Comments by "" (@sirtra) on "A Boss Reveals Everything Your Company Can Monitor in Microsoft" video.

  1. 4
  2. 4
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7.  @PL-rf4hy  given you say it was a "DOS interface" this tells me you are not technically savvy nor was working in a technical role at this telecommunications company back in 1990 and still today. Next up, calling it a "telecommunications" company today might make sense, but back in 1990 what would be considered a "telecommunications" company today was more commonly called something else. Take for example AT&T, one of the largest and well known telecommunications companies in the US, neither of the T's stand for telecommunications and there is good reason for that. Now here is the kicker, even if i play along and take everything you've said as being genuine and sincere, putting the red flags above to the side as "you're not a technical minded person" and even going so far as giving you the benefit of doubt that this really did happen and it really was 1990... I still don't see any plausible explanation for the purpose of you not only having access to a mailbox but then sending mail to a "friend" or co-worker in another office. You speak as though it was a one-off event which doesn't exactly support the idea that this really did happen, on the flipside if it wasn't a one-off or rare event but rather required as part of your job it begs the question of why you wouldn't you describe it in this manner (ie used it for business purpose) rather than sending a single mail to a single person in 1990 as proof. 1) Got an explanation for that bud? Now before you think of switching your answer to "oh yeah yeah i meant that i sent lots as part of my job i just picked the friend thing as one example" i'll let you know that the process to send an email in 1990 was a lengthy and tedious process which would have involved logging into another system. 2) What did you use to login to this system? Describe it in your own non-technical terms, don't worry if you don't know the right terminology it'll be immediately obvious if you're lying or not. I'll even explain why just as i have above should you provide an answer to the above two questions. I even numbered them so it's very clear and simple for you. I would love to be proven wrong but i doubt you'll even attempt to answer what should be 2 very simple questions for someone telling the truth about a vivid memory from over 35 years ago, making you at least 50 years old today.
    1
  8. 1