stage of development after they have been abused/molested or when they start abusing drugs and alcohol.
Somebody broke her at an early age and the only thing that will fix her is for her to repent and build a real relationship with the only one who will never hurt her, Christ the Lord. I was a smart-ass drinker when I was a kid and this very insightful woman gave it to me straight. She said I didn't have a drinking problem I had a God problem. She didn't preach, she just let it go at that. Those words haunted me for years but you know what, at the end of the day she was right.
I'm not gonna judge or mock this young lady, I'm gonna pray for her. There are millions of Mia's out there who are lost in a world that is becoming more demonic by the hour. If you haven't seen it, go watch Sound of Freedom and you'll see how all these Mia's are created.
"Understand this: there will be terrifying times in the last days. People will be self-centered and lovers of money, proud, haughty, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, irreligious, callous, implacable, slanderous, licentious, brutal, hating what is good, traitors, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, as they make a pretense of religion but deny its power. Reject them.” ― 2 Timothy 3: 1-5
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I see a lot of articles and videos about some new planet found in the habitable zone and most of them have a bias toward life existing on them. Even the art shows oceans and shorelines. All they need is a few palm trees and a high rise off the beach and they could be posters for Earth 2.0. A lot of them fail to mention they are tidally locked to red dwarfs that belch out cosmic rays like Bluto at a toga party. Looking at sun-like stars is a better use of time and resources but even then everything is speculation. I remember seeing some article where the headline read "10 Planets Better Suited for Life Than Earth," a rather silly statement since intelligent life you know, is actually present on Earth.
There are so many other factors beyond location that go into a life-supporting planet, let alone one capable of intelligent life. And the thing is, they are so far away we will never meet them even if they are out there. I don't buy the science fiction tales of warp drives and wormholes. Unless everything we know about physics is wrong, or some interstellar cousins of ours have figured out how to cheat space and time contact between beings separated by hundreds of light years of space, chock full of its own perils, is the stuff of fantasy. Fun fantasy, cool fantasy, but fantasy nonetheless. Live long and prosper my distant kin, maybe I'll see ya in the next life. 🤟
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Vietminh didn't defeat the Japanese in WWII. The Japanese left when they decided they needed the troops to defend Japan against an impending American invasion more than they needed to hang onto Vietnam. They basically told them, "You're all free now," and split. One of the myths that grew up around Ho-Chi-Minh was that he fought valiantly against the Japanese. Bullshit. He spent most of the war in the Soviet Union. He had run to the USSR in the 30s after the French put a bounty on his him. He claimed to be in charge when American OSS agents arrived but there were other Vietnamese guerilla fighters who were a whole lot more involved in the resistance against Japan than the Vietminh. And if you're looking to nitpick accuracy, there are other scenes such as the one where the men piss on the overheated mortars that would be a better choice than the one where the lady goes off about racism. There were plenty of folks living in the north who had never seen segregated facilities.
Also, you said that most of the men who went into this battle in 65 were conscripts who just wanted to come home. That's not true. A lot of the soldiers who went in around this time were patriots, true believers who believed in the cause and wanted to win. I get it, you are British and you sound young so I assume you were taught that stuff in school. The war wasn't unpopular at that time. The protests didn't pick up steam until two years later and even then, most Americans still wanted to stay at the war and wanted to win. LBJ was an insecure pussy who let the media bully him and when things got tough he didn't know what to do and just gave up. I'm not saying America could win the war. Truth be told, they wouldn't have been there if Truman and then Ike hadn't tied the French war in Indochina with the larger war against communism. Korea was going at that time and that had a lot to do with the development of the Domino Theory.
Anyway, by 1969 people were more fed up with LBJ than the war. The polls at that time reflect that. And the war protestors were not seen as valiant young people standing up for a noble cause like the history books and documentaries like to portray them. Most Americans thought they were commie agitators and cowards. You said you wouldn't put this film ahead of the other Vietnam movies but I will. Oliver Stone has a hard-on for the U.S. and its government so anything he does, from Platoon to JFK is just this side of Soviet state propaganda. Kubrick made a Kubrick movie and I'm one of the few who finds the Deer Hunter pretentious and Apocalypse Now tedious.
1
-
1
-
These cultists are absurd Tucker, low hanging fruit. They lack self-awareness but they are told what they need to be aware of in everybody else. It is Mao's Cultural Revolution 2.0, American Style. But in all honesty, where does Fox News really fall in all of this? You lambast McCarthy yet your network gives him air time pretty much any time he wants it. Doesn't Karl Rove still haunt your hallways. The one Hannity gushes about, calling him "The Architect?" And good old Lindsey Graham, let's not forget that stalwart of conservatism. He practically has his own office at your studio.
