Youtube comments of The Flint (@theflint7405).

  1. 439
  2. 349
  3. 292
  4. 196
  5. 140
  6. 98
  7. 94
  8. 86
  9. 76
  10. 74
  11. 67
  12. 62
  13. 60
  14. 59
  15. 58
  16. 57
  17. 55
  18. 55
  19. 49
  20. 48
  21. 44
  22. 43
  23. 42
  24. 41
  25. 38
  26. 37
  27. 37
  28. 37
  29. 36
  30. 36
  31. 35
  32. 34
  33. 34
  34. 33
  35. 31
  36. 31
  37. 31
  38. 31
  39. 31
  40. 31
  41. 29
  42. 29
  43. 28
  44. 28
  45. 25
  46. 25
  47. 25
  48. 25
  49. 24
  50. 24
  51. 24
  52. 23
  53. 22
  54. 22
  55. 22
  56. 22
  57. 21
  58. 21
  59. 21
  60. 21
  61. 20
  62. 20
  63. 20
  64. 20
  65. 20
  66. 19
  67. 19
  68. 19
  69. 18
  70. 18
  71. 18
  72. 18
  73. 18
  74. 18
  75. 17
  76. 17
  77. 16
  78. 16
  79. 16
  80. 16
  81. Of course Ukraine should have defended itself, but I think this war could have been avoided all together. With help of the EU, US and Nato their former democratically elected prime minister Yanukovuch was kicked out, also with help of neo-nazi's. In the west we aren't that picky who we use to get what we want, whether it is Al Quaida, Taliban or whatever extremist group can do our dirty business. The EU made sure Ukraine would choose to go west, instead they should have helped Ukraine be a bridge between the east and west, between Russia and Europe. It was possible, but they just wanted Ukraine on their side, just as Russia wanting them to be east oriented. The EU saw big potential in Ukraine, because of the cheap farm land, natural resources and cheap labour. And beside that Ukraine had/has much looser enviornmental laws and much less strict laws for labour (safety), which cost big companies in the west a lot of money. That is why the west wanted and still wants Ukraine, not because Russia attacked it. They never helped Moldova or Georgia against the Russian, because there was nothing in it for the west, nothing to earn! Now the west is paying billions to Ukraine, but it is no charity. No no it is an investment(loans)! Zelensky had to sign contracts, which grants US companies, like BlackRock and JP Morgan amongst others to rebuild the country after the war. Not Ukrainian companies, no western countries will rebuild Ukraine. These same companies owm the weapon manufacturers, so they win no matter what. They have also demanded the privatisation of all state-owned enterprises such as infrastructure, public transport, etc, etc. And of course these same companies will buy them up. But Ukraine can never repay the loans, so it is also possible that they will then demand the state-owned enterprises as repayment of the loan. Now because of the war, prices for land has gone down a lot and who buys it up, whilst a war is raging? Yes of course the same companies. Ukraine is a cashcow first class, that is why the west fights for it. They pull the same trick out of their hat as in Iraq, bomb the land and infrastructure and then your puppet politician you put in place will grant you the contracts to buy their companies, land and to rebuild what you helped to destroy. I weep for Ukraine, the Russians destroyed so much, but their so called allies and friends are skimming their money under the guise of fighting for you and helping you. It is a rotten world we live in!
    15
  82. 15
  83. 15
  84. 15
  85. 15
  86. 15
  87. 15
  88. 15
  89. 14
  90. 14
  91. 14
  92. 14
  93. 13
  94. 13
  95. 13
  96. 13
  97. 13
  98. 13
  99. 13
  100. 13
  101. 13
  102. 13
  103. 12
  104. 12
  105. 12
  106. 12
  107. 12
  108. 12
  109. 12
  110. 11
  111. 11
  112. 11
  113. 11
  114. 11
  115. 11
  116. 11
  117.  @tctommie68  De vraag is wat hoort hier? Er bestaat niet zoals dit of dat hoort hier niet. Over de eeuwen zijn er soorten gekomen en soorten gegaan. 4000 jaar geleden werd er volop graan geteeld op de Shetland eilanden omdat het warmer was dan vandaag. Daarna werd het weer koeler en was het heel lange tijd niet mogelijk omdat het te koud was. In de kleine ijstijd van ongeveer 1600 tot 1850 verdwenen er ook veel soorten uit Nederland, later kwamen ze weer terug. Veel weersextremen in de middeleeuwen brachtem ook verandering met zich mee, zoals de sint Elizabeth vloed, dat veranderde de natuur en het landschap drastisch. Natuurlijk verandert de natuur ook door mensen, het feit dat u en ik hier wonen in een huis en er een stoep en weg naar ons huis loopt heeft de natuur voor goed veranderd. De natuur verandert ook door de komst van dieren, door aalscholvers zit er nu minder vis in de meren hier vlakbij en is het eiland waar zij op broeden verandert in een woestenij. De vele ganzen veranderen de natuur hier ook. Als er geen mens ooit in Nederland had geleefd, dan waren er veel minder diersoorten geweest, dan we nu hebben. Veel soorten doen het goed dankzij de mens of die zijn hier puur en alleen omdat er mensen zijn. De vraag is of iets goed of slecht is, natuurvervuiling is slecht dat moge duidelijk zijn. Maar door alles wat we doen verandert de natuur. Mijn dorp is gebouwd was vroeger duingebied was, andere dorpen en steden waar vroeger bos, moeras of water was. Alles heeft invloed op elkaar. Nu El Ninjo brengt veel nattigheid en verandert nu de natuur weer, mogelijk tijdelijk. Wie zal het zeggen? De natuur is altijd aan verandering onderhevig geweest, de vraag is wat goed of slecht is? Wat een goede balans is? Natuurvervuiling moet aangepakt worden, net als verspilling. Maar we moeten ook reeël zijn dat we in een heel druk land leven en we niet terug kunnen gaan naar de natuur van 2000 jaar geleden, we hebben een goede balans nodig.
    11
  118. 10
  119. 10
  120. 10
  121. 10
  122. 10
  123. 10
  124. 10
  125. 10
  126. 10
  127. 10
  128. 10
  129. 9
  130. 9
  131. 9
  132. 9
  133. 9
  134. 9
  135. 9
  136. 9
  137. 9
  138. 9
  139. 9
  140. 9
  141. 9
  142. 8
  143. 8
  144. 8
  145. 8
  146. 8
  147. 8
  148. 8
  149. 8
  150. 8
  151. 8
  152. 8
  153. 8
  154. 8
  155. 7
  156. 7
  157. 7
  158. 7
  159. 7
  160. 7
  161. 7
  162. 7
  163. 7
  164. 7
  165. 7
  166. 7
  167. 7
  168. 7
  169.  @johnelliott5859  I looked everywhere, but I haven't heard one skeptic who was able to change my mind. That doesn't mean I know it all, far from it. But the skeptics and new atheists did not have any convincing arguments for example. If someone has a good argument, I am open to it, but often I hear the same 'attacks'. The Bible condemns human sacrifice. but I guess you meant the story with Abraham and Isaac. This wasn't a call for human sacrifice, it was a test as most rabbis say and most Bible scholars. Abraham said 'God will provide' and that is what he called the place. But skeptic always refute this, just cherry pick. That is often the case, (I don't say you do, but most do) people take one sentence and then say 'see this is what it means, the Bible is wrong'. Or the Bible contradicts itself. Well don't we all? I have said things which seem contradictory if you take them out of context. I can name dozens of instances I said something in the past, where I seem to contradict myself. And if taken out of context by people who don't know me, well it surely could seem that way. The Bible is clear on human sacrifice: it is wrong. There are enough verses which condemns it, but if people take the Abraham and Isaac story out of context and ignore the rest of scripture, then who is wrong,, the Bible or them? Some laws seem to contradict others too in the USA, UK or Netherlands where I am from. Of course you can say 'you see, our laws contradict itself'. But it is often the context of the law, which can be explained by the people who studied to understand the law: judges, prosecutors, lawyers, etc. Genesis 22: 8 Abraham answered, “God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son.” And the two of them went on together. Deuteronomy 12:31 You must not worship the LORD your God in their way (the old pagan ways of the Canaanites), because in worshiping their gods, they do all kinds of detestable things the LORD hates. They even burn their sons and daughters in the fire as sacrifices to their gods. Deuteronomy 18:9 When you enter the land the LORD your God is giving you, do not learn to imitate the detestable ways of the nations there. 10 Let no one be found among you who sacrifices their son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, Leviticus 18:21 “‘Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Molek, for you must not profane the name of your God. I am the LORD. Leviticus 20:1The LORD said to Moses, 2 “Say to the Israelites: ‘Any Israelite or any foreigner residing in Israel who sacrifices any of his children to Molek is to be put to death. 2 Kings 21: 1 Manasseh was twelve years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem fifty-five years. His mother’s name was Hephzibah. 2 HE DID EVIL IN THE EYES OF THE LORD, following the detestable practices of the nations the LORD had driven out before the Israelites. 3 He rebuilt the high places his father Hezekiah had destroyed; he also erected altars to Baal and made an Asherah pole, as Ahab king of Israel had done. He bowed down to all the starry hosts and worshiped them. 4 He built altars in the temple of the LORD, of which the LORD had said, “In Jerusalem I will put my Name.” 5 In the two courts of the temple of the LORD, he built altars to all the starry hosts. 6 He sacrificed his own son in the fire, practiced divination, sought omens, and consulted mediums and spiritists. He did much evil in the eyes of the LORD, arousing his anger. 16 Moreover, Manasseh also shed so much innocent blood that he filled Jerusalem from end to end—besides the sin that he had caused Judah to commit, so that they did evil in the eyes of the LORD. 2 Chronicles 28:1 Ahaz was twenty years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem sixteen years. Unlike David his father, he did not do what was right in the eyes of the LORD. 2 He followed the ways of the kings of Israel and also made idols for worshiping the Baals. 3 He burned sacrifices in the Valley of Ben Hinnom and sacrificed his children in the fire, ENGAGING IN THE DETESTABLE PRACTICES OF THE NATIONS the LORD had driven out before the Israelites. 4 He offered sacrifices and burned incense at the high places, on the hilltops and under every spreading tree. 2 Chronicles 33:6 He (Manasseh) sacrificed his children in the fire in the Valley of Ben Hinnom, practiced divination and witchcraft, sought omens, and consulted mediums and spiritists. HE DID MUCH EVIL IN HE EYES OF THE LORD, arousing his anger. Jeremiah 7:30 “‘The people of Judah have done evil in my eyes, declares the LORD. They have set up their detestable idols in the house that bears my Name and have defiled it. 31 They have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire—something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind. Psalm 106: 37 They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to false gods. 38 They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters, whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan, and the land was desecrated by their blood. 39 They defiled themselves by what they did; by their deeds they prostituted themselves. 40 Therefore the LORD was angry with his people and abhorred his inheritance. Ezekiel 23:37 For they have committed adultery, and blood is on their hands. With their idols they have committed adultery, and they have even offered up to them for food the children whom they had borne to me. The Bible doesn't paint a positive picture of most people in the Bible, it doesn't try to white wash anything. Abraham made many mistakes, as did Lot, Isaac, Jacob, David, Moses, etc, most of them were poster boys for how to live a good life. It is written down, so we can learn from their mistakes. But we don't, we humans keep on making the same mistakes over and over. But the Bible is clear about human sacrifice, it is wrong. And in the New Testament Jesus shows how it is done properly.
    7
  170. 7
  171. 6
  172. 6
  173. 6
  174. 6
  175. 6
  176. 6
  177. 6
  178. 6
  179. 6
  180. 6
  181. 6
  182. 6
  183. 6
  184. 6
  185. 6
  186. 6
  187. 6
  188. 6
  189. 6
  190. 6
  191. 6
  192. 6
  193. 6
  194. 6
  195. 6
  196. 6
  197. 6
  198. 6
  199. 6
  200. 6
  201. 5
  202. 5
  203. 5
  204. 5
  205. 5
  206. 5
  207. 5
  208. 5
  209. 5
  210. 5
  211. 5
  212. 5
  213. 5
  214. 5
  215. 5
  216. 5
  217. 5
  218. 5
  219. 5
  220. 5
  221. 5
  222. 5
  223. 5
  224. 5
  225. 5
  226. 5
  227. 5
  228. 5
  229. 5
  230. 5
  231. 5
  232. 5
  233. Toen de Sovjets raketten op Cuba zette, toen dreigde de VS met totale oorlog. Maar NAVO wil heel Rusland omringen en dan zijn zij de extremisten? We zijn zo verdomd hypocriet in het Westen. Maar ja, we leven niet in een democratie, we mogen wel stemmen, maar her grootkapitaal en de globalisten maken hier de dienst uit. Wilders wilde stoppen met de oorlog, maar toen zei Rutte "zonder steun aan Oekraine komt er geen kabinet Wilders". Dus dat is het bewijs dat we niet in een echte volwaardige democratie leven. De NCTv is een soort stasi aan het worden, die kritische mensen als vijanden van de staat bestempeld "anti-institutioneel extremist". Welke mafketel die term bedacht heeft, die zou een een hoofdrol moeten krijgen in de verfilming van 1984 van George Orwell" En al onze invasies in Irak, Afghanistan, plat bombarderen van Servië (de genocide werd zwaar overdreven, er was geen op handen zijnde genocide en de Kosovaren vielen zelf ook Serviërs aan. ), allemaal zonder VN mandaat. Maar het is oké als wij het doen, want wij zijn de goeden toch......? Echt niet, wij zijn niet de goeden, wij zijn de grootste hypocrieten op de planeet. Ik ben geen Poetin vriend, maar van Rutte, Johnson, Biden, enz ben ik dat ook niet. Wij hebben zitten stoken in Oekraine in 2013 en 2014 en steunden zelfs de neonazi, die een DEMOCRATISCH GEKOZEN president hebben verjaagd. Nu proberen de EU en NAVO en CIA dat trucje te herhalen in Georgië. Want verkiezingen zijn leuk, maar niet als ze niet voor het Westen kiezen. Dan mag een land in chaos gestort worden. Ja Rusland doet die dingen ook, maar het Westen dus ook. Is het nou zo moeilijk om die landen een brugfunctie te laten vervullen tussen het Westen, Rusland en Azië? Het had gekund, maar de neocons hadden een appeltje te schillen met Rusland. En de VS had een vijand nodig om hun 'wereldmacht' te rechtvaardigen en wie was dat beter dan Rusland? Een neutraal Oekraïne, als brug van oost naar west, had daar alle vruchten van kunnen plukken op economische als cultureel gebied. Maar ja, het mocht niet zo zijn. En kijk wat er nu van over is, dankzij de strijd zijn er 600.000 doden, ligt het halve land plat, kopen de Westerse bedrijven voor een prikkie grond, mijnen, enzovoorts op en vernietigd Rusland de rest. Dus de Oekrainers zitten tussen 2 vuren en zijn de klos van machtpolitiek van andere landen. Zalig de vredestichters, wajt zij zullen kinderen van God genoemd worden...... Helaas hebben we hier te maken met oorloghitsers...
    5
  234. 5
  235. 5
  236. 5
  237.  @mohammedxiii  So, then Jesus accepted blasphemy according to you. That is weird the prophet of God not correcting his followers and nobody else correcting them too when they blasphemed God! Everywhere in the Bible people got punished for blaspheming God, but Jesus, the great prophet and son of God didn't correct them? And you said earlier he kept the law. Then he didn't keep the law, because he let people think he is God, when he is not. And so according to you he is a liar and a sinner. 1 Samuel 3:13 For I told him that I would judge his family forever because of the sin he knew about; his sons blasphemed God,[a] and he failed to restrain them. Exodus 22:28 “Do not blaspheme God or curse the ruler of your people. John 10:33 “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.” If he wasn't God, then why didn't he just speak out 'No, I am not God or God's son, because that is blasphemy'. He didn't aknowlegded he was God's Son: Mark 14: 61 Again the high priest asked him, “Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?” 62 “I am,” said Jesus. “And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.” 63 The high priest tore his clothes. “Why do we need any more witnesses?” he asked. 64 “You have heard the blasphemy. What do you think?” They all condemned him as worthy of death. 65 Then some began to spit at him; they blindfolded him, struck him with their fists, and said, “Prophesy!” And the guards took him and beat him. If people fell on their knees for angels, then the angels said 'don't do this'. When people fell on their knees for the disciples when they healed somone, they said 'stop'. But the greatest prophet just ignored that? It doesn't make sense and is just simply showing you don't want to accept the truth. Truth is people worshiped Jesus and Jesus accepted it. He was the one without sin, if he accepted worship from people he WOULD NOT BE WITHOUT SIN and he would BLASPHEME GOD. So, either Jesus is no prophet at all and he is on big fraud or he is who he says he is. It is either one. Jesus said 'believe in me', no prophet ever said 'believe in me'. Believing is worshiping.
