Comments by "BigKandRtv" (@BigKandRtv) on "How will Nikki Haley respond to Stand For America donor list leak?" video.

  1. You were harmed because special interests and their dark money was exposed? Don't you WANT to drain the swamp?
    5
  2. Criminals always whine when they get caught.
    3
  3. Why do you oppose draining the swamp? Special interests and their dark money got exposed. That should be a good thing.
    2
  4. So that would be: He's MINE! I won't give him back!
    1
  5. "The beginning of our Nations Existence..." Only land owners could vote- not women, not people of color. Slavery was legal. The constitution was so flawed we've enacted 27 amendments to it so far. Your incomplete understanding of Freedom and Rights means I don't think I would join your cause.
    1
  6. Yeah, it blows my mind. Not Fox and Nikki, the voters who watch and comment. You would think they would want to know what special interests are pumping dark money into politics.
    1
  7. Sue? What duty did NY's AG owe this Political Action Committee? Seriously, what would be the cause of action?
    1
  8. I agree. There are some really unthinking people watching Fox. They feel the way they are told to feel. And now they are mad because dark money and special interests got exposed. It is like they don't really understand what draining the swamp means.
    1
  9. Bill, why do you oppose exposing special interest groups and dark money? Are you against draining the swamp?
    1
  10.  @tinablanchette5123  Don't worry Tina, Ron is just as out there as you.
    1
  11. Corrupt? What exactly is illegal about the situation?
    1
  12.  @tinablanchette5123  Ah, you don't know... You could have just said that.
    1
  13.  @randyrenner7643  Randy, I know you think so. but this isn’t going to go the way that you think it is. come back, and post the name of the law this violates. Don’t use a hyperlink, because your post will disappear and no one will see it. Just find the law that makes leaking the names of political donors illegal and come back and type in the code and subsection of the law.
    1
  14. Financial donations were ruled political speech by the Supreme Court of the United States. Speech is not guaranteed to be anonymous. The first amendment gives us the right to say (with limitations) what we want. It does not guarantee us any right to hide. some of you fools are literally taking the side of dark money special interest groups in politics. That’s literally what we are talking about. Special interest groups who want to hide their identities while influencing our politics. Only a moron would support that, no matter which side of the aisle is yours.
    1
  15.  @sharonkowaleski1267  yes, I do believe I receive services from our government. I’m going to get on the interstate today, something that I alone did not build. Sharon, it is clear that you take many, many things for granted. The extreme right and the extreme left have much more in common than they would ever recognize.
    1
  16. For???
    1
  17.  @mansiondave23  has any of the Maga scum heard of qualified immunity? obviously not. Only the least intelligent citizens become Maga in the first place.
    1
  18. Sue? On what basis? What legal duty did the NY AG owe this Political Action Committee? Do Republicans expect to be able to keep dark money in politics DARK?
    1
  19.  @AlfredoBodega  No. Republicans got the largest single political donation in history recenty: $1.6 BILLION. But you don't know that, do you?
    1
  20.  @mikebeckett2805  Great example, thank you! Don't voters deserve to know who is donating to which politician, and how much? How can we drain the swamp if Fox News tries to convince us we don't really want to know?
    1
  21. You don't want to know what special interests are pumping money into politics? What happened to draining the swamp?
    1