General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
natalie khanyola
LegalEagle
comments
Comments by "natalie khanyola" (@nataliekhanyola5669) on "LegalEagle" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
How is this not impartial??? Criticizing trump is not necessarily political. The same goes for biden or any other political figure. It's within reason for a lawyer, or anyone for that matter, to disagree with the decision of a political person/ leader. You trumpsters just don't like it when your daddy figure is called out for his fuckery.
5
No we're not. Trump has pardoned multiple war criminals and other deplorable individuals. That's not a political take, that's a FACT. Something you trump supporters are incapable of grasping. You don't have to be liberal or a democrat to criticize trumps decisions, It's also not sacrilege to do so.
4
@daboi9172 um... did you actually watch the video, legal eagle explains his position very well. Also, a puff piece for low informed people would be anything on news max or OAN. their entire organisation is built around feeding their low I.q audience garbage and mis-information.
3
Chelsea manning is not a war criminal or murderer. She did not execute inoccebt men, women and children.
3
Yes because activist who protest injustice, bigotry and racism have no reason to riot, but MALDING trump supporters who can't accept the outcome of the election, their daddy figure losing, do . Lol....😂🤣🤣🤣 Also the average americans have spoken, they've voted for Biden because he's the PRESIDENT they wanted. All 83 million if them. Trump spent his entire campaign and presidency shitting on entire groups of people but it's his supporters that have the right to feel offended. 🙄🙄🤥🤥🤥🤥
3
Also how is he depraved???
3
If disliking war criminals and murders if a liberal position, then I'm glad I'm liberal. You trumpsters love criminals when your daddy figure approves of them or when they kill innocent people. The "all lives matter" crowd ladies and gentlemen.
2
@massimo4307 most of the general public approve if government aid and regulation. We live in a society, most libertarians can't understand that. Also without the presence of a government capitalism would seize to exist, even capitalists economists admit that.
2
@massimo4307 So I guess the 89% of the population that approve if public services are leeches. Also if the majority of the population "volunteer " to pay taxes what's the issue????? Especially when they use those services daily. The only leeches i see are the billionaires that pay nothing in tax yet collect government subsidies. Willingly Paying into a system is not the same as theft, sorry. Also what society in history has ever existed in a way that would meet a libertarians standard???Just name one please. P s I'm 22 years old.
2
Why though???? You haven't given a reason.
2
So the war criminals who killed innocent civilians and were rightfully prosecuted for it, don't deserve to be jailed. Wow 🙄🙄🙄😒😒😒 I guess crime and murder is bad unless trump pardons those who do it. Republican logic 101.
2
Like what in particular?????
2
@massimo4307 you're right I'm not a liberal, I'm progressive. Also the same could be said for conservatives who deplore big government when it comes to serving the public but love to funnel billions to corporations via bail outs and subsidies. I however like it when there's a robust social safety net instead of a bloated military budget.
1
@massimo4307 what happens when the markets melt down and require billions to stabilise them???? Also I'm guessing you're a libertarian, which is even worse than a conservative. The markets require billions annually in subsidies to sustain them but I guess you don't mind that. Also takes aren't stolen money, They're given to public services that we all use. Except when the private sector loots it but you probably don't care about that either.
1
@massimo4307 well first, most boomers are right leaning you'de probably find more boomer libertarians than progressives, usually. The figure was by the associated press and study done by Harvard law. Cirporaruins not paying taxes yet benefiting from government subsidies or ball outs, including the resent trillions of dollars of stimulus given to them and wall street, seems like leeching to me. Safety nets ensure up ward mobility. look at the effect the new deal had on American prosperity amount other government policies. Many developing nations are capitalist yet fail to prosper, I happen to come from one if them. You want to know what made western countries more successful? A minimum wage, public education that astronomically increased the literacy rate of those countries. The abolition of child labour, Safer working conditions and access to healthcare, the exception being america. Just to name A few.
1
If libertarians don't want to live in a society, they should just opt out if it entirely. Live off the grid away from " big government" that's what anarchist societies did when they didn't want to assimilate into the main stream. Leave the rest of us to live in a fairer society with a meritocratic system.
1
@massimo4307 last I checked, Reagan increased the deficit by $3 billion the highest of any president since Washington, increasing it by over 3 times. He outsourced jobs and turned America's economy from being one of the world's largest manufacturer's to the largest debt economies. -The 1987 crash would say otherwise about his great economy. -Unemployment rose from 4% to 9% -Escalation of the war on drugs saw mass incarceration sky rocket. -His pathetic AIDS responce resulted in it being the largest public health crusts in American history, something we still grape with today. -Iran contra -He left with a 49% approval rating. Trickle down economics is horse shit.
1
@massimo4307 Italy's economy is still better that any libertarian country e.g Chile. And Germany has a similar structure in terms of a social safely net and leads Europe in being an economic power house. Italy has also had a conservative capitalist business man as president for multiple years. Until 2018. Labour rights did more to advance human rights and workers freedom than capitalism ever did. The reason people can afford to educate their children and increase the national literacy rate us because of a thing called... PUBLIC EDUCATION. plus progressive era policies that made child labour illegal. It's funny how libertarians think that companies great the BEST products for their consumers when in reality it's more like companies mass produce products to earn a profit, no matter how good or bad it is. Apple iPhones are technologically inefficient and need to be replaced very 3 years, it's literally company policy and an industry secret. Fast food and soda is one of the most unhealthiest industries in the world. As are many mass produced products. If you think the aim of most corporations is to create great products that are healthy for their consumers, you're not very bright. The goal is to make money at any cost. Even if it means selling toxic goods that are bad for us and the environment. Just look at multiple cars if corporations selling a product that is lethal. E.g thalidomide.
1
@massimo4307 I tried reading Friedman but I prefer C.S Lewis and Tolkien for fantasy novelists, more grounded in reality.
1
@massimo4307 libertarians: wanting M4A, Higher taxes, a large social safety net, a Living minimum wage and well fare, e.t.c is socialist Also libertarians: Sweden and Nordic countries that have all those things and more are CAPITALIST. Me: so can we have those same policies???? Libertarians: REEEEEE ThaTs ComMuList, reeeeeeeeeeeee. Libertarian logic 101. Also Sweden isn't a capitalist country but one that uses a mixed economy. It's more socialist than Italy in that regard. The minimum wage for service industry workers.. $25- $30 an hour. They also have some of the world's strongest labour unions, like Germany.
1
@massimo4307 yes I did, and it acknowledges the fact that Sweden has a mixed economy. Yes it obviously has a private sector but all the other things I mentioned are true As well. Did you bother to properly respond to my comment. Also, Chile was considered a libertarian/ free market heaven by Friedman himself. Friedman praised Pinochet as did other conservative/ libertarian leaders and Austrian/ supply side economists, including Reagan. How comes poor capitalist countries are much worse off than rich mixed economic countries. E.g Nordic and western European countries. Most if not all 3rd world countries are capitalist. If Chile isn't libertarian then what country would qualify as being one?
1
@doomshroom7682 you mean telling the truth about the Iraq war and how bush/ republicans lied us into it????🤔🤔🤔 She did the American public a favour by exposing the rot within government and the military. Now we know why we go to wars and it isn't for democracy or human rights, it's for resources and capitalism. War is a racket, always has been. - General smedley butler.
1
@noahdoucot3528 ok... enjoy Biden's presidency. 😁😂😂🤣
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All