    5
  238. 5
  239. 5
  240. 5
  241. 5
  242. 5
  243. 5
  244. 5
  245. 5
  246. 4
  247. 4
  248. 4
  249. 4
  250. 4
  251. 4
  252. 4
  253. 4
  254. 4
  255. 4
  256. 4
  257. 4
  258. 4
  259. 4
  260. 4
  261. 4
  262. 4
  263. 4
  264. 4
  265. 4
  266. 4
  267. 4
  268. 4
  269. 4
  270. 4
  271. 4
  272. 4
  273. 4
  274. 4
  275. 4
  276. 4
  277. 4
  278. 4
  279. 4
  280. 4
  281. 4
  282. 4
  283. 4
  284. 4
  285. 4
  286. 4
  287. 4
  288. 4
  289. 4
  290. 4
  291. 4
  292. 4
  293. 4
  294. 4
  295. 4
  296. 4
  297. 4
  298. 4
  299. 4
  300. Ik denk dat de media arrogant zijn geworden en zich boven de bevolking verheven hebben. Daarom zijn ze veel minder kritisch geworden en vinden ze het helemaal niet erg om de grens op te zoeken en zelfs over te gaan, want zij zien zichzelf als de goeden en in die rol vinden zij dat het geoorloofd is voor het algemeen belang. Hoeveel leugens over Trump verspreid zijn, is ongelooflijk. Maar de media heeft zo een hekel aan die man, dat ze dat helemaal niet uitmaakt. Dat komt omdat hij een paar zenders beschuldigde van nepnieuws. Hij is een bijzonder heerschap en gebruikte de term fake news ook ten onrechte, maar hij had ook zeker gelijk dat ze over hem logen. Maar de media heeft nooit spijt betuigd over de leugens of hun collega's bekritiseerd? Nee, geen een keer. Turmp zou betaald worden door de Russen, was allemaal gelogen. Hij zou zich hebben onder laten plassen door dames van lichte zeden. Ook gelogen. En zo zijn er velen, maar ze komen er mee weg. Vaak plaatsen ze het tussen aanhalingsteken 'Trump of Baudet zou dit of dat' en dan hebben ze niet gelogen, maar wel duidelijk leugens verkocht als het niet klopt. Dan vraag je je toch af waarom ze dat doen? Als zij inderdaad duidelijk iets raars doen, dan moet het nieuws zijn. Maar als het van horen zeggen is, dan moet de media het niet plaatsen volgens hun eigen regels. Maar daar houden ze zich allang niet meer aan. De media is een kliek geworden, die zich onaantastbaar waande en dat is precies waar het fout is gegaan en zij in veel gevallen hun objectiviteit verloren zijn, helaas. En nee, ik ben geen Trump fan. Maar als de media (ook in Nederland) beweert dat hij gezegd heeft dat neo-nazi's prima mensen zijn, dan is dat een grove leugen. Ik heb de toespraak 10x terug geluisterd en hij heeft het NOOIT GEZEGD, hij veroordeelde die mensen wel degelijk. CNN had zitten knippen in die toespraak, zodat het leek of hij het zei, maar de Nederlandse media geloofd CNN en MSNBC op hun blauwe ogen, terwijl die gewoon onzin verkopen. Fox bekritiseren ze altijd, maar dat komt omdat dat een rechtse zender is, maar linkse zenders die net zo erg of erger zijn dan Fox, daar slikt de Nederlandese media alles van voor zoete koek. De hoofdredacteuren van de Nederlandse kranten waren blij dat Trump van Twitter werd geknikkerd, maar vinden het prima dat de Taliban, Iran en Hamas erop zaten. Dus onze eigen media riep op tot censuur, wat ze ook deden met ON. Een van de hoofdredacteuren ging zelfs zover dat hij zeker wist dat Trump door de Russen betaald, ondanks dat er niets gevonden is. Dus de geheime diensten zijn allemaal zo dom, dat zij niets vinden, maar die redacteur weet het wel? Kom op zeg!? En later kwam het Steel dossier naar buiten en bleek alles gelogen. Enige zelfreflectie in de media dat zij jarenlang leugens hadden verkondigd? Enige spijt? Helemaal niets! Er is geen zelfreinigend vermogen in de media en geen zelfkennis. Ik draag de vrije pers een warm hart toe, maar zij hebben hun taak enorm verzaakt!
    3
  301. 3
  302. 3
  303.  @simonslater9024  Complete lies and heresy, nowhere in thr Bible it is mentioned salvation will be granted if you join the Roman church, you can ONLY receive salvation through the believe in Christ, NOTHING ELSE! Romans 10: 9 IF YOU DECLARE WITH YOUR MOUTH, “Jesus is Lord,” and BELIEVE IN YOUR HEART that God raised him from the dead, YOU WILL BE SAVED. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved. 11 As Scripture says, “Anyone who believes in him will never be put to shame.”[e] 12 For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, 13 for, “EVERYONE WHO CALLES ON THE NAME OF THE LORD WILL SAVED" Acts 4: 10 It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified but whom God raised from the dead, that this man stands before you healed. 11 Jesus is “‘the stone you builders rejected, which has become the cornerstone.’ 12 Salvation is found in no one else, for there is NO OTHER NAME under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.” 1 John 3:. 21 Dear friends, if our hearts do not condemn us, we have confidence before God 22 and receive from him anything we ask, because we keep his commands and do what pleases him. 23 And this is his command: to believe in the name of his Son, Jesus Christ, and to love one another as he commanded us. 24 The one who keeps God’s commands lives in him, and he in them. And this is how we know that he lives in us: We know it by the Spirit he gave us. NOWHERE is mentioned join he Catholic church, nowhere. All who believe will be saved through Jesus Christ. It is a heresy what you are preaching and you are downgrading Christ, bcs you put a church in between people and salvation.
    3
  304. 3
  305. 3
  306. 3
  307. 3
  308. 3
  309. 3
  310. 3
  311. 3
  312. 3
  313. 3
  314. 3
  315. 3
  316. 3
  317. 3
  318. 3
  319. 3
  320. 3
  321. 3
  322. 3
  323. 3
  324. 3
  325. 3
  326. 3
  327. 3
  328. 3
  329. 3
  330. If diversity is such a strength, than why do we need stricter laws to protect us from new comers who brought terrorism to our streets and people who address these problems? These diversity cult leaders ,live in the most monotome streets and neighbourhoods you can find. And if they have a migrant as neighbour, it is a ceo of Shell Nigeria or so. But the diversity they preach isno diversity at all, they want the independent nation states gone and mono culture too. Instead they want the world to embrace multiculturalism and diversity. So they want the whole world to be the same. That is no diversity, it is conformaty. I want real dicersity, like we had until 50 years ago. The Netherlands were distinct from England, Scotland from Norway, Norway from Germany, Europe from Africa from Asia. We had our distinct cultures, habbits, customs, quisine, clothes and language. Now it is all the same, the same shops, same boring fashion, same food, same fastood restaurants and diy mega stores, same snacks and the same melting pot everywhere. In Frankfurt you see all kinds of migrant shops, you have here too or in France and England. So, is that diversity if it is all the same? Of course not, it is a scam, divide and conquer. They create chaos by setting natives against migrants, skin colour against skin colour and than they bring the solution with more controle stricter laws and less freedom, bcs our freedom, our abikity to think for ourselves, that is the problem, they even said so several times.
    3
  331. 3
  332. 3
  333. 3
  334. 3
  335. 3
  336. 3
  337. 3
  338. 3
  339. 3
  340. 3
  341. 3
  342. 3
  343. 3
  344. 3
  345. 3
  346. 3
  347. 3
  348. 3
  349. 3
  350. 3
  351. 3
  352. 3
  353. 3
  354. 3
  355. 3
  356. 3
  357. 3
  358. 3
  359. 3
  360. 3
  361. 3
  362. 3
  363. 3
  364. 3
  365. 3
  366. 3
  367. 3
  368. 3
  369. Gaan we nou ook al twijfelen of Assad een dictator is? Ik heb echt geen idee wat ik nog van jullie moet denken. Sympathie voor Rusland - 600.000 doden aan Oekraïnse zijde, terwijl jullie beweren dat Israel genocide pleegt, maar nu Assad geen dictator is met 800.000 doden in de burgeroorlog. Het is perceptie......ja ja Flavio.......vertel dat aan alle families die mensen hebben verloren. Israel doet aan schending van territoriale schending zijn, maar als Rusland het doet, dan is het prima aldus Gietelink. Israel pleegt genocide met 35.000 doden, maar Rusland met 600.000 doden door Russische agressie, daar heeft Ab nog steeds wel begrip voor, zij konden immers niet anders. Nee, nee, dat is geen genoice, en nu zelfs 100.000en doden door Assad is zelf niet echt waar, dat is perceptie. Hebben jullie zelf niet door hoe ver julkie afgedwaald zijn. Je ziet het bij veel kanalen die zogenaamd tegenwicht tegen de reguliere media moesten bieden, want dat was allemaal veel te links en veel te bevooroordeeld, maar ondertussen is de alternatieve media zelf net zo geworden als waar ze de reguliere media van beschuldigden. Ze steunen vaak Andrew Tate, de loverboy, die meiden verleidde om achter de webcam van alles te doen, wat je je dochter niet wilt zien doen. Ook Candace is een held, tja, veel smerige antisemitische complottheorieën als zij verkoopt, die vind je niet snel. Israel was gesticht volgens haar als uitvalbasis voor pedofielen. Verzin het maar.....maar mag allemaal niet baten: zij is anti-woke, dus een held, net als Tate.... Nu zijn Trump en Musk de helden. Maar niemand die vragen stelt of Musk wel aan hun zijde staat en of hij hiet te veel macht heeft. Nee, hij is anti-woke, zegt wat rake dingen en hop, hij staat aan onze kant en is onze held. Hoe gemakkelijk de mensen anderen tot bondgenoten en helden verheffen ontgaat mij volkomen..... Kan iemand mij uitleggen waarom Klaus Schwab een enge man is omdat hij een transhumanist is, maar Musk is een held, ondanks dat hij OOK een transhumanist is. Die voor het gemak de leider wordt van ds digitale wereld. Wat zei Schwab ook alweer? Wie de eerste komt met een goede app voor de metaverse, die zal de online wereld overheersen. Musk: Tesla bots (die veel van de kijkers van Blckbx binnen 5 tot 10 jaar werkeloos zullen maken) Tesla (die chauffeurs werkeloos zullen maken) Neuralink, om ons te koppelen aan het internet uiteindelijk (internet of bodies, weten jullie nog wie dat ook zei? Juist Schwab...) Starlink, vele duizenden satelieten die de wereld in de gaten houden.....nee hoor, niets te zien xAI en zijn nieuwe Collosus, het AI centrum van Musk Gork die ChatGPT zal verslaan SpaceX Waarom zijn jullie zo naief over Musk? Leg eens uit hoe Musk iets van 8 enorme bedrijven heeft, maar tijd heeft zat heeft om met Trump op campagne te gaan, interviews van 2,5 uur te houden, uren bezig is om te twitteren en twitterberichten te lezen, 11 of 12 kinderen heeft en ook nog eens nr 1 in het spel Diablo IV is, wat je volgens kenners niet kan redden met 3 uur per dag spelen. Alleen als je werkeloos bent heb je tijd genoeg om zo ver te komen heb ik me laten vertellen. Dus jullie denken echt dat Musk al die bedrijven leidt? Duren zijn dagen 240 uur? Nee? Hoe doet hij dat dan? Hij heeft zijn mensen ervoor? Ja, en die hoeven niet aangestuurd te worden en er hoeft geen wekelijks overleg te zijn? Hij gaat nu als minister aan de slag. Wat weet hij van personeelsbeleid? Of gaat hij zijn bedrijven gebruiken om alles te automatiseren? En hoe heeft hij er tijd voor om minister te worden met zulke bedrijven?
    3
  370. 3
  371. 3
  372. 3
  373. 3
  374. 3
  375. 3
  376. 3
  377. 3
  378. 3
  379. 3
  380. 3
  381. 3
  382. 3
  383. 3
  384. 3
  385. 3
  386. 3
  387. 3
  388. 3
  389. 3
  390. 3
  391. 3
  392. 3
  393. 3
  394. 3
  395. 3
  396. 3
  397. 3
  398. 3
  399. 3
  400. 3
  401. 3
  402. 3
  403. 3
  404. 3
  405. 3
  406. 3
  407. 3
  408. 3
  409. 3
  410. 3
  411. 3
  412. 3
  413. 3
  414. 3
  415. 3
  416. 3
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. The video has several errors, sadly. It is obvious which sourches you used and which you ignored. Most scolars agree the gospels have not been written by eyewitnesses? That is simply not true, many scolars agree they did. The message of the Bible stayed the same, many of these so called errors are minor and doesn't change the message at all. And you forget to mention all the church fathers ot apostolic fathers if you will, like Polycarpus, Ireneus, etc. These were discipels from the discipels of Jesus. They wrote many letters themselves and also qouted the letters of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, etc. From these letters you can reconstruct the entire New Testament except for 7 sentences if I recall well. It is simply not true the gospels haven't been written by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Their own pupils/discipels mention they did write them. And now 2000 years later they say 'oh no, they did not', really? You mention Papias puts name on the gospel, but then you say we cannot check it, so 1900 later we say 'it is not true'. Bit simplistic. And they were written in Greek, so that proofs the discipels didn't write them? Luke spoke Greek, was an educated man. Paul spoke Greek. And it is said Mark wrote what Peter told him, although not chronological. John was a young man, he could have learned Greek. It is not all that far fetched, because the oldest fragment they found (John Ryland fragment) is from around 100-110 BC in Egypt. Some of the early church fathers said Matthew wrots in his own tongue and others translated it to the best of their ability. We have so many documents now, that we can reconstruct the Bible pretty well.
    2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. ​ @stephenfisher3721 It says Jesus is God incarnate, or God became flesh. God is all powerful, so He can present himself like whatever He desires. God visited Abraham and even ate with him. God is spirit and yet he appeared like a man, who ate food. He also walked in the garden with Adam and Eve. So it isn't a far fetched idea God becoming man. Don't forget physically Jesus was God's son, bcs through a miracle Mary became pregnant through the spirit of God. But His spirit was God, but his body was human. He says he and his Father are one. That is why the Jewish leaders wanted him dead, bcs they accused him of blasphemy bcs a human cannot claim to be God. John 10:33 “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God. - so this was before the crucificrion, they already tried tk stone him bcs he claimed to be God. If he wasn't God, then he would have said "of course I am not and torn his clothes, bcs it was blasphemy otherwise) John 14:Thomas said to him, “Lord, we don’t know where you are going, so how can we know the way?” 6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7 If you really know me, you will know[b] my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.” Matthew 26:The high priest said to him, “I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of God.” 64 “You have said so,” Jesus replied. “But I say to all of you: From now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.”[e] 65 Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “He has spoken blasphemy! Why do we need any more witnesses? Look, now you have heard the blasphemy. 66 What do you think?” “He is worthy of death,” they answered. According to the Bible Jesus is in heaven and has an exalted body according to the Bible. I hope this clarifies it a bit, but please ask on if your have more questions.
    2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571. 2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. Yes worship Elon Musk, your saviour. Damn elections and trust Elon instead. Labour won, f... it, trust Elon. Elon will set you all free. Maybe make some t-shirt and merch with "In Elon we trust"? Luckily there aren't problems in the US which needs his attention, no child abuse, no fentanyl problems, no huge child trafficing problems, no poverty, not 1 in 6 kids which goes to bed hungry, no people who cannot afford health or dental care, where their teeth fall out, no tent cities. No, the US is fine, that is why Elon focuses on Europe now, because he has so much time on his hands, his 6 large companies run themselves, has plenty of time campaigning with Trump, 11 or 12 children, tweeting several hours a day and playing Diablo IV also several hours a day (you don't reach nr1 like he did with less than 3 hours). So, this proves he has nothing better to do to worry and stoke division in Europe and tell who needs to be fired if they don't say yes and amen to him, like Farage. And his followers, well they don't care. He says a few things which they agree with, so they don't care about the rest, about children working in African mines for batteries, or the fact that thanks to Elon millions of jobs will vanish, nooooooooo, not important. His self driving cars and lorries, his robots and his xAI collosus will make millions of jobs obsolete, but we ignore this, because he is our hero. Taxi and lorry drivers, who needs them anyway? Cleaner, well robots can so better. Office jobs? Are you kidding me, xAI does it in a fraction of the time, doesn't need holidays nor sick leave. But at least Elon want a worldwide basic income, because he knows what he is doing. So, people get handouts from governments to do nothing. It will be enough to live, but not to thrive. But, but, but he is our hero, don't say these things abiut him. He did great things for us, you know....... "Like what?" Well you know......like.....uh.......like.......uh, well he did some great things......... "Like what exactly?" Well, he tweeted........ "Wait what, he tweeted?!" Yes, he did. "Wow and now he is your hero and saviour of mankind?" Well duh you are just a lefty and hater, you are envious at Elon. "Well no, not at all, I am rightwing, but I don't follow the pied piper, but instead of blowing the pipe, he tweets ahd throws money around and I am amazed how easily people on the right are so easily captured by someone like Elon, without any critical thinking. Funny really, his fans are all against the World Economic Forum, but Elon wants the same as them (also a trans humanist), but doesn't want to share the pie he wants it all If you let the rich decide the fate of your country, the rich will rule your country"
    2
  587. 2
  588.  @RufusTFirefly6843  You mean if HAMAS had not attacked Israel and did not take hostages. Yes, if HAMAS had not attacked, Israel would not have hit back! And if the Arabs didn't fool the Palestinian/Arabs in 1948 by attacking the Jews, because the Jews asked the British for a tiny piece of land. Then the Palestinians would have had their own land beside Israel from 1948 onwards. But the Arabs (who just got indepence from the British at the same time also after being being captured by the Ottomans for 100s of years) said hell no, Jews CANNOT have any land at all. And so they attacked the Jews, to drive them all into the sea (kill them all, just after the holocaust the muslims threatened the Jews with another genocide). They said to the Palestinians 'come to our lands, so we can wage war against the Jews and when we are done and the Jews gone, you can go back to your house and take the houses of the Jews too. 700.000 Palestinians listened to the lies of their muslim brethern from Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, etc and left. But against all odds the Jews won and weren't wiped of the face of the earth. And in laws of war, when you are being attacked and drive off the attackers and take their lands: it is yours to keep. So, now the Jews had more land, than where they asked for and Jordan and Egypt conquered the Gaza strip and Judea and Samara (they renamed it Westbank), where a lot of Palestinians lived. But the Palestinians who didn't leave, were allowed to stay by the Jews and became Israeli citizen with the same rights as the Jews. Now 2 million Israeli's are Palestinians/Arabs. But the Arabs/muslims were so angry they lost of the Jews of all people, that they kicked out 840.000 Jews from their own countries, from Syria, Iraq, Jordan to Egypt, Libya, Algiers, Morocco, etc. They had to leave everything behind! But they didn't attack anyone, nor did the Jews attack the Palestinians or Arabs in 1948. So, if you want to blame someone, blame the Arabs for the situation. Jews were attacked in the Middle East from the late 19th century all the way up to now. If HAMAS had not attacked Israel and raped, murdered, beheaded and set on fire 1200 people in Israel, the IDF would have done nothing at all. So, blame the right people. But about 35.000 - 40.000 Gazans have died, while almost 12 million people died of hunger since 7 October 2023, that is between 296 and 338 times as much as have died in Gaza. How many people/children of those millions of children who died of hunger did you try safe from starving? Did you safe any at all? Or you rather bought a flag, which helped absolutely nobody or maybe another Iphone of the newest Nike's or did you choose to go on holiday, while you could have used that money to stop children from starving?
