Comments by "Suzy Qualcast" (@suzyqualcast6269) on "Middle East Eye" channel.

  1. For fair care whilst being abducted? That sounds purely vindictive.
    15
  2. Just think what they've been doing g with the bodies, in the ruins, where they allow NO journos eye on witness, just imagine....
    9
  3. From his skittish footwork, I'd guess the plod was scared to nth degree, not knowing what to do with a melting man in front of him.
    4
  4. Think you have to declare yourself bankrupt if you've become a loss rather than a profit to yourself or yours. Morally so if you've taken to smacking your wife. Try writing a book?
    2
  5. Tis a shared land post 47/8. Except they allowed one sharer an army. Oh, and there's OIL below Gaza some want to take for FREE.
    2
  6. You've got it. As in their statement that Hamas are camouflaging themsens as civilians. 'Dead' giveaway.
    1
  7. No resolve likely there, Netman & Co wants the identified rather LaRgE OIL reserves below and offshore Gaza for FREE... The land as a bonus filip for Idsraels grabbing settler crew for pristine apartments with a view of the azure blue Med.
    1
  8. So Ids breaks the agreement with a new demand as because the Pals wish to stick with the original decisions the Ids batter them again. Cards on't table Ids want the Pals gone from Gaza/West Bank so they lift the Pals only other asset - it's OIL, for FREE.
    1
  9. WW1 was brought about by an expansionist Kaiser who couldn't get the Navy he wished for his Empire thus to equal his cousins across the Channel.
    1
  10. Eff Netman, in his/'its' quest for FREE OIl and fancied seaside living space. Not hate speech, utube, just statement of feeling and fact.
    1
  11. No, they haven't, collaterally, happen, but more specifically since WW1, when numbers became the crucial matter of fact.
    1
  12. @@Ares-sp7vo cos said soldats are shooting civvies, claiming that the nme is camo'd as them. Confusingly simple, is it not. Best thing is to simply not exist over there.
    1
  13. @@Ares-sp7vo 'Rules of War' expect white flagged, clearly ungunned, half naked peeps be taken in as captures, NOT used as live meat, yelling for Help in Hebrew, squiggling TARGETS!!
    1
  14. For doing what was demanded of him by suits never near any battlefield....
    1
  15. I just wanted to apologise for getting Shaban mixed up with wthe Viet napalm attack image. Either on here or elsewhere, twas an honest mistake. I'm so sorry for your loss.
    1
  16.  @j_shelby_damnwird  I think we've all encountered conscience. Proves, deep down that we know what is right, what is wrong.
    1
  17. Keep your thieving mitts off Pal land, GWAN!
    1
  18. Aye. Wars are fought twixt armies, NOT n never with an army directing itself agin a civilian population. Maybe Israel (what would they be minus 🇺🇸 arms/aid) are attempting to redefine the term. Makes one wonder, especially after all the years of bleating what their great and grandparents went through as targets of another country's pseudo military directed efforts.
    1
  19. They're after not just the land but, particularly the OIL below and offshore Gaza, for FREE. Thus Sam's interest in the continuation, s'all a sham.
    1
  20. Has she spent much time in 🇺🇸 ¿?
    1
  21. Seems the decision is out the bag now, to stamp the name Israel upon the land, sod any locals of any other title.
    1
  22. Wants it c l e a r e d for real estate redevelopment = fancy villas with pristine views of the Med. Loadsamoney.
    1
  23. Seems walking round, like the pic illustrates, stripped to the waist, hands aloft, carrying a white flag makes one a target. WHO is it that's been rattling on about the Conventions of War? At the outset of all this 'to arms', twas said was the enabling card for clear away leading to prime real estate development - vlllas with a perfect Med view, with no pesky previous knocking about. So, the enemy poses as civilians, eh? Well that's tough, first side ever that's moved in to wipe the indigenous cos said enemy isn't in uniform, and effectively admitted it.
    1