Comments by "DS_SD" (@simondahl5437) on "The New York Times" channel.

  1. Source?
    1
  2. That’s one hack of a generalization that is simply not true. The BLM movement was in large part peaceful. Then there were people that escalated the situation and caused harm. Saying “BLM is domestic terrorism” is like saying all republicans are terrorists because many of the capitol intruders were republican.
    1
  3. You missed the point...
    1
  4. Which there is no proof of...
    1
  5. But there is no evidence. And you can’t go around assuming things that you have no reason to assume.
    1
  6.  @masterhodir890  A knock and announce warrant...
    1
  7. Which the FBI denied.
    1
  8. Some did.
    1
  9.  @metrofilmer8894 . Maybe that has more to do with China being an authoritarian state prone to rebellious acts, than the rude manners of Americans.
    1
  10. That's a little rude...
    1
  11. Because military action against a US citizen is illegal.
    1
  12. Which there is no proof of...
    1
  13. Maybe you should let people decide that themselves.
    1
  14. You have a serious lack of human decency...
    1
  15.  @hughman2346 , That’s great, but this is not the place spread propaganda...
    1
  16.  @hughman2346 , First off, the fact that you confirm it’s propaganda is basically you saying “Yes I spread false information” . Second of all I don’t do propaganda. I do the truth, and the truth is what can be proved, which your claim: “The New York Times is CCP”, has not.
    1
  17. Which there is no proof of...
    1
  18. No they are not. You simply don't agree with what they stand for. Which doesn't make them terrorists.
    1
  19.  @themechanic764 . He did make sense..
    1
  20. How is your freedom being stripped?
    1
  21. Because?
    1
  22. Back the blue. But only when they do good work. Not this.
    1
  23. Because that’s one hack of a generalization that is simply not true. The BLM movement was in large part peaceful. Then there were people that escalated the situation and caused harm. Saying “BLM is domestic terrorism” is like saying all republicans are terrorists because many of the capitol intruders were republican.
    1
  24. that’s one hack of a generalization that is simply not true. The BLM movement was in large part peaceful. Then there were people that escalated the situation and caused harm. Saying “BLM is domestic terrorism” is like saying all republicans are terrorists because many of the capitol intruders were republican.
    1
  25. Israel still killed civilians. Which is no matter what: Wrong.
    1
  26. The majority of BLM protests were completely peaceful.
    1
  27. Yeah, and they say socialism is bad, which is simply not true
    1
  28.  @fatherson5907 , And you know that, how?
    1
  29. But if you have used self defense, you are legally required to stay and face law enforcement. Not run away and than shoot people who try to disarm you because you’re running away with a gun from a shooting. He was not with in his rights
    1
  30. Any source for the pelosi claim?
    1
  31. Because that’s one hack of a generalization that is simply not true. The BLM movement was in large part peaceful. Then there were people that escalated the situation and caused harm. Saying “BLM is domestic terrorism” is like saying all republicans are terrorists because many of the capitol intruders were republican.
    1
  32. I suggest you got to NASA’s website and search climate change and you will have all the evidence you could ever need. And sure there have always been hurricanes, but now at an accelerated rate.
    1
  33.  @replica1052 . Sure. But at that point it’s a train.
    1
  34. Hamas, not Gaza. Civilians shouldn't suffer just because some people are bad...
    1
  35. The scientists? I’ll assume you refer to the supposed scientist in the supposed lab in wuhan who supposedly caused the leak of the virus, and not all scientists in the world. That theory, which is a conspiracy theory hasn’t been proven...
    1
  36. A massacre isn’t exactly optimal
    1
  37. And what evidence do you have to support that claim?
    1
  38. Like Trump was the most honest president ever?
    1
  39. Donald Trump is not Chief of staff! He is commander and Chief, also known as the president. On the 20th, Joe Biden will take over and become the President of the United States, a position which he was elected to... And please don’t try to argue that the election was fraudulent because all the supposed “evidence” have been debunked, often by republican officials btw... You probably think of yourself as a patriot, then you should be capable of getting the title of The President right...
    1
  40.  @mabhodlelajj1195 , Just because the US Navy shot down a passenger plane, does that make every American a terrorist? Just because Isreal committed a war crime does that make every Israeli a war criminal? No of course not... So with no respect, do you have a functioning brain?
    1
  41.  @mabhodlelajj1195 , That's not an argument... Of course they would retaliate but that doesn't make it any less wrong to bomb civilians... And it is still a war crime...
    1
  42.  @mabhodlelajj1195 , I'd like to see the source of Isreal warning civilians, and if like to see the source of hamas forcing them to stay. And it shouldn't matter, if civilians stand in the way you don't shoot either way.
    1
  43.  @mabhodlelajj1195 . Can you read. I wrote that it doesn't make it any less wrong. I'f you are committing a war crime just to retaliate for others doing it, you are just as bad. And it's not a exactly someone saying that “this place will be bombed” it's loud speakers, bomb sirens, and proper communication. Not social media
    1
  44.  @mabhodlelajj1195 , They still killed civilians. And no matter if they warned them or not, that is still wrong.
    1
  45.  @mabhodlelajj1195  Are you dumb? That is the entire point of the Geneva convention. To have respect for people no matter if they are enemies or not. They have a moral responsibility and if they don't take that on, they may or may not suffer the consequence of sanctions and weapon embargos.
    1
  46.  @mabhodlelajj1195  Are children also terrorists? Are doctors? You are insane
    1
  47.  @MarvelousCards . No the 2nd amendment was designed to protect the population from a tyrannical government. Not a foreign state. And then you have the case of the 2nd amendment being totally useless, and doing more harm than good these days but that’s another discussion.
    1
  48.  @MarvelousCards . I don’t see that sentence. Anywhere. You weren’t stating anything, and the original comment isn’t yours. And for the record, I do not drink coffee.
    1
  49.  @MarvelousCards . First of all; calm down. What your or my opinion is on the existence of gun rights was not the topic of conversation. The topic was what the 2nd amendment was designed for. Secondly. Instead of just being blatantly mad and writing incoherent comments, which seem to contain no argument… try I don’t know. Coming up with one. And your channel has zero importance.
    1
  50.  @donnyemig6001 . I'd love to see the statistics on that. Please do share them. And no matter what you say the use is, the wording of the amendment is very clear.
    1