There are a lot of strong conservative voices who never get invited onto your panel and talk-shows. Why is that? Censorship by omission? Could it be they aren't toeing the proper party line? Or is it because the conservative movement, what's left of it anyway, is now and always has been homeless? Is that what you mean by getting their act together? Finding a home? Are you talking about the thought leaders who are busy selling merch and owning the libs while referring to mentally disturbed men like Bruce Jenner as Katlyn? 🤔 Oh wait, that's Fox again. Hell, I hear he's in line to get his own show over there. Bravo!
I like ya Tucker, I really do. But when you talk about self-awareness tell the whole story. A lot of people need to get their act together to fight this battle, and it's going to take a whole lot more than tweets and soundbites to defeat this foe, because he knows his time is short and he's not taking prisoners, he's taking souls.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I enjoyed that talk. Andrew gets it in the sense that our culture has actually gone past the tipping point and needs a serious course correction if this country is to survive. As Lincoln put it, a house divided cannot stand.
However, while he's going down the proper route he's missing the mark as far as the role faith should play. He expects the awakening that will move young people away from Post-Modernism will occur along spiritual lines but then he adds that it will happen at an intellectual level. That's fine on one hand, people should examine scripture and Christian beliefs from an intellectual perspective but his reference to the way young people are going about it is problematic. "They're trying to reinvent the Gospels for a new age which I don't think is a bad thing...I don't think the Gospel's were meant to freeze us into a First Century morality, that's not the way they read to me at all." That is one of the Church's biggest failings, especially within Protestant branches. This notion that we can rewrite or reinterpret scripture to make it more palatable for the masses has resulted in a lot of people, especially young people, being led astray. It is like they want to remake God in order for Him to be a more proper fit for their lives instead of giving their lives over to Christ which is what Christianity requires. It's "His will be done," not ours.
I've seen this tendency to intellectualize and make compromises in other videos he has made where he talks about Christianity. Like I say, there is nothing wrong with hearing opposing viewpoints and having discussions on what scripture means, but the idea that you make religion more accommodating is a slippery slope. I don't doubt Andrew's conversion, I saw a video where he became quite emotional talking about the time God reached into his heart, but his statement about reinventing the Gospels to prevent us from being locked into a First Century morality is way off the mark. Maybe it's the influence of the churches he attends. Having not grown up in the faith he has to have help as far as how it works and if he believes that I question the message he is receiving. Like that mega-church he attended with all the showmanship. They may pack them in but a lot of those churches have a serious problem when it comes to preaching the prosperity gospels.
Or maybe it's just Andrew's Libertarian bent. I see this with Dennis Prager as well. Dennis Prager is quite smart and he gives great advice but I have heard him take the Libertarian side in everything from drug use to sex-trafficking. The sex-trafficking video disturbed me so much that I unsubscribed from his channel. I still watch some of the videos but I can't get behind someone who will challenge the guest the way he did on that one or argue the free-choice angle on a topic like that, even if it is just to play devils-advocate. There is a time to talk and a time to listen and he was way out of line that day in my opinion.
It's the same with Andrew. I enjoy his talks on other subjects but his Libertarian streak gets in the way of what scripture requires of us so I generally steer clear of videos where he discusses Christianity. It's not because I doubt his faith, it's because I believe he misses the mark. That's just my opinion of course and people are free to disagree all they want. I have been called names for questioning him on this stuff before. The most common argument is, well, he's sticking up for our side so you need to give him a break. Or, what do you know about it. Are you a preacher? The thing is, where Christianity is concerned, it's not a matter of sides or credentials, it's a matter of truth and faith. I have faith that The Gospels are the true word of God and don't need to be reinvented. That is when the church gets in trouble. Just like I believe there is no room for compromise when it comes to the gay lifestyle or other areas I have heard Andrew argue for a more Libertarian sort of tolerance. Sin is sin and it's not okay to say, well, you can continue to sin that way as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else. Know who it hurts? It hurts the sinner, and God.
Anyway, this has been a long rant and it will be my last word on it. I doubt anyone will ever take the time read it but if you do keep this in mind, I like Andrew and what he stands for, but when it comes to Christianity, I think his messaging misses the point. I am so far from perfect it scares me. And that is precisely why I don't want to reinvent God's word or try to fit Him into a box that is more comfortable for me. I think we have failed our young people enough already. We don't need to reinforce their misunderstanding of how faith works by telling them it's okay to craft God's message in a way to fit a narrative it was never intended to fit. Watch "The Enemy Within" if you don't believe me. The church needs to clean up it's act or risk being devoured by the spirit of the age.
