Comments by "ChineseKiwi" (@ChineseKiwi) on "" video.

  1. To note - Argentina's public sector isn't like your public sector - like Venezuela with the PDVSA oil company - it was often used to buy votes or political favours in exchange for a job. Many Gulf countries do the same for their citizens in putting them in extremely comfy, low work demands public sector jobs - but those Gulf countries can get away with it due to essentially their majority migrant workforces. *This does not imply all public sector jobs everywhere are 'comfy'* - In reality, in most nations, they are often underpaid, understaffed and overworked.
    1100
  2.  @piekay7285  As stated - IT IS NOT.
    69
  3. see my comment, you know nothing in reality.
    7
  4. because the dynamics are very different regarding the role of the state in Argentina. And I am very anti neoliberalism.
    7
  5. see my comment, you know nothing in reality.
    2
  6.  @juancarlosalonso5664  did you even watch the video a few seconds after they pointed that out?
    2
  7.  @segiraldovi  wrong. The public sector often has to compete against the private sector and in reality, the tiny amount extra on wages is nothing vs the lost productivity but people like you can't see past the initial numbers.
    2
  8. Anyone with a deeper understanding of economics knows it isn't that simple. Look up 'Ordoliberalism'
    1
  9.  @jonnyd9351  I see you didn't bother to read it.
    1
  10.  @jonnyd9351  The public sector often has to compete against the private sector and in reality, the tiny amount extra on wages is nothing vs the lost productivity but people like you can't see past the initial numbers.
    1
  11.  @bonafidemonafide7810  *for CITIZENS in PUBLIC SERVICE jobs. Learn to read.
    1
  12.  @thomasowen1720  everyone is gangster until the hospital bill arrives keyboard warrior.
    1
  13.  @GotoHere  yeah, you have no idea and never worked in the public sector. Grow up kid.
    1
  14.  @nekonesto5601  see my larger liked post - Argentina are an exception - too much public sector relative to the greater workforce can indeed be a bad thing, particularly when abused for political means like Argentina's was - thus why the middle (Ordoliberalism / social market economy) is preferred. And look up mixed public / private markets - this is why often SOEs are setup to compete in the private markets or mixed ownership - as a form of market regulation against the bad tendencies of one another. Basically, if you like your football, how the German 50+1 model gives the benefits of both types of ownership, only in the wider economy. Private ownership in public services isn't automatically a bad thing - but it must be heavily regulated. e.g. the Dutch healthcare model, the Australian pension investments system.
    1