General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

ChineseKiwi
The Plain Bagel
comments

Comments by "ChineseKiwi" (@ChineseKiwi) on "The Plain Bagel" channel.

4:50 - *a wild Youtube monetisation thought appears*
46
12:22 - the Canadian and Australian dollars - RESOURCE MINING COMPANIES GO BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
31
This factor out the factor of founders rigging the voting rights 😂
8
Meanwhile me: Investing in a truck parts company with a near monopoly, an offshore vessel company in which the industry has a shortage of until at least 2027, and the only speculative one being a niobium (see rare earth metal) company who sits on top of a massive Tier 1 deposit and is needed for renewables and has massive shortages. Up 25% in 2-3 months and hodling the hell out of the offshore vessel company that it’s pending a takeover (that is far too cheap thus likely to be voted down in shareholder voting in June, which I will too as the shares are actually in my name). And I’m interested in opening a position in an electricity infrastructure construction and maintenance company that looks way too cheap share price wise and will only get better due to greater electricity demand in years to come. But I always give it a few days to see share volume etc Good investing with good core fundimentals is boring investing. Alot of those with low P/E ratios, particularly ‘defensive’ stocks = DEEP FCKING VALUE Oh yeah, Tradingview, even the free version, is over 9000 based too.
6
It isn’t even that complicated 😂
6
Disney’s crash and burn is due to them pushing the loss making Disney+ too hard, too fast. Occam’s Razor eh.
4
Like people actually bother to vote in them 😂
4
@victoneter ironically you have this same dumb stuff from some in Australia, in which every worker has mandatory ‘401k’ on top of wages, that are managed by financial companies, who invest their money on their behalf….like exactly what Vanguard and Blackrock do 😅😂
4
What he is saying isn’t wrong if you know any sort of financial knowledge
4
Correct. Libertarians making new personal bests in speedrunning the history of financial regulations and corporate governance 😂
3
Why not State Street shill or Fidelity Investments shill? Also why not Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund shill as they are the largest single shareholder? Oh they didn’t tell you to get mad at them. Got it. Not his fault you are financially illiterate
3
Sovereign Wealth Funds and SOEs say ‘uh……..’
3
The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund who own 1% of all global stocks does the same thing but the grifters and those who know nothing about finance didn’t tell you to hate them….
3
Yep, the grifter economy
3
Patrick is literally a hustle culture hustle-bro. Inception.
3
@SD-mi2vc ’helps my cause’ - of a lack of knowing how financial markets work.
2
Mate, all they do is literally manage other people’s money.
2
So you mean the many companies they own….5% of. And that is assuming 1:1 voting rights, which for a lot of companies, it isn’t as often the founders deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves despite owning less of the company.
2
They aren’t charities. They charge a fee for their service. I see you have never bought an ETF ever.
2
Ya probably the same guy that whines when your cheap stuff from Walmart gets more expensive.
2
You as the customer with the funds hold them responsible for returns - you can withdraw your money at any time via selling the ETF shares you own.
2
Here’s a clue big guy: The US isn’t the only country in the world. ESG corporate governance is everywhere
2
@ChippiesBR if you read the comments, you know why there is the confusion 😂
2
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate.
2
Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else
2
Less cognitive dissonance bro.
2
@SD-mi2vc as stated why not Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund shill? They literally own 1% of ALL global shares.
2
Wall Street Millennial's video goes into the financials far more in depth as well.
2
@Pezzerd because THEY OWN THE SHARES. Do you know how ETFs work? It is like you selling off a stock for whatever reason. When you are buying into an ETFs, you are paying them (via the management fee) to invest it ON BEHALF of you.
2
Just checked. Payment for order flow (PFOF) is banned under Australian law too since Feb 2014 :D
2
@silentwitness536 eh no. Watch it again. He was pointing out the bad reporting
2
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. Your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
Or it is if you have any sort of financial knowledge. Financial knowledge isn’t only the ones you choose to believe in.
