Comments by "BoxerClover" (@BoxerClover) on "MA v Karen Read: Could A Snow Plow Have Caused John O'Keefe's Injuries?" video.

  1. she was proven drunk by the lab technician's report & by kr's own BAC.
    14
  2. right. kr didn't appear 2 be drunk. she was proven 2 be drunk via her BAC.
    14
  3. the lab technician & kr's own BAC proved she was extremely intoxicated.
    9
  4. hasn't been proven. trial's not over. so how can that question even be asked?
    8
  5. no. she said she saw kr's car move up 2x in front of the house. that's y she texted 'pull in behind me.'
    6
  6. stop w/the ford edge. think 4 yourself.
    5
  7.  @mackenziex3axl no dog DNA. even defense isn't taking this route anymore.
    5
  8.  @debrashawcross170  saying 'mcalberts' = turtle juice consumption
    5
  9. he probably doesn't know how it ACTUALLY went down but the defense sure does.
    4
  10. 👏👍💯
    4
  11. it was PROVEN she was drunk by the lab technician.
    4
  12. u just don't wanna let go of the conspiracy. & ur hatred 4 people who weren't even involved.
    4
  13. 'research'? guess u don't consider the lab technician's research on kr's BAC 2 be actual research. talk about '🤦🏻‍♂️.'
    4
  14. he hasn't. those weren't actual fights where both parties had a beef. u just want them 2 be.
    4
  15. 'no evidence'? guess u didn't see the testimony of lab technician responsible 4 testing kr's BAC.
    4
  16. a big channel like 'court tv' is gonna state something unproven as absolute fact. you're daft if u think they will.
    4
  17. phrase only used during exchange of gunfire or other offensive/defensive scenarios.
    4
  18. part of her pending charges. lost her professorship b/c of it.
    3
  19. no dog DNA so couldn't be that.
    3
  20. 'last time [u] hit a dog'?!
    3
  21. no. u just want her to be.
    3
  22.  @estrella5935  did not say that AT ALL. said it was 'extremely rare' 4 the test 2 be inaccurate. & they absolutely DID draw kr's blood. placing it in a glucose serum is standard practice for retrieval of BAC. sorry EC. couldn't not answer this.
    3
  23. wrong. kr's own admittance is the common denominator.
    3
  24. binging on turtle juice isn't good 4 u. nor any1.
    3
  25. except the technician tasked with testing her BAC.
    3
  26.  @carebear6763  u said 'no one said' kr was drunk. 🤦🏻‍♂️
    3
  27. exactly. 👏
    3
  28.  @hipyshit  proven by lab technician that kr was waaaay over the limit.
    3
  29.  @MissteryDiva  no dog DNA.
    3
  30. 😂
    3
  31. no dog DNA.
    3
  32.  @rominahorn427  lot more than u obviously.
    3
  33. not kidding u. you're kidding yourself.
    2
  34. it was proven by the lab technician & kr's BAC that she was drunk.
    2
  35.  @denisemccourt9588  u just don't like any1 commenting who doesn't agree w/your opinion. when u purchase utube & make it private then u can tell people 2 stop posting. 'til then...
    2
  36. she told yannetti she hit him. she knew she had. she agreed that it was- per his statement- 'a terrible accident.' then jackson arrived & threw that away.
    2
  37. no dog DNA.
    2
  38. TB said lucky [plow driver] said he saw a body. [it's on the livestream w/boundless millennial if u wanna check it out.]
    2
  39. feds already investigated & only found proctor 2 need a reprimand. [he shoulda been fired.]
    2
  40.  @Pippie807  what do u think that 300-page document was?
    2
  41. good question. she said on nightline news she never actually saw him go in- was looking down at her phone at that moment.
    2
  42. except the lab technician & the lab results.
    2
  43.  @SaraWoodsss  thank u for the all-caps. they've convinced me.
    2
  44. no dog DNA tho.
    2
  45.  @MissteryDiva  NO. DOG. DNA. only pig's DNA.
    2
  46. verbatim turtle talk.
    2
  47. who? defense?
    2
  48. but all the witnesses have done is lie lie lie from day 1 according to the defense. but NOW their word is their bond, huh?
    2
  49. no way around it. 👏💯
    2
  50. it's biased. sorry.
    2
  51. agreed. they're flinging out theories 2 see which 1 might stick.
    2
  52. no canine DNA.
    2
  53. no dog DNA. end of dog attack theory.
    2
  54.  @Piat65  brian's driveway?
    2
  55. no it did not. no canine DNA found. only porcine.
    2
  56. what 'more than likely happened' doesn't involve a conspiracy.
    2
  57. @crystalclearsun 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  58.  @CPAries0404  ​​⁠ not true. & defense didn't stop the trial 2 cite jm w/perjury- like they did 2 the ambulance driver. & jm's testimony was far more vital than the driver's.
    2
  59. 👏👍💯
    2
  60.  @rominahorn427  thanks! happy new year!
