Comments by "" (@sirtra) on "Is Self-Help Guru PhD a Womanizer and Pseudoscientific Nonsense Broker? | Andrew Huberman Analysis" video.

Grande provides almost no examples or evidence to support his claims. The closest he comes is mentioning that one study used rats but was allegedly presented by Huberman as though it used humans - however Grande does not say what this study was, which episode or where/when it was presented in such a way. Why is that? If Grande has gone to the trouble of watching hours of footage and diligently combed through the studies findings and found something tangible, why not simply state this. Why obscure even high level details such as what the study was about!? Could it be that if Grande were to reveal more details about said study or gave sufficient information that one could go watch and read this for themselves to form their own conclusions, they would come to a different conclusion to Grande or realize his analysis is a bit of s stretch? We may never know because Grande did not, and likely never will, provide further information to substantiate these claims. We're just meant to take his word on it and trust Dr Grande over Dr Huberman?! Not very scientific of him frankly - the scientific method relies on the ability to replicate/reproduce or at the very least observe/witness the conclusions presented, ie peer review.
3
@terrystokes2948 Huberman is a professor at Standford. Not sure how you can claim Grande is spot on when it appears you have no idea who he is nor watched him. Guess you are his target audience though, makes a bit more sense to me now after reading all that.. so in a weird way, thanks! All the best friend (sincerely) 😊 PS not a fan of fake titles too 😉
2