1
Own all the shares in the holdings and micromanage them yourself then…Oh don’t want to? Then don’t complain.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
Also look up those released Fox News emails they were forced to release as part of the Dominion Voting Booth court case. They don’t actually believe what they say, they only want your viewership and thus ad revenue. It’s right there in the emails. They, like all the other right wing people, are using you. Avatar was PLENTY woke but they didn’t tell you to get angry at it like an actual sheep because you didn’t care about ‘woke’ until the mid 2010s (Avatar was 2009)
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
@nameTBA is it wrong though? It isn’t factually. They can’t control shit because of those realities.
1
⁠ Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. Spot the American who knows nothing outside ya own borders (you).
1
@DeAdBiGeYeFiSh If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate.
1
@DeAdBiGeYeFiSh do you think founders wouldn’t protect their own interests? 🤫 Occam’s Razor eh
1
There is - like that fact that if you bothered to look up the shareholder holdings of companies- Vanguard and Blackrock often often only own sub 10% of it. 🤣
1
@piccalillipit9211 ⁠only how are things changed in companies by shareholders? By voting. What if say the founders knowing this threat, rig the voting structure? Oh wait, they already do that! your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 Blackrock and Vanguard don’t control shit eh. Want a master class on rigging shareholder voting? See the Lee family, the founders of Samsung. Absolute art. Look it up.
1
Exactly. But tinfoil is cheap these days, and Occam’s Razor is out of stock.
1
Why not State Street shill or Fidelity Investments shill? Also why not Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund shill as they are the largest single shareholder? Oh they didn’t tell you to get mad at them. Got it. Not his fault you are financially illiterate
1
Friendly reminder: Banks can already do this if they suspect you of money laundering or you are not who you say you are via KYC / AML laws.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Larry can’t do shit by himself bro.
1
1:58 - Yep, other countries have had this for years at this point but US banking is always 10-15 years behind
1
They grifters didn’t tell the tinfoilers to hate them 😂
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
Australian pension investment funds, despite only 14 million workers, having a combined 6th largest pension fund investment assets under management in the world go brrrrrrrrrrr Funny what happens when it is mandatory, on top of wages at a rate of at least 11% eh….
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. They don’t massively influence crap.
1
Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. None of this has happened
1
⁠ Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else.
1
Jake Tran is a sellout who shilled now collapsed crypto companies and issued an ‘apology’ - his reputation is a joke and the total irony.
1
@TKO47 you mean 20 million customers?
1
The “Why do I have to address this dumb shit again” face the entire time 😂
1
In Australia: Building houses increasing the housing crisis??? Did you even read what you wrote. YOUR SUPER FUND LITERALLY DOES THE SAME THING BLACKROCK AND VANGUARD DOES. Your Super fund invests your money for you and they have voting rights…. Also they are not using Super funds for the HAFF ffs….
1
⁠ Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. Spot the American who knows nothing outside ya own borders (you).
1
Blackrock and Blackstone isn’t the same company pal.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. They don’t control crap.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate.
1
It’s called speculation over profits and at the time no one knew when the pandemic would end. Less tinfoil eh.
1
Both aren’t related to each other. Also another bozo who confused Blackrock and Blackstone.
1
@oliverstianhugaas7493 they aren’t. Blackrock is private equity, while the others are asset management. Private equity tends to wholly buy companies. Asset management tends not to. All Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street do is invest other people’s money on behalf of them via various portfolios. You can even get them to invest your money by buying into their ETFs. Blackstone you can buy shares in too but they more wholly own assets as said. If you look at the % of a company the likes of Vanguard, State Street and Blackrock own, they are often less than 5% of the company. Not to mention this isn’t even factoring in that often the founders rig the voting rights. E.g. Facebook/Meta shares are 1:1 voting rights. The non public Class B shares have 10:1 voting rights, being they have 10x the voting right. Guess who owns most of the Class B shares? The Zucc. Blackrock and the like don’t control shit. Centre left here, but a lot of the left are financially ignorant as well, historically and even now, as there was no strong implementation of wealth creation via equities for the common person in the US, Canada etc vs other countries, thus wider incentive to learn about this stuff. Ignorance of a thing or subject isn’t just a right wing MAGA conspiracy theorist thing. E.g. In Australia, at least 11% on top of wages is paid by the employer to your ‘401k’, called ‘superannuation’ or ‘Super’ for short. This is by law and mandatory. And it is tied to you and not the employer. And you can switch investment companies or portfolio makeup anytime. And it is deliberately hard to access without strong proof of hardship to save you from yourself and losing it all in a shitcoin. Therefore a lot of supermarket workers would in fact indirectly own shares in the same supermarket. The modern ‘owning the means of production’. Iceland, Netherlands have similar strong schemes.