1
-
1
-
He's guilty of committing journalism. For the longest time, these propogandists used to feign objectivity. But since we live in a post-truth society they are now free to goose-step to their hearts content. Listen to how often they will parrot what their masters at the DNC set up as the message de-jure. When biden first started in with his threat to democracy screed, every network repeated it ad-nauseum. When fauci spews out some BS about these booster shots working after just admitting that the first shots were worthless they defend his illogical position. Look who mans these anchor desks. They are the children of politicians or broadcasters. Look who is in congress and you get more of the same.
We are not only post-truth, we are post-argument. Broadcasters have been in the pocket of the DNC going back to the days of Roosevelt's fireside chats. Newsrooms have always been dominated by left-wing reporters who cover for democrats and demonize republicans. Then they accuse the republicans of being fear-mongers and conspiracy freaks for pointing out the obvious. Nixon was not a likeable politician by nature. He was better suited to books than people but that doesn't mean he was wrong when he pointed out the hypocrisy of the press corps and their slavish devotion to the DNC. It's just that it was Nixon who said it so it was easy to get people to agree with them when they said he was paranoid. I remember when they were attacking Reagan, calling him unstable, too old, dangerous, a threat to world stability. Sound familiar?
The game has always been played this way, it's just that they no longer need to hide it. And it's going to get worse. The next group, the ones they call Gen-Z are so far gone and lean so far left that it will only be a matter of time before all dissent is crushed. It's coming. I believe it was all prophesized but that is my faith. You believe what you want. I doubt I will be around to see the final clash but I encourage everyone to get right with God. To quote Bob Dylan, it's a hard rains, a gonna fall.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Democrats exercise power. Republicans fund-raise. They are nothing more than staged opposition, the Washington Generals of American politics. They put mccarthy and mcconnel into leadership positions. What part of the "we aren't serious" message those two moves conveyed did people not get. And for all you Trumpista's out there who keep telling us he's the only guy who can fix the mess he helped make worse, what's his plan for that? Not that he actually has a snowball's chance in Hell of winning a general election but let's play along. How many competent people who could get the job done are even willing to work for the guy? Lock her up was one his catch phrases, until he could, then it was like, "well, I didn't really mean it."
Give the commies credit, they are a committed bunch, less interested in the show than achieving their goal of the acquisition of total power so they can really get down to the business of fundamentally changing this country once and for all from now until the end of time. Does that sound like anything remotely close to what a worm like mccarthy has in mind? Very few people on the right are serious. Maybe it's just that they have been beaten down like dogs, or maybe it's because that conspiracy theory of dems running trojan horses in republican primaries wasn't so theoretical and now they are reaping the fruits of their efforts. Hang on kiddies, this ride is just getting started. Yes we can indeed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The main thing to keep in mind is that politics has replaced religion for a lot of people on the left. Our public education system spent decades pushing left-wing causes as virtuous and proper and right-wing causes as evil and mean. The left also invested a lot of time and money running God out of the public square. The thing about God is if you tell Him you don't need Him He will say okay, you're on your own. C.S. Lewis out it best: “There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.'" Combine that with a 24/7 bombardment of hateful messaging where talking heads tell their audiences that it's the people, not the ideas or viewpoints they hold, who are bad and what other outcome would you expect.
This digital age, where everyone gets to take part in the hate-fest, brings out the worst parts of human nature. Our dialogue has become coarse, people have become closed-minded, and now you have to accept the entire program without question or you aren't part of the clan. The vast majority of these people carrying on about wanting to kill the president wouldn't know how to fire a BB-gun. And they wouldn't have the nerve to try. But there are enough out there, people with murder in their heart, who aren't afraid to try anyway. There is a demonic force at play. Look at that trans cult going around killing people in the name of...well themselves.
We exist in these echo-chambers where group-think is mandatory, critical thinking is seen as heresy, compassion is seen as weakness, and getting along with the other side is seen as betrayal. We are entering a cold civil war. Will it turn hot at some point? I hope not. Even politicians make casual remarks on the floor of the house about a national divorce. Divorces are messy on a one-to-one level. A divorce at a national level? Be careful what you wish for Dorothy, you just might get it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There isn't anyone working at these networks who is intelligent enough to actually have an adult conversation with these candidates let alone moderate a debate. And Matt is right, they do make it all about them. That perino ditz has always been annoying and she cemented her legacy when she pulled her miss sweet and brightness routine interviewing that demonic family who agreed to have their child mutilated at the altar of Satan, calling it an act of love. She has always made me ill and last night, when I saw her smug face on that stage I knew it was going to be a sh*t show. And the questions that airhead asked. What would you do as president to stop a UAW strike? Since Trump is going to win if you all stay in which of you should quit? At least DeSantis called that snarky little bit*h out on that one, saying it was disrespectful. And that Latino girl. Where did they grab her from? Havana? You know, Latino voters hate republicans so what ju gonna do to make them love you a bit better?