    2
  589. @elijahfreeman5299  You must live in a very safe and peaceful neighbourhood that you can say such things. And is that custom that you put words in people's mouths and then judge them for what you made up they said? I never said it wasn't a big deal when people die, never. So stop lying! The IDF did their utmost best to stop civilians from dying and getting hurt, that you lie about that, that is on you. But okay. HAMAS attacked Israel, but now you blame the people who fight back. The IDF threw flyers out of planes to warn people they were about to attack and sending text messages to all phones. Tell me, which army does that after their people were raped, beheaded and set on fire, even babies? Tell me, please. You seem to know. Hamas uses civilians as human shields, even women and children and if they run away, they shoot them, yes they shoot them! So, what is Israel to do, when Hamas promised to repeat Oct 7 again and again and again? Please tell me, you seems to know a lot about war! Have you read the charter of Hamas? Here is a direct quotation, they think the end of times will come, when all Jews are dead. Allah's Messenger said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him." So, please again, tell me what could Israel have dons differently? If someone says they want to kill all the Jews, Jews no ONE THING, TO TAKS THEM SERIOUSLY! But you think they just targer civilians, because why exactly, because you believe the propaganda of Hamas, that is why. And again, what have you don't, beside complain about people dying in a war you don't understand and you blame the IDF, while the cause was Hamas. Or do you blame the British and Americans also for the German deaths in WWII? Or the fight against ISIS, people died then too. And if you are so concerned for people, what have you done to stop people from dying. Did you give money, did you keep your old Iphone 6s just like me, so you could help children in Africa? Or you just virtue signal on internet? Because complaining is easy, but actually helping others is a whole different story.
    2
  590. 2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. 2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. I stopped watching, I was soooo annoyed by these people, that I could not go on. They are delusional, don't like facts and there is one truth: West is bad. Then why they came to the West is beyond me, but hey....who am I? They are critisizing the country which took these people in......how grateful are these people?! it is the same if you that a hobo from the streets into your house and then he is telling you and your family are bad people and he is being oppressed and the food is bad. He would leave my house with a large boot print on his bottom. The West was first to abolish slavery, in Africa and Middle East slavery was abolished 120 years later. The islamoc slave trade started in the 7th century and went on to the 1970's, in the West the slavery lasted 300 years. To this day there are an estimate 60 milion people who are enslaved in mainly Africa, Middle East and Asia. But they don't care about that, theu don't care about facts. They rather blame countries who abolished slavery first, over a 160 years ago and who fought it elsewhere too, than be angry at the countries theu come from themselves. Because the West is bad.....blah blah blah. Delusional, delusional, delusional. If it is that bad here, then why do all these people come here? Watch how the Arabs treated there slaves https://youtu.be/dnDhuRUYQoE?si=bJznv0Iw3JPdMMBL The Ottamans enslaved millions of European people, the name slave comes from slav, bcs their capture mainly slavic people from Bulgaria, etc. And the islamic Barbary slave traders also captured 1,5 million Europeans who were sold in the Middle East. But that is ofc a lie, bcs the West is bad. So, then go east if it is that bad in the west!
    2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. Is it age or fame and money which influences? I think that ruins creativity more than age does. I know many bands which had to fight hard to break through, but the record after they became successful are almost always weaker than the record before. And ff course when you are young and just started playing music things are new and so I think you are more enthousiastic, the older you become things get more normal. I enjoyed music more than I do now, because it was all new. Metal, New Wave, Prog Rock, it was all new, but when did we see a new musical style evolve? People copy older styles, there is nothing really new. And there is so much music around us, that is the problem too. When I started to work 6 days a week and 8 to 12 hours a day, the radio was always on. When I got home, I was saturated and had no desire to put on a record. Before that I was at school and when I got home at 4 pm or later I was eager to put my radio on, but if I have listened to music 8 to 12 hours already, I have had more than enough. I wanted to turn the music off at work, but ky collegues couldn't live without it. And I hated it, music I didn't like and new songs played every our for 4 weeks, ughhh. If we eat turkey each and every day, it become normal, nothing special. But if we safe it for special occassions, it is great. So, we should have more time without music, so we enjoy the moments more when the music is on or we make music. Btw have your heard Andy Timmons his new album? That man still makes the most beautiful music, but sadly you never had him on your show. And what about U2? They renew themselves over and over. There are still people out there who didn't lose that creativity, but it comes all down to how much do you really love what you do and if people don't let themselves get saturated with too much music. It is the same with movies, before we had Netflix, we were eagerly awaiting new movies to come out in the theaters or for a new episode of which ever series. But then Netflix and other streaming services entered the market and we could watch movies and series 24/7, so it wasn't that special anymore. There is an overkill of music, movies, series, food, etc and that is what ruins everything!
    1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708.  @brahma_the_daughter_eater  No, but all you people can blame is Israel, you people don’t care about other wars and conflicts. But lets talk about apartheid states. The Jews have been treated badly in Europe, but also in the islamic world. After the holocaust some Jews fled to the British mandate of Palestine, where Jews have been living for over 3000 years. There never has been an independent Palestine. The last 2000 years it was annexed by several other peoples, the Romans, Persians, Byzantines, Arab muslims from 700 AD who conquered the place, then the Crusaders, muslims took it back again and later came the Ottomans, who were defeated in World War 1 and so the British took over. The name Palestine was given to the land as punishment for the Jewish revolt in 70AD. 1 million Jews were killed by the Romas and as extra punishment they renamed the land Palestine, which is Latin for Philistea (land of the Philistines). The Philistines were long gone and the Palestinians of today aren’t their decendents, they are Arabs. Philistines were Greeks. After the Holocaust Jews fled to what is now Israel to join their people there. They knew one thing after the pogroms and Holocaust, if we don't get a piece of land for ourselves, we will be gone when the next anti-semite enters the stage. In 1948 they asked for a tiny piece of land for them and a bigger piece for the Palestinians (they didn't call themselves Palestinians yet, that started in the 1960's). The British and French gave independence to several peoples in the Middle East. Syria was formed, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt. The Arabs got by far the most land. But the Jews didn't get anything, while they were discriminated against all over the muslim world. But instead of granting the Jews a tiny piece of land, the Arabs said Hell No! And attacked the Jews, to drive them all into the sea. So, just after the holocaust, they were threatened with another genocide. The Arabs asked the Palestinians to come to their countries, so their armies could wipe out the Jews. 700.000 listened, but others stayed. But against all odds the Jews won from all these much larger and stronger nations. And in war, when you are attacked and you win and capture land of the attackers, it is yours to keep. So, thanks to the Arabs who attacked the Jews, they now got a bigger piece of land. The remaing Palestinians became Israeli citizens, with the same rights. 21% of the population is Palestinian today with the same rights, except they don't have to serve in the army, Jews do. They can join if they want though and some do. But the Arabs were so angry they lost the war from the Jews of all people (second class in their eyes), that they kicked out 840.000 native Jews from their own countries. Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Libya all the way to Morocco. They had to leave everything behind, while Jews had been living in Iraq for 2500 years, twice as long as the Arabs. No mercy! So, if we are talking about apartheid states against the Jews, the Middle East and North Africa was full of them. Thanks to these states the Jews got a bigger piece of land and the Jewish population grew with hundreds of thousands Jewish refugees. Nobody ever talks about them. Israeli Jews cannot enter many islamic countries, talking about apartheid states until today! The Jews were kicked out from these nations, Israel did not kick out those 700.000 Palestinians. And they were not allowed to return, because they started the war and the other Arabs did not want them to return either. Jordan occupied the Westbank and Egypt Gaza. After Israel was attacked again in 1967 by the Arab world, they took the Sinaï, Gaza and the Westbank. They made peace with Egypt and gave back the Sinaï and also wanted to give Gaza back, but Egypt did not want Gaza anymore and Jordan didn't want the Westbank. Jordan even waged several wars against the Palestinians and kicked out 100.000s of them. Later after the Golf war, when the Palestinian leaders sided with Sadam Hussain of Iraq, Kuwait kicked out 400.000 Palestinians also. So, talk about apartheid states, there are many! And all the peace deals, to give Palestinians their own nation, were all declined by their corrupt leaders. And talking about an apartheid state. In Gaza oponents of HAMAS were killed and tortured, they even drove around with the corpses behind their cars as a warning. Israel left the Westbank and Gaza almost 20 years ago and HAMAS and Fatah never held an election after the first one. To it wasn't a democracy either, but a dictatorship. HAMAS always said they don't want peace with Israel, they don't want 2 states, no they want 2 things: all Jews dead and make Israel into an islamic caliphate under sharia law. You know what IS had also. If that would ever happened, you get an apartheid state big time. No democracy, death penalities for a lot of crimes, no womens rights, certainly nog lhgbt rights and of course no freedom of speech. It is all in their chartes, their own words, not mine. Israel isn't perfect, but everybody has the same right. Palestinians can study, work and go to hospital in Israel. They provided electricity and water. The Palestinians got the most aid per head of all the world. And what did HAMAS do with these many billions? They dug tunnels, built bunkers and bought rockets, bombs, guns, etc. And don’t forget over 70% of Gaza voted for Hamas! The Jews never fought back and they got persecuted and blamed for everything everywhere. They have been kicked oit of Spain, Portugal, England, Turkey, Arab nations, nazis persecuted them and in Eastern Europe there were the pogroms. And almost all islamic nations have been saying they want to wipe the Jews of the map since 1948. And last year Hamas attacked them and brutally tortured and killed young people, babies and even elderly. If Hamas had not attacked then Israel would not have attacked. Hamas knew Israel would hit back hard and it would cause much suffering among their people. You know what the leaders of hamas said in Spring: the suffering and dead Palestinians were worth it. Hamas fired over 20.000 rockets to Israel, Hezbollah 7000. If HezbolIah and hamas put down their weapons tomorrows, there will be peace. If Irael puts down its weapons, the Jews will be wiped out. It is as simple as that. Again, if Hamas had not attacked, this war would have never happened. Hamas sacrificed their own people. And Israel had no choice to strike back, because for 2000 years they have been persecuted and killed everywhere. If they didn’t defend themselves and attack, the next attack from Hamas and their allies would be so much bigger.
    1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764.  @7JeTeL7  Neo-nazi's did definately help with the protests and violence, that is just facts. Marshall plan is different and helped a lot, but we did not have to hand over our assets and lands or even change our laws, like Ukraine does. JP Morgan and BlackRock also demanded the unions had to lose much of their control. Who are they to demand these things? And look up how much land Monsanto and others are buying up in Ukraine whilst a war is raging. How ethical is that? They never would have helped Ukraine if there was something in it for them, as simple as that. Does that matter? It depends, how much they demand of the party they help. What now happens is wrong how much they take and buy. I don't get wars at all or power hungry people, who need empires to boost their egos. Whether is were the Romans, Napoleon, Nazi's, USSR, Putin. I value my own freedom and other people's freedom too. But we were naive to think wars were a thing of the past. Here in the Netherlands we wrecked our army, because we thought (well I did not) eternal peace had arrived. But humans will always strive for power, sadly. I wish it was different, but humans can be jerks. I never said Yankovych was a good guy, but he was democratically elected and the west supported his downfall. Who are we to meddle into other countries? In the west we always think we are the good guys, but after Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and other nations, I woke up from my dream. About 6 million deaths in these wars. It made other nations think, welll if you guys can do it, so can we. It is true what Putin did to stop Georgia and Moldova becoming Nato or EU members, but now they want Ukraine to join anyway, so that rule doesn't say much anymore. But what if your house is on fire and I say I help you fight the fire, but I demand your car, your garage, etc. Woukd you say that is ethical? Of course you can pay for the cost as much as you can, Ukraine can pay too to some extend, but if they then plunder the country it is a whole different story.
    1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. ​ @mephistophelean ​ You try to look smart, but Canaan was a series of city states, so NO it wasn't a country or nation state. Like Palestine never was a country. Israel had been a nation of 12 tribes and later became a kingdom, then it became 2 kingdoms Israel and Juda (including Benjamin). After that they were ruled by the Greeks, Roman, Byzantines, Arabs, Ottomans, so it has not been an independent state for over 2000 years. And several different people have lived there, like the Jews who have been there for 3500 years, albeit in smaller numbers than 2000 years ago, but they were still there. The Arabs came much later, 700 years. But many Palestinians are decendents of Jews themselves who were (forced) to convert to islam and many people in Gaza have Egyptian roots. In 1948 the Jews offered to form 1 country with the Arabs living there (they did not call them selves Palesrinians yet, that came after 1967) or form 2 countries, one Arab nation, 1 Jewish. The Arabs rejected and they started a war against the Jews together with Jordan, Egypt, Syria, etc, etc to wipe the Jews of the face of the earth. They said to the Arabs/Palestinians come to our countries, so you can go back to your houses and lands after we killed all Jews. But against all odds the Jews won and the people now could not returned. Still many Arabs did not flee and stayed and became Israeli citizens, 21% in the country are now Israeli Arabs, who have the same rights, can study, become police officers, open shops, join the army (they can join of their free will, but for Jews it is mandatory to join the army) and they also can become judges (an Arab judge sent a Jewish former prime-minister to jail) and they can become politicians also. All peace agreements have been declined by the Palestinians, well by their corrupt leaders to be fair. They could have gotten 98% of what they asked for, but still said no. Saying Israel doesn't exist is just crazy.
    1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. And the weird thing is, they don't care about the Palestinians at all, not one bit. They hate Jews and the Palestinians are the excuse to vent their hatred. I talked with several of them and asked why aren't you angry about what happens in Yemen or Syria, where 30 times more people were killed than in Gaza. None of them cared, they even said so. Some said "well it is a civil war, then people die, no big deal". So, I was stunned and said "but 30 times more deaths, in Yemen 200.000 children have died". "These thing happen" and that is all I got as an answer. I also challenged some far lefties who sided with the anti-Israel / anti-Jew discussions and every time they refused to answer, every single time.......I said in Congo 6 million people have died, that is 170 times as many. Why don't I see a protest against this conflict EVER, no Congolese flags in profiles, no burning of flags, no riots, etc nothing...and 9.000.000 people died of hunger since Oct 7 2023, that is 257 times as much as in Gaza. So if you really care for people who are suffering, you can raise money to help people from dying of hunger. I asked how much did you do to help these people? They said nothing and left. Or course you may be angry of what happens in Gaza, but if one of the smallest conflicts gets the most people on the streets protesting, spending millions upon millions euro/dollar and millions of hours in total of people protesting and people are only angry at Israel and Jews, you know something else is going on. Imagine they spent all that money and time on actually heloing people? How many children could have lived, if we used that money to feed them?
    1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. ​​ @HammyGiblets Nonsense, Jews had been living in that area for over 3000 years. Clearly you don't know anything about history. There have been several Iseali kingdoms and also Judean. In 70 AD the Jews revolted against the Roman occupation. About 1 milkion or more Jews were killed and the temple was destroyed. As an extra punishment for the Jews, the Romans renamed the land into Palestine, which is Latin for Philistea, an old arch enemy, which by then no longer existed. And the Philistines were Greek, not Arabs like modern day Palestinians. But still after the revolt Jews kept on living there, although many fled also. After the Romans came the Byzantines, Persian, several Arab muslims conquerers (they captured the land, so they weren't native), Crusaders, muslims conquered ir back and after that came the Ottoman empire who took over the region. After the pogroms in Russia, some Jews fled to what now is Israel to join their brothers and sisters living there and they were allowed by the Ottomans. So, no invaders. They bought legally land of Arab landlords, the swamp and parts of the desert, which they turned into good farm land, where Jews and Arabs could work. But as always people got envious and Jews were attacked and killed several times. After WWI the Ottomans lost the war and their empire and the Middle East become French and British mandates. After WWII Jews fled Europe and also came to the British mandate of Palestine and Syria. In 1947/1948 Jews they asked for a small piecs of land fro the Brits and a larger part of the Arab Palestinians. But all the Arabs in the region said "Hell no", while Syria, Iraq, Jordan, etc had gotten independence, so 95% of the land was for Arabs, but they did not want Jews to have any land. So, they attacked them to drive them into the sea, so commit genocide, just after the holocaust and pograms a fea years before that. They said to the Palestinian Arabs come to our land as we fight the Jews and when we are done, you can return. 700.000 of them listened, but others stayed on their land. Against all odds the Jews won from all these Arabs countries and now conquered more land, than they had asked for. And in war, when you are being attaccked and you win and drive the enemy back and capture their land, it is yours to keep. So, now Palestinians were abroad and weren't allowed to return from these Arab countries, but the Palestinians who didn't flee, they could stay on their land and in their houses and became Israeli citizen with the same rights as the Jews. 21% of the Israeli population is Palestinian Arab today, which is 2 million. But the Arab nations were so angry they lost from the Jews of all people (Jews are second class in their eyes), that they kicked out 840.000 Jeas from their own countries, from Turkey to Jordan, Egypt all the way to Morocco. They had to leave everything behind and still aren't allowed to visit the countries they or their parents or grandparents were kicked from. The Jews in Iraq had been living there for 2500 years, twice as long as the Arabs. But no merci, they were kicked out anyway. 50% of the Jews in Israel are from the Middle East and North Africa, so they are native indeed! After the war of 1948 Jordan occupied the Westbank and Egypt Gaza. Jordan waged several wars against the Palestinians and eventually kicked out 100.000s of them. Israel has been threatened with genocide from 1948 onwards and they have been attacked several times. In 1967 the Arabs tried again to wipe Israel of the map and they failed again. But now Israel pushed back and captured the Westbank, Gaza, Sinaï and Golan. And in war, when you are attacked and win and capture land of the attacker it is yours to keep. They offered Palestinians to work in Israel, go to school and hospital and they could also become Israeli citizen. But they kept attacking the Jews and several times people have tried to come to a peace agreements, but every time the corrupt leaders of the Palestinians declined, even peace treaties where Israel would go back to the 1967 for most part. Hamas says in their charter they don't want peace, don't want 2 states, they only want the Jews dead, Israel gone and to make greater Palestine into an islamlic caliphate. So, they want the same as ISIS. No democracy, no freedom of speech or religions, no nothing...... And in 2006 when Israel pulled back from Gaza, more than 70% voted for them and Hamas cancelled the elections right after that. So, in essencd it was a dictatorship, where opponents were even killed. And they kept attacking Israel with rockets and finally the attack on October 7 where they tortured, raped and killed 1200 people. HAMAS KNEW israel would strike back hard, but they vowed they would repeat Oct 7 many times. And they also said it was worth their own people died in the process. And as always they use their people as human shields. If October 7 had not happened, Israel would not have gone to war, simple as that.
