Comments by "CMTWGRDK" (@cmtwgrdk2748) on "Forgotten Weapons" channel.

  1. 9
  2. 6
  3. First, i used to be issued this gun(the original) its true we had the weapons at home, be it this one or the G3 the MG62(mg42) or the Carl Gustav antitank gun. now for this gun be a clone, i can not say if this is true, i have to se the buffer at the buttstock,,the gun had a special buffer, because of two things, to make the life better/longer for the scope, and because we had two types of 7,62 ammo, one,, the standard that was used in the G3, and the war version, that is loaded hotter than the G3 version, the hot ammo was for the MG62, and the sniper (finskytte) for the silent closing devise, its not if the bolt didnt close, it will never close if you let the bolt slide SILENTLY forward using the charging handle, due to the roller mechanism, you ride it slowly and silent forward, close the charging handle , and then push with the thump the bolt fully into battery ,, using a hk gun using the slamming style, lets the enemy hear you from VERY far away,, thats also why the Norwegin wanted this cut,, its brilliant, and something you forgot to mention in the M16 debate if a forward assist is needed, i will say,, i dont want to be killed, because the enemy did hear me slamming a bolt forward,, i prefer to slooowly ride the charging handle on my C7 ( Canadian M16 ) , and then to fully close the bolt, use the forward assist ;o) i prefer to live, and dont be killed because some found a reason to cheap out on the production,, the same goes for hunting with a ar style gun, changing ammo due to different game, it can be dine silently ,,again better have it and not need it, than need it and not have it ;o) yes the M16 needs a forward assist, without you might die,, and in stupid way that is ,O(
    4
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1