Comments by "ChineseKiwi" (@ChineseKiwi) on "The Absurdity of Nvidia's Valuation" video.

  1. It actually backs up all what the video has said. It is overpriced. You don’t judge bubbles by one after hours. You judge it over time. Give it 1-2 years like the pandemic boom stocks
    9
  2.  @jordansme1234567  you don’t get the Cramer prediction joke.
    8
  3. And absolutely overpriced.
    5
  4.  @ArturoGarzaID  it’s a Cramer investment advice joke
    5
  5.  @dickgrayson4325  why not just use the Reverse Cramer ETF? LOL
    4
  6. It actually backs up all what the video has said. It is overpriced. You don’t judge bubbles by one after hours. You judge it over time. Give it 1-2 years like the pandemic boom stocks. Too many clowns in here that dunno shit
    2
  7. Exactly but don’t tell the ‘number go up’ people in here. NVIDIA will have the scaling and entrenched consumer base advantage but I can easily see market share dominance being chipped away in years to come. Pun intended.
    2
  8.  @XanderDDS  I see you didn’t actually listen to the sound value based analysis in the video and went “ZOMG NVIDIA +25% after hours to the moon!!!!” Number go up amirite? You always look at fundamentals like Wall Street Millennial always does, because Y’know, he’s an actual qualified investment analyst and well, knows history and the maths. If you are buying NVIDIA long term to bet on their essential data centre monopoly, say 10+ years, in a highly diversified 25+ company portfolio (or that say NVIDIA is a holding in an ETF you are investing in), this bubble is of little consequence with high upside via DCAing. Buying it now = LOL Lol you.
    2
  9. It actually backs up all what the video has said. It is overpriced. You don’t judge bubbles by one after hours. You judge it over time. Give it 1-2 years like the pandemic boom stocks. You probably said the same of the pandemic boom stocks and their 2020/2021 earning calls
    2
  10. I see no one actually listened to the sound value based analysis in the video and went “ZOMG NVIDIA +25% after hours to the moon!!!!” Number go up amirite? You always look at fundamentals like Wall Street Millennial always does, because Y’know, he’s an actual qualified investment analyst and well, knows history and the maths. If you are buying NVIDIA long term to bet on their essential data centre monopoly, say 10+ years, in a highly diversified 25+ company portfolio (or that say NVIDIA is a holding in an ETF you are investing in), this bubble is of little consequence with high upside via DCAing. Buying it now = LOL
    2
  11. If it is part of a highly diversified portfolio and you are looking at a 10+ year horizon, then this bubble is of little issue with high upside. Otherwise overpriced as hell
    2
  12. Like….
    1
  13. 4:07 - this was to the point in mid 2020 that Microsoft data centres literally ran out of computing power and storage in their Central Europe data centres - this just doesn’t happen with HUGE companies like Microsoft!! Unless of course the massive demand surge was far beyond any modelling at the time - and was.
    1
  14. See my post. Too many ‘number go up’ clowns like you in here
    1
  15.  @Chris-vz2kv  actually read my post in the comments. It is how number go up and wether the number go up is justified vs how the company is actually doing objectively. If overvalued, like WSM points out via hard data, number will go down far quicker and far more easily e.g. Pandemic boom stocks You bought Zoom at the highs didn’t you?
    1
  16. It actually backs up all what the video has said. It is overpriced. You don’t judge bubbles by one after hours. You judge it over time. Give it 1-2 years like the pandemic boom stocks
    1
  17. It actually backs up all what the video has said. It is overpriced. You don’t judge bubbles by one after hours. You judge it over time. Give it 1-2 years like the pandemic boom stocks
    1
  18. Read my post. Too many derps that judge all investing as daytrading cloening
    1
  19. We, with basic investing fundamentals understanding, are swamped by the number go up clowns in here :/ 173PE is very very insane
    1
  20. It isn’t because as stated, you just don’t know the demand for it. It is risky as hell
    1
  21.  @Travisb238  it isn’t based on sales. There’s a measure called Price to earnings ratio for a reason.
    1