    1
  911. ​ @e.t.finger7215 ​​lets talk abiut justify.....Jews have been living in that area for over 3000 years. Clearly you don't know anything about history. There have been several Iseali kingdoms and also Judean. In 70 AD the Jews revolted against the Roman occupation. About 1 milkion or more Jews were killed and the temple was destroyed. As an extra punishment for the Jews, the Romans renamed the land into Palestine, which is Latin for Philistea, an old arch enemy, which by then no longer existed. And the Philistines were Greek, not Arabs like modern day Palestinians. But still after the revolt Jews kept on living there, although many fled also. After the Romans came the Byzantines, Persian, several Arab muslims conquerers (they captured the land, so they weren't native), Crusaders, muslims conquered ir back and after that came the Ottoman empire who took over the region. After the pogroms in Russia, some Jews fled to what now is Israel to join their brothers and sisters living there and they were allowed by the Ottomans. So, no invaders. They bought legally land of Arab landlords, the swamp and parts of the desert, which they turned into good farm land, where Jews and Arabs could work. But as always people got envious and Jews were attacked and killed several times. After WWI the Ottomans lost the war and their empire and the Middle East become French and British mandates. After WWII Jews fled Europe and also came to the British mandate of Palestine and Syria. In 1947/1948 Jews they asked for a small piecs of land fro the Brits and a larger part of the Arab Palestinians. But all the Arabs in the region said "Hell no", while Syria, Iraq, Jordan, etc had gotten independence, so 95% of the land was for Arabs, but they did not want Jews to have any land. So, they attacked them to drive them into the sea, so commit genocide, just after the holocaust and pograms a fea years before that. They said to the Palestinian Arabs come to our land as we fight the Jews and when we are done, you can return. 700.000 of them listened, but others stayed on their land. Against all odds the Jews won from all these Arabs countries and now conquered more land, than they had asked for. And in war, when you are being attaccked and you win and drive the enemy back and capture their land, it is yours to keep. So, now Palestinians were abroad and weren't allowed to return from these Arab countries, but the Palestinians who didn't flee, they could stay on their land and in their houses and became Israeli citizen with the same rights as the Jews. 21% of the Israeli population is Palestinian Arab today, which is 2 million. But the Arab nations were so angry they lost from the Jews of all people (Jews are second class in their eyes), that they kicked out 840.000 Jeas from their own countries, from Turkey to Jordan, Egypt all the way to Morocco. They had to leave everything behind and still aren't allowed to visit the countries they or their parents or grandparents were kicked from. The Jews in Iraq had been living there for 2500 years, twice as long as the Arabs. But no merci, they were kicked out anyway. 50% of the Jews in Israel are from the Middle East and North Africa, so they are native indeed! After the war of 1948 Jordan occupied the Westbank and Egypt Gaza. Jordan waged several wars against the Palestinians and eventually kicked out 100.000s of them. Israel has been threatened with genocide from 1948 onwards and they have been attacked several times. In 1967 the Arabs tried again to wipe Israel of the map and they failed again. But now Israel pushed back and captured the Westbank, Gaza, Sinaï and Golan. And in war, when you are attacked and win and capture land of the attacker it is yours to keep. They offered Palestinians to work in Israel, go to school and hospital and they could also become Israeli citizen. But they kept attacking the Jews and several times people have tried to come to a peace agreements, but every time the corrupt leaders of the Palestinians declined, even peace treaties where Israel would go back to the 1967 for most part. Hamas says in their charter they don't want peace, don't want 2 states, they only want the Jews dead, Israel gone and to make greater Palestine into an islamlic caliphate. So, they want the same as ISIS. No democracy, no freedom of speech or religions, no nothing...... And in 2006 when Israel pulled back from Gaza, more than 70% voted for them and Hamas cancelled the elections right after that. So, in essencd it was a dictatorship, where opponents were even killed. And they kept attacking Israel with rockets and finally the attack on October 7 where they tortured, raped and killed 1200 people. HAMAS KNEW israel would strike back hard, but they vowed they would repeat Oct 7 many times. And they also said it was worth their own people died in the process. And as always they use their people as human shields. If October 7 had not happened, Israel would not have gone to war, simple as that. So, it isn't justified to hit back when 1200 people killed and many tortured and raped? And even babies killed? Then hiw should have Israel reacted if that isn't justified? The Jews have been persecuted for over 2000 years and the last 1900 years they didn't fight back and because of it they were kicked out of many countries, there money and properties stolen and killed by thr millions. And if Hamas say they want to kill all Jews, then Jews know one thing: if people say this, we better take it seriously, because in the past we didn't and 6 million of us died. If Jews don't fight back, they are dead. Israel would be wiped from the map long ago if they laid down their weapons. But still they tried to make peace with the people who attacked them, but they declined the offer every time. And why doesn't anyone protest against the wars in Syria, Yemen, Congo, Sudan? I have never seen anyone with a flag of these countries in their profile. Yemen 400.000 deaths, from 200.000 children. Any protests? Nope... Syria 800.000 deaths, 22 times as many as in Gaza. Any protests? Nope.... Congo 5 million deaths, 156 times as much as in Gaza. Anyone have a Congolese flag in their profile or asking for justice? Nope either... Sudan, 100.000s of deaths and 8 million people displaced......you get the picture.....not a single protest, flag hoisted or burned. Do these countries warn citizens to move when they are going to attack, like Israel does? Well, nope either....do they give aid, food, shelter to the people who hate them? Sigh....hell no... Since October 7 2023 9 million people died or hunger, that is 285 times more people who died than in Gaza. Any protests? I don't even need to answer, but okay then: NOPE... How much money did you give to stop these people from dying? How often did you call for justice for them? But people only are angry with Israel, protest every week, have Palestinian flags in their bios, attack Jews all over the world, burn Israeli flags, etc, etc. Why is that?
    1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927.  @EduardoArtistaDelavega  But lets talk about apartheid states. The Jews have been treated badly in Europe, but also in the islamic world. After the holocaust some Jews fled to the British mandate of Palestine, where their brothers and sisters had been living for over 3000 years. There never has been an independent Palestine. The last 2000 years it was annexed by several other people, the Romans, Persians, Byzantines, Arab muslims from 700 AD who conquered the place, then the Crusaders, muslims took it back again and later came the Ottomans, who were defeated in World War 1 and so the British took over. After WWII and the holocaust Jews fled Europe and went to what is now Israel to join their brothers and sisters living there. They knew one thing after the pogroms and holocaust, if we don't get a piece of land for ourselves, we will be gone when the next anti-semite enters the stage. So, in 1948 they asked for a tiny piece of land for themselves and a bigger piece for the Palestinians (they didn't call themselves Palestinians yet, that happened fro  the 1960's onwards). The British and French gave indepence to several peoples in the Middle East. Syria was formed, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt. The Arabs got by far the most land. But the Jews didn't get anything, while they were discriminated against all over the muslim world. But instead of granting the Jews a tiny piece of land, the Arabs said Hell No! And attacked the Jews and wanted to drive them all into the sea. So, just after the holocaust, they were threatened with another genocide. The Arabs asked the Palestinians to come to their countries, so their armies could wipe out the Jews. 700.000 listened, but others stayed. But against all odds the Jews won from all these much larger and stronger nations. And in war, when you are being attacked and you win and capture land of the attackers, it is yours to keep. So, thanks to the Arabs who attacked the Jews, Israel now got a bigger piece of land. The remaing Palestinians became Israeli citizens, with the same rights. 21% of the population is Palestinian (2 million)today with the same rights, except they don't have to serve in the army, Jews do. They can join if they want though and some do. So, the Palestinians could have had an independent state from 1948 onwards if they hadn't attacked the Jews and listened to the other Arabs. But the Arabs were so humilinated and angry they lost the war from the Jews of all people (second class in their eyes), that they kicked out 840.000 native Jews from their own countries. Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Egyot, Libya all the way to Morocco kicked them out. They had to leave everything behind. Jews had been living in Iraq for 2500 years, twice as long as the Arabs. No mercy! So, if we are talking about apartheid states against the Jews, the Middle East and North Africa was full of them. Thanks to these states the Jews got a bigger piece of land and the Jewish population grew with hundreds of thousands Jewish refugees. Nobody ever talks about them. Israeli Jews cannot enter many islamic countries, talking about apartheid states until today! The Jews were kicked out from these nations, but Israel did not kick out those 700.000 Palestinians. And they were not allowed to return, because they started the war and the other Arabs did not want them to return either. Jordan occupied the Westbank and Egypt Gaza. After Israel was attacked again in 1967 by the Arab world, they took the Sinaï, Gaza and the Westbank. They made peace with Egypt and gave back the Sinaï and also wanted to give Gaza back, but Egypt did not want Gaza anymore and Jordan didn't want the Westbank. Jordan even waged several wars against the Palestinians and kicked out 100.000s of them. Later after the Golf war, when the Palestinian leaders sided with Sadam Hussain of Iraq, Kuwait kicked out 400.000 Palestinians also. So, talk about apartheid states, there are many! But Israel isn't one of them. I don't say they don't mistakes, but which country doesn't? And all the peace deals to give Palestinians their own nation, they were all declined by their corrupt leaders. And talking about an apartheid state. In Gaza opponents of HAMAS were killed and tortured, they even drove around with the corpses behind their cars as a warning. Israel left the Westbank and Gaza almost 20 years ago and HAMAS and Fatah never hold an election after the first one. To it wasn't a democracy either and a dictatorship. HAMAS always said they don't want peace with Israel, they don't want 2 states, no they want 2 things: all Jews dead and make Israel into an islamic caliphate under sharia law. You know what IS had also. Talk about the plans for an apartheid state! No democracy, death penalities for a lot of crimes, no womens rights, certainly nog lhgbt rights and of course no freedom of speech. So, talking about apartheid states, Palestine will become one if Hamas would win the war. And so many other apartheid states who kicked out all the Jews, which had been living there for 1000s of years, in Iraq even 2500 years!
    1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965.  @mikethebloodthirsty  The quesrion is what is genocide, because that word is being misused more and more. Hamas admitted they were dishonest about the number of deaths, it is estimated that it is around 24.000 now since 7 October. It is a lot, but most of them are Hamas fighters who vowed to kill all Jews. Their charter states that all Jews should be killed and 80% voted the people in power who have genocide on the Jews in their charter. The Palestinian populatian grew 5 or 6 fold sincd 1948, with genocide the numbers go down. I don't say Israel doesn't make mistakes, they do. But why is this genocide, but the 400.000 deaths, from which 200.000 children in Yemen, isn't? Nobody ever calls that genocide. Or the 5 million deaths in Congo the last 20 years, the 800.000 Syrians or the 6,65 million people who died of hunger since October 7? Nobody ever uses the word genocide, even if 277 times as much people died of hunger worldwide than in Gaza in the same period. I even forgot the 100.000s of deaths in Sudan and now the 8 million people who are on the run, driven from their homes as we speak. So why is the word genocide used so selectively? Of course it is sad if civilians die, but if most are fighters/soldiers (75 or more %), then is it genocide? The war could have been over long ago, if the hostages were released. So, if their own leaders don't release them, knowing their people keep dying bcs of it. Then whose fault is it? If I have a neighbour who is 3 times stronger than me and is ruthless and I decide to smack his son on the head, I will get beaten up and maybe my family too. Can I blame my neighbour? I started it. Hamas knew Israel would hit back hard after Oct 7, but they still chose to go on killing 1200 people, raping, beheading, and even life streaming it, knowing they would sacrifice their own people afterwards. And how should Israel have responded on this attack? Hamas promised to do it again and again and again. And recently Hamas said it was worth so many of their own people died, bcs it was good for the cause.
    1
  966. 1
  967. Waarom laten jullie de steekpartijen op de Engelsen niet zien door migranten en moslims? Wekelijks worden er mensen neergestoken door nieuwkomers. Diverse terroristische aanslagen de laatste 20 jaar, zelfs 20 kinderen bij Aria Grande en een man in London die onthoofd werd op straat. Paar dagen terug in Ipswich een man neergestoken. In Southenend liepen migranten met enorme messen over straat te zwaaien, in Leeds waren er rellen met moslims. En dan de Pakistani muslims grooming gangs, die tienduizenden Britse meiden hebben verkracht, verhandeld, gebrandmerkt, gemarteld en zelfs gedood. Daardoor loopt het nu uit de hand. Jarenlang is er veel te weinig opgetreden, geen eisen gesteld aan nieuwkomers, wijken waar niemand meer Engels spreekt en elke Brit die er moeite mee had, die werd als redhtsextremistische gek weggezet. En hebben jullie gezien hoe verschillend de politie optreedt tegen blanke Britten en moslims? Vredelievende protestanten die werden gewoon in elkaar gemept, terwijl de protesten tegen Israel en BLM waar veel gesloopt werd, zelfs oorlogsmonumenten en de meest vreselijke anti-Semitische leuzen werden geroepen, daar deed de politie niets tegen. Mensen zijn bang in het Verenigd Koninkrijk, niet zo gek na tig aanslagen en ook nu blijkt fat kleine kinderen niet meer veilig zijn en als seksslaven gebruikt en zelfs vermoord worden. Als mensen denken dat ze niets meer te verliezen hebben, dan gebeuren die dingen. Een kat in het nou maakt vreemde sprongen. Is het dus maar goed? Natuurlijk niet, maar als je decennialang niet luistert naar de mensen dan ontploft de bom een keer. Als je dat niet ziet als politicus, ga dan lekker post verkopen. Dus de meeste politici kunnen van baan wisselen........
    1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. Every country ruled (if you can call it that) by a the globalist from the World Economic Forum turns into chaos, every of these countries have the same destructive policies, every single one. They had all the same insane policies during Covid, they all have open borders, the natives being treated very different from the new comers, , the white native middle class is being demolished, we are all told how bad our history and we whites are. We have to suffer for sins not of our fathers, our grandfathers or great grandfathers, no not even our great-great grandfathers, but for rich families who had slaves 170 or more years ago. Our families were working class, poor and were barely scraping a living at the mills, mines or fields of the rich, who also were behind the slavetrade. Our families weren't slaves by name, but in reality they were treated as such also. Our forebears worked 14 hours even at the age of 10 and many we lucky if theu made it to 30 or 35 years. And yet we are being accused of slavery, while slavery existed everywhere and while our forefathers could not even vote when slavery existed in Europe. And we and only we destroy the planet, only the white native folk, nobody else. This narrative is being pushed in every simgle nation with World Economic Forum puppets behind in the helm in our countries. BUILD BACK BETTER, but to build, you must destroy it first. The Great Reset, which is almost forgotten, but still at play behind the scenes. They are building their utopia. But their utopia is another men's hell, without freedoms. The globalists are selling the diversity cult, but all of these cult leaders live in the least divers neighbourhoods and towns there is. And their diversity is no diversity at all, because they want to get rid of the nations with distinct culture, they want every nation to be a multi-cultural society, which means every country will be the same, without distinct cultures or peoples. A nationalist is someone who trully appreciates diversity, bcs they want to safeguard their culture and that of others countries. Thess diversity preachers want the opposite. They are selling snake oil Communism 2.0.....
    1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990.  @ProspectiveProspector  You know there are fair skinned and blue eyed Palestinians also? Bet you didn't. A 5 year old knows more than you. 840.000 Jews were kicked out of islamic countries between 1948 and 1951. They had been living in those countries for 2500 years, like Iraq. Twice as long as the Arabs lived in Iraq. You know why they got kicked out? Because the islamic countries started a war against the Jews in 1948, when the Jews asked to form 2 countries independent of the British, one small piece of land for the Jews and a larger piece of land for the Palestinians. There has never been a Palestinian state, but now for the first time they coukd have had their own state. But the iskamic countries attacked the Jews and wanted to drive them all into the sea. Hey said to the Palestinians come to our countries, so we can kill all the Jews and when we are done, you can return. Against all odds the Jews won and conquered some land. And in war when you are attacked and you win and capture land of the people who attack you, then you can keep it. So, now the Jews had more land because they won, then they ask for in the first place. All thanks to the Arabs. And they were so angry, they kickedmout 840.000 Jews, who had to leave everything behind. The Palestinians who did not listen to the Arab nations, they stayed and became Israeli citizens with the same rights as the Jews. 21% of the people in Israel are Palestinians, that is 2 million people. Who can become anything they want, study, become lawyers, judges, politicians, etc. But the leaders of the Palestinians in Gaza and the Westbank declined every single peace treaty since 1948. They could have had an independent state for 76 years now. But HAMAS says they don't want peace, they don't 2 states, they want all Jews dead and make Israel into an islamic caliphate under sharia law. You know, the same as ISIS wanted. It is in their own documents and charter. And over 70% of the people voted for HAMAS. So, I guess you want an islamic caliphate, that is what most Palestinians want.
    1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. ​ @marilynshepherd6480 You don't know anything about history that much is clear. The name Palestine was given by the Romans to the land in 130 AD after the Jewish revolt, as a punishment. Palestine is the Latin name for Philistea, the old arch enemy of the Israelites. But the Philistines were gone for over 2500 years. And the Philistines were from Greek, modern day Palestinians are Arabs. So, maybe do some more research instead of talking nonsense. Jews have been living in that land for 3500 years, Arabs came 2100 years after that, but there have always been Jews. And in 1948 when the Jews asked for a small piece of land, the Arabs said hell no, Jews cannot have land. Because Jews are second class in their eyes. And the Arabs/Palestinians would get a bigger land. But the Arab neighbours from Syria, Egypt, Jordan (which just became independent themselves) said to the Palestinians, come to our country, so we can wipe out the Jews and killed them all. But against all odds the Jews won and comquered land they had not asked for. And in laws of war, when you are attacked, you win and conquer land of the attackers, it is yours to keep. 700.000 Palestinians listened to the lies and were now stranded in Jordan, etc. But the Palestinians who didn't listen, they were allowed to stay from the Jews and they became Israeli citizens with the same rights as the Jews. But the muslims were so angry the Jews won the war, that they kicked out 840.000 Jews from their countries, from Syria, Iraq (Jews had been living there for 2500 years, twice as long as the Arabs), Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Algiers and Morocco and other countries. So, Palestinians could have had their own country in 1948 also, next to the Jews. But they listened to the lies of the other Arabs. And btw Egypt conquered Gaza and Jordan the Westbank.
    1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. We get what we deserve, we fought hard to built our countries and to vent off foreign nations, like the French, Spaniards, the nazi, etc. But we let our own political parties and government wreck our countries and take it om the chin. Instead of saying we don't take it no more, we have had enough, we just keep voting for the same 2 parties, who both have a record of ruining the country beyond repair. We have become complacent, lazy, spineless and stupid. We keep voting for the same 2 parties that are pushing the country further and further into the abyss, thinking at every election that if we vote for the other party again now, changes will come. When is enough really enough? Millions of people can hardly pay their bills and many can't at all, your kids cannot afford to buy a home and have to wait up to 17 years for a rental house, whereas new comers are placed in 5 star hotels and often get a house within 6 months to a year. Whole neighbourhoods don't speak your language anymore and you are the stranger in your own street. More and more kids are functionally illiterate. They tell your kids their country, history and even flag is racist. Beside that they spent 10 of billions abroad to foreign wars and refuse to negotiate for peace, while the NHS is collapsing, bcs there isn't any money. And you all take it on the chin, you complain and you answer is, well lets vote Labour again, who will change nothing. They are more concerned for the well being of new comers and foreign wars and projects, than they are with you, your children and grandchildren. Why is enough really enough?
