Comments by "Dylan Burston" (@dylanburston7453) on "carwow" channel.

  1. 41
  2. 25
  3. 15
  4. 11
  5. 10
  6. 10
  7. 8
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 3
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21.  @SealofPerfection  You need to do your research "buddy". All the metal components are all poured into sand casts, and then said components are put together by hand. The only thing computerised is a robot that puts the lubricant in the cylinder, and a final test done by a robot (after its been checked by a human) Everything else is done with nothing more than a drill and a couple of spanners They are the only car manufacturer that still has a forge. The Ferrari engine is truly hand made, not just a big lego set where other than screwing it together all the work was done by a machine. Short of shooting the cow for leather and digging ore out of the ground, everything is done by Ferrari, and most of that is done by hand. The engines at Ferrari are another level of Handmade, which everywhere but Ferrari is now extinct, and the car as a whole is much more handmade than any vette. And in terms of Nat asp v8s, Chevy has only just started putting out Ferrari numbers from 15-20 years ago, and with an extra 1-2 litres of displacement. The Zo6, even with an extra %60 more displacement and two more cylinders is still less power than the 296s v6 by itself, disregarding the hybrid. Corvette have moved away from a indirect competition with the mid- rear engine spors/ super car market into direct competition, and almost every company makes a car as good if not better than the c8, that are in direct competition. Every single Ferrari is closer to the rivals next step up car in their range (eg 296 is much closer in terms of speed and handling to a 675Lt ) The 296 is offering figures (and the technology) of the hybrid hyper car trilogy for a quarter of the price. The c8 offers absolutely nothing. It offers less than the c7, which was unique, looked better. Now, Corvette just make a cheap looking car with the performance of a 2 generation old Ferrari
    1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24.  @SealofPerfection  Oh, the corvette is reliable is it? then why in consumer reports is it in the top 10 least reliable cars. And i mentioned that GM founded the foundry (at least in the comment i was writing before i clicked off). Its still outscoursing to a different factory, its still more automated than the Ferrari system. Who gives a shit if its American made? American cars are shite, its why you dont see a singe one outside of america in any category of car, other than a couple of mustangs, the odd vete, and some inbred halfwit with a massive F150. 99% of the performance? its a good 25% down on power and at least one girthy gentleman heavier. Upgrade it? Why would i need (or want) to upgrade a 100k + sports car? They are not 2 different markets. Not for the ZO6. They are both in the same class of car, and they know they will be competing for sales. The c7 corvette was never in the same market, but the c8 is, so they are being compared. Yes, a Ferrari should outrun a Vette. But your missing the point. The Ferrari it lost to is 10 years old, based on a 15 year old car, regardless of cost, especially when that car is not some hypercar, but the "baby" (admittedly speciale) Ferrari of the range. Corvette charge nearly the same as the European manufactures, besides Ferrari, for a car thats a good 10 years behind the times, and offers nothing unique for a global market. The C8 vette lost the individuality and put it in direct competition with Ferrari, Lambo and Porsche. I think the c8s alright. But the fact corvette is using a 15 year old Ferrari as its benchmark shows you just how far behind it really is. Id rather have - and could for the price- said 15 year old Ferrari 2nd hand than the vette. It looks better, sounds better, is iconic, it has a moustache. I just dont think a car being on par with a 15 year old car in the same class is impressive.
    1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1