    2
  61. you're a fool 2 keep drinking créme de la turtle.
    2
  62. 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  63. 👏👍💯
    2
  64. when did any1 say or even insinuate that jm was intoxicated?
    2
  65. 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  66. might not have been just kr who was sh*tfaced but like it or not she's the 1 charged w/murder.
    2
  67. b/c kr's the 1 on trial. y don't people get that? if others were drunk they shoulda been cited 2. absolutely. but it doesn't automatically exonerate kr. this is HER trial.
    1
  68. the lab tests 'said it.' loud & clear. & if these witnesses lie so much like u say- y are you believing them now? 😂
    1
  69. no actual fights w/ a beef & bloodying 1 other. could be wrong but looks like messing around. i once won a timothy chalomet- however u spell it- lookalike contest [don't ask] but i've never considered myself an actor.
    1
  70. not dog bites. no dog DNA.
    1
  71. lab technician & the results of her BAC sure did.
    1
  72. except the lab technician who proved she was.
    1
  73. found the editing kinda funky 2.👍
    1
  74. 'do not collect $200!'
    1
  75. yeah but all the witnesses are nothing but a bunch o' lowlife liars. right?
    1
  76. incredible huh? flinging stuff just 2 see what might stick.
    1
  77. anything- anything! as long as it vilifies jm. u quote kr's dad: she KNEW she 'struck something.' u ask y she'd say that & not remember. then u say it couldn't have been a plow or car. then maybe she did hit him- but he went inside where they beat him up?! 🤦🏻‍♂️ some of u cling 2 this conspiracy like it's the only source of oxygen on the planet.
    1
  78. he left. probably something u said or did. thanks a lot.
    1
  79. prosecution already has the real killer. but she'll probably go free even so.
    1
  80. except the lab technician & kr's own BAC report.
    1
  81. probably. but it's kr's trial.
    1
  82. no dog DNA.
    1
  83. not.
    1
  84. 'will we ever get to the truth?' might. if we stop w/the ridonkulous coverup/conspiracy crap.
    1
  85.  @LumiRose5804  omg. 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  86. only snow-job was a 'turtle' brand snow-job.
    1
  87. technician & BAC affirmed that she was drunk. but NOW what the other witnesses say is credible?
    1
  88.  @enzienzie  not true. not at all.
    1
  89. 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  90. 'what evidence?' the BAC in kr's own bloodstream.
    1
  91.  @AmericaFirstFLL  that made absolutely no sense- but we're all used 2 that from u guys.
    1
  92. no dog DNA.
    1
  93. she stated on nation tv- nightline news- that she dropped him off.
    1
  94. 'no one'? try the lab results. & why would u believe the witnesses now? b4 it was all 'lied about this' & 'lied about that.'
    1
  95. no civilian testimony. but how come y'all lovin' them now? thought all they did was lie lie lie.
    1
  96. if u can blame a victim's family & call a shattered mother of a slain boy a 'c*nt' & u 'hope she burns in hell'- it's pretty clear it's no longer about the victim anymore. was it ever?
    1
  97. THANK. U. 7 hells! the contortions people will undergo 2 vilify others & keep 'muh conspiracy theery' going. 🤦‍♂️🤯
    1
  98. her lab tests proved she drank A LOT that night.
    1
  99. wanted 2 downsize b/c kids moving out. chloe bit a woman & 2 dogs. been explained over & over- people just wanna believe what they wanna believe.
    1
  100. as 'terrible' as some1 not even saying goodbye 2 children they'd known & claimed 2 love 4 years?
    1
  101. never said she saw him go in. said she looked down at her phone- nightline news.
    1
  102. jm was not proven 2 have been drunk. kr was.
    1
  103. 👏💯!!!
    1
  104. but all the witnesses are liars remember? u trust what they say now tho?
    1
  105.  @CPAries0404  i'd never 'come back 2 [u.]' u look like Count Chocula & Steve Buscemi made a baby.
    1
  106. & watch out 4 kr on the road!
    1
  107. it's U proclaiming they're lies as if that's a fact. so y even ask?
    1
  108. kr was proven 2 be inebriated by BAC. & many have been saying all the witnesses r liars- but suddenly they're as truthful & pious as nuns when it comes 2 observing kr as not appearing drunk. so which is it?
    1
  109. u said "all testimony." don't be goin' & editin' it.
    1
  110.  @nancymcgough6707  well of COURSE u 'stand by it.' the brainwashed can't be swayed.
    1
  111. but they're all liars. remember?
    1
  112. more of an embarrassment that u regurgitate tb's words almost verbatim. 🐢🥤😜
    1
  113. can. cited proctor 4 misconduct & handed defense a 3001 pg doc citing [almost] all their accusations as unfounded. [sorry.]
    1
  114. no dog DNA.
    1
  115. true but that's not what u really care about.
    1
  116. no escaping the BAC report & the lab technician's words.
    1
  117.  @cheshirecat6518  🤦🏻‍♂️
    1