    1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. ​ @svenhaheim A fictional god? Believing nothing created everything out of nothing sounds way more fictional to me. You don't believe in the virgin birth of Christ, but you do believe in the virgin birth of the universe…..out of nothing and by nothing. Besides that you believe in the virgin birth of information, also out of nothing and by nothing. No life without information! And you need to have intelligence and knowledge of the world around you to create anything. Unless you can create something from nothing, but I doubt that. Otherwise I have a job for you. If you want to build a house, you need a plan and you have to do research. What kind of house do you need, how big, how many rooms, is the ground stable enough to build upon, which materials do you use and what are the properties of these materials, which tools do you need to work these materials, where do you start and what does the end result have to look like? So, you need intelligence(a brain) and you need knowledge of the world around you. But if there isn't a god, then when the first eye appeared, there was nobody around who knew light existed, let alone the properties of light and how to detect it. And yet, out of nothing an organ came into existence by a fault in the dna, a genetic mutation, so suddenly a cell could detect light, while nobody knew light existed. So, how does that work? Evolution? Nature? Natural selection? Well, neither can detect light or create anything to see it. So, again, none of them knew light existed. But somehow 'they' or 'it' built an eye, without the knowledge of light, without knowledge of the properties of light and also without the knowledge of how to detect it. And without any knowledge the brain evolved, the eyes got a connection to the brain and without knowledge the right firmware was uploaded to make sense of those images the eyes detected/saw. Oh and we got 2 eyes, while without a god or other intelligent being, nobody existed who even knew what a depth even was and how to ‘see it’. Ask 10 random people and ask why we have 2 eyes and most people don’t know. It is to see depth, otherwise we walk against walls, trees and cannot aim. If that wasn’t enough, we got auto focus as well, but again if there wasn’t any god, then nobody knew what a sharp image looked like or how to test it. If I build a lens, you can be sure I have to test and adjust it a 100 times. And there wasn’t even anyone who knew something as simple as dust existed, and lo and behold: eyelids popped up, as did eye glands, eyelashes and eyebrows to keep dust from the eyes and clean them. What a miracle! Evolution is a word to describe a process, but that is it. It is not a person, so it cannot think, detect, see, decide, ponder, invent, design, create, test, adjust, it cannot do anything at all. Nature then? Well, same thing: nature is nothing more than a word to describe everything humans haven't made, so living beings are nature, plants, insects, animals, sea, bacteria, toadstools, trees, fish and even humans. So, nature is not a person, not self aware, so it cannot think, detect, see, decide, ponder, invent, design, create, test or adjust either. Neither can natural selection. Natural selection is just one organism having  a better chance of survival than the other, not a thinking agent involved either. So, then nothing created everything if there is no god. Nothing was the cause of the big bang, of the laws of nature (why are there laws if there is no law-giver anyway?), stars, planets, moons and LIFE. Okay, maybe the eye was just a fluke for the sake of the argument. But how about air? If there was no god, then nobody knew air existed and certainly not which gasses it is made up of and what properties these gasses had. But nothing, or if you want we can call it evolution, figured it out without being able to detect and think that the air contained oxygen, which can be used for energy for living beings. How about that?! It took humans many 1000s of years to figure out that air was made up of different gasses and that was Joseph Priestly in 1774, he was Christian btw. But if there is no god, then nothing aka evolution or nature (pick one) figured it out first and has knowledge about chemistry and physics, without being able to think, detect, etc. That is scientifically impossible! And it also knew how to extract oxygen, which it did not know existed. Oh wait, that is impossible also. It cannot know how to extract something if it doesn't know it is there. But somehow it did, (well if you believe the mythology of atheism). Then it created a nose, air pipe, lungs, the right muscles and without knowledge the brain got a software update to fine tune the system, just as it did with the eyes, the heart, the stomach (while it didn’t know which minerals were on the earth and which could be used as food, but okay, lets not nit pick) All life, every creature has a specific function, just as every organ has or had. Unlike a random rock, it is not designed, has no purpose and was formed gravity, sun, rain, wind, etc. You can use it as a paperweight or a hammer, but it was not designed for it. Design means to create with a purpose. And   every creature has a specific purpose, every organ, etc. Eyes are for seeing, hands for grabbing, pulling, lifting and touching (can only be designed if you have knowledge of the world we live in), legs and feet for standing walking and if you are fit enough jumping and as a bonus ice skating, skiing, playing football. So, as everything has a purpose on earth, that means their is a purpose giver, a designer, better know as God. The word design means to create with a purpose. But evolution and nature cannot give purpose to anything, because they aren’t thinking agents and so don’t even know what purpose means and have no knowledge of the world and everything it contains, neither has it knowledge of chemistry, physics, gravity, etc. Most people cannot even build an Ikea cabinet with a building manual , let alone without.....but evolution or nature could create all life without a plan, without thinking, detect, inventing, testing, adjusting, without intelligence and knowledge? Of course it cannot! So, atheism and uncontrolled evolution is a myth and not even a good one! Nothing cannot create anything, it cannot think, design, ponder, detect, see, feel, invent, test, adjust or even make mistakes. Only an eternal God can create everything from nothing, matter, energy, space and time. . But again: nothing cannot create anything
    1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. @MsUpptaget  Nothing is wrong with caring, but what are his motives? And I have nothing against free speech, but domyou really think Musk is meddling in the UK and Germany out of the goodness of his heart? But don't you think it is weird that the problem with child trafficing in the US is a 100 times worse, but you don't hear him about it? Children in his own country are getting abducten and sold and he stays silent, but somehow he worries for children in a country 3000 miles away? There are lots of pedos in the US, more than the UK, but you don't him about that either. So, you really believe him? Why so naive about those entitled billionaires? If they do something it is because they want something in return. If Eloj had paid Reform, he would have owned it. He is not a guy who then doesn't demand what happens and who is in charge. And free speech can still be dictating. If I tell my children to go to bed, yes it is free speech, but also a demand. Musk aant to have it his way. And don't you think it is weird he has 6 huge companies, is building new factories as we speak and a new huge xAI centre, is campaigning with Trump, has 2,5 hour interviews all over the place, tweets several hours a day, has 11 or 12 children, plays Diablo IV (he is nr 1 in that game, which you won't reach with playing just 3 hours a day I hace been told by people who play it). And then there is a huge problem of child trafficing in the US, several pedo rings of famous people, 1 in 6 childrsn go to bed hungry in the US, but......... ...........and yet he has so much time to spare that he is campaigning in the UK and Germany for foreign parties and telling them what needs to happen and waving his wallet around.........
    1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. This video is so biased, it is ridiculous! Were should I even start? Jews suffered 2000 years of prosecution? Nope, that is from the beginning about 3500 years. Many nations have tried to wipe Israel from the map and even kill all the people even as far back as 3000-3500 years ago. They weren't called Jews, but Israelites back then. The word Jew comes from Judah, one of the 12 tribes of Israel. The nation of Israel was a kingdom of 12 tribes. Then they got seperated into 2 kingdoms: Israel with 10 tribes in the north and Judah with 2 tribes in ths south. Around 750 Israel was taken into exile by the Asserians and later the Judah by the Babilonians, but they returned to their land after 70 years, while the other tribes stayed in exile. With the Jewish uprising in 70 AD the Romans killed over a million Jews and many fled. Jerusalem was destroyed, as was the Jewish temple. The Romans changed the name in Palestine, to try to erase the rememberance of the Jews. Still some Jews stayed behind and never has the land of Israel or Palestines be free of Jews. Something Johnny did not mention. The UN did not give the land to the Jews, another error. The league of nation did! In 1948 the Jews offered to have one country together with the Arabs, the Arabs declined and started a war to wipe Israel of the face of the earth. The Arab nations told the Arabs in Palestine (they did not call themselves Palestinians, happened after 1967) to leave thr land, while they would drive the Jews into the sea. So, just after 6 million Jews got killed, the Arabs wanted to wipe them out too. Beside that 800.000 Jews got kicked out of muslim countries in 1948, they were told to leave or face the consequences (get killed). They had to leave their properties, lands, companies, yes everything behind. Johnny also forget to mention that, I wonder why? He also says Israel turned out not be safer than Europe was for the Jews. Are you kidding me Johnny? In Europe the Jews could not protect themselves, in Israel they could/can. And the leak document? He did not give any proof it was real, where he got it. So, I doubt it is e en real. And also the leaked footage of Bibi Netanyaho is not that ckear, that you can say 'oh it is all a big plan'. And the remark 'and then Hamas fires a fea rockets', are you freaking kidding me? They fire 1000's. They use millions to make rockets, dig tunnels, while they could have used that money for the betterment of their people. Johnny also did not share Hamas wants to kill all Jews in the world and even toddlers are being told to hate the Jews. And another thing he didn't tell, that Palestinians rejected every single peace accord in the last 75 years. And he is silent also about Egypt have they exact same checkpoint and closed borders as Israel has. I could go on and on, but then my post would be too long. But his all idea of divde and conquer is just a conspiracy abput those evil Jews. Hasn't history taught us anything with ideas like that? His whole video was about blaming the Jews, nothing more, nothing less. Yes, they make mistakes, many. But this is just nonsense this video, so one-sided and full of holes, there should be a warning on it. It is so biased, as usual with many of his videos. That you wonder what the reason is of this video and who paid for it. He is a journalist/influencer for hire by governments and ngo's.
    1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. @ulrikof.2486  Good question, it is a while back I wrote this. I have to rewatch the video why I said it like this. Lot and his 2 daughters were saved, was it because he was just? It doesn't say, but for sure he wasn't perfect, but maybe just not as bad as the other people in his town? Of course you can try to lead a good life amongst bad people, but you there is no gurantee. Was he saved out of mercy, because Abraham asked God? It doesn't say, so I don't know. He offered his daughters to the town folk who wanted to molest his guests (the angels), so he wasn't a great man, quite the opposite: he was a coward. So, he wasn't just at all. Abraham was a much better man, so he should have stayed with him instead of moving to the area with the best pastures for his cattle, but the worst people. But it also doesn't say he lived among 'just' people afterwards, but for sure his daughters were influenced by the morals or lack thereoff of their old town, because what they did to get pregnant. In general if you hang out with bad people, your morals will suffer for it. I had friends who were always looking down on certain people and always making fun (in a rude way) of them, they were selfish, negative, etc. I thought I cou.d he friends with them and hold up my own morals, but that is a myth. After a while I decided I don't want to hang out with people like that anymore, because they were a bad influence on me and without I noticed it, they had changed me. I was a lot younger then. From then on I chose not to be friends anymore with people who are rude, selfish, sexist, condescending and negative. Later I got much better friends, and although some of them have died, sadly, I learned a great deal from them and their positive influence still helps me how to look at certain topics in life.
    1
  1107. 1
  1108. @Idontcare69696  Younare right, Lot chose to live amongst these people and must have know about them. So, if you choose to live in such a wicked city, just because of financial gain, there is something wrong with your stamdards. And he also offered his daughters to the r@pe gang instead of the angels. So, his mind was deprived too. And later his daughters made him drunk and you know what. The peoples who came from Lot didn't have the best morals either. It was mercy indeed they were saved, that he was Abraham's cousin, but not because he was just and great person. Like Paul said 1 Corinthians 15:33 Do not be misled: “Bad company corrupts good character.”[e] 34 Come back to your senses as you ought, and stop sinning; for there are some who are ignorant of God—I say this to your shame. Don't think hanging out with bad people rub off on us too. I used to have very rude friends when I was younger, it influenced me a lot and I negatively influenced other friends on my turn, which I am ashamed to say. When I became a christian, it took a long time to shed all the bad words I used. Still I see lots of people calling themselves christian mock othes and throw around f-bombs all the time. We shouldn't do that and keep out tongue in check like James 3 says 9 With the tongue we praise our Lord and Father, and with it we curse human beings, who have been made in God’s likeness. 10 Out of the same mouth come praise and cursing. My brothers and sisters, this should not be. 11 Can both fresh water and salt water flow from the same spring? 12 My brothers and sisters, can a fig tree bear olives, or a grapevine bear figs? Neither can a salt spring produce fresh water. Looking back, I should not have posted this first post, I have thought it through well enough. But I am glad people, like yourself are correcting me. Thank you!
    1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. You are right Rick! Technology is great, but it also made people lazy and complacent. Now music is everywhere 24/7. But when I was young, you did not listen to music in the bus, at school, during running or in the shops. We were used to silence or just chatting without any distraction. Now people cannot go without background noise anymore, afraid of the silence. People get overdosed on noise and ditraction, and aren't used to just sit down for a chat or sit down to enjoy music. People have to be distracted all day, because they aren't use to quiet periods during the day, so they cannot stand it, let alone appreciate it. You can listen to music everywhere, so why sit down for it? When we came home from school or work, you were looking forward to put your cassette in the cassette player, the record on the record player and later the cd in the cd player or just turn the radio on and just sat down to listen, soak in the music. And it was magical when you went to town to visit the record shop with your hard earned cash, browsing through the racks with albums. The smell, the images on the covers, the store owner who knew what you liked and helped you search for that one album and then the listening at the counter through head phones or if you were lucky, through the loud speakers in the store. But now there is too much music, it is too easily available, too cheap and also has lost its value. It has become background noise for people who are not used (and often afraid) of the silence. Overdosed on distraction and noise, their concentration span is as low as the memory span of a gold fish. We need to slow down, put away our phones, learn to appreciate the silence, so when can appreciate the times when we hear music. Same goes for human interaction, now on parties of youngsters eveybody is holding a phone, like junkies clinging to their last (you know what), instead of chatting and enjoying music together, it is a PAT party (as in LAT relation) Party alone together, we are togther, but all on our own digital island. It is the same as a proper meal, if you never have one and don't even sit down properly to eat and only eat junk food, you will never learn to appreciate a good freshly cooked meal with family or friends.
    1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. It didn't add up from the start, because our so called leaders did not keep their own Covid rules all over the world, they ignored the rules they had given us and we were fined if we didn't the same. At the G7 summit the prime ministers and presidents stood 6 foot from each other in their own circle, after that they walked ro each other, gave hands and even hugged old Joe Biden. Same with Boris Johnson, was talking with 20 people, the photographer asked if they were ready to take the group photo and then everybody took out their face mask put it on and kept 6 foot from each other, the photo shoot was over and face masks went off right away. Covid was abused for political means, it wasn't as bad as they claimed. Right from the start all our leaders (who were aligned with the World Economic Forum) all said the exact same things - the world is never going to be the same (how do they know within 1 month (it was before any Western had died) - we need a reset (the great reset) - we need ro build back better (build back, means destroy the okd ways first) Beside that they tested all sorts of new laws to follow people and see what was possible and what would people accept. And of course they used it to transfer money, which they could not do before. Now with the pandemic the media was too busy to check what really was happening (they didn't care, because the pandemic was good for business and they felt mightily important as well) The whole pandemic stinks, millions died which could have been avoided. But I wonder if the truth will ever come out.
    1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295.  @YacobIbnMohamed  Onzin, ja er zijn fouten dingen gedaan. Noem een land op die het niet gedaan heeft? De Afrikaanse slavenhandel bestond al duizenden jaren voordat de Europeanen daar slaven kochten. De moslims kochten daar al 1000 jaar slaven en zijn ook lang doorgegaan nadat het hier afgeschafd was. In het Midden Oosten ging het door tot de jaren 60 en 70 zelfs. Daar werden de slaven gecastereerd, daarom zijn daar nauwelijks of geen nazaten van die slaven te vinden. Vergeet ook niet dat de Afrikanen hun eigen mensen verkochten. Toen de Britten de slavernij afschaften hebben zij jarenlang de zeeën over gevaren om slavernij schepsn tegen te houden. 2000 blanke Britten hebben hun leven daar coor gegeven. In de VS hebben 400.000 voornamelijk blanken mannen in ds burgeroorlog hun leven gegeven om de slavernij te beëndigen. Dat hoor je alleen nooit, mensen pikken alleen de slechte dingen eruit als bewijs dat Nederland, Europa, Amerika en de blanken allemaal fout zijn. Het woord slaaf komt van de slavisch volken, omdat de Ottomanen en Arabieren daar ook veel mensen in Zuid-Oost Europa ronselden en die verkochten in Saoedië Arabië. De Barbarijnse (Noord Afrikaanse) slavenhandelaren hebben 1,5 miljoen mensen uit Europa geroofd en ook door verkocht in Noord Afrika en S. Arabië. De Japanners maakten weer anderen tot slaat, de Chinezen ook. De Vikingen hadden slaven, de Maya's, de native Amerikanen hadden zelfs slaven en ook zwarten Amerikanen hadden slaven. Nu nog in Afrika, Midden Oosten en Azië heerst slavernij, zo een 60 tot 70 miljoen. Dus om nou een land als fascistisch te bestempelen, laat duidelijk het gebrek aan kennis zien. De meeste ziekenhuizen, kraamklinieken, kindertehuizen en scholen zijn door blanke Europese en Amerikaanse Christenen opgericht. (Vele duizenden) Het is fout om alleen de nadruk te leggen op fouten van een land, net zo goed als het fout is om alleen de goede dingen te benoemen. Elk land, elk volk heeft slechte dingen gedaan en ook elk land en volk heeft goede dingen gedaan. Net als elk mens. Dat leert de geschiedenis, niet uw versie.
    1
  1296. @user-rt7kl6ir4d  Onzin, ja er zijn fouten dingen gedaan. Noem een land op die het niet gedaan heeft? De Afrikaanse slavenhandel bestond al duizenden jaren voordat de Europeanen daar slaven kochten. De moslims kochten daar al 1000 jaar slaven en zijn ook lang doorgegaan nadat het hier afgeschafd was. In het Midden Oosten ging het door tot de jaren 60 en 70 zelfs. Daar werden de slaven gecastereerd, daarom zijn daar nauwelijks of geen nazaten van die slaven te vinden. Vergeet ook niet dat de Afrikanen hun eigen mensen verkochten. Toen de Britten de slavernij afschaften hebben zij jarenlang de zeeën over gevaren om slavernij schepsn tegen te houden. 2000 blanke Britten hebben hun leven daar coor gegeven. In de VS hebben 400.000 voornamelijk blanken mannen in ds burgeroorlog hun leven gegeven om de slavernij te beëndigen. Dat hoor je alleen nooit, mensen pikken alleen de slechte dingen eruit als bewijs dat Nederland, Europa, Amerika en de blanken allemaal fout zijn. Het woord slaaf komt van de slavisch volken, omdat de Ottomanen en Arabieren daar ook veel mensen in Zuid-Oost Europa ronselden en die verkochten in Saoedië Arabië. De Barbarijnse (Noord Afrikaanse) slavenhandelaren hebben 1,5 miljoen mensen uit Europa geroofd en ook door verkocht in Noord Afrika en S. Arabië. De Japanners maakten weer anderen tot slaat, de Chinezen ook. De Vikingen hadden slaven, de Maya's, de native Amerikanen hadden zelfs slaven en ook zwarten Amerikanen hadden slaven. Nu nog in Afrika, Midden Oosten en Azië heerst slavernij, zo een 60 tot 70 miljoen. Dus om nou een land als fascistisch te bestempelen, laat duidelijk het gebrek aan kennis zien. De meeste ziekenhuizen, kraamklinieken, kindertehuizen en scholen zijn door blanke Europese en Amerikaanse Christenen opgericht. (Vele duizenden) Het is fout om alleen de nadruk te leggen op fouten van een land, net zo goed als het fout is om alleen de goede dingen te benoemen. Elk land, elk volk heeft slechte dingen gedaan en ook elk land en volk heeft goede dingen gedaan. Net als elk mens. Dat leert de geschiedenis, niet uw versie.
