Comments by "" (@sirtra) on "Upper Echelon"
channel.
-
14
-
12
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Do you have any proof showing that Mario himself solicited everything you show here?
My initial impression is there are two potential factors not taken into consideration:
1) an agreed upon definition of what "botted" actually means.
Accusing someone of something which you don't even clearly define yourself opens the door to a difference of opinion and plausible deniability in both directions.
If you walk out of the grocery store having only paid for 9 out of 10 items in your bag is that "shoplifting" - if you weren't aware that 10th item was even in your bag, let alone put it there, that's rather different to intentionally hiding the 10th item inside your bag.
It seems pretty clear to me that Romy is not technical and has more sway than Bob, which is a little odd given the org chart you showed. Combine with this her being rather explicit about no bots early on - insubordination and being "set up" comes to mind before some sort of grifting or fraud scenario.
2) being incorrect or making a mistake should not be equated to deception, lying or grifting etc.
If bringing up the deleted tweet about that person he thought was dead is one of your key pieces of direct evidence against Mario's character and grifting, in my view, seems rather petty, verging on smear or hit piece and had the opposite effect.
I'm by no means saying he's innocent or that you're wrong, but other than your interpretation of a signal group chat there isn't any substance here... feels like this might be more a personal beef and clouding your judgement than a bombshell expose revealing Mario is a grifter.
I don't know enough about him to have an opinion either way yet, but i haven't seen anything yet which suggests he's a bad actor.
If you did a 2 hour interview with him yet the only useful material to build your case was him denying using bots 3 times, do you really have a strong case?
Perhaps ask yourself, what triggered you to make this video?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It all started in australia after a troll viral facebook post saying 40% of aussie TP was imported from China, a few gullible people panic bought clearing out shelves at a couple stores. Pictures of this then gave the troll post some merit and caused more people to the panic buy, the media did a story on the shortages (but didnt mention the 40% thing is BS, it was pitched as a doomsday prep thing for covid-19) and it snowballed out of contol nationewide from there.
What exacerbated the situation is that TP is a bulky item and whilst nearly every store had new stock everyday it was all sold 30 minutes after opening - theres only so much they could have delivered each day and people were buying ludicrous amounts (multipke trollies worth)
Wouldnt gave gotten so bad if mainstreaming media cared mored about facts and setting the record straight rather than clicks and ratings. Or if people werent so gullible.
Then other (more sensible) items start sufferifng.. pasta, canned goods, long life milk, sugar, water etc.. causing more media stories.. more panic blah blah. Restrictions on these items per customer had to be implemented because it was impacting people, particularly elderly, low income/unemployed, single parents etc. Wasnt until a further 3 days after restrictions were in place until one news station finally chose to do a tear jerking segement on how the panic buying was impacting these people and that people shouldnt go overboard stocking up - this is after a week of daily segments about it drumming up more panic and fear wth footage of fights etc.
Didnt expect it to spread to US but i guess gullible people and sensationalized news stories is fairly universal in most western countries.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1