General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
ChineseKiwi
The Hill
comments
Comments by "ChineseKiwi" (@ChineseKiwi) on "The Hill" channel.
*The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately.* Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media ) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
9
Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals, yes they are the CONSERVATIVE party in Australia) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
9
AMERICANS: READ THE ACTUAL AUSTRALIAN COMMENTS HERE The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately.
7
*AMERICANS: READ THE ACTUAL AUSTRALIAN COMMENTS HERE* The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately.
7
Americans: In Australia here: This heavily misses the mark and nuance of the issue due to essentially, them not being in Australia. Read my comments.
7
AMERICANS: READ THE ACTUAL AUSTRALIAN COMMENTS HERE The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately.
3
They have not yet. A deal has only been stuck with SevenWestMedia.
3
Its a poor take in reality, because they are not in Australia. Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media ) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
3
It isn't a great insight at all - Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch (News Corp, who also own Fox in the US) owns 70% our print media. The ruling right-wing LNP party has strong ties with Rupert Murdoch and to a lesser extent, Nine/Fairfax. These two groups combined control the majority of Aussie legacy media, push heavily and (usually successfully) for the LNP during both federal and state elections, and in return want the LNP to pass laws to prop up their business model. This is actually a massive power struggle between them and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
2
@sewpungyow5154 Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media ) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
2
*The Hill MASSIVELY missed the nuance here* Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals, yes they are the CONSERVATIVE party in Australia) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
2
or neither side in reality.
2
AMERICANS: READ THE ACTUAL AUSTRALIAN COMMENTS HERE The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately.
2
@honeybadger6348 um...I live in Aus maaaaaate.
1
Both are working in their own corporate interests in reality but as friendlyjordies rightly pointed out, there is an actual balance of power now.
1
*You MASSIVELY missed the nuance here* Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals, yes they are the CONSERVATIVE party in Australia) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
*The Hill MASSIVELY missed the nuance here* Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals, yes they are the CONSERVATIVE party in Australia) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
Oh shut up Roger. AMERICANS: READ THE ACTUAL AUSTRALIAN COMMENTS HERE The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately.
1
and so do you. Just stop it eh.
1
@capttrips1523 Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals, yes they are the CONSERVATIVE party in Australia) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
@capttrips1523 500,000 Australians signed the petition to have this enquiry. The largest number in any official government petition
1
@capttrips1523 I did not state that so stop it.
1
In Australia here: In reality, Google has only made a deal with SevenWestMedia in regards to this. As Rupert Murdoch (see News Corp, same owners as Fox in the US) owns 70% of all print media here in Australia, and knowing that it is massively losing money for them vs. online...you can add it up. **Rupert Murdoch was literally consulted to make up the co-design media policy for this!!**. The current conservative government is known to be heavily favoured in news coverage by the Murdoch press to the point of damn Senate enquiry into this *If you want something to REALLY cover, we have an actual senate inquiry (in American terms) on the domination of Murdoch in the local news media here. Look up former Prime Minister's Kevin Rudd's Youtube channel. - 'Senate Inquiry into Media Diversity in Australia' .You can add this up. Not to mention Facebook are blocking based upon what the proposed deal states down here is "core news content" which includes all of that unfortunately. It maybe overreaching, but this take completely misses the mark due to essentially, you not being in Australia and knowing the nuances of the issue.
1
*The Hill MASSIVELY missed the nuance here* Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals, yes they are the CONSERVATIVE party in Australia) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
And NO ONE liked Trump here. Stop spreading fake news eh.
1
@mosaicskulls8071 I've used this name for 20 years. Also would you think that spies would name themselves as a spy. Less tin foil bro.
1
@mosaicskulls8071 less fake news bro
1
*AMERICANS: READ THE ACTUAL AUSTRALIAN COMMENTS HERE The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately.** Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media ) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
@ThresholdGaming Remember when people remembered that free speech laws only applies in public spaces (Facebook is a private company)....
1
Facebook marketplace shudder
1
The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately. Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media ) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
He's only doing it because he is Rupert's lapdog. Don't kid yourself.
1
*You miss massive nuances unfortunately.* Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
*You MASSIVELY missed the nuance here* Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals, yes they are the CONSERVATIVE party in Australia) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
so yes, your statement is lawfully ironic.
1
The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately. Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media ) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
Murdoch revoked his Australian citizenship in the late 80s and possesses an American passport.
1
@taylorlibby7642 Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media ) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
the law has not been passed.
1
*You miss massive nuances unfortunately.* Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media ) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
@RooseCochran Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch (News Corp, who also own Fox in the US) owns 70% our print media. The ruling right-wing LNP party has strong ties with Rupert Murdoch and to a lesser extent, Nine/Fairfax. These two groups combined control the majority of Aussie legacy media, push heavily and (usually successfully) for the LNP during both federal and state elections, and in return want the LNP to pass laws to prop up their business model. This is actually a massive power struggle between them and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page and I highly recommend you do so. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
In reality, *The Hill MASSIVELY missed the mark on this one* - Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch (News Corp, who also own Fox in the US) owns 70% our print media. The ruling right-wing LNP party has strong ties with Rupert Murdoch and to a lesser extent, Nine/Fairfax. These two groups combined control the majority of Aussie legacy media, push heavily and (usually successfully) for the LNP during both federal and state elections, and in return want the LNP to pass laws to prop up their business model. This is actually a massive power struggle between them and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
AMERICANS: READ THE ACTUAL AUSTRALIAN COMMENTS HERE The Hill missed the massive nuances unfortunately.
1
@ramses1134 Here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch owns 70% our print media (News Corp, who also own Fox News in the US), our media has a strong bias that has supported and helped elect our conservative party (Liberals) in the majority of our elections in recent history. This is actually a massive power struggle between Murdoch's news media ) and Facebook. Our former prime minister Kevin Rudd just sat before our senate for a Royal Commission into Murdoch's monopoly on our news media. You can view this in full on Kevin Rudd's Youtube page. The government is pushing Rupert Murdoch’s agenda - major news outlets will get compensated but independent journalists won’t. This Australian law says that, to simply link to news articles, one has to pay the publisher — and only establishment news qualifies. This disenfranchises independent news as well as breaks a key aspect of a free and open internet — being able to link to and move between different sites liberally.
1
@ramses1134 Correct. Both are acting in their own corporate interests but as an independent journalist / comedian who ironically survived the purge (FriendlyJordies, look him up on Youtube) and yes, posted a video on Facebook to flex, pointed out, for the first time, there is a balance of power. Murdoch can't just abuse whoever he wants now as there is actual bigger fish than him (Google, Facebook) who can actually fight back.
1
@ramses1134 and of course the MSM don't mention that angle as they want a slice of the pie too.
1
@ramses1134 but most Australians can see through that crap. Like for example when the Murdoch media massively went on the attack on the Labor candidate (left wing) in Queensland in their state election, in which Murdoch literally owns *100%* of the print media there.....only for the Labor candidate to win in a landslide ROFL. IT WAS *GLORIOUS* to see Murdoch be completely owned.
1