    1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. The right to return? Does that go for the 800.000 Jews too who were kicked out of muslim countries in 1948? They had to leave everything behind too. Nobody talks about this, but it happened too. Jews have been kicked out of dozens of countries before 1948 too, from Portugal, Spain, England, Russia of course, etc. But not a word in this interview about this. Maybe if this was taken into account, you could understand why Israel has become like this. It is not that it give them the right to treat Palestininians badly. But maybe if they see both of them have suffered, maybe they can come together in this? But Bassem is very one-side, even if he talks about the end times profecies of some Jews and how it would affect Palestinians. But Bassem leaves out that in Islam the end time profecy will be hailed in whe the Jews are defeated. When even the stones cry out 'a Jews is hiding behind me, kill him'. But again, Bassem is very biased and talks about things which others do or think, but he or they think themselves too. Same with Americans who hate Jews, but want to help Israel, but really don't care about Jews. But what about the Muslims, who do exactly the same? Who confess to care for Palestinians, but who don't help them or take them in? He hates the west, but still lives there. There is a lot I don't understand from this man, but he talks in one way only: Israel and the West are too blame, not Palestinians or the Muslims countries who mistreated the Palestinians. Although several countries have kicked out his people by the 100.000's. This interview he showed his bias against the west and Israel. And noI am not pro-Israel or anti Palestine. I want there to be peace and reconciliation!
    1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. These people are so delusional......21% of Israeli's are Palestinians Arabs with the same rights, well more rights. They don't have to join the army, the Jews do. A secular Palestinians state? HAMAS want a Islametic Caliphate with sharia law, they say it so themselves. The Nakba? Jews have lived 3300 years in the land, sometimes in the millions, sometimes in the tens of thousands. But they have always been there. After the holocaust more Jews went to the British Mandate of Palestine. There has never been an independent Palestinia state ever in history. At first their were Canaanite city states, the Jews took over and pushed some out and others stayed. Eventually the Canaanites ceased to exist, so the Palestinian aren't there relatives. The Philistines lived also next to Israel, but they were from Greek lands. They ceased to exist too. Fast forward to 2000 years ago the Romans ruled of Judah (part of Israel), the Jews revolted in 70 AD against the Roman occupation. The Romans killed 1,5 million Jews and pushed many out, but still some Jews remained. The Romans also renamed the land of Israel/Judea into Palestine as punishment. Bcs Palestine is the Latin word for Philistine. Since then Israel has been ruled by many different empires, Persians, Byzantines, Arabs, Crusaders, Arabs muslims again, Ottomans, etc, until 1917 when the British took over from the Ottomans who lost the war. In 1948 the Jews asked the Arabs to form one country with the Arabs (they weren't called Palestinians yet, Jasser Arafat started calling them Palestinians from the late 1960's) or 2 different countries, 1for the Jews and 1 for the Arabs/Palestinians. The Arabs declined and the Arabs nations (which were just formed a few decades earlier after the fall of the Ottoman empire) said to the Palestinians come to our countries, then we are going to kill all Jews (genocide) and you can return after we have won. But against all odds the Jews won. So, now the Palestinians were outside the land and could not go back, thanks to the Arabs nations. The Arab nations were so angry they kicked out 840.000 Jews of their countries, who had been living their for 2000 years or more. They had nowhere to go, so most went to Israel. Since then there have several attempts to come to a peace agreement, but all have been declined by the Palestinians. They could have had their own country from 1948 onwards. Hamas doesm't want peace, they say it themselves, they want one thing they say themselves: they want all Jews dead and start an Islametic Caliphate with sharia law. So, gays for Palestine will not ne welcome in a Caliphate, bcs they get killed. If these protesters really were concerned about people suffering, 24.000 people die a day from hunger, that is more than 6 million since Okt 7, while in Gaza 24.000 people died in 9 months, while the same amount dies a day of hunger. So why not use your time to raise money to keep people from dying from hunger? That really helps, shouting om the street and harassing people, leads to absolutely nothing!
    1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. I know he is frustrated, but instead of appreciating the people who invite him and want to hear his story, he attacks them constantly and put words in their mouths. And acts if nobody cares about Palestinian. So, that is why we have 6 months of demonstrations and the west and others have sent billions upon billions in aid and help the last 50 years? So, nobody cares? He also says nobody cares if 30 Palestinians get killed, but of it happens in London people do care. Uh what? Over 100 kids get stabbed and killed and does anyone care? And what about the 400.000 Yemenites? Nobody cares about them, they get a 100.000 times less attention also in islamic countries than the Palestinians. Or the people in Sudan, Somalia, Libya or Syria? Do you hear any news about these people? Nope, but for years the Palestinians get most screen time. But sadly he seems to see everybody as an enemy and hates the wests for what happens in Palestine. But what about the islamitic countries who treat the Palestinians badly as well? Kuwait kicked out 400.000 Palestinians, did anyone protest? But what about what the Palestinians did and do in Lebanon, they wrecked the country which took them in. It is not just one group who is at fault, it is way more complex than that. Israeli's do bad things, Palestinians, Arabs, Europeans and Americans, etc. I agree though with them, it looks hopeless. The difficulty is if there is so much hate on both sides, how can you over come this? If people cannot forgive, this problem won't go away. Btw he said Jews treat Christians badly also, even from England. But what about the Palestinian Christians who were bullied and had to flee from their lands also bcs how Muslims treated them? Several Palestinian towns were majority Christian, but now only have a small minority.
    1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. ​ @zaydevans2077 Jews aren't allowed ro travel to many islamic countries, but I don't hear you talk about that, well nobody talks about it actually Jews have been living in what is now Israel for over 3000 years. And after the pogroms in Eastern Europe Jews went to the area which is now Israel to join the Jews there. They bought swamp and desert land (the worst parts) and cultivated them, attracting Arabs labourers from the area. It was still under Ottoman occupation. And after the 1st world war, the Brits took over control of the area. Fast forward 2nd world war, Hitler was friends with a Palestinian mufti, who shared their hatred of Jews. He lived in Germany for several years. After the war Jews who survived the holocaust fled to British occupied "Israel" , because they knew they would not be safe anywhere, only in a land which they could protect themselves. So, in 1947/1948 they wanted their own state, free from British rule. They asked the Arab Palestinians if they woukd form 1 shared country or 2 seperate ones. The answer of the Arabs was that they attacked the Jews, who wanted to drive them all into the sea. (Kill them all). The Arab nations said to the Palestinians come to our countries, while we take care of the Jews and when we are done, you can all return. Against all odds the Jews won and now 700.00 Palestians lived abroad, thanks to their Arab brothers. These Arabs were so angry they lost the war, they kicked out about 840.000 Jews from their countries between 1948 and 1951. These Jews had been living there for 2500 years, like in Iraq. Longer than the Arabs were there. But no merci, despite they had nothing to do wih Israel or the war. They had to leave everything behind, from Turkey to Morocco they were kicked out. Most went to Israel, where else coukd they go? They were just slaughtered in Europe and now they were threatened with another genocide. Gaza and the Westbank weren't captured yet in the 1948 was. Gaza was taken by Egypt and the Westbank by Jordan. Then the Arabs attacked Israel again and Israel captured Gaza and the Westbank in 1967, also the Sinaï. They gave the Sinaï back to Egypt, but Egypt didnot want Gaza back, which is odd. The Jordanians didn't want the Westbank either. They even waged several wars against the Palestinians and kicked out 100.000s of them. Nobody protested. In war if you are attacked and you win and capture lands of the attacker, it is yours. Israel never set out to capture land, they just asked for a small portion in 1948, but the Arabs said no. Mind you Arabs have many countries, Jordan is also a newly formed country in the 1940's. There could have been 2 states and peace from 1948 onwards, the Jews asked for a tiny piece of lands, while the Arabs in the region got the whole area. But they didn't want one small section for the Jews, who had nowhere to go. Since then several attempts have been made to come to a peace deal, but all were declined by the Palestinian leaders. There could have been free movement, but how many suicide attacks have there been? How many assaults? If one state in the US attacks the next every time, free movement is gone too. Of course Israel has made many mistakes, but they have been persecuted for over 2500 years. If they don't stand uo for themselves, they will be gone. Almost every country in the region wanted Israel and the Jews gone. There is a saying, if Israel lays down their weapons, Israel and the Jews are gone, if HAMAS and Hezbollah put down their weapons, there is peace tomorrow. Again Israeli's cannot travel to many countries, even tourist who travel to Israel were denied access if they wanted to go from there to one of the muslim countries. HAMAS has in their charter they don't want peace, all they want is all Jews dead, Israel wiped of the map and Palestine to become an islamic caliphate like ISIS had. It is in their own documents. So, how else can Israel respond to people who voted for a party with over 70% of the people who want all Jews dead? In the charter it says "When a Jew hides behind a tree or stone, the tree will says come here, there is a Jew behind me, come kill him or the stone, who says there is a Jew behind him, come kill him" So, how would you deal with people who hate you so much and taught their children to hate you even more? And every peace deal you offered, they declined? And every oportunity to work for you and study at your univeristies and even are allow to get treatment in your hospitals and they still hate yoi with every fibre of their being. Did you know Pakistan was created in 1947 which caused a staggering 14 million people to flee to India. Are they still called refugees after all those years? Does anybody every talk about them or protest for them? No, the whole world is only angry at Israel, why is that? Wars in Yemen with 400.000 deaths or Syria withn700.000 deaths and not a single peep. Or the 5 millions deaths in Congo or the 8 million people who are displaced in Sudan? Or the 8 million people who died of hunger since Oct 7 last year. Nobody cares, but one of the smallest conflict in the world gets the most people riled up and mass protest break out and Jews are harassed worldwide. Why is that?
    1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. The whole world stumbles over Israel and the Jews, they say because of the Palestinians. Not true, because the Gaza conflict is one of the smallest conflict in the world, but Israel and Jews face by far the most hate. There are (civil) wars all over the place, in Yemen 400.000 people have died, Syria 800.000, Congo 5 million, Sudan 100.000s and 8 million displaced. Have you ever seen one single protest against them or against their enemies? Not one! 10 to 160 times more casulties in these conflicts, but Israel is the absolute worst with 32.000 deaths? Of course 32.000 is still a lot, but HAMAS attacked first and kidnapped 100s of people, who they don't want to let go, even though there own people are dying bcs of it. So what does that say of HAMAS? And people are delusional, they think when Israel is gone, Jews can remain in greater Palestine and it will be all peace and happiness. Nothing is further from the truth, HAMAS want all Jews dead and turn Palestine into an islamic caliphate under sharia law. No democracy, no human rights, no freedom of speech, no womens rights and certainly no lhgbtqi+ rights. The weird thing is, the left has alligned themselves with islamists and fight for a state, which hate all the other groups they say they are fighting for. Apperantly the hatred for Jews and Israel is greater than their love for the lhgbtiq+ community. I talked to muslims why they weren't upset by what is going on in Yemen, they said "well it is a civil war and in civil wars, people die. No big deal". So, it is about the Jews, not about the Palestinians.
    1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. Bibles are the same, every Bible tells the same story about Israel and that God sent his Son to free psople from sin to teach how we should live. Some churches have a few books more in the Bible (Bible is a collection of books and letters), but they don't add much and doesn't change it. There is also ONE gospel not four, but four people wrote about it. They sent copies of there letters/gospel to other christians and Jews and gentiles to teach them about Jesus. If you write a letter to you mother about a holiday you went on with your dad, brother and sister and they also all wrote letters about the holiday, than you didn't have 4 holidays, but 1 holiday and 4 people writing about it. And everybody writes differently, so you may write longer sentences than your father and you may tell about your father going for a swim, while your sister don't mention this at all and writes about something your dad did, what you didn't write about it. The same with the gospel, Matthew and john were both eyewitnesses of Jesus and lived and worked with them, Mark often travelled with Peter and wrote what he heard from Peter. And Luke also travelled with the disciples and Paul, so he wrote what he heard and probably read in the gospel written by Matthew. Jesus could read and write, he wasn't illetrate. He often went to the synagogue and read from the Torah, like is mentioned in Luke 4: 16 He went to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and on the Sabbath day he went into the synagogue, as was his custom. He stood up to read, 17 and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was handed to him. Unrolling it, he found the place where it is written: 18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me,     because he has anointed me     to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners     and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free, 19     to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” So, he could read and also he was taught by the Holy Spirit. He spoke Armeic/Hebrew and also Greek (he spoke to the Romans and Greeks who lived in Judea (part of Israel). Some say he was born on 25 December, but some say it was in March, but it is not really important.
    1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. Exactly, I never understand these people who say "but in the end I believe in the goodness of humanity"..........Human history was full of violence, biogtry, human sacrifice, murder, wars, torture and slavery. Many atheists say he morals of today are just made up from concensus. But they still call the police when someone doesn't adhere to the concensus and break into their house or fight back when a country with different morals attacks them. Of course for good reason, but can you really be angry at others with different morals if it comes down to concensus? The West is in decline since Christianity is on the way out. More division, more loneliness, more depressions, more suicides, more divorces, more drug use, more selfishness, more obsity, more chronic diseases and more state control to make up for the changing society. Doesn't mean Christians are the better people, not at all. But it binded us together and taught us to care for each other. Christians built by far the most schools, universities, hospitals, maternity centres, eldey homes, care homes, etc of any group on earth. But since Christianity is in decline the state had to take over and they became the standard of what we should teach our children. They took more and more responsibilies from the people and so taking our freedom to decide for ourselves. The left wants to give even more power to the state, because they don't trust the people. Ask yourself why they want to. Dennis is right about music and art also, but that is not the only thing the age of atheism brought: marxism, communism, nihilism, relativism, horrible architecture, horrible art, a lot of horrible music, movies get worse and worse and then the latest invention:woke, with the obsessive celebration of lhgbtqia++, abortion and euthanasia and demonising everyone who don't agree with them.
    1
  1512.  @RufusTFirefly6843  You must live in a very safe and peaceful neighbourhood that you can say such things. And is that custom that you put words in people's mouths and then judge them for what you made up they said? I never said it wasn't a big deal when people die, never. So stop lying! I just asked you what you did yourself to stop people from dying, but of course you failed to answer that. So, I guess you don't do much. That is odd if you are so concerned for people. So, again what have you done beside complain on internet? Did you give money or did you keep your old Iphone 6s just like me, so you could help more children in Africa instead of buying a new phone? Or are you just virtue signalling on internet? Because complaining is easy, but actually helping others is a whole different story. But you seem more concerned for people who die in Gaza than the 12 million who die of hunger and people you could actually have helped. Your false accusations against me are an admission of who YOU are. Yes, who I am, I help children in Africa. That is the difference between you and I it looks. The IDF did their utmost best to stop civilians from dying and getting hurt, that you lie about that, that is on you. But okay. HAMAS attacked Israel, but now you blame the people who fight back. The IDF throws flyers out of planes to warn people they were about to attack and sending text messages to all phones. Tell me, which army does that after their people were raped, beheaded and set on fire, even babies? Tell me, please, you seem to know. Hamas uses civilians as human shields, even women and children and if they run away, they shoot them, yes they shoot them! So, what is Israel to do, when Hamas promised to repeat Oct 7 again and again and again? Please tell me, you seems to know a lot about war! Have you read the charter of Hamas? Here is a direct quotation, they think the end of times will come, when all Jews are dead. "Allah's Messenger said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him." So, please again, tell me what could Israel have done differently? If someone says they want to kill all the Jews, Jews know ONE THING: TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY! But you think they just target civilians. Tell me why they did? There is no reason to go for civilians, because the whole world is against them, the more people die, the more people hate the Jews all over the world. So, that is just nonsense. But you just choose to believe Hamas propaganda over Israel. Bit odd, that is for sure. And again, what have you done, besides complaining about people dying in a war you don't understand and you blame the IDF, while the cause of this war was Hamas. Or do you blame the British and Americans also for the German deaths in WWII or for the fact that civilians died in the fight against ISIS?
    1
  1513. 1
  1514. The media and politicians were more outraged about the riots, than about the killing of 3 young girls and wounding of others. That says something sinister! And this was the umpteenth attack by new comers of their offspring on British people and their children. If this he first attack, there would not have been riots. But the stabbings, acid attacks, groomings, etc, etc keep on going. This was just the last straw for many people. But the politician and the media just don't want to see his, bcs they belong to the diversity is awesome cult. But they can only be part of the cult, when they don't live in the neighbourhoods ordinairy people live. Because then they would have know that too much diversity isn't a strength, it is the opposite! It is a fuse waiting to be ignited, bcs off people who have completely different values and morals than the natives. You need shared values and a shared language, otherwise you cannot live peacefully together. These people come from countries where diversity is put down, so do peop,e really think they all leave their bias behind when they cross our borders? Of course not, especially when they don't mix with natives and only watch tv from their home countries and only hang out with their 'own people'. This isn't rocket science, this is human nature. Diversity can only work if we have shared values and mutual respect. All alarm bells should be ringing loudly if you see new comers pay our hospitallity back by terrorism, stabbings, murder, grooming gangs, anti-Semitic marches, burning our flags and by not integrating and learning our languages. But they just don't want to see it, bcs they live in their own safe bubbles. And these migrants who spit on our way of life, ruin it for the good migrants. So, it is not only natives suffering, it are the people from the West-Indies and many other communities, bcs angry people don't see clearly, often they see everyone as a foreigner. So, this can get outmof hand quickly. Pray it won't and you will get new leaders who can keep the peace and who will listen to the people and will tackle all the problems leading up to this chaos.
