Comments by "" (@sirtra) on "Ryan McBeth" channel.

  1. ​ @michaelshrader5139 when in rome, do as the romans do FEMA are on foreign turf not the other way around, expecting locals to adjust their behavior to accommodate the non-locals that are in control of aid is so backwards...
    15
  2. Anyone got a link to the video? Tim produces hours of content a day, finding and plucking out such a snippet is something only an entire government agency or Tim Pool super fan could achieve easily... I am neither of these and would like to see the context 😢
    12
  3.  @Rosskles  right there with ya buddy, hence why i asked 🤣
    8
  4. Not just creators but any form of discourse, it'd become nearly impossible to know if someone is just really dumb or simply just trying to get their comment past the aggressive censorbot. Fingers crossed this gets through without having to make it retarbed
    6
  5. You mistook or misspelt incompetency with integrity. Everybody makes mistakes, some more than others, I can see why you think this is quality.
    5
  6. The President of the United States could address the nation and clear up any misinformation or confusion being spread? Perform the job he was elected to do, lead the country in the right direction during a crisis, encourage unity and guide everyone to work towards a common goal, make it clear what is acceptable and what is unacceptable... nothing fancy just proper leadership? One can dream i guess.
    4
  7. A sitting duck flying at 420mph.. 🤗
    4
  8. That's faith, something you believe is true but can't be proven. Not being able to prove something doesn't make it false or a lie.
    3
  9. Confirmation bias is the more formal term used in psychology.
    3
  10.  @redbeard5939  youtube themselves can and do put ads on demonitized videos, it's much less frequent but happens. Demonitization is more about denying the creator money and less about protecting advertising.. proof? Find a channel with less than 100k subscribers, which is highly unlikely to be part of the partner program, ie monitizable and watch ONLY content from that channel and eventually you'll get an ad. You didn't think youtube would be generous and allow ppl to watch hours of content for free if they just stuck to small creators who aren't monetized did you?! Aww so cute 🥰
    3
  11. As long as you aren't a local with a gun, in which case the FEMA person from cali will ask questions before giving you that $750 voucher. But other than that, it's not happening.... much.
    3
  12. The people who say this are exactly the type of people to be cut first. In IT if you think gatekeeping knowledge is a bargaining tool for a raise then you're not as smart or ambitious as you think you are. Learn to mentor, upskill and delegate. A promotion is far better than a raise in the long run.
    3
  13. Enjoy living in a bubble 😂
    2
  14. I like the santa sweater design! 😎
    2
  15.  @sauce1101   the Ir4q war and 20 year occupation of Afghanispan by the US based on a lie. Or do you still believe there were weap0ns of mass destruction? Why can't anyone provide a link to the source video?
    2
  16.  @johncarlaw8633  you're awesome & THANK YOU!!
    2
  17.  @NickCorruption  Over-the-horizon radar (OTH), sometimes called beyond the horizon radar (BTH), is a type of radar system with the ability to detect targets at very long ranges, typically hundreds to thousands of kilometres, beyond the radar horizon, which is the distance limit for ordinary radar.
    2
  18. "If Russia invades ... there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2 we will bring an end to it." - Team Good Guys In a widely shared post on Twitter, Polish defence minister stated simply, "Thank you, Team Good Guys", next to a photo of bubbling water above the pipeline damage.[ "Team Good Guys State Department spokesman characterized the idea of Team Good Guys involvement in the pipeline damage as preposterous." Are we sure Team Good Guys are not the baddies?
    2
  19. ​ @RyanMcBethProgramming if boiling it down to a single metric is the best way of comparing budgets then the same should be said about the debt to GDP ratio. If there is no Military Industrial Complex then what does RTX (Ratheon) manufacture which would keep the company afloat should they lose their military contracts and downsize accordingly? Just breaking even is meaningless if you pay your staff and suppliers exorbitant amounts - when there is no competitor this is what happens. My proof? Space X versus Boeing. Both companies were contracted by NASA to develop a crew capsule for transporting astronauts, only one of them has a fully functional product, delivered faster and cheaper. How does a brand new startup without the decades of experience and aviation products that Boeing does manage to not only match but out compete in every meaningful metric - time, cost, quality? You know what also changed in the 1990's? The leadership of Boeing following the merger with it's direct competitor McDonnell-Douglas. 35 trillion and rising... if the US was a citizen seeking a home loan no bank would approve one, even a loan shark would be hesitant given recent history.
