Comments by "ChineseKiwi" (@ChineseKiwi) on "LastWeekTonight"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
habadashery2009 the science is true, however it is FAR easier to get excess sugar in the diet than excess saturated fat which negates the biological efficiency of processing fat vs sugar. Also fat isn't an chemically addictive as sugar, which has proven to be one of the most addictive substances on the planet, more than cocaine and close, if not, as addictive as heroin.
"Overall, this research has revealed that sugar and sweet reward can not only substitute to addictive drugs, like cocaine, but can even be more rewarding and attractive. At the neurobiological level, the neural substrates of sugar and sweet reward appear to be more robust than those of cocaine (i.e., more resistant to functional failures), possibly reflecting past selective evolutionary pressures for seeking and taking foods high in sugar and calories." -Sugar addiction: pushing the drug-sugar analogy to the limit.
Ahmed SH, Guillem K, Vandaele Y.
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013 Jul;16(4):434-9. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328361c8b8. Review.
PMID: 23719144
But basically, I've read plenty of academic studies (none of this sourcing from fad-diet sites, yay for Google Scholar) and to nail it down to one sentence it's: calories in - calories out.
1
-
1