    1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. That is nonsense, many countries were dictatorship because of the royals who ruled over these lands. Ruling over people isn't christian at all, that people abused christianity for their own gain, like power hungry folk use anything and everything to gain power or stay in power. Democracy was introduced when Europe was still christian, not secular. You can look up all the names and see they were christians. The thing atheists cake up with was marxism and communism, which were introduced in Russia and which later became the Sovjet-Union, China, North Korea, Cambodia, etc. 200 million people were killes in those countries, the most EVER. Churches, synagoues and mosques were destroyed and freedom and free speech were abolished under the regime which hated religion and who promised to bring a utopia free from faith. It turned into a nightmare! And the people fled to christian countries from there, not the other way around. That is odd, if the countries without religion should have been so much better as you say. Modern science was started by christians, look uo the first scientific journals in the UK, it says they were pursueing science understand creation better and to the glory of God. Scientific journal still exists btw. The person voted the greatest scientist of all time was a christian, Isaac Newton. By far the most scientific discoveries were done by christians and per capita, the Jews. Christians built by far the most schools, universities, hospitals, carehomes, maternity centres, etc, etc. Give most money to charity and spent most time helping others. And the christian rules forbid dictatorships also Luke 22:24 A dispute also arose among them as to which of them was considered to be greatest. 25 Jesus said to them, “The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them; and those who exercise authority over them call themselves Benefactors. 26 But you are not to be like that. Instead, the greatest among you should be like the youngest, and the one who rules like the one who serves. 27 For who is greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves? Matthew 7:12 Treat other the way you want to be treated yourself, that is what it is all about. The modern concepts didn't start in the atheistic regimes, all purely atheistic regimes were dictatorships, the modern concept of liberty started in the judeo-christian lands.
    1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. Douglas is right! No other conflict attracts so much hate, as the conflict Israel is in. Yemen with 400.000 deaths, Syria with 800.000, but the whole world stays silent. 5 million people died of hunger since Oct 7. Etc If they all really cared for people, then why aren't there are protest for these milliojs of people? The Jews have heen hit the hardest over 3 years, people have tried to wipe them out several times, they have been kicked out of dozens of countries, chased away from their own lands several times. And now they are the only one who aren't allowed to fight back and make mistakes also? They have to be sensible? Agreed they have to be sensible, but why don't have the Houthi's to be sensible? Or the the west with the attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan? The threatened to stop supplying weapons to Israel, just after they have been attacked with 350 rockets from Iran. Do we stop supplying weapons to S.Arabia who fights in Yemen, where 400.000 people died? Nope! Do we say Ukraine please be careful with the Russians? Did we conquer 80% of Kuwait back after Sadam invaded it? No we chased them all the way into Iraq. I hate war and I think Israel is desteoying too much and there are toomany civilian casualties. But on the other hand, what do you do when 70% of a pollutation vows to kill you and your children, even after you hit him hard several times? Can you allow to take risk, if you fellow men and women have been slaughtered by the millions by people who said the exact same thing before?
    1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. I live on the coast and there is hardly any polution here, not even in the 1970's. We have been lied to for decades, just like about climate. Governments use it all to roll out more control and so they can tax more. Every day the beach is cleaned by the local counsel in Summer also, so it don't end up inmthe sea. Now they have attached the cap to the bottles, because the caps ended up in nature they said, which is absolute nonsense. 95% of bottles are used at home and even the 5% don't end up in nature either. Ever seen people throwing away the cap in nature and the bottle in the bin? Of course not. Same with plastic straws, never come across them in nature, but the government says they all end up in there. So, is someone collecting straws at fastfood restaurauts and throwing them in nature? That said, I rather don't use plastics at all. I have glass and stainless steal straws, I don't want plastic in my mouth. I have always brought my own bags when shopping even 40 years ago. Almost everybody did 40 years ago or more, than suddenly shops started using plastic bags, which was nuts. When we still had our local grocery shop, everybody had their own bags, you brought your jars to he refilled with honey, the milkman had glass bottles, baker used paper bags for the bread, but then in the 1960 the supermarket arose and from then on you saw more and more plastics being used. That is where it went wrong with the advance of supermarkets and the American fastfood companies which spread across the globe made it even worse. They not only kade lots of people fat, but what a waste they produce, it is insane!
    1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583.  @mysteriousman8769  Nonsense, Palestinians are Arabs, no Cananites, no Philistines (they were Greek), but these people were long gone from the area 2500 years ago. There hasn't been a Palestinian state, the name Palestine was given to the land by the Romans as punishment for the Jewish revolt in 70AD, it was the Latin name for Philistine. They gave that name tk punish the Jews. But these people were long gone! For about 3300 year Jews have been living in te land nonstop, sometimes in the millions, sometimes far fewer than that. But they have always been there. Around the 7th century he Arabs invaded the land, from which the Palestinians came (not all of them, bcs in Gaza there are quite a few people from Egyptian decent). The Arabs also invade Iraq, what is now called Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt all the way to Morocco. The last 2000 years Israel or Palestine was in the hands of several different empires, there wasn't a Jewish or Palestinian state, until 1948. The Jews offered to share the land or make 2 countries, 1 for the Palestinians and 1 for the Jews. The Arabs declined and the Arab nations attacked the Jews to kill them all. They said to the Palestinians come to our country so we can drive the Jews in thr sea and when we are done, you can return. But against all odds the Jews won. The Palestinians/Arabs who did not listen to the Arab nation stayed and became Israeli citizen with the same rights as Jews. 21% of Israel's population consist of Palestinians. After the Arabs lost the war, they kicked out 800.000 Jews out of there country would had been living there for 1000's of years. They had to leave everything behind. Should they get their houses and land back too?
    1
  1584.  @mysteriousman8769   @mysteriousman8769  Nonsense, Palestinians are Arabs, no Cananites, no Philistines (they were Greek), but these people were long gone from the area 2500 years ago. There hasn't been a Palestinian state, the name Palestine was given to the land by the Romans as punishment for the Jewish revolt in 70AD, it was the Latin name for Philistine. They gave that name tk punish the Jews. But these people were long gone! For about 3300 year Jews have been living in te land nonstop, sometimes in the millions, sometimes far fewer than that. But they have always been there. Around the 7th century he Arabs invaded the land, from which the Palestinians came (not all of them, bcs in Gaza there are quite a few people from Egyptian decent). The Arabs also invade Iraq, what is now called Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt all the way to Morocco. The last 2000 years Israel or Palestine was in the hands of several different empires, there wasn't a Jewish or Palestinian state, until 1948. The Jews offered to share the land or make 2 countries, 1 for the Palestinians and 1 for the Jews. The Arabs declined and the Arab nations attacked the Jews to kill them all. They said to the Palestinians come to our country so we can drive the Jews in thr sea and when we are done, you can return. But against all odds the Jews won. The Palestinians/Arabs who did not listen to the Arab nation stayed and became Israeli citizen with the same rights as Jews. 21% of Israel's population consist of Palestinians. After the Arabs lost the war, they kicked out 800.000 Jews out of there country would had been living there for 1000's of years. They had to leave everything behind.
    1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. Weet u dat in 1948 de Arabieren de Joden aanvielen om hen allemaak de zee in te drijven, dus genocide te plegen? De Joden vroegen om een klein stukje land voor zichzelf en een groter stuk voor de Palestijnen. Heel het Midden Oosten was onder leiding van de Britten en Frankrijk en na de oorlog werden nieuwe landen gevormd, zoals Jordanië i 1947, Egypte werd onafhankelijk, Syrië en Irak. 95% van de grond ging naar de Arabieren, maar toen de Joden vroegen of zij ook een klein land voor zichzelf mochten hebben, toen zeiden de Arabieren "nooit zullen Joden een eigen land hebben" en begonnen de Arabieren oorlog tegen de Joden. Zij zeiden tegen de Palestijnen kom naar ons, dan vermoorden wij de Joden en kunnen jullie terug als wij klaar zijn. Maar de Arabische landen verloren van het kleine groepje Joden. En in oorlog als je aangevallen wordt, maar je wint van de aanvallers en neemt een stuk van hun land, dan mag je het houden. De Joden begonnen niet de oorlog, de Arabieren. Jordanië pikte toen de Westbank van de Palestijnen af en Egypte Gaza. Dus nu hadden de Joden meer land, dan waar ze om gevraagd hadden en de Palestijnen die niet naar de andere Arabieren geluisterd hadden en gewoon zijn gebleven, die mochten blijven wonen en die kregen dezelfde rechten als de Joden. Daarom wonen er nu 2 miljoen Palestijnen in Israel. De Arabieren waren zo boos dat ze de oorlog van de Joden verloren, dat zij 840.000 Joden uit hun eigen land schopten. Syrië, Jordanië, Egypte, Marokko, Libië, enzovoorts die gooiden allemaal de Joden het land uit. De Joden woonden al 2500 jaar in Irak en moesten vertrekken. Dus de Palestijnen hadden al in 1948 een eigen land kunnen hebben, als ze de Joden niet hadden aangevallen. Israël heeft meerdere keren geprobeerd om vrede te sluiten en hun als nog een eigen land te geven, maar de corrupte leiders van de Palestijnen zeiden iedere keer nee. Israël had de Westbank en Gaza in 2005 al verlaten, maar Hamas bleef raketten schieten. Dus Israël bezette het land niet.
    1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653.  @_MikeJon_  I am not a fan of Hancock, but some of ideas deserve to be listened at. While others are too far fetched. But many archeologists ars dogmatic, like in Israel a tomb of James was found. Without doing any research many shouted right away that it wasn't true, it could not be true, because the Bible wasn't true. I read what they said, it was even on the news. David never existed is another one. If he was such a great king, why hasn't much been found of him. Valid question, but great doesn't mean he was great like Ramses or Julius Ceasar and built huge piramids and palaces, like they did. Also no fortified towns have been found when he was supposed to live. Well, they have now, several. Also a stone with "house of David" on it and other things from that period. I have watched the documentaries years ago and they all claimed David was a myth. First of all archeologists should not draw conclusions like that, because what hasn't been found yet, can be found in the future. (And I don't mean a flying saucer with mumified aliens beneath a pyramid) They also claimed civilisation started at a certain era and everyone claiming otherwise, well was a conspiracy theorist, then they found Gobekli Tepe and others. In North-America they claimed there were any advanced civilisations, while plenty of things have been found to proof otherwise. We were taught all 'indians' lived in tipis, which is far from the truth also. Also we were taught Columbus was the first to discover the Americas, to claim he wasn't, was a conspiracy theory from someone who was mad (that is often the reaction if they disagree with someone). Well now it is clear the Vikings were there much earlier. And did the tempeliers visit North America too? They have found stones with their symbols. And even the Irish may have reached North America, it was possible. Around 1980 I believe his name was Tim Smith built a boat from the 7th century and recreated the journey and was successful. But too often they fight any new theory and many just don't want to accept it. You see that in many other fields also, people are in general dogmatic. That said, we live in an ags everything js challenged, I even saw YT channels where they claim buildings in London and US couldn't have been built in the 1700 and 1800s, but were left from very ancient times. Because they could not find any info who built them or they could not have been built in 3 years as stated in documents they found. So, I see the danger of challenging everything, but that doesn't mean every new idea should be deemed nonsense. But in this day and age it is hard to find the right balance.
    1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679.  @jeffbalog5161  Zephaniah 3, Zechariah 10 and Zechariah 12 and other places in the Bible speak of the restoration of Isreal, which has happened and still happening. But what has not happened is that they will mourn over the One they have pierced (Jesus, the Messiah) not and also the world has not stood at the gates of Jerusalem yet also. Zephaniah 3 18 “I will remove from you all who mourn over the loss of your appointed festivals, which is a burden and reproach for you. 19 At that time I will deal with all who oppressed you. I will rescue the lame; I will gather the exiles. I will give them praise and honor in every land where they have suffered shame. 20 At that time I will gather you; at that time I will bring you home. I will give you honor and praise among all the peoples of the earth when I restore your fortunes[e] before your very eyes,” says the Lord. Zechariah 10 6 “I will strengthen Judah and save the tribes of Joseph. I will restore them because I have compassion on them. They will be as though I had not rejected them, for I am the Lord their God and I will answer them. 7 The Ephraimites will become like warriors, and their hearts will be glad as with wine. Their children will see it and be joyful; their hearts will rejoice in the Lord. 8 I will signal for them and gather them in. Surely I will redeem them; they will be as numerous as before. 9 Though I scatter them among the peoples, yet in distant lands they will remember me. They and their children will survive, and they will return. Zechariah 12 2 A prophecy: The word of the Lord concerning Israel. The Lord, who stretches out the heavens, who lays the foundation of the earth, and who forms the human spirit within a person, declares: 2 “I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that sends all the surrounding peoples reeling. Judah will be besieged as well as Jerusalem. 3 On that day, when all the nations of the earth are gathered against her, I will make Jerusalem an immovable rock for all the nations. All who try to move it will injure themselves. 10 “And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. THEY WILL LOOK ON ME< THE ONE THEY HAVE PIERCED, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn son. 11 On that day the weeping in Jerusalem will be as great as the weeping of Hadad Rimmon in the plain of Megiddo. 12 The land will mourn, each clan by itself, with their wives by themselves: the clan of the house of David and their wives, the clan of the house of Nathan and their wives, 13 the clan of the house of Levi and their wives, the clan of Shimei and their wives, 14 and all the rest of the clans and their wives. Best read the entire chapters, it is all about the restoration of Israel. And this last chapter is not about Pentacost, because the land (Israel) has not mourned over this yet, only a small portion of it.
    1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. Pro open borders.....sigh! Why can other people force me to accept millions of foreigners in my country, so much so that the waiting list for social rental houses since 2015 have gone up from 4 years to 10 years or more, even up to 15 or 16 years! The people who are pro mass migration, all live in a expensive bought houses and not in social housing. They don't have to wait 10 to 16 years for a house, like we do. They don't have neighbours who they cannot understand, bcs they refuse to learn and speak our language, not even after 10 years. They don't live between people who come from countries which hate each other and start massive fights in front of their houses (like we have), they don't have stabbings (like we have had), they don't have people driving without licence and are a danger(like we have) or use their garden as a dumb, etc, etc. This is not an isolated incident in my street, it happens everywhere. It is not only the natives, but also the older migrants, who came here to work who say the same. Their children cannot get houses either, they see the violence going up too. People who don't experiences and talk about it, are ofc racists according to the pro-open borders, but again they live in communities where there are no refugees. These migrants came here to work and take responsibility over their lives, but of the refugees 80% doesn't work or speak the languages in my town and at the same time we get migrant workers from Eastern Europe. Can anyone explain this? I used to welcome refugees first, bcs I felt for them. So, no racist here! But when I ask them if I could help learning Dutch or getting a job, they all said 'nope, don't wanna learn the languages and did not come here to work' (I used a translator). And no this is no lie, they really said this.
    1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693.  @WhatsThisNonSense  Can't you do some research yourself or think? 200.000 children died in Yemen, I don't hear anybody talk about that? More Germans died in WWII than Americans and British. So? More ISIS fighters died than Americans, British and Russian, including civilians. But then again I heard nonody complain about that either. People only suddenly care when it is about Israel, besides that you never hear anyone. No protests for Sudan, where 100000s have died and 11 million are om the run. So, you confirm my claim with your reply. And where exactly did I say it is okay to starve maim people? You make things up as you go, as so many do. Don't know much about history, Israel or war. Israel gave food and provided water to Gaza, which often was stolen by hamas. The UN aid was left unattached and stood rotting in Gaza in a depot. But the media and most people rather believe hamas propaganda than the Jews. The fact that children died in Gaza is the fact that hamas uses women and children as human shield, they fire at Israel, then get a rocket back to the place where they fire from and then they suddenly surrounded the launch platform with people, to martyr them, who die and if they try to run away, they get shot.......that is hamas and that is why children die. But children were starving over there, no adults. If Hamas wouldn't have attacked, no baby would have died in Gaza, how about that? And 2 million Plaestinians live in Israel, with the same right. They aren't starving or under attack, so it can't be racism the war in Gaza.....
    1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734.  @mohammedxiii  You clearly don't know the Bible and think we only listen to Paul. What did Paul said? Follow Christ alone, not me, not Peter, etc. Old Testament: Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Psalm 2 10 Now therefore, be wise, O kings; Be instructed, you judges of the earth. 11 Serve the Lord with fear, And rejoice with trembling. 12 Kiss the Son, lest He be angry, And you perish in the way, When His wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all those who put their trust in Him. What did Jesus say about himself? John 14: 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. 7 “If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; and from now on you know Him and have seen Him.” 8 Philip said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is sufficient for us.” 9 Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10 Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak on My own authority; but the Father who dwells in Me does the works. 11 Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father in Me, or else believe Me for the sake of the works themselves. John 10:30 I (Jesus) and my Father are one. Luke 10:22 Allthings have been delivered to Me by My Father, and no one knows who the Son is except the Father, and who the Father is except the Son, and the one to whom the Son wills to reveal Him.” John 14:11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake. John 15:26 “But when the Helper (Holy Ghost) comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me. 2 John 1:3 Grace be with you, mercy, and peace, from God the Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father, in truth and love. 1 John 2:22 Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son. 23 Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who acknowledges the Son has the Father also. John 20:26 And after eight days His disciples were again inside, and Thomas with them. Jesus came, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, “Peace to you!” 27 Then He said to Thomas, “Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing.” 28 And Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!” - Thomas called him ‘My Lord and my God’. If Jesus wasn’t, then this would have been blasphemy and Jesus would have rebuked Thomas. Then Jesus answers: 29 Jesus said to him, “Thomas, because you have seen Me, you have believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”
    1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743.  @Essemm52  "I find your bias frighting", says the person who is biased him or herself. I haven't forgotten the attacks on Israel, I defended Israel up until now. And why do you call up those terrorist attacks in the US and Europe and ask such a dumb question if I minded other people couldn't not get the treatment bcs of these attacks. What a ludicrous question is that. Ofc I mind. I myself am the victim of not being able to get help in time bcs of others, with permanet injury as a result. Bcs I care about humanbeings I am biased? So, I can only care for Jews or Westerners? I cannot care for Lebanese and Palestinian people? What a nonsense! You see, that is wrong in this world, people wanting us to choose, bcs if you are not for us, you are against us. Guess what? I don't care anymore. I call out what is wrong. But for many people Israel cannot do any wrong and for others Israel does everything wrong. Well, the truth is more nuanced. Many bystanders got hurt, over 5000 people got injured. Like I said before limps and male body parts were blown off, stomaches ripped open, faces and eyes ripped to shreds. Also from bystanders. And you call me bias when I call these atrocities out? I called the Oct 7 attack oit many a times. Did this attack stop rockets from flying? Nope, it probably will increase the attacks. And it creates more hate, even amongst the people who weren't involved. Many people beca,e terrorist in Iraq after the West wrecked their country. If Israel would have blown up terrorrists or a base, fine. But target people who were amongst civilians is just wrong, more than 5000 people got injured. Israel boasted they weren't like the rest and warned civilians ahead of time, well they didn't this time. You asked about if I cared about the terror attacks and people not getting to hospital. Can I ask you if you cared about the Iraqis who the West bombed, bcs of lies about weapons of mass destruction? 1 million dead and in the aftermaths Quaida and ISIS arose, killing more people. But I cared for the Kurds who were killed by Sadam, but if I cared the US and others killed Iraqis, than I am biased? Oops sorry we did not mean to bomb that wedding where 70 people died, oops sorry that school was a mistake. I am not biased, you are. I call everybody out who does wrong, whether it is Hamas, Hezbollah, Asad from Syria, Houthis in Yemen (almost 400.000 deaths in the war in Yemen en these crazy people call out and attacks Israel?), but also the US, my own country, Russia, UK, I don't care who. Bcs I am not biased. If I was I would only call out 1 side, which I don't. Doesn't mean I say Hezbollah are the good guys now, ofc they aren't, but Israel should have higher standards. And this attack was wrong this way. Wrong is wrong whoever does it.