The Governor should consider just staying away from the next debate. They were like 15 minutes into it before they even asked him a question. When he said he was the only candidate who served in the military that snarky little witch piped up, well niki's husband is serving as well. Lady, your boss, in terms of just straight up IQ, was the dumbest guy to ever occupy that office. He let cheney and rumsfeld lead his stupid ass into a war to make their contactor buddies rich and all he accomplished was to break the middle east, strengthen Iran, and get a lot of good young people killed and maimed. You shouldn't even be allowed to comment on anything military related.
I'll stop. No one will read this anyway but I felt like venting. Man, that woman just flat out galls me. Her and the rest of the bushies need to find a hole to slink back into. Steve Deace is right, faux news needs to be put down like a rabid dog. It's not needed and like that blonde airhead, it serves no useful purpose.
1
-
All American news outlets have a bias and all of them, including Fox, are in bed with one political party or another. Reporters like Murrow and Cronkite had an easier time hiding their biases because of the role they played covering WWII. It also helped that the democratic party had a stranglehold on the American political system during the period mass-media exploded onto the scene. That was the lens through which the message was delivered it just became the norm. Media bias wasn't even an issue until politicians like Nixon started calling reporters out for their democratic favoritism. But for the most part the networks still covered national and world events in a straight up fashion. This allowed them to deflect the criticism of their political coverage by dismissing those who accused them of bias as sore losers and fringe paranoid types.
Things really changed after Vietnam and Watergate. Reporters were no longer covering stories, they became part of them. It was, in many ways, a return to the days of Yellow Journalism. Then 24/7 cable came around and suddenly you had all kinds of air time to fill. TV journalists went from being reporters to being celebrities and they were all coming out of left-wing universities where they were encouraged to be activists first and reporters second. Now, it is more about who you know when it comes to landing these TV jobs. Look at how many news anchors and show hosts are second and third generation media types. Look at how many come from families with deep political roots.
The internet has made them lazy to boot. That worm obama had running point on his nuclear treaty with Iran came right out and admitted that he took advantage of young reporters who lacked the skills and intellectual curiosity to properly fact check him. CBS, NBC, and ABC are now the propaganda arm for the democratic party. CNN may have started with the intention of being a straight news outlet but they figured out they would do better if they got on on team or the other. MSNBC was always intended to assume the role of DNC mouthpiece. Papers like the NY Times are so far gone they are never coming back. They count on the money they get pimping the left-wing narrative.
I get a kick out of the fact they all freak out because the republicans have one network that leans their way. But even Fox has gone mainstream to the point where they have given up their claim as the network for conservatives. They have run fluff pieces promoting transgender mutilation of children using that bush hack dana perino to put some kind of sweetness and light spin on that evil practice. How much air time does Fox give actual conservative commentators like Steve Deace, Delano Squires, or Daniel Horowitz? How many invites to CPAC do those guys get? There are a few brave independent reporters like Andy Ngo out there but how much air time does he get anywhere?
Wanna know what happened to America Will? Colonel Jessup told us: We couldn't handle truth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Obviously we're in the south, so there's kinda like, racism." You can tell that kid was raised in the north and is a product of a public school education. I have spent decades living north, and south of the Mason Dixon line and trust me, racism, especially black to white, is higher in the north. The race hustlers and academics want to keep the myth of systemic racism alive and act like Bull Conner is still the model for southern sheriffs and it's sad that kids like that one don't get what is going on around them. The marxists are full of it but they are very effective and their long march through the institutions has payed off.
But the beauty of it is, a lot kids raised on the same lies that kid was fed are in their 30s now, trying to raise a family in a world where the insane theories of those teachers who taught them are being put to the test and they are realizing that the utopia they were told was attainable isn't just around the corner. What is around the corner is a homeless druggie pissing on their street and willing to cut their throat for a dollar. They also discovered that maybe trusting teachers to their own devices isn't such a good idea when their five year old girl announces she is now a boy and her teacher gave her a star for it, telling her, "that's great honey, just don't tell mommy and daddy yet. It'll be our little secret for now"
Evil is evil, no matter how it's packaged and when you grow up and have to live in the world of the way things are you find out that idealism doesn't go very far at the checkout line or the gas pump. John Lennon said all you need is love but he was rich. These 30 and 40 somethings are waking up and rejecting the left wing nonsense they were taught because they have kids of their own and they became more precious to them than their misplaced ideals. That is why the democrats are going to get tossed out on their asses and that is why when they talk about threats to democracy, people look at them say yeah, I hear ya. I know there is a threat to that and more and that is why you have to go away now.
1
-
1