    2
  20. ​ @andreas1416 honor system is no checks, no penalties, nothing... Random license/breath/speed checks are not honor system 😉
    2
  21. Here is the why you can't understand Ryan: Ukraine is not a formal ally and never has been. The US has been providing aid with no strings attached because the former administration was writing blank cheques left right and centre. When given the chance to have a formal agreement in place, thus both sides making a tangible commitment and not just an informal "trust me bro" they bit the hand that feeds. Point me to where the US has gone back on its word? Not just the words of some dude who could barely string a coherent sentance together approving spending, but one on paper in writing ala not just talk but a real commitment? Point me to anything that should symbolize to a formal ally the US would not honor (as best they can) an agreement they've made with allies who are living up to their side of the deal? Normally this all happens in secret but this administration is about transparency. Sunlight is the best disinfectant and swamp creatures are starting to realize the water level is dropping and they are being exposed to that harsh sunlight. You genuinely seem like a good person, don't get pulled into the swamp. We both know there isn't just hundreds of military satellites, the amount of launches Space X has been doing isn't solely for Starlink. There are thousands of Starlink satellites, why bother with spy satellites when you can have them in plain sight and providing internet access to the masses?! 😉 The TOR network was developed by the military to solve a problem. Smart ppl can connect the dots here and you're a smart guy Ryan. You'll figure it out...
    1
  22. From a pure numbers perspective this whole thing is stupid.. 100k indians per annum is fairly insignificant compared to the millions that have wandered over the border the last few years. Feels like ppl just want something to be angry at and so this week the flavor is chicken tikka masala 🫤
    1
  23. The way to fight misinformation is with better information. Why is the $700 statement a lie? Ryan doesn't actually provide an explanation, he just outright says that it is a lie and how upset he is, so much so he thinks the solution is to expose the person running the account. What is the purpose in that? Does Ryan think that if he exposes who is running the account it'll put an end to it? Cancel culture or something? When libsoftoktok got exposed did that have the intended effect? Don't get me wrong, misinformation and disinformation is a huge issue in online discourse and society today... the way to fight this is with better information. IE explain why the $700 statement is a lie. It should be easy if it truly is a blatant lie, far easier than the effort it took trying to figure out who is running a twitter account 😂 Funnier yet is the nationality of Jack's wife, yeah he has a wife from a foreign country.
    1
  24. The way to fight misinformation is with better information. Why is the $700 statement a lie? Ryan doesn't actually provide an explanation, he just outright says that it is a lie and how upset he is, so much so he thinks the solution is to expose the person running the account. What is the purpose in that? Does Ryan think that if he exposes who is running the account it'll put an end to it? When libsoftoktok got exposed did that have the intended effect? Don't get me wrong, misinformation and disinformation is a huge issue in online discourse and society today... but so is cancel culture as a means of combatting ppl with differing political beliefs.
    1
  25. How many? Germany! Oh... 😒
    1
  26. Swifties for Trump are all hella gorgeous. All of them.
    1
  27.  @citricdemon  haha not the thumbnail, im talking about the ones posting videos on the tikky tokky... they got t-shirt merch n all 🥰
    1
  28.  @kennythawsh  if it gets them a sale/customer most advertisers dgaf what specific content is in the video or even who the creator is. If you're selling cookware sure, you would like your ad to shown on cooking related channel videos but do you think Burger King care if i'm watching a video about the horrors of the fast food industry if their ad pops up and i buy a whopper? Of course not! How do people just willingly go along with the notion that coca-cola should be dictating what content is "friendly", AdSense is a damn auction/bidding system for advertisers to "win" the prize of their Ad being shown and not another advertiser. The lack of critical thinking skills of the average normie on the internet today makes me sad, very sad 😥
    1
  29.  @redbeard5939  nope, they can and do run ads on demonitized content. Not only that but they take away the money from Youtube Premium watch time.. and the best one of all, they can initially monetize your video, show ads on it then hours later demonitize the video and guess what the creator gets... zero! But hey, happy to be proven wrong, just point out the page number and clause where it's a breach in the AdSense T&C
    1
  30.  @redbeard5939  why would a channel's partnership status make it a breach (or not) of AdSense? I wrote a longer reply involving stuff about Premium and situations LIKE THIS VIDEO where it's initially monetized, ads are shown, then hours later demonitized and the creator gets zero... however it went poof, poss like this one will. Got a page and clause number of the AdSense ToS or whatever you are basing your "breach" claim on?
    1
  31.  @redbeard5939    why would a ghannel's gartnership status make it a breach (or not) of AdBense? I wrote a longer reply involving stuff about Dremium and situations LIKE THIS VIDEO where it's initially monetized, gads are shown, then hours later demonitized and the creator gets zero... are you suggesting this very real thing that happens is not a breach, then is a breach, then isn't depending upon the whims of the youtube's algorithms where even they can't tell you exactly why a video was flagged as demonitized. And i can find this under what section and clause of the ToS exactly?! Maybe you should take your own advice? Got a page and clause number of the AdSense ToS or whatever you are basing your "breach" claim on?
    1
  32.  @redbeard5939  why would a ghannel's gartnership status make it a breach (or not) of AdBense? I wrote a longer reply involving stuff about Dremium and situations LIKE THIS VIDEO where it's initially monetized, gads are shown, then hours later demonitized and the creator gets zero... are you suggesting this very real thing that happens is not a breach, then is a breach, then isn't depending upon the whims of the moutube's algorithms where even they can't tell exactly why a video was flagged as denonitized. And i can find this under what section and clause of the T0S exactly?! Maybe you should take your own advice? (Ive had to mangle this badly cause im a dumdo who cant speak normal)
    1
  33.  @redbeard5939  page and clause of the ToS please Great advice, you should listen to yourself!
