Comments by "BigKandRtv" (@BigKandRtv) on "'NO BALANCE': Trump hush money trial dominates mainstream media headlines" video.

  1.  @NirtyDigger5 If your first language is Russian, it is understandable that you don’t know the difference between trader and traitor.
    6
  2. You know, if Trump really were intelligent, he would not have committed crimes in New York. I love the fact that Trump is going to be judged by his fellow New Yorkers.
    6
  3. What’s worse is the so-called “Christians” buying those.
    5
  4.  @jacquelinestapleton9490  you can tell by these people making the comments that they do, they have no idea what Trump actually did or how much evidence there is to prove it.
    4
  5. If the statute of limitations had expired, yes. But it did not. He was indicted a long time ago. He has been actively delaying this in hopes he could get elected and pardon himself.
    3
  6. G, you sound like you think trumpy is going to be convicted.
    2
  7. Right? 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  8.  @henrychurch6062 WRONG!!! Where did you get that number? 60 cases lost on the “stolen election”, 17 felony convictions against The Trump Organization, two civil losses to E Jean Carol, and a $450 M civil loss in NY. That’s 64 consecutive court losses.
    2
  9. Hit the thumbs up if you enjoyed watching Trump cry and whine as he went into court.😊😊😊
    2
  10. 20 to 24?
    1
  11. No matter what? So even if he actually is guilty he will be found guilty? Works for me.
    1
  12.  @smoothoperator1083  I take it you tried to read the indictment, but couldn’t sound out those words?
    1
  13.  @smoothoperator1083  on the contrary. I know where to find court documents, and I read them. It’s really not that hard.
    1
  14.  @smoothoperator1083  You aren’t fooling anyone but yourself. Are you going to have a break down when trumpy gets convicted?
    1
  15.  @smoothoperator1083  Read for yourself. If you can.
    1
  16.  @smoothoperator1083  That sounds like you are going to cry. No one is above the law. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🫡
    1
  17. Name any three of the charges on Trump‘s indictment. Prove that you know what you’re talking about. If you don’t even know what he’s charged with, your opinion is worthless.
    1
  18. A jury made up of WE THE PEOPLE will tell us the answer to that question.
    1
  19. Brother, you clearly have not seen the witness list. The people who will be testifying against Trump are every single one Republicans.
    1
  20. You have your facts confused about the case. The woman sold her story to the national inquirer, who was secretly working with the Trump campaign. The national inquirer, having bought all the rights to the story, never published it. Trump paid for this, which makes it a felony.
    1
  21. I think it’s funny that conservatives think this case is about hush money. This case is about election interference. You’ll see.
    1
  22.  @MagaCult-ps9xr  🎉🎉🎉🍾
    1
  23.  @217_Walker  Sure bud. Is that why the appeals court refused to dismiss the charges? Or did you not know about that?
    1
  24. OK buddy, let’s try this out. Name any three of the charges on Trump’s criminal indictment to prove you’re not full of crap. Because if you can’t name any of the charges, your opinion is worthless.
    1
  25. Never.
    1
  26. We don’t care if you blame Dems. Our nation is going to hold a traitor accountable.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
    1
  27. Can’t. A grand jury of WE THE PEOPLE issued the indictments.
    1
  28.  @Lefty-rp3rh  I love watching all of these conservatives predict that their hero is going to be convicted of crimes. It shows everyone everyone just how much faith you have in Trump.
    1