Comments by "BigKandRtv" (@BigKandRtv) on "George Santos on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight': 'I made a mistake'" video.

  1. It’s not talent. It was an editorial decision. What we need to see our agencies, making the editorial decision to pursue the truth, and expose lies.
    4
  2. Same.
    3
  3. Exactly. Imagine if fox newZ had done some actual journalism before the primary. The Republican party would not be at risk of losing one more US Representative from their slim majority.
    2
  4. Yep. Voters expect integrity. Not lies. Not insulting our intelligence.
    2
  5. We don't.
    2
  6.  @mhesse4325  listen buddy, not all of us are stupid. If you only support one side telling the truth, you don’t care about the truth. You care only about whatever advances your cause.
    2
  7. Yep. Real apologies don't get delivered with complaints that others did the same and got away with it.
    2
  8. I think Sandtoes believed he would be talking to Tucker Carlson. I think Fox did a switch-a-roo on him at the last second.
    2
  9. He called us stupid. That's exactly what he did.
    2
  10. And WILL use him. They care about power. Integrity is "debatable".
    2
  11. You can like people with different political principles. The world is not simple, and it is not black or white.
    2
  12. Back when Bill Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, Rush Limbaugh said "Republicans eat their own, but Democrats defend the indefensible." Back then he was right. Now-a-days, not so much.
    2
  13.  @messiahmozgus  Well, maybe that's true. Tell me who he trashed (R) and what day. I will go watch it.
    2
  14.  @yvettemontalvo7991  well, maybe I am the oddball. If someone asked me if I have no shame, either I’m going to explain to them why I don’t deserve shame, or I’m going to say yes and I’m really sorry I did X, Y, and Z.
    2
  15. Like they vetted Hershel Walker? They think the voters are stupid. Can't blame them after 2016.
    2
  16. Disagree. Tulsi asked him questions, and let him answer. Tulsi didn't do this to him, he did it to himself.
    1
  17. Trump's press secretary provided "alternative facts", so I guess reality is up for debate?
    1
  18. Not quite right, sir. Votes get you elected, dollars raised is at best corollary. But not always. Wonder why the Repubs didn't vet this candidate?
    1
  19. I will never in my life forget that the "2020 election was stolen, and they used Jewish space-based lasers to do it".
    1
  20.  @highroller-jq3ix  Obviously, you have never been inside an active quart (*court) room. Asking questions is intended to reveal the truth.
    1
  21.  @highroller-jq3ix  D’oh! I clarified, thanks for catching that. As you correctly guessed, I meant Court room. I still think my intended point is valid.
    1
  22.  @highroller-jq3ix  have you testified before? If so, do you remember the oath you affirmed?
    1
  23.  @highroller-jq3ix  what an obtuse question! Of course they do. They are officers of the court. Stick around, there is much to learn.
    1
  24.  @highroller-jq3ix  Using "vapid" does not cover your lack of understanding. A question is not a statement of fact. If you are capable of using "obtuse" and "vapid", you are capable of learning the nuances of the English language.
    1
  25.  @highroller-jq3ix  looks like someone got a thesaurus for Christmas!
    1
  26.  @highroller-jq3ix  weak. Do better.
    1
  27.  @highroller-jq3ix  Now you’re just phoning it in.
    1
  28. Eh, the world is not black and white. But it's clear to me this ashhole crossed the line several times.
    1
  29. Then 7 of his administration have been indicted.
    1
  30. You want lying Dems? Think Kate. Think.
    1
  31. I think this was planned. I think this was an editorial decision.
    1
  32. Can we say that he really knows his base?
    1
  33. For once, Fox “news” isn’t trying to promote moral equivalencies. Lying is lying. Deceiving the voters is wrong. And the voters are more important than any politician or political party ever.
    1
  34. I am not sure he has been all that successful. Are all of his bio claims lies? Dunno.
    1
  35. 15 years ago, they would not stand for it. Now.... 🤔🤔🤔 the Republican party is dead to me.
    1
  36.  @lexluthor9509  Yep, both things above happened. As it should be.
    1
  37. The Republican party will rally around him. The Republican party will not pressure him to step down. The Republican party cares more about power than integrity.