1
Other countries do this fine.
1
Hidden? LOL. There’s a joke about the ‘Pelosi ETF’ for a reason.
1
The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund who own 1% of all global stocks does the same thing but the grifters and those who know nothing about finance didn’t tell you to hate them….
1
Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. This has never happened.
1
That is not how anything works. And the Prez fully has that power. Gees, the Chinese government have made business people ‘disappear’…. And do you think Elon Musk didn’t get some people from the CIA visit him regarding supplying Starlink connections to Ukraine? 🤣 If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate.
1
Not sure if sarcasm or just plain dumb.
1
@ChippiesBR you underestimate the power of dumb 😅🤣
1
They don’t because in many companies, they only own about 5% and company founders often rigged the voting rights towards themselves
1
@RickBlaine the biggest shareholders are Super Funds mate.
1
@RickBlaine Super funds, not fund. They are pension contribution investment companies so literally Australian workers.
1
@RickBlaine do you know what industry Supers are? Also the funds (and capital used for investment and in turn, indirect ownership) is via Australian workers. And you are aware the banks are in turn mostly owned by Super funds? 😹 The literal biggest single entity shareholder in CommBank is AustralianSuper at around 7% of all shares.
1
@WPaKFamily Yes, it isn’t in the US.
1
Yes, don't settle for less knowledge. Like you actually have. If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
That is not how government debt works….😂
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate.
1
@SD-mi2vc Why not State Street shill or Fidelity Investments shill? Also why not Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund shill as they are the largest single shareholder? Oh they didn’t tell you to get mad at them. Got it. Not his fault you are financially illiterate
1
@SD-mi2vc as stated, If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate.
1
Bro, you liked Avatar which was ‘blue gender neutral Pocahontas with themes of repression, discrimination and environmental destruction/ degradation’ It was very ‘woke’. But no one told you to hate it 😂
1
Did you like WALL-E too?
1
@slidefirst694 did you like Avatar? Simple yes or no answer bud. The grifters didn’t tell you hate it did they?
1
@nameTBA uh huh, you can’t change the themes of the movie and that the creatures depicted were deliberately gender neutral 🤣
1
@nameTBA Or in reality they didn't care about being 'woke' until the mid 2010s (the first Avatar was 2009) until Trump and all the subsequent grifters told them to be mad. And yes, that includes right wing outlets like Fox News, who as revealed in the emails Fox had to hand over in the discovery phase of the Dominion voter booth court case, don't actually care the things they actually say, but only want to capture the right wing audience and make money, like the grifters. This is backed up by the leaked Fox News memo, in which all Fox News staff must be double vaccinated when they were pushing the opposite, There, 'serious' enough for you? LOL
1
No, trusts have a very much a certain legal definition.
1
If youlook into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣
1
If you want a master class in voting power obfuscation, look up the Lee family’s control of Samsung. Absolute art if it wasn’t so dystopian and late stage capitalism. How robot Zucc has rigged it for himself is pretty funny too if it wasn’t so dystopian either. Blackrock and Vanguard don’t control shit.
1
CAN’T HAVE BASIC HUMAN BEHAVIOUR EXPLANATIONS EVER!!!