    1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. @AbHumBolein First of all who says they stole land? If they did why did they live in a tiny flat with 2 families? Pretty bad thieves if you ask me. And why don't you blame you own people for stealing lands, houses, companies of the Jews? You know, when 800.000 Jews who got kicked out of muslim countries first in 1948. And why did the Palestines reject every single peace accord? And how come 21% of Israel's population are Palestinians, if the Jews stole all their land? The Arabs made Israel grow, bcs they kicked out 800.000 Jews who had been living there for 2000 years or even longer. They could not go anywhere else, so they went to Israel. So, if you blame someone, blame them. And the Arabs said to the Arabs living in what is Israel now, flee to our countries, so then we will wipe the Jews of the face of the earth and when we win and the Jews are all dead, you can go back to your houses. But the Arab nations lost the war they started themselves and thanks to them, many Palestinians now could not return. While in 1948 the Jews offered to share the land or make 2 countries. The Arahs rejected and instead started a war. So, Israel grew thanks to the Arabs. What puzzles me is that muslims never protests against the war in Yemen, where 400.000 people died from which 200.000 children, or the war in Syria with 800.000 deaths or Sudan, where 8 people had to flee. Or the land stolen from Armenians and Assyrians. They don't protest for the Rhoninga muslims who got kicked out of Myamar. But they always only protest against one nation: Israel.
    1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799.  @johnelliott5859  “That cannot be an all powerful, all knowing and all loving deity. The character of the god shown in the bible refutes its own existence.” He can be all powerful, all knowing and all loving, but as he created us with free will, we can do whatever we like. You can believe or you can’t, you can treat your neighbours well, or you don’t, you can be kind, or you can be rude, you can give life by feeding people or you ignore it and let them starve. The New Testament is about God becoming man, about salvation and about showing how to live our lives and treat others. There is no contradiction there! We have all done wrong, some more than the other, but we have all sinned/made bad descisions and hurt others. But God gave a free ticket to get out of this suffering here on earth and get eternal life. You see condemnation, but God offers salvation. Nobody else offers it, he alone. John 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. John 6:35 Then Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. And you talk about Christianity is about human sacrifice, which is not true, although it is about sacrifice out of love, God suffered to buy as free. He could have end the whole world, because hardly anyone listened to his commands, and yet he still did not give up on us and gave us a way out and eternal life. Matthew 7:12 Treat others the way you want to be treated yourself. Have a good night! (well it is night here in the Netherlands)
    1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. ​ @sottovoce4626  You are the one who is lying, I wonder if you have ever read a Bible. I guess not or read some parts long ago, because then you would know you are lying. The Romans crucified Jesus, the Jews weren’t allowed to by law to execute anyone, it is all in the Bible, which you clearly don’t know”: John 18: 28 Then the Jewish leaders took Jesus from Caiaphas to the palace of the ROMAN GOVERNOR. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness they did not enter the palace, because they wanted to be able to eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate came out to them and asked, “What charges are you bringing against this man?” 30 “If he were not a criminal,” they replied, “we would not have handed him over to you.” 31 Pilate said, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” “BUT WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO EXECUTE ANYONE,” THEY OBJECTED. John 19:23 WHEN THE SOLDIERS CRUCIFIED JESUS, they took his clothes, dividing them into four shares, one for each of them, with the undergarment remaining. This garment was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom. John 19:38 Later, Joseph of Arimathea ASKED PILATE (THE ROMAN GOVERNOR) for the body of Jesus. Now Joseph was a disciple of Jesus, but secretly because he feared the Jewish leaders. With Pilate’s permission, he came and took the body away. Matthew 27: 27 THEN THE GOVERNOR'S SOLDIERS TOOK JESUS into the Praetorium and gathered the WHOLE COMPANY OF SOLDIERS around him. 28 They stripped him and put a scarlet robe on him, 29 and then twisted together a crown of thorns and set it on his head. They put a staff in his right hand. Then they knelt in front of him and mocked him. “Hail, king of the Jews!” they said. 30 They spit on him, and took the staff and struck him on the head again and again. 31 After they had mocked him, they took off the robe and put his own clothes on him. THEN THEY LED HIM AWAY TO CRUCIFY HIM. So, there you have it, John 18:31 says the Jews didn’t have the right to execute anyone, that is why they went to the Romans, to Pilate. And Matthew 27 says the governor’s soldiers, which were Romans and THEY CRUCIFIED HIM! Now read a Bible before you spread any more lies! Proverbs 30:5 “Every word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. 6 Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar.
    1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. @megarotom1590  True! But Elon is in favour of basic income, because he says many will be obsolete because of the 4th industrial revolution. So, in essence he is saying many will end up in welfare. That is what Elon predicts and not only he, but many others. The World Economic Forum has been saying the same and their favourite adviser Harari called these people useless who cannot join the leap forwards. You cannot create jobs if there is a cheaper alternative, the system in the US prevents that. Bezos has less people working for him, because of all his robots cart and robot arms, which pick up the orders. If you have 10.000 order pickers for instance, if you automate the company you lose 80% at least of that workforce. Of course he then needs more mechanics and programmers, but for sure not 8.000 of them. I don't say we should not innovate, but companies will go for the cheapest option. That is how capitalism works. So, if Bezos can kick out a 8.000 people because his robot army is cheaper, he won't hesitate a second. Elon Musk the same thing. All the people who do manual labour can't suddenly switch to IT, there is no need for a 100 million IT personal in the US. So, what are these people going to do when that happens? Harari said give them drugs and let them play video games. I don't know about you, but playing video games 14 hours a day is like hell to me. And travel because you are free? Well the basic income won't be high enough to do much at all. Then we get a large portion of the population who will become like those people in Wall-i, glued to their chair staring at a screen like zombies. What will we do as a society, just dump the people at home who cannot advance themselves to work in IT and all the other professions the 4th indus. rev. brings or do we choose for the humane option and let them have a job, even if it could easily be taken over by a robot or AI? Even welding, post delivery, farming, cleaning, supermarkets, fastfood restaurants, etc, etc, there hardly is a sector whoch won't be affected. I know what Elon will choose, that is why he is for a basic income, welfare for the people who don't have the talents to go to college or learn a new trade.
    1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915.  @dellchica2373  Mary was sinless? So, you say the Bible is a lie? Just like the Catholic Church does? Romans 3: 21 But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. 22 This righteousness is given through faith in[h] Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile, 23 FOR ALL HAVE SINNED AND FALL SHORT OF THE GLORY OF GOD, 24 and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. 25 God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement,[i] through the shedding of his blood—to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished— 26 he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus. Romans 5: 12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned— ALL HAVE SINNED, does it say except Mary? NOPE, someone made that up, it IS NOT IN THE BIBLE. Neither did she stay a virgin, because she and Jospeh got more children after Jesus was born. Unless of course you say the Bible is lying, feel free to, but be careful with it. Proverbs 30: 5 “Every word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. 6 Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar. 1 John 1:10 If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us. Only Jesus was without sin, that is why he was the only one who could pay for our transgressions.
    1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. The problem is they see migrants as a group they must protect out of some sort of supriority complex, plus they think diversity is a strength. So, everything which undermines their beliefs, have to he attacked, even if that means ignoring Pakistani muslim r@pe gangs. Just like the murder of 3 little girls a few months ago, the media was more upset about people being angry, than they were of the fact that young girls were murdered. These people are missing something, how else can you turn things upside down? That is why they keep going on and on about the so called far right, they portrait it as a far bigger problem than grooming gangs and muslim terrorists, while every sane person knows who where the real danger comes from. The far right is a tiny group of nutters, but everybody who dares to disagree with the media and government is now deemed far right thugs. But did they ever call the grooming gangs or terrorists thugs? Nooooo, they went to mosque to show their support, bcs they feared islamophobia could arise bcs of the terrorists attacks. The world upside down.........I wonder how these people can sleep at night and how it works in their heads to twist and turn everything to fit their narrative, even if that means 1000s of girls were/are molested? But these are white girls, working class often and the entitled leftish journalists look down upon people like that. Believe all women my @ss, they only believe them if they are the right groups. It is a bloody shame, so many girls violated, scarred for life.......a bloody shame and still they ignore them......
    1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. Antisemitism is a cancer which has always been there, but it is getting out of hand, sadly! The most pathetic conspiracy theories run wild, where Jews are blamed for the most ridiculous things out there. You see it in the comment section on Youtube too I got new muslim neighbours, at first they came across as liberals the way the talked and looked. They voted for a liberal party they said, they said we all should respect everyone, even gays. Jews were their brothers, etc. They were nice people and also looked after me, so we became pretty close friends. But after a while, when they really started ro trust me, their stories changed. Homosexuality was a disease. And not much later they said they should as get killed, all of them. And the Jews were behind most problems in the world. And then they said the women in the west are to 'free', even the woman said it. I was shocked, how radically different their views were in reality, than what they claimed theu were when talking to (other) neighbours on the street. And it was not only them, their relatives, friends, they all had the same views. They just lie about it to the Dutch natives here, but they started to see me as one of them and they opened up. Everybody thought they were liberal, because they dressed like people in the west and what they said. Then I found out they believe it is okay to lie to non-muslims. They also said Europe will be islamic within 50 years. Then Syrian refugees moved into my street, also muslim. On Oct 7 after the horrific attack on Israel, they were glad and waving a Palestinian flag, just as other refugees in my neighbourhood. I was stunned, they and their kids celebrated the massacre of 1400 people, including babies and eldery. And this happened all over the world, where muslims and people on the left took to the streets on Oct 7 and 8, long before Israel fought back. They were happy it happened but also angry at Israel at the same time, while Israel had not done anything yet. Another muslim neighbour came to live opposite from me. He was a refugee from Libya and had to flee ISIS he said when he introduced himself. But he said ISIS were no real muslims, it was started by the Jews. Bcs other muslims woukd not have attacked them. He also talked about Jews running all banks in the world and other bs. All the same dumb conspiracy theories. I get so sick of people moving into my country, who have the same hatred for the Jews as the nazi's did and 'sell' the same conspiracies, including Jews are baby killers. The liberals in the west just don't want to see this for some odd reason, not even after several attacks from muslim terrorists. If there is another attack, they don't scratch themselves behind their ears and wonder what is happening here and why, no the first thing they do is they warn against islamophobia which can arise after these attacks. But these attacks happened bcs of westernphobia, Jewphobia, Christophobia, etc
    1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. ​ @mrumarGTA There never has been a Palestianian state before 1948 and before 1946 there wasn't a state called Jordan either. Jews have been living there for the last 3300 and have had a country called Israel several times and later Judea. The land was ruled by many empires, but there were always Jews there, sometimes in the millions, sometimes in the 10.000's, but they were always there. In 70AD the Romans killed 1,5 million Jews and kicked out many others, they renamed the land into Palestine, which is the Latin name for Philistea, the old enemy of Israel. They did it to punish the Jews extra to rename the land after their old enemy, although the Philistine died out long ago. They were Greeks btw, not Arabs like people who call themselves Palestinian today. The Arabs captured the lajd somewhere around the 7th to 8th century, so they weren't natives either, they came from the east, from well guess what: Arabia. After the holocaust Jews fled Europe, bcs of centuries of persecution. They joined their brothers and sisters in what was called the British Mamdate of Palestine, it wasn't a Palestinian state! In 1948 they ask the Arabs living there also to form 1 state together with them or 2 seperate state, 1 for the Jews and 1 for the Arabs. The Arabs said no and the surrounding Arab nations said to the Palestinians come tomour countries, so we can kill al the Jews and when we are done, you can return. Many listened and moved, but then the Jews won against all the odds. And in international law it states when you are attacked , but then win and take land, it is yours. Still many Arabs said we dom't listen and stay and those became Israeli citizen, with the shame rights as the Jews. They just don't have to join the army, only Jews are oblihed too, although they can join voluntarily, which some do. All the peace plans since 1948 have been declined by the Palestinians! They could have had a country from 1948 onwards, but they refused it every time. (they weren't called Palesrinians in 1948, Jasser Arafat started using the term in the 1960's btw HAMAS has always said they don't want peace, they don't want 2 states, the only thing they want is to kill all the Jews, it is written in their charter. And when that is done, they will start an islamic caliphate where sharia law is implemented.
    1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. ​ @ME-ot2ce You talk about the oppressed, but clearly know little about the history. The Jews have been the people who have been kicked out countries the most. In 70AD the Romans killed 1,5 millions Jews, tore the temple down and many others fled the country, still some remained and their have been Jews in Israel for 3300 years. The Jews were oppressed by the Romans, Catholics and by the muslims in Nothern Africa and Middle East. Jews were kicked out of Spain, England, Portugal and many other countries. About 120 years ago they were oppressed in eastern Europe, where many were killed and others had to flee. Then in Europe they were oppressed even more and 6 million were killed. Then after WWII they fled to the British mandate of Palestine, where they asked the Arabs to form one country with them or 2 seperate states, one for the Jews and one for the Arabs (in 1948 they were not called Palestinians yet, that was introduced in the 1960's). But the Arabs said no and we will wipe you all out. So, many of them just survived the holocaust and now the Arabs want to murder them all again. So, the Arabs nations said to the Palestinians, come to our country, so we can wage war against the Jews and wipe them of the face of the earth. Then against all odds the Jews won and these Palestinians who chose the other side were now abroad. But there were also Arabs who remained and 21% van Israels population are Arabs, who have the same rights and can study, work start companies, they can become judges or proscuters and even politicians. After the 1948 war, the islamic nations were so angry that theu kicked out 800.000 Jews, who had to leave all their possesions behind and had to leave overnight. These people didn't have anything to do with Israel and have been living there for over 2000 years. From 1948 there have been many attemps to get peace between the Palestinians in Gaza and Westbank, but ALL peaces treaties were declined by the Palestinians, all of them. HAMAS says in their charter we don't want peace, we don't want 2 states, all we want is to wipe out Israel and kill all the Jews. I don't say Israel doesn't make mistakes, they do kf course. But you cannot talk to people who want you all dead, like HAMAS. And 70-80% voted for them and more tha 70% agreed with the Oct 7th attack according to a Palestinian survey.
    1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978.  @youngsixty7395  So, everybody should leave the Americas? Because many are mixed race or do you have to be full blood native? Or 51%? Do all the Asians in the US also have to leave and the Afro-Americans? And some of the natives in the America arrived around 1200-1400 AD, so do they have to go back to Russia as well? Or only the whites? And if the people don’t want to go or cannot leave, will they be killed? Do the Scotti (Irish tribe who invaded Scotland, Scotland was name after them) have to retreat to Ireland and give back the land to the Picts? The English back to main land Europe? Will be hard, bcs English are made up of Anglos, Saxons, Jutes, Viking Danes, Celts, Normans (who were from Norway and Denmark who invaded what is now Normandy in France and then invaded England and later Ireland) and also Hugonuts from Franch and Belgium. Do the Turks have to leave Turkey, bcs they conquered the land of the Byzantines at appr. the same time as the Americas were discovered in 1453 and the Americas were discovered in 1492. And the Arabs, should they leave Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Libya, etc, etc? These were all Christian countries and the genocide went on for centuries, even today in Iraq Christian were killed in large numbers and driven out of the country. Or the 1,5 million Armenian and 400.000 Assyrians, all Christians, who were killed by the Ottomans. Do the Slavic people and muslims have to leave Albania, Montenegro and North Macedonia? Because Greeks used to live there. Do the muslims have to leave Afghanistan and Pakistan and India and bring back the Hindus and Buddhists? I guess only the whites have to go back, everybody has invaded and were invaded. Everybody had slaves, but only whites are at fault. Nonsense of course. The native tribe of the Commanche stole land from the Apache. So, who get the land back if all others leave, the Commanche or Apache? But before these tribes lived there, another peoples lived there, so now where do the Commanche and Apache go?The Comanche bands regularly waged war on neighboring tribes and European settlers encroaching on Comancheria. Although infamous for their unrelenting warfare and raiding into Mexico, they also took thousands of captives from raids on other Native tribes as well as Anglo settlers on the American frontier. Many of these captives were kept as slaves or traded to the Spanish in New Mexico. The Western nations had abolished slavery long ago, but at around 1500 it came back for 300 years, sadly. But then it was abolished again, while the rest of the world kept slavery legal. In the Middle East it went on until the 1960’s and 1970’s. And this is how the Arab muslims treated the black slaves: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xN0sBDQWzYQ&ab_channel=BlackJournals Although the Ottomans did the same, but with Europeans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_Ottoman_Empire They captured millions of white Europeans and enslaved them, the word slave comes from the Slavic people. And then there were the Barbary muslim slave traders, who captured also over a millions Europeans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade It was all wrong what happened in the America’s, but the natives were fighting amonst each other too. The natives in Mexico for example practised human sacrifice. Thousands were sacrificed in 1 day even, that is how bad it was. So, do we hand over the Mexico to the Aztecs again? Mexico is a melting pot and the natives even asked the Spaniard for help, bcs of the violence and human sacrifice. Native tribes in what is now the US also worked together with Europeans and when they bought firearms, they waged war on other tribes and drove them off their lands. All peoples have sinned, not only Europeans, we all have sinned. Some more than others, but no country, nor people, nor tribe were innocent. We cannot go back 400 or 500 years and kick out all the whites, that would even cause more bloodshed. Is that what you want?
    1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1