Comments by "" (@sirtra) on "NowThis Impact" channel.

  1. The exact same thing could be said about the people who where shot - the one in the arm had a hand gun too, all of them were breaking curfew blah blah. Nothing you've said rebukes the self defense claim though - it's really quite simple, if someone attacks you (irrespective of what you said, where you are, how you got there, what your intent was, whether you were breaking other laws at the time, what color underwear your wearing etc) you have the right to defend youself if your life (or someone elses) is under immediate threat. From the video footage in all 3 of the shootings: 1) kyle was retreating, not advancing and was actively being pursued 2) kyle was struck or hit by the attackers first 3) kyle only shot those who attacked him Kyle's in good hands now Lin Wood in on the case. Law and order will prevail...
    2
  2.  @EpicMania18  search "every angle of kyle rittenhouse" on yt
    2
  3. A white supremacist you say? ORLY This video aint going to age well.. here's an idea.. don't chase and attack someone with a rifle unless you are prepared to suffer the risks and consequences. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
    2
  4. It's just a coincidence that the riots are all in democratic run states.. pure coincidence.. what are the odds.. absolutely nothing to see here folks.. orange man bad
    2
  5.  @EpicMania18  how did Kyle undermine police and justice exactly? As you've stated yourself he went there with the purpose of protecting property and people, he wasnt there to make a political statement, fight for racial justice, make his voice heard or such things. He felt local law enforcement weren't doing enough and decided to step up - sure, this might not have been a wise move but at the same the police didnt seem to have any issues with him (and dozens of others) wandering the streets with firearms. It'd be a different matter if police instructed Kyle to go home upon seeing him wandering the streets during curfew with a rifle but they didnt - in fact even after the shootings they just drive on by as if its not out of the ordinary, just another peaceful protestor walking the streets during curfew. You can't have it both ways. If police are turning a blind eye to people committing crimes, breaking curfew, burning and destroying property etc it can't be then said that people taking matters into their own hands to prevent these very things that police should be doing but aren't, are undermining them. I totally agree there is no law and order currently - thats the crux of the problem! Furthermore it's not the police's fault for their inaction - it's fairly obvious these arent rogue law enforcement officers just letting people do whatever they want and are ignoring their superiors. The lack of action by police is a directive coming from much higher up than the officers themselves and even the police dept as a whole. There is just going to be a growing number of these incidents involving civilians taking matters into their own hands whilst the violence, looting and destruction continues with police taking little to no action to prevent it. It's ironic that the people trying to push the narrative that Kyle was only chased and attacked by other civilians (the mob) after he shot someone - as if this suddenly means it's okay for people to take matters into their own hands - are generally the same ones trying to make the arguement that Kyle shouldnt have taken matters into his own hands. The hypocrisy is truly amazing! Anyhoo when i say law n order will prevail i'm talking in the near future, things are likely to still get worse until there is an incident that can't be spun for political gain or is so egregious that people start questioning where were the police? Who wants to live in a society where on a weekly basis there is yet another business looted and burnt to ground, yet another violent assault or death from "mostly peaceful" protests.. causing chaos and civil unrest isn't an effective way to bring about justice and peace.
    1
  6.  @pizzasteve5825  the "peaceful" protestors could stick to daylight hours, as this would make it very easy for law enforcement to differentiate between the troublemakers and protestors at night when they start looting and burning but they don't - why is this? What are the protestors gaining by being on the streets at midnight that can't be done during daylight hours? Why don't the protestors leave the area when the fires and destruction start? I have absolutely no sympathy for "peaceful" protestors and even media that put themselves in harms way, ignore law enforcements warning to clear the area and then get gassed or hit with bullets etc. Would it be better if it didnt get to that point, sure, but it's not like the protestors are unaware of the risks and consequences.. it's like waving a red flag in front of a bull for an hour and then screaming in outrage that you got a horn thru the chest. There's a suitable time and place to conduct protests and get your message heard by the public.. in the middle of the night amongst people looting, burning and destroying property is not it.
    1
  7. Woops i mean "mostly peaceful protest" not riot. Every good protest has at least one ceremonial car burning to kick off the festivities. Dont forget to bring marshmallows.
    1
  8.  @abelsm6270  buildings are systemic racism that date back hundreds of years and often used white supremacists for shelter, storage and recreation. They should all be burnt to the ground, no exceptions. Period. There is no wiggle room. We must ensure that no more buildings fall into the hands of these white supremacists. This is too important to ignore. Everywhere i look there are buildings. Who knows how many of these are being used by dangerous criminals, keeping them safe and hidden in our society. We can no longer sit by quietly and let this continue. The time has come for the abolishment of buildings, or at the very least building reform. We shouldnt waste time trying to fix them, the only way forward is to tear them down entirely and build back better.
    1
  9.  @abelsm6270  both of those things can be true at the same time, they aren't mutually exclusive. I'm deeply offended by your accusations and my feelings are hurt, how dare you! You'll have to answer to the mob now, they decide who is innocent or guilty these days. Justice is served fast and swift, the mob don't get bogged down with all this "facts" and "evidence" business, judgements and sentences are handed out by yelling and chasing people down the street. This new mob justice system is flawless so far!! :)
    1
  10.  @Missconduct044  i dont think many people are going to miss the dead convicted ped0ph1le VS the lifeguard who volunteered removing graffiti earlier that day.. its difficult to defend the life of a kiddy fiddler to be honest.. i'm not one for the death penalty but if something unfortunate were to happen to him like it did.. well lets just say i wouldnt be removing my shirt to try save his life
    1
  11.  @thebakery3996  bullet forensics will determine the sequence of shots fired, you'd be amazed at what they can do with poor sound footage alone.. even to the untrained ear there is at least 3 different guns and over 20 shots fired.. kyle clearly has experience with a rifle.. in all the footage ive watched his hit ratio looks to be 100%
    1