Comments by "Ted Moss" (@tedmoss) on "Daily Mail World" channel.

  1. What is your definition of "on purpose"? A mistake like that will always lead to the same result, so it is "on purpose". The guy that did it did not know the result, so it was "accidental".
    2
  2. No attempt was made to start, it would have been much bigger.
    2
  3. I don't think they want this for future tests.
    1
  4. It was turned off or not installed yet.
    1
  5. Just a note here, those vehicles at @2:06 are not tanks.
    1
  6. If it had started up, it would have been even louder.
    1
  7. No paper money was involved.😁
    1
  8.  @bababoy91  Jealous?
    1
  9. There are three things needed for a fire, an ignition source is one of them.
    1
  10.  @jamesm.4426  Methane. It goes boom!
    1
  11. I was in San Antonio, Texas in 1963, right across from the 205 Hydrogen bomb core explosion. This "explosion" is not even a deflagration.
    1
  12. Well it didn't even explode, what do you want?
    1