Comments by "BoxerClover" (@BoxerClover) on "Karen Read Speaks Outside of Court: Day 27 Recap" video.

  1. either that, or "y'all can blame the horrible" FKRs.
    4
  2. the ANGLE OF THE CAMERA'S in on it, too, now?! 🤦🏻‍♂️😂
    3
  3. Are you SERIOUS? "Why"? 🤦🏻‍♂️
    3
  4. "INHIBIT herself from the trial"? 😂 & you're telling the attorney not to pretend she's smart?! 🤣
    2
  5. wait. u didn't know? CourtTV's in on the conspiracy. 🤫in fact, they spearheaded it, & then set up Jen McCabe to make it look like SHE spearheaded it! Vinnie's testifying next week. [gonna wear purple polka dots in his honor!!!]
    2
  6. KR is NOT an innocent idiot! 😡
    2
  7. how would "looking into" a judge make CourtTV more "objective"? 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  8. riiiiiiiight. 😂
    2
  9. yea! get someone who loves KR & thinks she sh*ts gold!
    2
  10. it's an OPINION. it already HAS a bias. did u not understand the assignment?
    2
  11. really? it's cool w/u that Proctor referred to a woman in such gross, debased, and unprofessional terms? Rather than someone who's just a not-so-great witness? 🐢s ain't go no sense.
    2
  12. let's hope BIG! or small. either way, it ain't happenin'.
    2
  13. probably not. merely an opinion.
    2
  14. oooh ... u FKRs just love that "factually" this & "factually" that, don't ya? u all are factually f*ck*d in the head.
    2
  15. John was fighting for his life, too, & very much wanted to live.
    2
  16. 'cuz she did.
    2
  17. doubt it.
    2
  18. no, YOU shut up. & get outta my room!
    2
  19. i was with u 'til u used the "loosah" turtle-talk. shame.
    2
  20. she did- there's footage of it outside the courthouse. female voice asks her, & KR politely says, "no, i did not." just can't remember who/when.
    2
  21. 😂 u don't know if she's "woke" any more than you know where the library is.
    2
  22.  @rachelbeck7647  ok, but melanie little is a idiot.
    1
  23. And you come across as a turtle-licker, sure of your position on the bottom row.
    1
  24. no. that's just sh*t turtleboy made up & you're brainwashed enough to believe.
    1
  25. biased towards the cw? yet she'll most likely rule in favor of allowing the defense to have these expert witnesses, even though doing so is a violation?
    1
  26.  @helenfong3339  i agree- think she's a little intimidated by Jackson.
    1
  27. enough with "she needs to recuse herself." it's not gonna happen. get over it.
    1
  28. Bulger?
    1
  29. 👮‍♂️🌸🌸let's not pretend u give- nor ever gave- a SH*T about John O'Keefe's suffering & pain- nor that of his family ... mmmkay?🌸🌸👮‍♂️
    1
  30.  @jaiadixon7918  right. & pig DNA.
    1
  31. No one wants to do Karen.
    1
  32. 👏💯👍
    1
  33. the judge ok-ed it already?!
    1
  34. but FKR does.
    1
  35. u are WHACKED.
    1
  36. "i say" you're part of the conspiracy.
    1
  37. slow. clap. revolutionary.
    1
  38. "F court tv📺 short hair glasses 👓 woman👩" ... are u playing charades?
    1
  39. "bullying"?! are you on glue? 😂
    1
  40. COULD YOU YELL A LITTLE LOUDER? I DON'T THINK THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK HEARD YOU.
    1
  41. are attorneys on CourtTV supposed to only say things they LIKE about a person? it's an OPINION. if u wanna take it as the gospel truth that's your problem.
    1
  42. "WHY SHE KNOWS SHE DIDN'T ... " ??? Can you use a language that makes sense, please?
    1
  43. really? the judge will most likely rule in favor of allowing the defense to have these expert witnesses, even though doing so is a violation. THERE'S her bias.
    1
  44.  @jeanmariesmith1224  😂 in what dumpster did you find THAT sentiment?
    1
  45. whether or not we may think it's bullshit, Rule 14 is still a RULE.
    1
  46. COULD YOU YELL YOUR LIES A BIT LOUDER?! I COULDN'T HEAR THEM OVER THE SOUND OF THE AUDIENCE LAUGHING.
    1
  47. nah.
    1
  48. probably knows he can push her around enough & get her to say what he wants.
    1
  49. nah. just at you.
    1
  50. name ONE other case in which she "dumps on white women." yeah. didn't think so.
    1
  51. no one's limiting how long the defense can present. it was Jackson who said they'd only need about 3 days.
    1
  52. Who's Larry?
    1
  53. knew it. had to make it about race because GOD FORBID a black woman simply has an opinion- like everybody else is allowed to.
    1
  54. You should make friends with punctuation.
    1
  55. only because they had 1 show where they didn't 100% agree w/FKR. whether they do or not, question away.
    1
  56. 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  57. nah. it's probably because it's a violation to add witnesses this late.
    1
  58. with your type of reasoning, YOU should be covering the Proudboys' trial in Alabama.
    1
  59. agreed. just like the time she lost her cool & hit John O'Keefe.
    1
  60.  @Nasdaqbaby  sure that's what you meant? your comment was confusing.
    1
  61. 🤦🏻‍♂️ because Trooper Paul & Buhkenik had been approved beforehand- by BOTH parties- for the WITNESS list.
    1
  62.  @helenfong3339  "in his drunkenness" "frugal" ... not one bit of sorrow; just me, me, me.
    1
  63. u don't see the hypocrisy in your comment. "are we going to choose what lies are truths?" that is EXACTLY what YOU'VE done. you've CHOSEN to believe the Alberts' & McCabes' [i appreciate u not calling them "McAlberts"- I mean that sincerely] testimonies as lies, and to state it as if that's simply a fact accepted by everyone. & yet, u KNOW it's not. [or else, why would we be here?] p.s. sorry about the all-caps; not yelling- just used to emphasize. ☻︎
    1
  64. who's "she"? & she's "baling"? what, like "baling hay"?
    1
  65. mike-butthurt reply
    1
  66.  @sandrabecht4489  ok, i'll go tell everyone.
    1
  67. JOHN O'KEEFE is the VICTIM. NOT Karen Read. love how people just conveniently forget that.
    1
  68. would you rather he NOT have been called? the defense would disagree.
    1
  69. she absolutely CAN say no to them.
    1
  70.  @shirleyac12 go for it.
    1