Comments by "BigKandRtv" (@BigKandRtv) on "Candace Owens: Democrats are utter psychopaths and this is just one example" video.

Don’t you already depend on the government? Do you have your own Marines, Air Force, navy etc.?
3
@jeffreyfailing3183 Bless your heart Jeffrey, you miss read my post reread it because my challenge isn’t what you think it is. And by the way, just because someone doesn’t instantly respond to you doesn’t mean they can’t respond. I was driving buddy. Settle down.
2
Look at the title. More radicalization by Fox News.
1
Brother, do you want 81 million Americans labeled as sociopaths and psychopaths? You must really hate her country.
1
@michelleschweizer9000 Michelle, are you claiming correlation or causation?
1
Patriotic Americans who hate 81 million Americans. Who call those 81 million Americans psychos. That’s not very patriotic.
1
OK I’m gonna give you that. That was funny. However, Trump letting our economy shut down and spending $7 trillion in deficit spending is what led to this recession. Still a funny comment though.
1
@im2tweaked Tweaked, or anyone else who qualifies please let me know. I’m looking for a conservative to help me test a theory via YouTube comments. I am asking for a back and forth in this comments thread, and what I want to test is pretty simple. This is not a got you to get a conservative, and I don’t think you’ll really get an opportunity to own me either. This is more about figuring out why we get such wildly different information. Any takers?
1
@im2tweaked So what I am trying to test is my belief that Conservatives are mislead because they are not motivated to look into what the news tells them. That has been my existing theory. I have been wondering if I am wrong about that, and perhaps they search and read about things like this just as I do. Perhaps conservatives do make the effort just like me, but an algorithm(s) give them a different out come than I get. I want to compare search results on the same topic using Google. I want to search for the same information that a Conservative searches for, and compare what I get with what they get.
1
@im2tweaked Well, I’m not really concerned about how I look. I’m more interested in figuring out how you and I can get such radically different information.
1
@evtuz9266 If you said radically different information radically different information radically different information radically different information you might have had a point. That's what I am talking about.
1
@im2tweaked Yeah, I am trying to exclude politicians as sources. Biden claims, Trump claims, Pelosi claims -any politician's claims. I don't take important things as fact without verifying with a reliable source.
1
@im2tweaked And Marc Goldwein (Senior Vice President of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget) said Biden reduced the deficit by $126 Billion by end of 2021. So again, I am trying to partner with a conservative to figure out how we end up with such contradictory information.
1
@im2tweaked Dammit, where did all my posts go?
1
@im2tweaked it looks like my last few posts disappeared, so I’ve gotta start over. Settle down tweak I was driving. Obviously I’m responding to you. You’re responding to me so I’ll take that as a sign you’re willing to test this. i’m going to search with Google for the following: “ has Joe Biden entered deficit spending?“ Then I’m going to tell you the top 10 websites that I get when I search. I’m not trying to tell you you are wrong at this point, I just want you to post the top tens websites you get after you search that quote. Give me a few minutes to rebuild the list, because it disappeared the first time I posted it.
1
@im2tweaked Is this getting through?
1
@im2tweaked Do me a favor tweak. Will you try posting a web address and see if your post disappears? Mine do.
1
@im2tweaked I am trying something different because my posts are getting blocked. Fact (words) Check (words) Dottie (words) oh, are, gee. Author of the article is Robert Farley. Hopefully this one doesn't get blocked.
1
@im2tweaked I hope we can get this sorted out, because I want to share what I am finding and where I am finding it. My suspicion is that we are not able to find the same information, even if we search for the same things. Let's see if that one gets blocked.
1
@im2tweaked thanks for checking. I’m starting to suspect I’m going to owe some people apologies. If they can’t get to what I’m seeing, yeah…
1
@im2tweaked Agreed. It would explain a lot about the division in our nation if we couldn’t find the same data. I expected that on Facebook, which is why I quit in 2010. I expect it on MS NBC and Fox news etc. But not on Google.
1
@im2tweaked So many of the posts I’ve made trying to direct you to that article are gone. I assume no one is able to see them. I wonder if YouTube really hates references to outside sources. So I’m going to really disguise the source. On 427 of this year Robert Farley posted an article. The comment about $126 billion deficit reduction can be found in paragraph eight. I’m going to stop there and see if this post gets blocked.
