Comments by "BigKandRtv" (@BigKandRtv) on "This is why the whistleblowers came forward: Former FBI agent" video.

  1. Another comment I agree with. If the evidence is there, what are we waiting for?
    3
  2. Most conservatives don't know the difference. Respect to you for trying to educate them.
    3
  3.  @Hbrown1770  What is your deal? The observation was on point, accurate, and logical. This is AMERICA. We have the freedom to criticize.
    3
  4. Unfortunately I can't disagree with that. Google the Citizens United Supreme Court Case. It supports your point.
    3
  5.  @GoodAvatar-ut5pq  Sorry, I didn't realize you had already educated these sheep. You are correct.
    2
  6.  @federalistpapers4523  Good to know! So that will be on Wednesday? I mean, I don't give a rip about Hunter beyond getting fair and appropriate justice in compliance with our constitution. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
    2
  7.  @Scumbagballless  Agreeing with the original post is disinformation?
    2
  8.  @sunshyne07fl80  Can we stipulate that the payments were made? Then the question becomes were they illegal? Right?
    2
  9. Hunter has already agreed to admit guilt, hasn't he? That will include being arrested. Your opinion seems to be contradicted by facts we all know already.
    2
  10. Ask the Republicans why. I would think they would have at least tried to take a vote.
    1
  11.  @gregoryM8105  I don’t see any reason to wait for that. Do you have any guess as to why Republicans won’t even have an impeachment VOTE? It seems to me that they have the majority right now, and they need to hurry before George Santos goes to prison.
    1
  12.  @vernonbowling5136  FD-1023 are notes where the agent responding captures what the person they are interviewing SAYS. Would you like to see an FD-1023 showing that aliens abducted a guy and put things in his rear? How about one that said Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election? <<< We already know THAT one exists. LOL
    1
  13.  @rosmarin2438  You do realize that one is a boomerang that will come right back to you when the espionage charge goes to trial?
    1
  14. "I am trying to give a pretty clear signal I have made up my mind [pre-trial]. I'm not trying to pretend to be a fair juror here. ~Republican Lindsey Graham "I'm not an impartial juror." ~Republican Mitchell McConnell If conservatives think the Dems aren't going to do the things Republicans get away with, the next six years are going to be ROUGH for you. You can cry your crocodile tears, but frankly no one gives a crap. Sweet dreams.
    1
  15.  @patriotpatrol3709  So if he ends up being convicted/pleading guilty, you think he will incriminate Joe?
    1
  16.  @patriotpatrol3709  I try to keep my bets within my means. Would you care to wager $1 on that?😁
    1
  17. That's not the only option! The DOJ and the FBI have NO control over a state Attorney General who prosecutes a STATE level case. Did you see that New York has brought STATE charges against Trump? There is nothing stopping Republicans from doing the same thing. FACT: Any of the 50 states could bring STATE charges against Hunter, and there is NOTHING GARLAND OR JOE COULD DO TO STOP IT. Get your story straight, pal. Not all of us are "mushrooms".
    1