    1
  38. Cliff, is that all that matters to you? Moral equivalency?
    1
  39. I think most of the surprise is that fox newZ turned on one of their own.
    1
  40. Straight up.
    1
  41. They are not ready to face that yet. Be patient. And if you have teenage children, tell them there's going to be a lot of money made in the mental health field as conservatives begin to face the reality of 2016 - 2022. Get into that field, and wait for the money to roll in.
    1
  42. So Dems are your moral standard bearers? If Dems do it, we should do it? Pull your head out of your ash.
    1
  43. People who don’t have good memories will not know what you were referencing. People who do not have good memories usually gravitate to the conservative party.
    1
  44. Hon, have you LOOKED at Trump's tax returns? What businessman loses $52,000,000 and calls himself a business genius? Liars, that's who.
    1
  45.  @jolenebear8168  That spaz you see is called being informed. You should try it!
    1
  46. I am not sure they are pulling away. Without additional confrontations of obvious liars, I will assume this was just an outlier. I will assume Fox attacked the easy target to plant a seed in their viewers' minds that Fox is "honest". Until they prove me wrong...
    1
  47. Exactly. Many journalist at Fox have the intelligence and skill to hold accountable lying politicians. They don’t, because they’ve sold out to the editorial agenda of their news agency.
    1
  48. Yo, Tusk! I think you misspoke. You said "...knowing it was NOT RUSSIAN interference." I think what you meant was that TRUMP was not proven to be involved. There ABSOLUTELY was election interference BY RUSSIA in 2016. Go look at the FBI's most wanted page. They are still trying to capture the Russians who interfered with the 2016 election. Names we all know and love: Boris Alekseyevich Antonov, Dmitriy Sergeyevich Badin, Nikolay Yuryevich Kozachek, Aleksey Viktorovich Lukashev, Artem Andreyevich Malyshev, Sergey Aleksandrovich Morgachev, Aleksandr Vladimirovich Osadchuk, Aleksey Aleksandrovich Potemkin, Ivan Sergeyevich Yermakov, Pavel Vyacheslavovich Yershov, and Viktor Borisovich Netyksho. Not busting your chops, because I think we all know you meant to say TRUMP was not proven to be involved.
    1
  49. Yep, because Trump can make things happen just by thinking about them!
    1
  50. If/when the masses start learning how much they have been lied to by media in the last 7-8 years, there's going to be a massive mental health crisis in conservative homes across this nation.
    1
  51. “They wouldn’t understand“.
    1
  52. Tucker is biased. Why else was Tulsi the one to confront this crook?
    1
  53. I assume he didn't know Fox was going to switch-a-roo the host. He may have thought Tucker was going to help him, and found out while on air that he had been double-crossed by Fox.
    1
  54. No one is perfect. But the voters also should not tolerate repeated lies, followed by "well, everyone lies".
    1
  55.  @lorimeyers3839  Well, not completely the same. For example: I have strongly disapproved of some things Joe has done, but I don't see it as criminal. Someone can do a bad job without it breaking the law.
    1
  56.  @shanepettit6600  If she's against politicians committing major lies, she's on my side.
    1
  57.  @Awestefeld6612  Art, can you tell me the last three positive things you saw on Fox?
    1
  58. The Republican party is dead. We just haven't had the funeral yet.
    1
  59. Reminds me of the old commercials from the 80's for some for-profit technical college. DURING JOB INTERVIEW: "I worked in the automotive storage business" [he parked cars for a living]. Anyone remember those?
    1
  60. Bingo.
    1
  61.  @tonyd3057  last week? two months ago? give me an idea where to find it in the timeline.
    1
  62.  @tonyd3057  YT won't let me post links either. I am searching that now...
    1
  63.  @tonyd3057  Well, I know it exists, but I can't get the original. What I found was an interview between Tucker and Kelly on Kelly's YT channel. However, it has been edited. I can see Tucker getting worked up to lash out at her, then the video cuts to another vague answer from Kelly. I believe you are right, but I can't find the unedited video. Also, that happened 2 years ago. Technically you are correct, but two years ago...
    1
  64. What was it?
    1
  65.  @yvettemontalvo7991  At 3:27 she asks if he has no shame. He said 37 words - uninterrupted - after that question. He chose to change the subject and talk about Joe Biden. Thirty-seven words and he didn't address his conduct. <<<<<<<Guess how many words that is? 37. 😎
    1
  66.  @yvettemontalvo7991  oh yeah, I remember that! Good song!
    1