1
I’m going to say one more thing about why I am asking tweak to do this with me. That’s for anyone else reading our comments wondering what the hell I’m going on about. Years ago my wife and I bought a top-of-the-line super fancy car. It had technology that we did not even know existed at the time. My wife and I almost got into a fight on a road trip over what the display screen was showing. We got really angry at each other and thought the other had lost their minds. It turns out it was our first experience with screens that show different menus depending on where you are viewing it from. The driver could see one menu, the passenger could see a different menu, both on the very same screen depending on which side of the car you sat on. we figured this out after nearly calling divorce lawyers. I’m wondering if at least part of the craziness we have in our nation right now is due to us not being able to access the same information, and assuming the other side was either lying or stupid.
1
@im2tweaked OK, why don’t you give me something to search for and let me tell you what I find? See if it matches what you find.
1
@im2tweaked Tweet, is there a post missing? The last thing I saw from you was that you were going to check the one I just directed to you. If you ask a question, ask it again I don’t see it.
1
@im2tweaked Excellent. I see you were able to find the article. I have several appointments this morning, but I will get back to you late today.
1
@im2tweaked OK, I am back. Do you want me to talk about the article on Factcheck, or do you have something I should search?
1
@im2tweaked Tweak, I said clearly that this would probably not provide anyone an opportunity to own anyone. You probably should trust me a little more. So let's dig in. Just a few paragraphs later (#11 & 12), the author points out that at this point Biden's budget had not even passed. It was not even law. The Congress was not operating on Biden's budget. Kind of surprising isn't it? Still no where near $7 Trillion in deficit spending. Now as we know the article we are referring to was from April 27. In the time since that was written, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was passed and signed into law on August 16th. The IRA established a minimum tax rate of 15% on corporations with revenue at or above $1 Billion. That rate is up from 0%, so it's a huge amount.
1
@im2tweaked Background: The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is responsible for preparing cost estimates of every bill under consideration. They do this both as bills are being considered, and after they pass. You can find these on Senate dottie GOVers. The most recent was August 11. HOWEVER, as is the usual situation some components of bills are too complex to complete in just a few days. The IRA is one of them. In the CBO's cost estimate, they explicitly say they need more time to analyse Title 1 of the bill. You can read the bill yourself and see that Title 1 is the tax increase on rich people and big corporations. What they were able to publish were the costs of the other programs in the IRA. And wouldn't you know it, they total $1.703 Trillion dollars over the NEXT NINE YEARS. BUT some media outlets act like they did not notice that the new revenue that is to pay for this was not included in the CBO report. 87K new IRS agents to catch tax cheats, and collect from billion dollar corporations who used to pay zero. And some media outlets chose to leave that out. Again, I am hoping you can go find this information, and that you will verify what I have said independently. Now what I would really like is not to argue with you about the above, but rather have you tell me something you think liberals have ignored and see if I find the same information you have access to. Even if you aren't interested in moving on, I appreciate the work you have put into this.
1
81 million Americans voted against the Republican Party in the presidential election. She is smart because she calls us psychos?
1
@goji059 I disagree on both those point. I remember clearly our economy coming to an absolute halt because of Trump’s failed pandemic response. And I absolutely remember getting checks in the mail with Trump’s name on them while I sat at home. And I am aware of trumps deficit spending. He spent $7 trillion we did not have. This recession is what you get when they economy shuts down and more money flows into it.
1
@terrihilder8217 deficit spending? Can you back that up? The CBO says that with the passage of the inflation reduction act there will be no deficit spending. The Congressional budget office says in fact the deficit Trump ran up will be reduced by $201 billion over time.
1
@terrihilder8217 let me summarize that for you. Trump= debt of $7 Trillion. Biden= no debt, plus paying $201 Billion towards Trump’s mess.
1
@jeffreyfailing3183 Yet you have been. If you were born here, or lived here for any meaningful length of time you have been touched at thousands of points by what the Federal government has done in the past, and what it is currently doing.
1
@jeffreyfailing3183 Jeffery, I am from a different generation. My first job started three months before my 13th birthday. So put your credentials away, they won't help. Let's get this "never taken one cent" dealt with. I am going to stipulate that you have never received any cash/check from the Federal Government. The comment you are arguing against is that everyone is getting help from the Fed. Govt. I am gearing up to list a bunch of ways you probably have gotten help. Do you want me to do it, or are you starting to think of ways on your own?
1