1
It’s Blackstone who has been buying residential real estate, not Blackrock facepalm Not the same company fam. Less getting your information from TikTok or memes
1
@desobrien6136 most financial institutions avoid it like the plague in reality due to the risk and in reality, far less returns than commercial infrastructure investment. Commercial property values, particularly of infrastructure and industrial and farm real estate, fluctuates a lot less, have greater yield, have longer term rental contracts thus better cashflow, the drawdown is a lot less in bad financial times…..
1
Only they are apples and oranges if you bothered to look under the hood and not just state they are the same because the paint job on both of them are blue.
1
@ethandye8764 lol judging a portfolio on a year. The S&P 500 for the years 1993 to mid-2023, the average stock market return for the last 30 years is 9.90% (7.22% when adjusted for inflation). The Asian Financial Crisis, the dot-com bubble, the GFC and COVID happened in that time.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
Yes, via lobbying, not voting rights
1
@The13thRonin and individual companies. Vanguard and Blackrock only own portions, usually around 5%
1
Anyone who actually knows how it works fully agree with him but we are all in the payroll 🙄
1
⁠ Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. Spot the American who knows nothing outside ya own borders (you).
1
⁠ Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. None of this has happened. Not to mention, banks can already do this if they suspect you of money laundering.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
Yep, yet another clever guy mixing Blackrock and Blackstone
1
They exist because they offer a convenient service for rock bottom management fees. Also you (likely deliberately) miss the point of mocking Joe Rogan
1
Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else
1
⁠ Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. Spot the American who knows nothing outside ya own borders (you).
1
Once again, Blackrock and Blackstone are not the same company
1
But you didn’t say this about Avatar in 2009 because the right wing grifters didn’t tell you to hate it back then…. Avatar was a movie about gender neutral aliens whose themes were repression and environmental destruction
1
Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else
1
@toddalquist3391 you missed the sarcasm and it mocking the tinfoilers
1
did you even read what you wrote and actually have it make sense?
1
@TheSecrecyOfFrequency so YouTube is offering extra incentives so he can get censored and thus demonetised….. yeah ok bud.
1
You know you can get Blackrock and Vanguard to manage your money right now by buying into one of their ETFs right? That’s all it is.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate.
1
@197BRUTE bro, look at the Chaebols in South Korea. Blackrock and Vanguard isn’t even close to that sort of influence in the US. Walmart would have greater indirect power 🤣
1
Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
They are right in this comments, thinking Blackrock buy residential homes when it is Blackstone who does it.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
⁠Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. Spot the American who knows nothing outside ya own borders (you). The EU doesn’t respect human rights? Look up UN reports on your US jails eh.
1
⁠ Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. None of this has happened. Not to mention, banks can already do this if they suspect you of money laundering.
1
Why not a Fidelity Investments shill? Or State Street shill? Or a Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund shill? Oh the grifters and TikTok didn’t tell you to hate them?
1
⁠ Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. None of this has happened. Not to mention, banks can already do this if they suspect you of money laundering.
1
You know you can be one of those ‘greedy bastards’ by buying into one of their ETFs right?
1
⁠ Other countries have already have these instant payments systems for years Ol’ Tinfoil. The US banking system is 10 years behind everyone else. Spot the American who knows nothing outside ya own borders (you).
1
As a person living in Australia, it being the size of Canada and has state governments as well, a lot of this is WTF!? The (un)United Provinces of Canada. Thank God most of this mind-numbing stuff is at a Federal level.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1
If you bother to look into the percentages of which they own companies, it is often 5% or less. Not to mention this assumes 1:1 voting rights, which often isn’t the case as often the founders of the company deliberately stack the voting rights towards themselves far over the percentage of which they own the company. Not his fault you are financially illiterate. your favourite Fox News, owned by the Murdoch family, have 39.4% of the voting power despite owning only 14% of the shares 🤫🤣 Zucc has 60% of the voting rights in Meta despite owning far far less shares, because he owns 90% of the non public Class B shares, which have 10x the voting power of the public shares 🤫😂 They don’t control shit eh.
1