Comments by "BigKandRtv" (@BigKandRtv) on "Gutfeld: Deranged criminals go free as Alvin Bragg goes after Trump" video.

  1. If trump were president, the media would not be allowed to cover what is happening in Brazil. Haven't you watched his video from yesterday promising to imprison all the journalists? Ron, that was a dumb thing for you to say.
    6
  2. Hon, you don't know about the news that dropped last night do you? Bragg has more evidence than the entire Library of Congress. Remember that I was laughing at you when you finally catch up.
    5
  3. Jim, after what the majority of Americans learned last night he will be a legend in American history books. You obviously don't know, and you probably don't want to know. Either way, you are on the wrong side of history. You will have to make excuses for why you didn't know.
    3
  4.  @mhall801  you don’t seem to be arguing that Trump is not a criminal. You seem to be arguing that he is above the law.
    2
  5. Nothing Burger: It's going to be hard to say that after the other shoe just dropped. Not covered by Fox, of course. 😆😆😆😆
    2
  6. These people will have no clue what you are talking about. By the time Fox is forced to cover it, their viewers will have forgotten.
    2
  7. You clearly don't know about what dropped last night.
    1
  8. And THAT is what trump will be charged with. Fox wants the sheep distracted so they don't realize trump deserves to be in prison.
    1
  9.  @tobybigham4196  Sure. One of perhaps 15 or so I con provide: a federal judge ruled in the espionage case against trump that a prima facie case had been made that Trump used his lawyer in the furtherance of a felony. Trump appealed that over the weekend. The federal appeals court heard his argument, and they have already ruled. They upheld the finding that trumps lawyer assisted Trump in the commission of a felony, and they have forced him (meaning the attorney) to testify before the grand jury in Washington. When a judge issues, a ruling, that is literally evidence. When the appeals court upholds the original judges ruling, that’s additional proof. The way you asked your question it seems like you are both sincere and Ernest. I get along fine with sincere people. I wish that I could post a link in the YouTube comments for you to go read the rulings I am referencing. Unfortunately, YouTube blocks comments with links to other sites. But as long as I think you are being sincere, I will respond to you if you have further questions.
    1
  10.  @tobybigham4196  Where did you go, Toby? Want more evidence? What about the rest of the stupid people? Come get some.
    1
  11.  @prodigalpriest  that is either wishful thinking, are you have no clue what is going on.
    1
  12.  @debbieprice3435  No one wants that job forever.
    1
  13.  @MPR_2023  The same way he determined the Earth is flat. 🙄
    1
  14.  @robertthacher-ro6bh  Because he is a threat to your idol?
    1
  15. Clearly you have not seen the other shoe that dropped last night. Bragg has more evidence than the library of Congress. And you are obsessed with a YouTuber. SAD.
    1
  16. Yep, all the fools are conservatives. And you know what they say about fools and their money are soon parted...
    1
  17.  @mhall801  <<<<Willfully ignorant.
    1
  18.  @manlysoutherner3696  Good to see you again, stupid.
    1
  19. THREE things happened yesterday that Fox did not cover. Two other criminal cases appear to be MUCH, MUCH stronger than originally assumed. And they were slam dunks before yesterday. And as for your breaking laws, go ahead. We want to purge criminals from our streets. We would be happy to turn the LEO lose on you.
    1
  20. You don't know about what just happened with the attorney representing Trump in this matter yesterday. Obviously. This is actually a 72 oz Big Texan. Dummy.
    1
  21.  @goldbud2287  You are thinking of either Hilary or Hunter.
    1
  22. See me in 4 months. Seriously, look my screen name up. You are duped, and you do not yet realize it. Wake up, Cody.
    1
  23. What if the grand jury declines to indict trump? You gonna call them frauds?
    1
  24. But you seem to only be hearing the neutral press. Do you even KNOW what we learned last night?
    1
  25. It has to be Democrats? Can't possibly be that your hero is a one-man crime spree? Reality too hard for you? Snowflake.
    1
  26. Mari, you obviously don't know about what was revealed yesterday. I am embarrassed for you.
    1
  27. Sure, bud.
    1
  28. CNN has video of an attorney from 2018 indicating that he did a prospective client interview with Daniels and learned what evidence she has against trump. He declined to represent her, and instead is now trump's lawyer. That lawyer will be disbarred at the least, and will probably end up in prison with trump. You are a gullible sheep.
    1
  29. Not at all. It would have been back in the 50's and 60's, but not now.
    1
  30. With the new information that dropped last night, not a chance.
    1
  31. Don't know what happened last night, do you? Look up trump's lawyer Joe Tacopina. Liz, you are embarrassing yourself. Bragg now has more evidence than the Library of Congress. Stop being a sheep.
    1