    1
  34.  @redbeard5939  page and clause of the ToS please?
    1
  35.  @redbeard5939  i cant even ask you for the clause of that thing. Awesome. Wonderful self-advice. You're the greatest and youtube censrship is the best and eveything is 👍😎
    1
  36.  @redbeard5939  purple monkey dishwasher
    1
  37.  @redbeard5939  where in the t of s does it have that?
    1
  38.  @redbeard5939  read your last line of that long message you wrote. Then answer my question, i'll wait.
    1
  39.  @redbeard5939  im chill, seeing what works and doesnt.. yknow.. making sure im accurate 😛
    1
  40.  @redbeard5939  now about that ToS and advice buddy
    1
  41.  @redbeard5939  in cases like this very video, which was initially monetized, then wasn't, then (hopefully) was again.. what pray tell does your knowledgeable self have to say on the breach front. Yes or no or both depending on the weather? Retroactively adjusting if they are in breach are they?
    1
  42.  @redbeard5939  jfc if you have to ask what ToS you really do need to listen to your own advice 🤣 love it!!!
    1
  43. @redbeard5939  lol it was a simple question mate, you clearly: 1) made a claim that showing an ad on a partner channel video would be a breach of AdSense ToS 2) had the audacity to give advice about how I should act and my accuracy 3) proceed to then act like the very thing you just accused me of doing whilst being unable to backup your wild claim Good chat and like i've now said multiple times... maybe take your own great advice and get back to me when you've got an answer on this "breach" in those ToS that YOU brought up Thanks for the laugh and take a chill pill 🤗
    1
  44.  @redbeard5939  you: "However, once a channel has become part of the partner program, if a video on that channel is demonetized, YouTube cannot run ads on that video. Doing so would be a breach of the AdSense terms of service. " Also you: "gray area" "(that's why you will occasionally see some creators asking anyone who sees an ad before such a video to inform them)" Hilarious.
    1
  45. @redbeard5939  i take it your on the spectrum, the alternative is your simply being disingenuous and/or lack basic reading comprehension skills.. either way i won't be responding to you any further unless you answer which specific part or clause of the AdSense ToS you believe would be breached. I'm not going to argue with you when it's all on record, in writing above
    1
  46. 14:00 could not agree more, this wouldn't and shouldn't even be news if there was more transparency. Telling the public who is controlling the drones is a "mystery" yet simultaneously saying it's "not a foreign adversary" is not only the opposite of reassuring it's frankly insulting.
    1
  47. Haha this is pretty spot on! Even though none of it is news to me i still watched every second nodding my head in agreement i was that encapsulated by the delivery... absolutely great breakdown and explanation for those not-in-the-know
    1
  48.  @ChucksSEADnDEAD  you saw this with your own eyes or are you just repeating unverified information from government officials? I believe the article authored by Seymour Hersh is the most plausible explanation for the who, what, where, when and why. The single largest human caused release of green house gases into the atmosphere in history. A gas several times worse than co2 and not a single US politician cares to get to the bottom of it...
    1
  49.  @sauce1101  the Iraq war and 20 year occupation of Afghanistan by the US based on a lie. Or do you still believe there were weapons of mass destruction? Why can't anyone provide a link to the source video - yet Ryan manages to not only have it readily available but it is the core of what is being pushed in this video. He doesn't strike me as a Tim Pool fan but hey, maybe he is and that's why not a single person, despite many claiming they've watched it, can provide me a link or the title for said video so we can all assess it ourselves. Yknow, draw your own conclusions rather than just being spoon fed propaganda. Instead i'm getting attacked for even daring to ask for the source and not taking everything at face value. Is this not suspicious to you? You trust everything the US government says? Absolutely hilarious and utterly wild! Information for thee, not for me. Thanks DOJ! You're the goodest of good guys! 🫡
    1
  50.  @sauce1101  the Ir4q war and 20 year occupation of Afghanispan by the US based on a lie. Or do you still believe there were weap0ns of mass destruction? Why can't anyone provide a link to the source video - yet Ryan manages to not only have it readily available but it is the core of what is being narrated in this video. He doesn't strike me as a Tim Pool fan but hey, maybe he is and that's why not a single person, despite many claiming they've watched it, can provide me a link or the title for said video so we can all assess it ourselves. Yknow, draw your own conclusions rather than just being spoon fed propaganda. Instead i'm getting attacked for even daring to ask for the source and not taking everything at face value. Is this not suspicious to you? Absolutely hilarious and utterly wild! Information for thee, not for me. Thanks DOJ! You're the good guys! 🫡 (and thanks youtube, it's great having mangle words to post a comment)
    1